Seropositivity

血清阳性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在2022年12月7日取消零COVID-19政策后,中国从2022年12月中旬到2023年1月中旬经历了压倒性的COVID-19大流行。然而,感染率研究较少。我们旨在调查零COVID-19政策终止后不久儿童的SARS-CoV-2感染率。
    方法:从2023年2月20日至4月10日,我们纳入了393名8个月至3岁未接种COVID-19疫苗的儿童和114名3至6岁的儿童,根据本横断面研究的便利抽样,接种了灭活COVID-19疫苗。用商业试剂盒(深圳YHLOBiotech,中国)。
    结果:在393名未接种疫苗的儿童中(1.5±0.6岁;52.2%的男孩),369(93.9%)为抗N/S1IgG阳性。在114名接种疫苗的儿童中(5.3±0.9岁;48.2%的男孩),112(98.2%)为抗N/S1IgG阳性。未接种或接种疫苗的儿童均未出现抗N/S1IgM阳性。接种儿童IgG抗体滴度中位数(344.91AU/mL)明显高于未接种儿童(42.80AU/mL)(P<0.0001)。男孩和女孩之间的抗N/S1IgG阳性率和滴度分别没有显着差异。
    结论:在中国结束零COVID-19政策后不久,绝大多数儿童感染了SARS-CoV-2。这些未接种疫苗的感染儿童是否应该接种COVID-19疫苗值得进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: China experienced an overwhelming COVID-19 pandemic from middle December 2022 to middle January 2023 after lifting the zero-COVID-19 policy on December 7, 2022. However, the infection rate was less studied. We aimed to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in children shortly after discontinuation of the zero-COVID-19 policy.
    METHODS: From February 20 to April 10, 2023, we included 393 children aged 8 months to less than 3 years who did not receive COVID-19 vaccination and 114 children aged 3 to 6 years who received inactivated COVID-19 vaccines based on the convenience sampling in this cross-sectional study. IgG and IgM antibodies against nucleocapsid (N) and subunit 1 of spike (S1) of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-N/S1) were measured with commercial kits (Shenzhen YHLO Biotech, China).
    RESULTS: Of the 393 unvaccinated children (1.5 ± 0.6 years; 52.2% boys), 369 (93.9%) were anti-N/S1 IgG positive. Of the 114 vaccinated children (5.3 ± 0.9 years; 48.2% boys), 112 (98.2%) were anti-N/S1 IgG positive. None of the unvaccinated or vaccinated children was anti-N/S1 IgM positive. The median IgG antibody titers in vaccinated children (344.91 AU/mL) were significantly higher than that in unvaccinated children (42.80 AU/mL) (P < 0.0001). The positive rates and titers of anti-N/S1 IgG had no significant difference between boys and girls respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Vast majority of children were infected with SARS-CoV-2 shortly after ending zero-COVID-19 policy in China. Whether these unvaccinated infected children should receive COVID-19 vaccine merits further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染是全球公共卫生负担,尤其是在亚洲和非洲。人们担心胎儿暴露于HBV和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)可能会抑制先天免疫反应,并减少胎儿和婴儿的乙型肝炎表面抗体(HBsAb)的产生。因此,我们进行了当前的研究,以评估ART对胎儿和婴儿对HBV免疫反应发展的影响。
    方法:我们选择拉米夫定代替替比夫定或替诺福韦作为干预措施,因为它是妊娠期最古老,最广泛使用的ART,其安全性数据已得到充分记录。对八个电子数据库进行了全面检索,包括四个中文和四个英文数据库。符合以下资格标准的研究包括:人类随机对照试验(RCT);治疗组的参与者仅暴露于拉米夫定;对照组的参与者暴露于安慰剂,没有治疗或乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白;所有参与者都是HBV阳性孕妇,病毒载量高,主要结果是新生儿HBsAb血清阳性。将数据制成表格并使用R软件进行分析。
    结果:纳入并分析了9个随机对照试验。与对照组相比,拉米夫定在出生后24小时内显着降低新生儿的HBsAb血清负性(表明胎儿对HBV的免疫反应)。在出生后6-7个月内的婴儿和12个月内的婴儿中也发现了类似的结果(表明新生儿对HBV疫苗的免疫反应)。
    结论:妊娠晚期拉米夫定治疗可增强胎儿对宫内HBV的免疫反应,增强新生儿出生后对乙肝疫苗的免疫反应。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide public health burden, especially in Asia and Africa. Concerns were raised that foetal exposure to HBV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) might suppress the innate immune response and reduce the production of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) in foetuses and infants. We therefore conducted the current study to evaluate the impact of ART on the development of the immune response to HBV in foetuses and infants.
