Rescue therapy

抢救治疗
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Eculizumab改善了肌无力危象(MC)病例的通气支持恢复。然而,前瞻性研究的安全性和有效性仍缺乏.本研究旨在探讨依库珠单抗在难治性MC患者的前瞻性病例系列中的安全性和有效性。我们跟踪了一系列抗乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)抗体阳性的重症肌无力(MG)患者,这些患者在MC期间接受了依库珠单抗作为附加治疗12周,以促进断奶过程并降低疾病活动。在依库珠单抗给药之前和之后评估血清抗AChR抗体和与补体途径相关的外周免疫分子。与基线美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)-定量MG测试(QMG)得分(22.25±4.92)和MG-日常生活活动(MG-ADL;18.25±2.5)得分相比,从治疗后4周(分别为14.5±10.47和7.5±7.59)到12周(分别为7.5±5.74和2.25±3.86)观察到改善.肌肉力量持续改善整个眼睛,球杆,呼吸,和肢体/粗体域组。1例患者在16周时死于心力衰竭。3例24周时仍处于缓解状态,平均QMG评分为2.67±2.89,ADL评分为0.33±0.58。没有明显的副作用报告。血清CH50和可溶性C5b-9水平显著下降,虽然血清抗AChR抗体水平没有显著变化,C1q,C5a液位,或外周淋巴细胞比例。Eculizumab的耐受性良好,在该病例系列中显示出疗效。需要进行长期随访的大型前瞻性队列研究,以进一步探索现实实践中的安全性和有效性。
    Eculizumab has improved recovery from ventilatory support in myasthenic crisis (MC) cases. However, the safety and efficacy profiles from prospective studies are still lacking. This study aimed to explore eculizumab\'s safety and efficacy in a prospective case series of patients with refractory MC. We followed a series of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who received eculizumab as an add-on therapy for 12 weeks during MC to facilitate the weaning process and reduced disease activity. Serum anti-AChR antibodies and peripheral immune molecules associated with the complement pathway were evaluated before and after eculizumab administration. Compared to the baseline Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-quantitative MG test (QMG) scores (22.25 ± 4.92) and MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL; 18.25 ± 2.5) scores at crisis, improvements were observed from 4 weeks (14.5 ± 10.47 and 7.5 ± 7.59, respectively) through 12 weeks (7.5 ± 5.74 and 2.25 ± 3.86, respectively) post-treatment. Muscle strength consistently improved across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross domain groups. One patient died of cardiac failure at 16 weeks. Three cases remained in remission at 24 weeks, with a mean QMG score of 2.67 ± 2.89 and ADL score of 0.33 ± 0.58. No significant side effects were reported. Serum CH50 and soluble C5b-9 levels significantly declined, while there were no significant changes in serum anti-AChR antibody levels, C1q, C5a levels, or peripheral lymphocyte proportions. Eculizumab was well tolerated and showed efficacy in this case series. Large prospective cohort studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to further explore the safety and efficacy profile in real-world practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    丘脑底核(STN)和苍白球(GPi)是两个主要结构,主要是通过深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗晚期帕金森病(PD)。结果不令人满意的病例的子集可能受益于针对另一个结构的救援DBS手术。虽然这些患者的特征没有得到很好的描述,这种现象也没有得到很好的评价。
    这项单中心回顾性研究包括PD患者,在回顾性分析初始双侧GPiDBS结果不满意后接受了STNDBS的抢救。对当前文献进行了简短回顾,以报告抢救DBS手术的临床结果。
    确定了8名患者,其中6人被纳入本研究。在初始GPiDBS后19.8个月进行救援STNDBS。在救援STNDBS8.8个月后,与最初的GPiDBS相比,患者的运动症状在非药物治疗方面显著改善29.2%.非运动症状和健康相关生活质量也显著改善。
    我们的研究结果表明,抢救STNDBS可以改善初始GPiDBS失败的患者的非药物运动和非运动症状以及生活质量。对当前文献的简短回顾表明,从GPi到STN的目标转换主要是由于不良的初始结果,并且通过目标替代进行,而从STN到GPI的转换主要是由于利益的逐渐减少,长期轴性症状,运动障碍,和肌张力障碍,并通过目标添加进行。
    UNASSIGNED: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) are two main structures primarily targeted by deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat advanced Parkinson\'s disease (PD). A subset of cases with unsatisfactory outcomes may benefit from rescue DBS surgery targeting another structure, while these patients\' characteristics have not been well described and this phenomenon has not been well reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: This monocentric retrospective study included patients with PD, who underwent rescue STN DBS following an unsatisfactory outcome of the initial bilateral GPi DBS in a retrospective manner. A short review of the current literature was conducted to report the clinical outcome of rescue DBS surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight patients were identified, and six of them were included in this study. The rescue STN DBS was performed 19.8 months after the initial GPi DBS. After 8.8 months from the rescue STN DBS, patients showed a significant off-medication improvement by 29.2% in motor symptoms compared to initial GPi DBS. Non-motor symptoms and the health-related quality of life were also significantly improved.