Telephone

电话
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定基于电话的支持计划(PBSP)对新诊断的乳腺癌女性的有效性。
    方法:设计两组重复测量的随机对照试验。参与者包括94名年龄在18-60岁的患者,他们在中国一家三级医院新诊断为乳腺癌并接受化疗。他们被随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预组的参与者参加了四个阶段的PBSP,由四个互动部分组成:学习,讨论,问专家,和个人故事,加上常规护理。结果包括患者自我护理自我效能感,心理困扰(包括症状困扰,焦虑,和抑郁),和生活质量。这些在三个时间点进行了评估:干预前(T1),干预后(T2),使用自我护理自我效能感量表进行随访(T3),M.D.Anderson症状清单,医院焦虑抑郁量表,和全球健康状况量表。
    结果:完成干预后,干预组的参与者有显著(p<.001)更高的自我护理自我效能(T2:Mdiff=11.49,T3:Mdiff=22.33),更好的生活质量(T2:Mdiff=8.18,T3:Mdiff=17.19),较低的症状困扰(T2:Mdiff=-26.68,T3:Mdiff=-54.76),减少焦虑(T2:Mdiff=-2.52,T3:Mdiff=-5.11),与对照组相比,抑郁程度较低(T2:Mdiff=-3.61,T3:Mdiff=-6.71)。
    结论:这些研究结果表明PBSP是有效的。医疗保健专业人员,尤其是护士,可以利用它来提高自我护理自我效能和生活质量,以及减少新诊断乳腺癌女性的心理困扰。
    背景:泰国临床试验登记处#TCTR20230321010。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a Phone-Based Support Program (PBSP) for newly diagnosed women with breast cancer.
    METHODS: A two-group repeated measures randomized controlled trial was designed. Participants included 94 patients aged 18-60 years who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital in China. They were randomly assigned to the intervention and the control groups. Participants in the intervention group were enrolled in a four-session PBSP, consisting of four interactive sections: learning, discussion, ask-the-expert, and personal stories, plus the routine care. Outcomes included patients\' self-care self-efficacy, psychological distress (including symptom distress, anxiety, and depression), and quality of life. These were assessed at three time points: pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and follow-up (T3) by using the self-care self-efficacy scale, the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, the hospital anxiety and depression scale, and the global health status scale.
    RESULTS: After completion of the intervention, participants in the intervention group had significantly (p < .001) higher self-care self-efficacy (T2: Mdiff = 11.49, T3: Mdiff = 22.33), better quality of life (T2: Mdiff = 8.18, T3: Mdiff = 17.19), lower symptom distress (T2: Mdiff = -26.68, T3: Mdiff = -54.76), less anxiety (T2: Mdiff = -2.52, T3: Mdiff = -5.11), and less depression (T2: Mdiff = -3.61, T3: Mdiff = -6.71) than those in the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the PBSP is effective. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, could utilize it to enhance self-care self-efficacy and quality of life, as well as decrease psychological distress among women newly diagnosed breast cancer.