    METHODS: We selected lamivudine instead of telbivudine or tenofovir as the intervention measurement because it was the oldest and most widely used ART during pregnancy and its safety data have been sufficiently documented. A comprehensive search was conducted in eight electronic databases, including four Chinese and four English databases. Studies that met the following eligibility criteria were included: human randomized controlled trials (RCTs); participants in the treatment group were exclusively exposed to lamivudine; participants in the control group were exposed to placebo, no treatment or hepatitis B immunoglobulin; all participants were HBV-positive pregnant women with a high viral load and the main outcome of interest was neonatal HBsAb seropositivity. Data were tabulated and analysed using R software.
    RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included and analysed. Compared with controls, lamivudine significantly decreased HBsAb seronegativity in the newborn within 24 h after birth (indicating the foetal immune response to HBV). Similar results were noted in infants within 6-7 months after birth and infants within 12 months (indicating the neonatal immune response to HBV vaccine).
    CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine treatment in late pregnancy boosted the foetal immune response to HBV in utero and enhanced the neonatal immune response to hepatitis B vaccine after birth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,2020年估计有710万新梅毒感染,其中超过30%的新感染报告发生在塞拉利昂等非洲国家.尽管如此,塞拉利昂没有HIV特异性梅毒筛查项目.因此,需要数据来告知公共卫生实践。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定HIV感染者(PLHIV)中梅毒血清阳性的患病率和与梅毒血清阳性相关的因素.
    方法:在塞拉利昂的10个医疗机构进行了一项横断面研究,在感染艾滋病毒的成年人中,18岁或以上,从2022年9月到2023年1月。收集了感兴趣的参数,包括年龄,性别,婚姻,抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)方案,HIV病毒载量,ART治疗的持续时间,和医院水平的护理。梅毒抗体是通过基于免疫色谱法的快速测试来检测的。使用R软件版本4.2.3(R核心团队,维也纳,奥地利)。皮尔森χ2检验,Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-WallisH检验用于评估各组间梅毒血清阳性的差异。单因素logistic回归和多因素logistic回归分析用于评估梅毒血清阳性相关因素。具有统计学意义的水平设为P<0.05。
    结果:在我们研究的3082例HIV感染者中,2294名(74.4%)女性和2867名(93.0%)接受ART。平均年龄为36岁,211(6.8%,95%CI6.0-7.7)梅毒阳性。60岁及以上人群梅毒患病率最高(21.1%,95CI14.7-29.2),其次是50-60岁的人(15.5%,95CI11.9-19.9)和丧偶人口(11.9%,95CI8.9-15.8)。梅毒血清阳性在性别之间没有差异,ART状态,ART方案,艺术的持续时间,艾滋病毒病毒载量和医院护理水平。年龄(50-60岁:校正OR3.49,95CI2.09-5.85P<0.001;60-100岁:校正OR4.28,95CI2.21-8.17,P<0.001)是梅毒血清阳性的独立预测因子。
    结论:我们观察到梅毒在PLHIV中的患病率很高。老年人和丧偶人群的梅毒血清阳性率较高。年龄是梅毒阳性的独立预测因素。因此,我们呼吁梅毒筛查的整合,艾滋病毒服务中的治疗和预防。
    BACKGROUND: Globally, there were an estimated 7.1 million new syphilis infections in 2020, with more than 30% of these new infections reported in African countries such as Sierra Leone. Despite this, there is no HIV-specific syphilis screening program in Sierra Leone. Thus, data are needed to inform public health practice. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of syphilis seropositivity and factors associated with syphilis seropositivity among people living with HIV (PLHIV).
