Schwannomatosis is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary syndrome disease characterized by multiple schwannomas throughout the body, without bilateral vestibular schwannoma or dermal schwannoma. The most common location of schwannomatosis is the head and neck, as well as the limbs, while multiple schwannomas in the lumbosacral canal and lower extremities are relatively rare. In this study, we report a 79-year-old woman diagnosed with schwannomatosis. MRI and contrast-enhanced imaging revealed multiple schwannomas in both lower extremities. An 18F-FDG PET/CT examination revealed that in addition to multiple tumors with increased 18F-FDG uptake in both lower extremities, there was also an increased 18F-FDG uptake in a mass in the lumbosacral canal. These masses were confirmed to be schwannomas by pathology after surgery or biopsy. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of schwannomas were correlated with MRI and pathological components. Antoni A area rich in tumor cells showed significant enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI, and PET/CT showed increased uptake of 18F-FDG in the corresponding area, while Antoni B region rich in mucus showed low enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI, accompanied by a mildly increased 18F-FDG uptake.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Schwannomatosis is a rare disease characterized by multiple schwannomas of the whole body. Although benign, schwannomatosis that occurs in important areas of the body, such as the brain and spinal canal, can cause considerable disability and mortality. The disease is rare, frequent and relapsing, and this poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
METHODS: A 40-year-old male had multiple masses all over his body, starting at the age of 19. Four years prior, he started to experience a progressive decrease in muscle strength in both lower limbs and developed urinary and defecation dysfunctions, and gradual paralysis. One month prior, the patient developed pain and numbness in his left forearm. The patient had undergone five surgical procedures for this disease in our department. Based on the family history, imaging examinations, pathological biopsy and molecular biological examinations, the diagnosis of schwannomatosis was confirmed. This time, the patient was admitted to our hospital again for a 6th operation because of the pain and numbness in his left forearm. After the operation, the patient\'s symptoms improved significantly; the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital. At the last telephone follow-up, the patient reported a poor general condition but was alive.
CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report a rare case of schwannomatosis. We conducted 15 years of patient follow-up and treatment, and analyzed the timing of surgery and patient psychology. This case will further extend our overall understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of this rare tumor.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomatosis is the third subtype of neurofibromatosis. Schwannomatosis, particularly the familial variant, is uncommon. Recently, germline mutations of the SMARCB1 gene have been found to cause schwannomatosis. In this report, we describe a case of familial inherited intraspinal schwannomatosis. Postoperative pathology indicated a schwannoma. The results of gene testing showed that the SMARCB1 gene had a spliced mutation.
METHODS: A patient with a rare case of familial intraluminal schwannomatosis was admitted to our hospital. Peripheral blood gene testing was performed on the patient and her son, and a splice mutation of the SMARCB1 gene located at C. 1118+1G>A on intron 8 was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Schwannomatosis is an incomplete dominant autosomal dominant genetic disorder. The structural and functional abnormalities of proteins caused by mutations in the SMARCB1 gene may be the molecular basis for familial schwannomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with penile schwannoma are rare and usually with variant presentations. No evidence-based clinical guideline exists for diagnosis or treatment. To put schwannoma into differential diagnoses of benign soft tissue lesions in the penis is important.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and categorize clinical, histopathological, and radiological presentations and apply possible explanation on several fields of penile schwannoma.
METHODS: We collected the English literature through the PubMed database of the National Library of Medicine up to October 2019. A newly diagnosed case in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, was also included. This study categorized lesion locations into the penile body or shaft, glans, or penile root, dorsal or ventral.
METHODS: The main outcome measure was to demonstrate clinical, pathological, ultrasonography, and MRI manifestations of penile schwannoma and perform immunohistochemistry staining that has not been performed among penile schwannomas.
RESULTS: We collected 40 cases. Data were arranged in tables. Clear descriptions were added on several fields of penile schwannoma in detail in Discussion.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile schwannomas are mostly located at the penile shaft and dorsum of the penis. Dyspareunia is the most reported complaint for sexual dysfunction. This study is the first study in the world to document the expressions of calretinin, SOX10, glial fibrillary acid protein, D2-40 (podoplanin), and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 in penile schwannoma and claims magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic presentations of penile schwannomas are synonymous with schwannomas from head to toe. The current patient may be the first to present with penile schwannoma with schwannomatosis. Huang LC, Wang HZ, Chu YC, et al. Clinicopathological Presentation and Management of Penile Schwannoma. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:615-621.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomatosis is the third subtype of neurofibromatosis. Because the tumor is multiple and prone to recurrence, it often brings challenges to clinical diagnosis and treatment. In the past decade, researchers have come to realize the relationship between the SMARCB1 gene and schwannomatosis, which is expected to improve the current level of diagnosis and treatment.