    BACKGROUND: The Thai Clinical Trial Registry #TCTR20230321010.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)电话对于高血压的随访和管理是可靠的。它花费的时间更少,在很大程度上相当于手动跟进。我们进行了一项可靠性研究,以评估AI电话随访在高血压管理中的效率。2020年5月18日和6月30日期间,招募了上海彭浦社区卫生服务中心管理的350名高血压患者进行随访,一次是人工智能,一次是人类。第二次随访在3-7天内进行(平均5.5天)。用配对t检验比较两个呼叫的平均长度时间,采用Cohen的Kappa系数评价两次随访结果的可靠性。AI调用的平均时间长度(4.15min)短于手动调用的平均时间(5.24min,P<.001)。与症状相关的答案显示出中度至实质的一致性(κ:.465-.624,P<.001),与并发症相关的那些表现出相当的一致性(κ:.349,P<.001)。就生活方式而言,与吸烟有关的答案显示出非常高的一致性(κ:.915,P<.001),而那些解决盐消费的人,酒精消费,和运动显示中等到基本的一致性(κ:.402-.645,P<.001)。常规用药有中等一致性(κ:.484,P<.001)。
    Artificial intelligence (AI) telephone is reliable for the follow-up and management of hypertensives. It takes less time and is equivalent to manual follow-up to a high degree. We conducted a reliability study to evaluate the efficiency of AI telephone follow-up in the management of hypertension. During May 18 and June 30, 2020, 350 hypertensives managed by the Pengpu Community Health Service Center in Shanghai were recruited for follow-up, once by AI and once by a human. The second follow-up was conducted within 3-7 days (mean 5.5 days). The mean length time of two calls were compared by paired t-test, and Cohen\'s Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the results between the two follow-up visits. The mean length time of AI calls was shorter (4.15 min) than that of manual calls (5.24 min, P < .001). The answers related to the symptoms showed moderate to substantial consistency (κ:.465-.624, P < .001), and those related to the complications showed fair consistency (κ:.349, P < .001). In terms of lifestyle, the answer related to smoking showed a very high consistency (κ:.915, P < .001), while those addressing salt consumption, alcohol consumption, and exercise showed moderate to substantial consistency (κ:.402-.645, P < .001). There was moderate consistency in regular usage of medication (κ:.484, P < .001).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估电话和短信随访对吸入糖皮质激素治疗的哮喘儿童的依从性和疗效的影响。
    方法:选择在青岛大学附属医院哮喘门诊就诊的120例中度支气管哮喘患儿作为研究对象。根据随访类型将其随机分为3组:电话和短信服务(TelSMS)组合组,SMS组,和一个对照组。随访12周后,评估每位患儿的哮喘控制水平,并测量其肺功能.
    结果:电话+短信组和短信组患儿依从率分别为86.49%和56.25%,分别。两组总有效率分别为94.59%和75.0%,分别)显著高于对照组(P<.01)。3组患儿的肺功能指标均优于治疗前。虽然只有Tel+SMS组和SMS组明显改善(P<0.05)。Tel+SMS组和SMS组的大、小气道肺功能指标也明显优于对照组(P<0.01)。研究结果表明,哮喘儿童依从性差的原因之一是担心吸入糖皮质激素的不良反应。
    结论:电话和短信随访可提高哮喘患儿吸入糖皮质激素治疗的依从性,改善哮喘控制水平和肺功能。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the effect of telephone and short-message follow-ups on compliance and efficacy in asthmatic children treated with inhaled corticosteroids.
    METHODS: A total of 120 children with moderate bronchial asthma who visited the Asthma Outpatient Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were enrolled in the study. They were divided randomly into 3 groups based on the type of follow-up given: a combined telephone and short-message service (Tel + SMS) group, a SMS group, and a control group. After being followed up for 12 weeks, each child\'s asthma control level was assessed and their lung function was measured.
    RESULTS: The compliance rates of children in the Tel + SMS group and SMS group were 86.49% and 56.25%, respectively. The total effective rates of these 2 groups (94.59% and 75.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than the rate of the control group (P < .01). The lung function indicators of the children in all 3 groups were better than those before treatment, although only the Tel + SMS group and SMS group improved significantly (P < .05). The lung function indicators of the large and small airways in the Tel + SMS group and the SMS group were also significantly better than those of the control group (P < .01). The results of the study suggest that 1 of the causes of poor compliance in asthmatic children is fear of an adverse reaction to inhaled corticosteroids.
    CONCLUSIONS: Telephone and short-message follow-ups can increase compliance with inhaled corticosteroid treatment and improve the asthma control levels and lung function of asthmatic children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:本调查的主要目的是设计一种移动应用程序,用于癌症相关不适的自我管理,以提高患者的整体健康为总体目标。与传统的随访程序相比,使用自我管理应用程序会改善生活质量吗?