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at 10 health facilities in Sierra Leone, among adults with HIV, aged 18 years or older, from September 2022 to January 2023. Parameters of interest were collected including age, sex, marriage, antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen, HIV viral load, duration of ART treatment, and hospital level of care. The syphilis antibody was detected by a rapid test based on immunochromatography assay. Data were analyzed using R-software version 4.2.3 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Pearson\'s χ2 test, Fisher\'s exact test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were applied to assess the differences in syphilis seropositivity between groups as appropriate. Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with syphilis seropositivity. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Of the 3082 PLHIV individuals in our study, 2294 (74.4%) were female and 2867 (93.0%) were receiving ART. With a median age of 36 years, 211 (6.8%, 95% CI 6.0-7.7) were positive for syphilis. The prevalence of syphilis was highest in people aged 60 years and over (21.1%, 95%CI 14.7-29.2), followed by people aged 50-60 years (15.5%, 95%CI 11.9-19.9) and in the widowed population (11.9%, 95%CI 8.9-15.8). There were no differences in syphilis seropositivity between gender, ART status, ART regimen, duration of ART, HIV viral load and hospital level of care. Older age (50-60 years: adjusted OR 3.49, 95%CI 2.09-5.85 P < 0.001; 60-100 years: adjusted OR 4.28, 95%CI 2.21-8.17, P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of seropositive syphilis.
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high prevalence of syphilis among PLHIV. Older people and widowed population have higher syphilis seropositivity. Older age was an independent predictor of syphilis positivity. Therefore, we call for the integration of syphilis screening, treatment and prevention in HIV services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2型糖尿病(T2D)患者2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的发病和死亡风险增加。关于T2D患者对COVID-19疫苗的抗体反应的数据研究较少。本研究旨在评估住院T2D患者对灭活COVID-19疫苗的IgG抗体反应。这项研究包括2021年3月至10月没有COVID-19病史并接受两剂灭活COVID-19疫苗(国药或CoronaVac)的住院患者。在第二次疫苗剂量后14-60天测量SARS-CoV-2特异性IgG抗体。共有209人参加,96例T2D和113例非糖尿病患者,包括在内。T2D组SARS-CoV-2刺突(S)蛋白的抗受体结合域(抗RBD)IgG抗体阳性率和中位滴度均低于对照组(67.7%vs83.2%,p=.009;12.93对17.42AU/ml,p=.014)分别。同样,T2D组针对SARS-CoV-2(抗N/S)的核衣壳(N)和S蛋白的IgG抗体的血清阳性和中位滴度均低于对照组(68.8%vs83.2%,p=.032;18.81对29.57AU/mL,p=.012)分别。调整后的年龄,性别,BMI,疫苗类型,第二次疫苗接种后几天,高血压,肾病,还有心脏病,T2D被确定为抗RBD阴性和抗N/S血清阳性的独立危险因素,奇数比0.42(95%置信区间0.19,0.89)和0.42(95%CI0.20,0.91),分别。T2D与对灭活COVID-19疫苗的抗体反应受损有关。
    Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data on the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines in T2D patients are less studied. This study aimed to evaluate IgG antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in hospitalized T2D patients. Hospitalized patients with no history of COVID-19 and received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines (Sinopharm or CoronaVac) were included in this study from March to October 2021. SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies were measured 14-60 days after the second vaccine dose. A total of 209 participants, 96 with T2D and 113 non-diabetes patients, were included. The positive rate and median titer of IgG antibody against receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in T2D group were lower than in control group (67.7% vs 83.2%, p = .009; 12.93 vs 17.42 AU/ml, p = .014) respectively. Similarly, seropositivity and median titers of IgG antibody against the nucleocapsid (N) and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-N/S) in T2D group were lower than in control group (68.8% vs 83.2%, p = .032; 