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that the rescue STN DBS may improve off-medication motor and non-motor symptoms and quality of life in patients with failure of initial GPi DBS. The short review of the current literature showed that the target switching from GPi to STN was mainly due to poor initial outcomes and was performed by target substitution, whereas the switching from STN to GPi was mainly due to a gradual waning of benefits, long-term axial symptoms, dyskinesia, and dystonia and was performed by target addition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨NeuroformEZ支架治疗急性前循环大动脉闭塞的疗效和安全性。
    2018年1月至2019年8月在我们的中风护理中心接受NeuroformEZ支架治疗的42例连续急性前循环大动脉粥样硬化闭塞患者的临床资料,包括基线特征,images,治疗状况,并对随访资料进行回顾性分析。
    有42例颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄机械血栓切除术(MT)失败的病例,其中78.6%(33/42)预后良好,88.1%(37/42)随访时未见再狭窄。从穿刺到再通的平均时间为79.50±14.19分钟。术中支架释放成功率为97.6%,虽然有一例支架移位,三例血栓逃逸,6例出血。
    用于急性前循环大动脉粥样硬化闭塞的NeuroformEZ支架的抢救治疗可以存档良好的短期影像学和临床结果,虽然仍需要长期随访来验证。
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the Neuroform EZ stent in treating acute anterior circulation large artery occlusion.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 42 consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation large atherosclerotic occlusion who were treated with the Neuroform EZ stent from January 2018 to August 2019 in our stroke care center, including baseline characteristics, images, therapeutic condition, and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 42 mechanical thrombectomy (MT) failure cases of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with rescue Neuroform EZ stent implantation, of which 78.6% (33/42) had a good prognosis and 88.1% (37/42) showed no re-stenosis at follow-up. The average time from puncture to recanalization is 79.50 ± 14.19 min. The successful rate of intraoperative stent release is 97.6%, while there is one case of stent displacement, three cases of thrombus escape, and six cases of hemorrhage.
    UNASSIGNED: Rescue therapy of the Neuroform EZ stent for acute anterior circulation large atherosclerotic occlusion can archive good short-term imaging and clinical results, while long-term follow-up is still needed to verify.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:基于Vonoprazan(VPZ)的方案是幽门螺杆菌的有效一线疗法(H。幽门螺杆菌)感染。然而,它们作为救援疗法的价值需要探索。
    目的:评估以VPZ为基础的治疗方案作为幽门螺杆菌抢救治疗。
    方法:这种前瞻性,单中心,临床试验于2022年1月至8月间进行.有幽门螺杆菌治疗失败史的患者每天两次服用20mgVPZ,750毫克阿莫西林,每日3次,和250毫克布拉氏酵母菌(S.boulardii)每日两次,共14d(14dVAS方案)。VPZ和布拉氏链球菌在饭前服用,而阿莫西林是在饭后服用的。根除治疗结束后3d内,所有患者均被要求填写问卷,以评估他们可能经历的任何不良事件.根除治疗结束后至少4-6周,使用13C-尿素呼气试验评估根除成功,并探讨了与根除成功相关的因素。
    结果:这里,对103名患者进行了评估,最终纳入68例患者。所有纳入的患者先前有1-3次根除失败。使用意向治疗和符合方案分析计算的总体根除率为92.6%(63/68)和92.3%(60/65),分别。根除率与治疗失败的次数没有差异(P=0.433)。克拉霉素的比率,甲硝唑,左氧氟沙星耐药率为91.3%(21/23),100.0%(23/23),和60.9%(14/23),分别。没有四环素耐药的病例,阿莫西林,或者呋喃唑酮.在60.9%(14/23)的患者中,幽门螺杆菌分离株对所有3种抗生素(克拉霉素,甲硝唑,和左氧氟沙星);然而,92.9%(13/14)的患者达到根除。所有患者均出现甲硝唑耐药,根除率为91.3%(21/23)。无焦虑患者的根除率(96.8%)高于有焦虑患者的根除率(60.0%,P=0.025)。无严重不良事件发生;大多数不良事件为轻度且无干预消失。95.6%(65/68)的患者依从性良好。血清学检查显示肝肾功能无明显变化。
    结论:VAS是一种安全有效的抢救疗法,具有可接受的根除率(>90%),不管以前治疗失败的次数。焦虑可能与根除失败有关。
    BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan (VPZ)-based regimens are an effective first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, their value as a rescue therapy needs to be explored.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess a VPZ-based regimen as H. pylori rescue therapy.