    方法:模块是在使用Delphi技术的肿瘤疼痛专家的协作专业知识下精心设计的。使用Cronbach'sα评估咨询的可靠性。开发应用程序后,进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以评估该应用对参与者生活质量的影响.试验组使用该应用程序;对照组接受了后续电话咨询。在基线和4周干预期后进行生活质量评估。
    结果:经过两轮Delphi专家咨询,疼痛卫士的功能模块被确定为包括五个功能模块,包括疼痛自我测量(患者疼痛的实时动态记录),患者提醒(疼痛处置爆发的提醒,药物,andreview),上传检查报告,在线咨询,健康教育,等功能模块。克朗巴赫的α为0.81。总的来说,96例患者(包括食道,胃,结直肠,鼻咽,肺,胰腺,乳房,卵巢,子宫,骨头,胸廓,膀胱,子宫颈,软组织肉瘤,纵隔,和淋巴瘤)患有癌症疼痛的患者分为试验组和对照组。两组之间的基本信息和基线生活质量没有显着差异。经过4周的干预,试验组的生活质量显著高于对照组.患者对应用程序的满意度很高(93.7%)。
    结论:在治疗癌症相关不适的应用开发中遇到的主要障碍在于主题的敏感性,可能导致患者担心疼痛管理的应用程序使用。因此,对用户偏好和预期的细致关注势在必行,需要创建以用户友好性和医疗功效为特征的应用程序。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiCTR1800016066;http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=27153。注册日期:2018-05-09。
    OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this investigation was to devise a mobile application for self-management of cancer-related discomfort, with the overarching goal of enhancing patients\' overall well-being. Would the utilization of the self-management application result in an amelioration of life quality compared to conventional follow-up procedures?
    METHODS: Modules were meticulously devised with the collaborative expertise of oncology pain specialists employing the Delphi technique. Reliability of the consultation was assessed using Cronbach\'s α. After developing the app, a prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the app\'s effect on participants\' quality of life. The trial group used the app; the control group received a follow-up telephone consultation. Assessments of quality of life were conducted both at baseline and following a 4-week intervention period.
    RESULTS: After two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the functional modules of Pain Guardian were determined to include five functional modules, including pain self-measurement (real-time dynamic recording of pain by patients), patient reminders (reminders of outbreaks of pain disposal, medication, and review), uploading of examination reports, online consultation, health education, and other functional modules. Cronbach\'s α was 0.81. Overall, 96 patients (including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, nasopharyngeal, pulmonary, pancreatic, breast, ovarian, uterine, bone, thoracic, bladder, cervical, soft tissue sarcoma, mediastinal, and lymphoma) with cancer pain were divided into the trial and control groups. There were no significant differences in basic information and quality of life at baseline between groups. After 4 weeks of intervention, quality of life was significantly higher in the trial group than in the control group. Patients\' satisfaction with the app was high (93.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The primary obstacle encountered in the development of applications for managing cancer-related discomfort lies in the sensitive nature of the subject matter, potentially leading to patient apprehension regarding application usage for pain management. Consequently, meticulous attention to user preferences and anticipations is imperative, necessitating the creation of an application characterized by user-friendliness and medical efficacy.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR1800016066; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=27153 . Date of Registration: 2018-05-09.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    With completing a baseline survey of a large natural population cohort, conducting regular follow-up has become a key factor in further improving the quality of cohort construction and ensuring its sustainable development. Typical cohort follow-up methods include repeat surveys, routine monitoring, and community-oriented surveillance. However, in practical applications, there are often issues such as high costs, difficulty, and high error rates. Telephone follow-up is an important supplementary method to the methods mentioned above, as it has the characteristics of low cost, fast response, and high quality. However, the with difficult organization, quality control is challenging, response rates are low, and management levels vary widely, which limits its widespread use in large-scale population cohort studies. Given the above problems, this study draws on customer relationship management based on the actual needs of the China Northwest Cohort follow-up. It relies on the REDCap electronic data collection platform to build a telephone follow-up management and quality control system. Targeted solutions are provided for key issues in telephone follow-up implementation, including organizational structure, project management, data collection, and process quality control, to improve the quality control level of telephone follow-up comprehensively and thereby enhance the quality and efficiency of follow-up. We hope to provide standardized follow-up programs and efficient quality control tools for newly established and existing cohort studies.