18.81 vs 29.57 AU/mL, p = .012) respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, vaccine type, days after the second vaccine dose, hypertension, kidney disease, and heart disease, T2D was identified as an independent risk factor for negative anti-RBD and anti-N/S seropositivity, odd ratio 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.19, 0.89) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.20, 0.91), respectively. T2D is associated with impaired antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    EB病毒(EBV)是鼻咽癌的危险因素之一,了解EBV激活的可改变的危险因素对预防NPC至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查NPC高危地区固体燃料使用与EBV血清阳性之间的关联.我们的研究基于中国南方四汇县正在进行的基于人群的前瞻性队列的基线发现。我们探讨了目前在烹饪中使用固体燃料与EBV血清阳性之间的关系,和NPC相关的EBV激活,使用逻辑回归模型。进一步进行分层分析以评估潜在的效应改性剂。我们还检查了固体燃料使用的频率和持续时间的影响,并切换燃料类型,在所有用户中的EBV血清阳性。在我们分析的12,579名参与者中,4088(32.5%)为EBV血清阳性,421(3.3%)为NPC相关EBV激活的高风险。固体燃料的使用与EBV血清阳性和NPC相关的EBV激活的风险较高相关,赔率比(ORs)为1.33(95CI:1.01,1.76)和1.81(95CI:1.03,3.18),分别。对于不使用通风设备和食用盐渍食物的人,观察到较高的EBV血清阳性风险。在任何用户中,对于固体燃料暴露超过40年(1.17,95CI:1.00-1.37)且一直使用固体燃料(1.30,95CI:0.96-1.75)的参与者,OR最高。我们没有发现烹饪频率对EBV血清阳性有统计学意义的影响。确定固体燃料是EBV激活的危险因素,对于了解NPC的病因具有重要价值。鉴于全球三分之一的人口仍然无法获得清洁烹饪,我们的发现也具有重要的公共卫生意义。特别是在低资源设置。
    Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of the risk factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and understanding the modifiable risk factors of EBV activation is crucial in the prevention of NPC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between solid fuel use and EBV seropositivity in a high-risk area of NPC. Our study was based on the baseline findings from an ongoing population-based prospective cohort in Sihui county in Southern China. We explored the association between current use of solid fuel in cooking and EBV seropositivity, and NPC-related EBV activation, using logistic regression models. Stratification analyses were further conducted to assess potential effect modifiers. We also examined the impact of frequency and duration of solid fuel use, and switch in fuel types, on EBV seropositivity among ever users. Of the 12,579 participants included in our analysis, 4088 (32.5%) were EBV seropositive and 421 (3.3%) were high risk for NPC-related EBV activation. Solid fuel use was associated with a higher risk of EBV seropositivity and NPC-related EBV activation, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.33 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.76) and 1.81 (95%CI: 1.03, 3.18), respectively. Higher risk of EBV seropositivity was observed for those who did not use ventilation apparatus and those who consumed salted food. Among ever users, OR was highest for participants with more than 40 years of solid fuel exposure (1.17, 95%CI: 1.00-1.37) and who have been constantly using solid fuel (1.30, 95%CI: 0.96-1.75). We did not find a statistically significant impact of cooking frequency on EBV seropositivity. The identification of solid fuel as a risk factor for EBV activation is of great value for understanding the etiology of NPC. Our findings also have important public health implications given the fact that a third of the global population still lack access to clean cooking, especially in low resource settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大规模疫苗接种已在全球实施。快速、大规模检测血清中和抗体(NAb),为评估抗SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗的免疫反应奠定了基础。另外的评估包括抗体的持续时间和增强的免疫应答的最佳时间。
    方法:使用COVID-19疫苗接种血清(n=164)比较了5种替代NAb-3种化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)和两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及特异性IgM和IgG测定的性能。以常规病毒中和试验(cVNT)为标准,评价5种试验的诊断一致性和相关性。我们在志愿者中长达6个月的两剂量疫苗后研究了抗体反应。
    结果:五种替代NAb测定的灵敏度和特异性范围为84%至100%。我们的cVNT结果表明与替代测定非常一致。初次接种疫苗后28天,NAs的血清阳性,IgG,IgM为6%,4%,13%,分别。加强剂量后,血清阳性率达到14%,65%,97%,分别。在接受第二次剂量六个月后,NAb阳性率最终维持在66%.在所有COVID-19疗养院中,患者在出院后3个月检测到100%NAb.
