OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and trabecular bone score (TBS) and to assess the ability of WWI to identify individuals with degraded bone microarchitecture (DBMA).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants aged 20 and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Furthermore, WWI was calculated by waist circumference and body weight. In addition, linear regression models were employed to investigate the association between WWI and TBS, while logistic regression models were employed to determine the association between WWI and the risk of DBMA. Finally, the performance of WWI in identifying individuals with DBMA was using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the ROC curve.
RESULTS: A total of 4,179 participants with a mean age of 49.90 years were included in the final analysis. WWI was negatively associated with TBS and positively associated with an increased risk of DBMA. Furthermore, the associations between WWI and TBS, as well as DBMA risk, were stable regardless of stratification by age, sex, race, or body mass index (BMI). Moreover, WWI achieved good performances in identifying individuals with DBMA or low TBS. In addition, the combination of WWI and BMI showed better performances in identifying individuals with DBMA or low TBS than WWI or BMI alone.
CONCLUSIONS: WWI established a negative association with TBS and a positive association with the risk of DBMA. Clinicians should be alert to the potential risk of DBMA among individuals with high WWI. Moreover, WWI, alone or in combination with BMI, has the potential to serve as an early screening strategy in identifying individuals with DBMA.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, the evolution of themes in the field of osteoporotic fractures has changed from epidemiology and prediction of long-term morbidity, risk assessment of osteoporotic fractures, and zoledronic acid and denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis to treatment guidelines for osteoporosis and the side effects caused by anti-osteoporotic drugs.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the trends and hotspots in osteoporotic fracture research.
METHODS: Original articles were retrieved between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace software facilitated the analysis and visualization of scientific productivity and emerging trends.
RESULTS: Nine studies were identified using bibliometric indices, including citation, centrality, and sigma value, which might indicate a growing trend. Through clustering, we identified six major hot subtopics. Using burst analysis, top-5 references with the strongest bursting strength after 2017 were identified, indicating a future hotspot in this field.
CONCLUSIONS: Current hot subtopics in osteoporotic fracture research include atypical femoral fractures, androgen deprivation therapy, denosumab discontinuation, hip fractures, trabecular bone score (TBS), and bone phenotype. Management and prevention of secondary fractures in patients with osteoporotic fractures, TBSs, and long-term administration strategy for zoledronic acid are expected to become research hotspots.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of denosumab and zoledronic acid for adult patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) has not been established.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid in adult patients with OI.
METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label study. Patients were randomized to receive denosumab 60 mg every 6 months or zoledronic acid 5 mg once for 12 months. Pathogenic mutations of OI were identified by next-generation sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Percentage changes in the areal bone mineral density (aBMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs) from baseline to 6 and 12 months of treatment, as well as safety, were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 51 adults with OI (denosumab: 25, zoledronic acid: 26) were included, of whom 49 patients had identified pathogenic mutations. At 12 months, aBMD at the lumbar spine and total hip significantly increased by 4.34% (P = .005) and 1.45% (P = .023) in the denosumab group and by 4.92% (P = .006) and 2.02% (P = .016) in the zoledronic acid group, respectively. TBS showed an increasing trend by 1.39% and 2.70% in denosumab and zoledronic acid groups, respectively. Serum levels of β-isomerized carboxy-telopeptide of type I collagen and alkaline phosphatase markedly decreased after denosumab treatment. Percentage changes in aBMD, TBS, and BTMs during the treatment were similar between the 2 groups. Patients with OI with milder phenotypes showed a significantly higher increase in the TBS after 12 months of denosumab treatment than those with more severe phenotypes (P = .030). During the study period, the denosumab group had fewer adverse events than the zoledronic acid group.
CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab effectively increases aBMD in adults with OI, with similar efficacy to zoledronic acid. Long-term and large-sample studies are needed to confirm the antifracture efficacy and safety of denosumab in adult patients with OI.