    随着大型自然人群队列基线调查工作普遍完成,如何开展常态化的随访已成为进一步提升队列建设质量、保证队列建设可持续发展的关键。经典的队列随访有重复调查、常规监测、社区定向监测等,但在实际应用中,普遍存在成本高、难度大、错报率高等问题。电话随访具有成本低、反应快、质量高的特点,成为重要补充手段。但其组织难度大、质量控制(质控)困难、应答率低且管理水平参差不齐,限制了其在大型自然人群队列研究中的广泛应用。本研究借鉴客户关系管理理念,基于西北区域自然人群队列随访现实需求,依托REDCap系统搭建自然人群队列电话随访管理质控系统,对电话随访在组织架构、项目管理、数据采集和过程质控等实施关键问题提供针对性的解决方案,全面提升电话随访水平,进而提升随访的质量和效率,以期为新建队列和现有队列研究提供常态化随访方案及高效质控工具。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评估电话指导对结肠镜检查患者肠道准备质量的影响。
    方法:在线英语数据库(PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,和Embase)从开始到2022年4月15日,根据有关结肠镜检查肠道准备的电话说明筛选随机对照试验。数据提取后,使用ReviewManager软件进行荟萃分析.
    结果:有3,836例患者的9项随机对照试验被纳入荟萃分析。电话组充分的肠道准备率明显高于对照组。合并相对危险度(RR)为1.17(95%置信区间[CI]:1.05-1.30,P<0.01)。波士顿肠道准备量表评分的合并平均差(MD)为1.32(95%CI:0.15-2.49,P<0.05),渥太华肠道准备量表评分为-1.93(95%CI:-2.35至-1.51,P<0.01)。电话组息肉检出率明显高于对照组(RR=1.58,95%CI:1.23~2.04,P<0.01),而两组间腺瘤检出率无显著差异(RR=1.37,95%CI:0.97-1.94,P=0.08).
    结论:接受结肠镜检查的患者的电话指导显著提高了肠道准备质量,提高了息肉检出率。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of telephone instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
    METHODS: Online English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were screened for randomized controlled trials on telephone instructions regarding bowel preparation for colonoscopy from inception to April 15, 2022. After data extraction, the Review Manager software was used for meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 3,836 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.30, P < 0.01). The pooled mean difference (MD) for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score was 1.32 (95% CI: 0.15-2.49, P < 0.05), and that for the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale score was -1.93 (95% CI: -2.35 to -1.51, P < 0.01). The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group (RR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was noted in the adenoma detection rate between the groups (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.97-1.94, P = 0.08).
    CONCLUSIONS: Telephone instructions for patients undergoing colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation and increased polyp detection rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:电话辅助心肺复苏(T-CPR)已被证明是提高外行反应者在远程医疗急救服务期间进行心肺复苏(CPR)的能力的关键干预措施。虽然大多数既定的T-CPR协议主要侧重于指导个人救援人员,缺乏对指导和协调多个外行响应者合作进行复苏的重视。
    目的:本研究旨在开发一种创新的基于团队的远程指导工具,以有效地组织和指导多个非专业人员进行CPR过程,并评估该工具的有效性和可行性。
    方法:我们在本研究中使用了混合方法设计。我们进行了随机对照模拟试验进行定量分析。干预组使用基于团队的远程指导工具进行团队复苏,而对照组无法访问该工具。在初始阶段进行基线复苏(第一阶段测试)。随后,所有团队观看了基于团队的CPR教育培训视频,并完成了3人的实践课程,包括教学和培训后测试(第二阶段测试).在定性分析中,我们从每个团队中随机抽取一名人员和4名急诊医疗服务专家进行半结构化访谈.这些访谈的目的是评估该工具的有效性和可行性。
    结果:基于团队的远程指导工具显着改善了I期和II期测试中的胸部按压质量。与对照组相比,干预组的平均压缩率更合适(中位数104.5,IQR98.8-111.8min-1与中位数112,IQR106-120.8min-1;第一阶段P=.04,中位数117.5,IQR112.3-125min-1与中位数111,IQR105.3-119min-1;第二阶段P=.03)。在干预组中,与对照组相比,紧急响应时间有所延迟(首次胸部按压时间:中位数20,IQR15-24.8秒vs中位数25,IQR20.5-40.3秒;P=.03;打开气道的时间:中位数48,IQR36.3-62秒vs中位数73.5,IQR54.5-227.8秒;P=.01).然而,这种延迟在II期试验后得到部分缓解.定性结果证实了基于团队的远程指导工具的兼容性和通用性,展示其通过团队合作和与电信运营商的有效沟通来有效指导多个外行响应者的能力。
    结论:基于团队的远程指导工具的使用提供了一种有效的解决方案,可以提高多个外行反应者的胸部按压质量。该工具促进了调度员组织复苏小组,并实现了有效的合作。有必要进一步评估远程医疗紧急服务系统中基于团队的远程指导工具在现实生活中的救援场景中的广泛采用和实际应用。
    Telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) has proven to be a crucial intervention in enhancing the ability of lay responders to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during telehealth emergency services. While the majority of established T-CPR protocols primarily focus on guiding individual rescuers, there is a lack of emphasis on instructing and coordinating multiple lay responders to perform resuscitation collaboratively.