METHODS: We collected the clinical data of intraspinal schwannomatosis in the same family, which is rare, and carried out the genetic tests on 3 generations of family members (N = 25). We found that 8 family members had germline mutations of the SMARCB1 gene, manifested as mutation at the splice site between SMARCB1 gene exon 8 and 9 (c.1118 + 1G > A).
CONCLUSIONS: The structural and functional abnormalities of proteins caused by the mutations of the SMARCB1 gene may be the molecular basis for the pathogenesis of schwannomatosis in this family. This study may provide clues for the study of schwannomatosis in the future.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a kind of rare neurogenic malignancy, which usually arises from nerve fibers in any tissue and organ that have nerve fiber distributions, especially the trunk and extremities, but it is extremely rare in spinal canal.
METHODS: We report a 30-year-old woman who had a history of excision of intraspinal occupying lesions 5 times and the pathologic diagnosis based on histomorphologic and immunohistochemistry was schwannomatosis, which existed in her family history. Unfortunately, she died because her condition deteriorated rapidly and appeared multiple lung metastases. MPNST was confirmed by needle biopsy of lung lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Many cases of MPNST usually developed from neurofibromatosis type 1. However, the incidence of MPNST arising from schwannomatosis was extremely rare. More significantly, using genetic testing on her, we found a splice site mutation (c.1118+1G>A) that occurred between exons 8 and 9 of the SMARCB1 gene, which was first found in this MPNST patient and could lay the foundation for further study of its pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of spinal schwannomas in patients with schwannomatosis and compare them with a large cohort of patients with solitary schwannomas and neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2).
METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of 831 patients with solitary schwannomas, 65 with schwannomatosis, and 102 with NF2. The clinical, radiographic, and pathological data were extracted with specific attention to the age at onset, location of tumors, initial symptoms, family history, and treatment outcome.
RESULTS: The male-to-female ratio of patients with schwannomatosis (72.3% vs 27.7%) was significantly higher than that of patients with solitary schwannomas (53.3% vs 46.7%) and NF2 (54.0% vs 46.0%), respectively (chi-square test, p = 0.012). The mean age at the first spinal schwannoma operation of patients with NF2 (24.7 ± 10.2 years) was significantly younger than that of patients with solitary schwannomas (44.8 ± 13.2 years) and schwannomatosis (44.4 ± 14.1 years; 1-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). The initial symptoms were similar among the 3 groups, with pain being the most common. The distribution of spinal tumors among the 3 groups was significantly different. The peak locations of spinal schwannomas in patients with solitary schwannomas were at C1-3 and T12-L3; in schwannomatosis, the peak location was at T12-L5. A preferred spinal location was not evident for intradural-extramedullary tumors in NF2. Only a slight prominence in the lumbar area could be observed. The patients in the 3 groups obtained similar benefits from the operation; the recovery rates in the patients with solitary schwannomas, NF2, and schwannomatosis were 50.1%, 38.0%, and 53.9%, respectively. The prognosis varied among spinal schwannomas in the patients with schwannomatosis. Up until the last date of follow-up, most patients with schwannomatosis (81.5%) had undergone a single spinal operation, but 12 patients (18.5%) had undergone multiple spinal operations. Patients with nonsegmental schwannomatosis or those with early onset disease seemed to have a poor prognosis; they were more likely to undergo multiple spinal operations. Small cauda equina nodules were common in patients with schwannomatosis (46.7%) and NF2 (86.9%); these small schwannomas appeared to have relatively static behavior. Two patients suspicious for schwannomatosis were diagnosed with NF2 with the detection of constitutional NF2 mutations; 1 had unilateral vestibular schwannoma, and the other had suspicious bilateral trigeminal schwannomas.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical features of spinal schwannomas vary among patients with solitary schwannomas, NF2, and schwannomatosis. Spinal schwannomas of patients with NF2 appear to be more aggressive than those in patients with solitary schwannomas and schwannomatosis. Spinal schwannomas of schwannomatosis predominate in the lumbar area, and most of them can be treated successfully with surgery. The prognosis varies among spinal schwannomas of schwannomatosis; some patients may need multiple operations due to newly developed schwannomas. Sometimes, it is difficult to differentiate schwannomatosis from NF2 based on clinical manifestations. It is prudent to perform close follow-up examinations in patients with undetermined schwannomatosis and their offspring.