OBJECTIVE: We described the clinical and densitometric characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who developed atypical femoral fractures (AFF) while on bisphosphonate for osteoporosis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all adults aged ≥50 years who developed AFF while on bisphosphonates between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2020, and subsequently managed in the Osteoporosis Centre at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong. A control group of patients who developed fragility hip fractures while on bisphosphonates in the same period was included for comparison. We compared the clinical and densitometric characteristics between the two groups, and described the clinical outcomes for the AFF group.
RESULTS: In total, 75 patients were included (AFF: n = 35; fragility hip fracture: n = 40). All were related to oral bisphosphonates. The AFF group was characterised by a longer duration of bisphosphonate use (median of 5 years), higher bone mineral density (BMD) and more acute neck-shaft angle (all p < 0.05). Following AFF, 8 patients (22.9%) did not receive any subsequent bone-active agents: due to refusal to use an injectable, or BMD out of osteoporotic range. Most of those who received bone-active agents were given teriparatide, followed by raloxifene, and achieved stable BMD. However, subsequent fragility risk remained high. Nonetheless, AFF did not confer excess morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: AFF was characterised by usually long duration of bisphosphonate use, higher BMD and more acute neck-shaft angle. AFF did not confer significant impairment in mobility or mortality. Nonetheless, further research work is necessary to optimise bone health among patients who develop AFF.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with osteoporosis, and bone mineral density (BMD) have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of a history of GDM with osteoporosis, BMD, and trabecular bone score (TBS) in postmenopausal women.
METHODS: Postmenopausal women from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2007 and 2010, between 2013 and 2014, and between 2017 and 2018 were retrospectively included in this cross-sectional study. The logistic regression model was used to explore the relationship between GDM and osteoporosis, and a weighted linear regression model was applied to investigate the association between GDM and total femoral BMD, femoral neck BMD, and total TBS. Subgroup analysis of the association between GDM and osteoporosis was performed according to age, body mass index (BMI), and DM (yes or no).
RESULTS: Of the 6732 women included, 253 women (3.76%) had GDM. No significant differences in total femoral BMD, femoral neck BMD, and total TBS were observed between postmenopausal women with and without a history of GDM. However, a history of GDM was associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [odds ratio (OR): 11.18, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 3.64 to 34.27, P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference between a history of GDM and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women whom BMI is normal and overweight women. However, there was an association between a history of GDM and osteoporosis in postmenopausal obese women (OR: 26.57, 95% CI 10.23 to 68.98, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A history of GDM was associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, particularly in postmenopausal obese women.

BACKGROUND: Bone fragility is a recognized complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Thus, lower trabecular bone score (TBS) measurements in T1D patients can be predicted. However, the results of current studies on TBS in patients with T1D are inconsistent. In this context, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that T1D is associated with lower TBS through a meta-analysis.
METHODS: An electronic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Web of science databases to identify studies related to TBS and T1D, supplemented by an additional manual check of the reference list of relevant original and review articles. All data was analyzed using a random effects model. Results were compared using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 software were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Seven cross-sectional studies involving 848 participants were included. TBS was lower in T1D patients than in healthy controls on random effects analysis, with no heterogeneity (SMD =  - 0.39, 95% CI [- 0.53, - 0.24], P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). In addition, by subgroup analysis, T1D patients were strongly associated with reduced TBS in different regions and age groups, and the results were independent of covariate adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that TBS was lower in patients with T1D than in healthy individuals with normal blood glucose levels, suggesting that TBS may be a useful measure to assess fracture risk in T1D.

BACKGROUND: The skeletal involvement of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related primary hyperparathyroidism (MHPT) is not exactly the same as that of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a texture parameter has been reported to reflect trabecular bone damage.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, especially the skeletal involvement, between patients with MHPT and SHPT.
METHODS: The clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected in 120 patients with MHPT and compared with 360 patients with SHPT in the same period. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were conducted in some patients with MHPT, in whom bone mineral density (BMD) and calculated TBS derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images were compared with those of patients with SHPT.
RESULTS: Although the duration of disease in the MHPT group was longer, the age at hospital visit was significantly lower than that in the SHPT group (43.5 [interquartile range, 31.5-52.0] vs 52.0 [interquartile range, 40.5-61.0], P < .001). The proportion of skeletal involvement in the MHPT group was significantly lower. However, in the subgroup of MHPT cases (n = 86) with data of BMD, there was no significant difference in skeletal involvement from SHPT cases matched for gender and age. Although the BMD and TBS in the lumbar spines of patients with MHPT were lower than those of patients with SHPT (BMD: 0.91 ± 0.18 g/cm2 vs 1.01 ± 0.17 g/cm2; TBS: 1.22 ± 0.14 vs 1.29 ± 0.11, P < .001). According to TBS, among 34 patients with MHPT with normal BMD, 15 patients had bone microstructure damage.
CONCLUSIONS: The cancellous bone microarchitecture was more severely damaged in patients with MHPT according to TBS, which suggested that TBS could be a sensitive supplemental index in addition to BMD to identify bone-involvement risk in patients with MHPT.