    This study aimed to develop an innovative team-based tele-instruction tool to efficiently organize and instruct multiple lay responders on the CPR process and to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the tool.
    We used a mixed methods design in this study. We conducted a randomized controlled simulation trial to conduct the quantitative analysis. The intervention groups used the team-based tele-instruction tool for team resuscitation, while the control groups did not have access to the tool. Baseline resuscitation was performed during the initial phase (phase I test). Subsequently, all teams watched a team-based CPR education training video and finished a 3-person practice session with teaching followed by a posttraining test (phase II test). In the qualitative analysis, we randomly selected an individual from each team and 4 experts in emergency medical services to conduct semistructured interviews. The purpose of these interviews was to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of this tool.
    The team-based tele-instruction tool significantly improved the quality of chest compression in both phase I and phase II tests. The average compression rates were more appropriate in the intervention groups compared to the control groups (median 104.5, IQR 98.8-111.8 min-1 vs median 112, IQR 106-120.8 min-1; P=.04 in phase I and median 117.5, IQR 112.3-125 min-1 vs median 111, IQR 105.3-119 min-1; P=.03 in phase II). In the intervention group, there was a delay in the emergency response time compared to that in the control group (time to first chest compression: median 20, IQR 15-24.8 seconds vs median 25, IQR 20.5-40.3 seconds; P=.03; time to open the airway: median 48, IQR 36.3-62 seconds vs median 73.5, IQR 54.5-227.8 seconds; P=.01). However, this delay was partially mitigated after the phase II test. The qualitative results confirmed the compatibility and generalizability of the team-based tele-instruction tool, demonstrating its ability to effectively guide multiple lay responders through teamwork and effective communication with telecommunicators.
    The use of the team-based tele-instruction tool offers an effective solution to enhance the quality of chest compression among multiple lay responders. This tool facilitated the organization of resuscitation teams by dispatchers and enabled efficient cooperation. Further assessment of the widespread adoption and practical application of the team-based tele-instruction tools in real-life rescue scenarios within the telehealth emergency services system is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:尽管在过去十年中,移动健康应用程序(mHealthapp)程序有效地促进了疾病自我管理行为,使用率随着时间的推移往往会下降。
    目的:我们使用了由护士领导并由健康-社会伙伴关系团队支持的病例管理方法,目的是维持社区居住的老年人的应用程序使用并评估结果差异(i。e,自我效能感,抑郁的程度,和医疗服务总使用量)在那些继续使用该应用程序的人之间。
    方法:这是一项3臂随机对照试验。共有221名老年人患有高血压,糖尿病,或慢性疼痛被随机分为3组:mHealth(n=71),m健康与互动(m健康+I;n=74),和对照(n=76)。mHealth应用程序已提供给mHealth和mHealth+I组。mHealth+I小组还在3个月内收到了来自护士的8个主动电话,以鼓励使用该应用程序。对照组不接受干预。数据在干预前(T1)收集,干预后(T2),并在干预后3个月(T3)确定持续效果。
    结果:总共有37.8%的mHealth+I和18.3%的mHealth组参与者每周至少两次继续使用mHealth应用程序,直到第六个月末。在T2和T3之间,两组之间的应用程序使用差异有统计学意义(χ21=6.81,P=0.009)。在继续使用该应用程序的mHealth组参与者中,从T1到T3观察到自我效能(β=4.30,95%CI0.25-8.35,P=.04)和抑郁水平(β=-1.98,95%CI-3.78至-0.19,P=.03)的改善。尽管mHealth+I组的自我效能感和抑郁评分从T1到T2有所改善,在T3时平均值下降。从T1到T2,所有组的医疗服务使用率均下降(β=-1.38,95%CI-1.98至-0.78,P<.001),在T3时略有增加。
    结论:在随访中,mHealthapp使用率相对较低,与文献中报道的相当。需要更多的工作来合并mHealth的技术驱动和面对面方面。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03878212;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03878212。
    RR2-10.1159/000509129。
    Although mobile health application (mHealth app) programs have effectively promoted disease self-management behaviors in the last decade, usage rates have tended to fall over time.