    结论:COVID-19疫苗诱导了持续至少6个月的体液免疫应答。快速血清学检测被用作识别免疫水平变化的代理,并作为个体是否需要加强疫苗接种的指导。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, mass vaccine inoculation against coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been being implemented globally. Rapid and the large-scale detection of serum neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) laid a foundation for assessing the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine. Additional assessments include the duration of antibodies and the optimal time for a heightened immune response.
    METHODS: The performance of five surrogate NAbs-three chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs)-and specific IgM and IgG assays were compared using COVID-19-vaccinated serum (n = 164). Conventional virus neutralization test (cVNT) was used as a criterion and the diagnostic agreement and correlation of the five assays were evaluated. We studied the antibody responses after the two-dose vaccine in volunteers up to 6 months.
    RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of five surrogate NAb assays ranged from 84% to 100%. Our cVNT results indicated great consistency with the surrogate assays. At 28 days after primary vaccination, the seropositivities of the NAbs, IgG, and IgM were 6%, 4%, and 13%, respectively. After the booster dose, seropositivities reached 14%, 65%, and 97%, respectively. Six months after receipt of the second dose, the NAb positive rate was eventually maintained at 66%. In all COVID-19 convalescents, patients were detected with 100% NAb sat three months after discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine induced a humoral immune response lasting at least six months. Rapid serological detection was used as a proxy for identifying changes in immunity levels and as a guide to whether an individual may require a booster vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人囊性包虫病(CE)是一种由细粒棘球蚴幼虫期引起的人畜共患疾病,通过影响牲畜造成经济损失,并在全球范围内构成公共卫生威胁。本研究是关于抗E.巴基斯坦人类的颗粒抗体。该研究使用了来自拉合尔不同医疗中心的93份疑似CE患者的血液分析报告的数据,巴基斯坦。在93份血清样本中,20例(21.5%)血清阳性,间接血凝试验(IHA)的血清阳性率(17.2%)高于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。研究结果表明,年龄,性别,和年份与CE的血清阳性没有显着关系。目前的研究为巴基斯坦近期的疾病管理提供了方向。
    Human cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato that causes economic losses by affecting livestock and also poses a public health threat worldwide. The present study is the first retrospective report on the seroprevalence of anti-E. granulosus antibodies in humans in Pakistan. The study used data from 93 blood analysis reports of patients suspected of having CE from different medical centers in Lahore, Pakistan. Out of 93 sera samples, 20 (21.5%) were seropositive, and higher seropositivity (17.2%) was recorded with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA) than with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The findings indicated that age, gender, and year had no significant relationship with the seropositivity of CE. The current study provides directions towards the management of the disease in the near future in Pakistan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Although measles, rubella and mumps elimination had achieved great progress in recent years, outbreaks were still reported worldwide. Serological surveillance on the remaining susceptibility in the population is essential to evaluate the preventive policy, estimate the current risk of infection, and predict evolutions in the future. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of seropositivity of antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps in a population of all ages in Youyang, southwest China. A cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted among 657 cases who attended to Youyang Hospital from Sep 2018 to Aug 2019. Sero IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. No difference in the seropositivity of antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps was found between neither urban vs. rural, nor male vs. female. The overall seropositivity of anti-measles, rubella, mumps IgG antibodies was 81.1% (95% CI: 78.0-83.9), 65.9% (95% CI: 62.2-69.4) and 63.2% (95% CI: 59.4-66.8), respectively. The IgG seropositivity varied with age significantly. In this study, the seropositivity of antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps among the participants was insufficient in the population, especially among infants, teenagers and productive women, who were suggested to booster the immunity. To better control and eliminate measles, mumps and rubella-related diseases, nation-wide active laboratory-supported surveillance, outbreak investigation and revaccination for vulnerable population are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In 2008, China introduced live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (L-HepA, licensed in 1992) and inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (I-HepA, licensed in 2002) nationwide, and is currently the only country using L-HepA in routine immunization. We assessed seropositivity and its duration following vaccination, safety, and association with hepatitis A incidence and population seroprevalence for I-HepA and L-HepA.