BACKGROUND: Iron-overloaded patients are recognized as presenting an increased risk of osteoporosis. However, studies on the correlation between osteoporosis and organ iron overload are controversial or scarce. The aim of this study is to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) in correlation with hepatic and pancreatic iron overload.
METHODS: Forty-one patients diagnosed with hemoglobinopathies, were studied. BMDs of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) were analyzed by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. LS bone quality was derived from each spine DXA examination using the TBS analysis. Hepatic and pancreatic iron overload were obtained with a multi-echo gradient echo T2* technique.
RESULTS: Abnormal microarchitecture and abnormal bone mass were observed in 19/41 (46.3%) and 9/41 (22.0%) patients, respectively. For 26 males, BMD, T-score and Z-score of LS were significantly lower among subjects with moderate-severe hepatic iron-overload than their counterparts, as it is between no- and pancreatic iron-overload groups. For 15 females, patients with moderate-severe hepatic iron-overload had significantly lower BMD and T-score of FN and TH, and patients with pancreatic iron-overload had significantly lower BMD, T-score of FN, and lower BMD, T-score and Z-score of TH than their counterparts. Moreover, pancreatic T2*-value was positively correlated with BMD and T-score at all analyzed sites and Z-score at TH.
CONCLUSIONS: These data showed lower bone mass in patients with organ iron overload, particularly for LS in males, FN and TH in females. TBS may well represent a complementary tool for the evaluation of bone quality and the risk of fracture in iron-overloaded patients.

Growing evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of fracture. Bone intrinsic factors (such as accumulation of glycation end products, low bone turnover, and bone microstructural changes) and extrinsic factors (such as hypoglycemia caused by treatment, diabetes peripheral neuropathy, muscle weakness, visual impairment, and some hypoglycemic agents affecting bone metabolism) probably contribute to damage of bone strength and the increased risk of fragility fracture. Traditionally, bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered to be the gold standard for assessing osteoporosis. However, it cannot fully capture the changes in bone strength and often underestimates the risk of fracture in diabetes. The fracture risk assessment tool is easy to operate, giving it a certain edge in assessing fracture risk in diabetes. However, some parameters need to be regulated or replaced to improve the sensitivity of the tool. Trabecular bone score, a noninvasive tool, indirectly evaluates bone microstructure by analyzing the texture sparsity of trabecular bone, which is based on the pixel gray level of DXA. Trabecular bone score combined with BMD can effectively improve the prediction ability of fracture risk. Quantitative computed tomography is another noninvasive examination of bone microstructure. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography can measure volume bone mineral density. Quantitative computed tomography combined with microstructure finite element analysis can evaluate the mechanical properties of bones. Considering the invasive nature, the use of microindentation and histomorphometry is limited in clinical settings. Some studies found that the changes in bone turnover markers in diabetes might be associated with fracture risk, but further studies are needed to confirm this. This review focused on summarizing the current development of these assessment tools in diabetes so as to provide references for clinical practice. Moreover, these tools can reduce the occurrence of fragility fractures in diabetes through early detection and intervention.

X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is the most common form of heritable hypophosphatemic rickets. Although generalized mineralization defects have been observed, elevated areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in the lumbar spine measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has also been found in XLH. In contrast, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) revealed lower volumetric BMD (vBMD) and damaged bone microstructure in the peripheral bone in XLH. Trabecular bone score (TBS), which can assess the trabecular microstructure in the lumbar spine, has not been explored in XLH. This study aimed to explore TBS and its correlations with biochemical indices and HR-pQCT parameters in adult XLH patients. A total of 66 patients with XLH (26 men and 40 women) aged 29.6 ± 9.6 years and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Z score of lumbar spine aBMD was relatively high [2.0 (0.6, 3.7)], with normal TBS (1.475 ± 0.129) in the XLH patients. HR-pQCT revealed larger total and trabecular area in the peripheral bone in the XLH group compared with the control group. In addition, lower trabecular and cortical vBMD, lower trabecular number with greater separation, and lower bone strength at both the radius and tibia were found in the XLH group compared with the control group. Smaller cortical area, lower thickness and higher porosity in the XLH group compared with controls were only found at the radius. TBS was not associated with any biochemical indices, while better HR-pQCT parameters correlated with higher serum phosphate and lower ALP levels. TBS was positively related with aBMD but not HR-pQCT parameters. In conclusion, adult patients with XLH had high bone mass and normal TBS in the lumbar spine but compromised microarchitecture and bone strength in the peripheral bone. This finding indicated a site-specific effect of the disease on the skeleton in the XLH patients.