    We used a case management approach led by a nurse and supported by a health-social partnership team with the aim of sustaining app usage among community-dwelling older adults and evaluated the outcome differences (i.e, self-efficacy, levels of depression, and total health service usages) between those who continued to use the app.
    This was a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. A total of 221 older adults with hypertension, diabetes, or chronic pain were randomized into 3 groups: mHealth (n=71), mHealth with interactivity (mHealth+I; n=74), and the control (n=76). The mHealth application was given to the mHealth and mHealth+I groups. The mHealth+I group also received 8 proactive calls in 3 months from a nurse to encourage use of the app. The control group received no interventions. Data were collected at preintervention (T1), postintervention (T2), and at 3 months\' postintervention (T3) to ascertain the sustained effect.
    A total of 37.8% of mHealth+I and 18.3% of mHealth group participants continued using the mHealth app at least twice per week until the end of the sixth month. The difference in app usage across the 2 groups between T2 and T3 was significant (χ21=6.81, P=.009). Improvements in self-efficacy (β=4.30, 95% CI 0.25-8.35, P=.04) and depression levels (β=-1.98, 95% CI -3.78 to -0.19, P=.03) from T1 to T3 were observed in the mHealth group participants who continued using the app. Although self-efficacy and depression scores improved from T1 to T2 in the mHealth+I group, the mean values decreased at T3. Health service usage decreased for all groups from T1 to T2 (β=-1.38, 95% CI -1.98 to -0.78, P<.001), with a marginal increase at T3.
    The relatively low rates of mHealth app usage at follow-up are comparable to those reported in the literature. More work is needed to merge the technology-driven and in-person aspects of mHealth.
    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03878212; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03878212.
    RR2-10.1159/000509129.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然数字认知行为疗法治疗失眠(D-CBTI)已被证明是一种可行的治疗失眠的方法,缺乏反应的灵活性以及医生与患者之间的直接接触和舒适度可能会限制其疗效。将个性化电话会议集成到D-CBTI中可以克服这些障碍,可能为慢性失眠患者提供额外的临床益处。我们评估了电话加D-CBTI(TD-CBTI)与单独的D-CBTI的临床有效性。
    方法:从睡眠医学中心连续选择失眠患者,华西医院2020年3月至2021年2月。失眠由精神障碍诊断和统计手册标准定义,症状持续≥3个月。标准D-CBTI是通过APP“SUMIAN,“它提供了完全自动化的,交互式和标准CBTI超过6周治疗。TD-CBTI向D-CBTI增加了每周10-15分钟的个性化电话会议。
    结果:一百零七名患者接受D-CBTI,465名患者接受TD-CBTI。治疗前后的ISI差异和大多数睡眠日记报告的睡眠指数在组间具有可比性。然而,TD-CBTI患者表现出基于SE的缓解几率显着增加(167%,OR=2.67,95%CI1.34-5.23),减少睡眠药物的几率显着增加(352%,OR=4.52,95%CI1.27-10.05)。
    结论:这项研究表明,将个性化电话会议整合到D-CBTI治疗中,为失眠患者提供更多的临床益处,特别是成功停用睡眠药物。
    Although digital cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (D-CBTI) has been shown to be a viable treatment for insomnia, lacking flexibility of response and direct practitioner-to-patient contact and comfort potentially limited its efficacy. Integrating personalized telephone sessions into D-CBTI may overcome these obstacles, potentially providing additional clinical benefit to chronic insomnia patients. We evaluate the clinical effectiveness of telephone plus D-CBTI (TD-CBTI) versus D-CBTI alone.