    We obtained seroprevalence data from two nationwide serosurveys (in 1992 and 2014), vaccination status from the 2014 serosurvey, and vaccine safety and disease incidence data from the national surveillance system. We compared long-term HAV seropositivity among vaccine recipients and described safety profiles of both vaccines. We categorized the 31 provinces into those predominately using I-HepA and achieving high coverage (n = 4), those predominately using L-HepA achieving high coverage (n = 4), and those predominately using L-HepA achieving lower coverage (n = 23). We compared population HAV seropositivity, coverage, and disease incidence among the three groups.
    One year after vaccination, seropositivity from I-HepA was significantly higher than from L-HepA (97.8% vs 90.7%), and seropositivity declined to 73.5% for L-HepA and 75.4% for I-HepA after 10 years - not significantly different by vaccine. The annual incidence of serious AEFI was <0.5/100 000 for both vaccines. Prior to licensure of either HepA vaccine, provinces that would go on to predominantly use I-HepA had lower incidences of hepatitis A and lower seropositivity levels to HAV than provinces that would go on to use L-HepA. By 2014, these differences were significantly diminished. Regardless of vaccine selection, all three province groups had lower immunity to HAV among individuals born during the 10 years prior to nationwide vaccine introduction - individuals who were 10 to 24 years old in 2014.
    Evidence of good immunogenicity, safety, and impact on incidence supports continued use of both I-HepA and L-HepA in the EPI system. These results may be useful for countries considering integrating HepA vaccines into their routine programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了解COVID-19有症状和无症状儿科病例的流行病学和临床特征,我们于2020年1月19日至4月30日在上海开展了一项前瞻性研究。共纳入49名确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染的儿童(平均年龄11.5±5.12岁),包括11例(22.4%)国内病例和38例(77.6%)输入性病例。9例(81.8%)本地病例和12例(31.6%)输入病例具有明确的流行病学暴露。28例(57.1%)有症状,21例(42.9%)无症状。无症状或有症状的病例均未发展为严重疾病。SARS-CoV-2在上呼吸道的平均病毒脱落时间在无症状病例中为14.1±6.4天,在有症状病例中为14.8±8.4天(P>0.05)。45例(91.8%)在粪便中检测到病毒RNA。在无症状病例中,粪便中病毒脱落的平均持续时间为28.1±13.3天,在有症状的参与者中为30.8±18.6天(P>0.05)。<7岁儿童粪便中病毒RNA脱落的时间比学龄儿童长(P<0.05)。在确认感染后的1-3周内,有43例(87.8%)对SARS-CoV-2的抗体呈血清阳性。总之,在COVID-19大流行期间,无症状的SARS-CoV-2感染可能在社区儿童中很常见。无症状病例以与有症状病例相似的模式脱落病毒RNA。特别值得关注的是,无症状的个体可能是SARS-CoV-2的种子传播,并对疾病控制构成挑战。
    To understand the epidemiological and clinical features of the symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric cases of COVID-19, we carried out a prospective study in Shanghai during the period of January 19 to April 30, 2020. A total of 49 children (mean age 11.5 ± 5.12 years) confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled in the study, including 11 (22.4%) domestic cases and 38 (77.6%) imported cases. Nine (81.8%) local cases and 12 (31.6%) imported cases had a definitive epidemiological exposure. Twenty-eight (57.1%) were symptomatic and 21 (42.9%) were asymptomatic. Neither asymptomatic nor symptomatic cases progressed to severe diseases. The mean duration of viral shedding for SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory tract was 14.1 ± 6.4 days in asymptomatic cases and 14.8 ± 8.4 days in symptomatic cases (P > 0.05). Forty-five (91.8%) cases had viral RNA detected in stool. The mean duration of viral shedding in stool was 28.1 ± 13.3 days in asymptomatic cases and 30.8 ± 18.6 days in symptomatic participants (P > 0.05). Children < 7 years shed viral RNA in stool for a longer duration than school-aged children (P < 0.05). Forty-three (87.8%) cases had seropositivity for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 within 1-3 weeks after confirmation with infection. In conclusion, asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection may be common in children in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic wave. Asymptomatic cases shed viral RNA in a similar pattern as symptomatic cases do. It is of particular concern that asymptomatic individuals are potentially seed transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and pose a challenge to disease control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号