    Insomnia patients were selected consecutively from the Sleep Medicine Center, West China Hospital from March 2020 to February 2021. Insomnia was defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders criteria with symptoms lasting ≥3 months. Standard D-CBTI was administered through the APP \"SUMIAN,\" which provided fully automated, interactive and standard CBTI over six weekly treatments. TD-CBTI added weekly 10-15 min personalized telephone-based sessions to D-CBTI.
    One hundred and seven patients received D-CBTI and 465 patients received TD-CBTI. Pre-to posttreatment differences of ISI and most sleep diary reported sleep indexes were comparable between groups. However, TD-CBTI patients showed significantly increased odds of SE based remission (167%, OR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.34-5.23), and significantly increased odds of reduction of sleep medications (352%, OR = 4.52, 95% CI 1.27-10.05).
    This study demonstrates that integration of personalized telephone sessions into D-CBTI treatment, provides increased clinical benefit to insomnia patients, particularly for successful discontinuation of sleep medications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:评估针对癌症相关疼痛患者的自我管理干预措施对疼痛强度的影响,自我效能感,生活质量(QoL),疼痛药物依从性,和疼痛相关知识,并根据现有证据对自我管理干预的内容和形式提供建议。
    方法:对随机对照试验(RCT)和叙事综合的系统评价。
    方法:搜索六个电子数据库,包括Medline,PsycINFO,EMBASE,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),WebofScience和Scopus
    方法:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告(PRISMA)指南。检索了2011年1月至2022年3月以英文发表的研究。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估质量。使用叙事综合对数据进行总结。
    结果:本系统综述包括6项RCT,涉及748例癌症相关疼痛患者。结果支持干预对QoL和疼痛相关知识的有效性。在疼痛强度的有效性方面观察到混合结果,自我效能和服药依从性。总的来说,证据质量很低。自我管理干预的内容因研究而异,但形式相似(面对面指导和电话随访)。
    结论:现有证据支持自我管理干预对疼痛相关知识和生活质量的有效性。需要进一步的高质量RCT来确定最有效的干预措施。
    结论:建议自我管理以改善癌症患者的疼痛意识,自我管理行为和适应能力。癌症疼痛自我管理的组成部分,包括患者态度和知识评估,护士辅导和咨询,后续期间的加固,并提供有关疼痛管理和药物依从性的补充材料,可以涵盖在干预中。在未来,值得探索使用基于互联网的信息技术进行有效干预,例如微信,帮助实施自我管理干预。
    UNASSIGNED:这项系统评价不一定涉及患者或公众成员参与这项工作。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of self-management interventions targeting individuals with cancer-related pain on pain intensity, self-efficacy, quality of life (QoL), pain medication adherence, and pain-related knowledge and provide recommendations for the content and format of self-management interventions based on the existing evidence.
    METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and narrative synthesis.
    METHODS: A search of six electronic databases, including Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Scopus.
    METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published from January 2011 to March 2022 in English were retrieved. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess quality. Data were summarised using narrative synthesis.
    RESULTS: This systematic review included six RCTs involving 748 patients with cancer-related pain. The results support the effectiveness of the intervention on QoL and pain-related knowledge. Mixed results were observed in the effectiveness on pain intensity, self-efficacy and medication adherence. Overall, the quality of the evidence was low. The content of self-management interventions varied across studies but with similar formats (face-to-face coaching and telephone follow-up).
    CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence supports the effectiveness of self-management interventions on pain-related knowledge and QoL. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the most effective interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Self-management is recommended to improve cancer patients\' pain awareness, self-management behaviour and adaptability. Components for self-management of cancer pain, including patient attitude and knowledge assessment, nurse coaching and counselling, reinforcement during follow-up period, and provision of supplementary materials on pain management and medication adherence, could be covered in the intervention. In the future, it is worthwhile exploring an effective intervention using Internet-based information technology, for example WeChat, to aid the delivery of self-management intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review does not necessarily involve patients or public members in this work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号