    METHODS: This prospective, single-center, clinical trial was conducted between January and August 2022. Patients with a history of H. pylori treatment failure were administered 20 mg VPZ twice daily, 750 mg amoxicillin 3 times daily, and 250 mg Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) twice daily for 14 d (14-d VAS regimen). VPZ and S. boulardii were taken before meals, while amoxicillin was taken after meals. Within 3 d after the end of eradication therapy, all patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire to assess any adverse events they may have experienced. At least 4-6 wk after the end of eradication therapy, eradication success was assessed using a 13C-urea breath test, and factors associated with eradication success were explored.
    RESULTS: Herein, 103 patients were assessed, and 68 patients were finally included. All included patients had 1-3 previous eradication failures. The overall eradication rates calculated using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were 92.6% (63/68) and 92.3% (60/65), respectively. The eradication rate did not differ with the number of treatment failures (P = 0.433). The rates of clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin resistance were 91.3% (21/23), 100.0% (23/23), and 60.9% (14/23), respectively. There were no cases of resistance to tetracycline, amoxicillin, or furazolidone. In 60.9% (14/23) patients, the H. pylori isolate was resistant to all 3 antibiotics (clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin); however, eradication was achieved in 92.9% (13/14) patients. All patients showed metronidazole resistance, and had an eradication rate of 91.3% (21/23). The eradication rate was higher among patients without anxiety (96.8%) than among patients with anxiety (60.0%, P = 0.025). No severe adverse events occurred; most adverse events were mild and disappeared without intervention. Good compliance was seen in 95.6% (65/68) patients. Serological examination showed no significant changes in liver and kidney function.
    CONCLUSIONS: VAS is a safe and effective rescue therapy, with an acceptable eradication rate (> 90%), regardless of the number of prior treatment failures. Anxiety may be associated with eradication failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素耐药性的增加是导致幽门螺杆菌(H.幽门螺杆菌)根除失败。作为营养补充剂,卵黄抗体(IgY)为幽门螺杆菌感染的抢救治疗提供了新的途径。
    在这个随机的,对照研究,纳入100例先前接受幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的幽门螺杆菌阳性患者。所有个体接受标准的含铋的四联疗法,每天两次(5毫克艾普拉唑,100毫克多西环素,500毫克克拉霉素或1克阿莫西林或100毫克呋喃唑酮,和220毫克胶体酒石酸铋),持续14天,并随机接受每日两次7克IgY-H。幽门螺杆菌治疗(研究组)与否(对照组)。治疗结束后4周,尿素呼气试验用于评估幽门螺杆菌根除率.所有参与者通过全球总体症状量表(GOS)进行评分,并记录试验期间的不良事件。
    幽门螺杆菌根除率为84.0%(95%CI73.5-94.5%)在意向治疗(ITT)分析中,研究组和对照组的80.0%(95%CI68.5-91.5%)和85.7%(95%CI75.6-95.9%)与符合方案(PP)分析为80.0%(95%CI68.5-91.5%),分别。两组治疗后症状缓解超过80%的人数分别为27例(60%)和12例(29.2%)(p<0.05),不良事件发生率分别为4例(8%)和6例(12%),分别。
    两组在幽门螺杆菌抢救治疗和IgY-H方面均取得了满意的根除效果。pylori有效缓解症状,依从性好,不良反应少。
    UNASSIGNED: The increasing antibiotic resistance is the main issue causing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. As a nutritional supplement, Egg Yolk Antibody (Ig Y) provides a new approach for H. pylori infection rescue therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized, controlled study, 100 H. pylori-positive patients with previous H. pylori eradication treatment were included. All individuals received standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy twice daily (5 mg ilaprazole, 100 mg doxycycline, 500 mg clarithromycin or 1 g amoxicillin or 100 mg furazolidone, and 220 mg colloidal bismuth tartrate) for 14 days and were randomized to receive either twice daily 7 g Ig Y-H. pylori treatment (study group) or not (control group). 4 weeks after the end of treatment, urea breath tests were used to assess the H. pylori eradication rate. All participants scored by the Global Overall Symptom scale (GOS) and recorded adverse events during the trial.
    UNASSIGNED: The H. pylori eradication rates were 84.0% (95% CI 73.5-94.5%) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 68.5-91.5%) in the study and control groups at intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 85.7% (95% CI 75.6-95.9%) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 68.5-91.5%) at per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The number of over 80% symptom relief after treatment in the two groups was 27 (60%) and 12 (29.2%) (p < 0.05), and the incidences of adverse events were 4 (8%) and 6 (12%), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Both groups achieved satisfactory eradication efficiency in H. pylori rescue therapy and Ig Y-H. pylori effectively alleviates the symptoms with good compliance and fewer adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:比较含利福布汀三联疗法与铋剂四联疗法对幽门螺杆菌的抢救治疗的疗效和安全性(H.幽门螺杆菌)。
    方法:这是一项针对幽门螺杆菌治疗的非劣效性研究试验,用于至少两次治疗失败的受试者。受试者被随机分配接受利福布汀三联疗法和14天埃索美拉唑(20mgbid),阿莫西林(1.0gbid)和利福布汀(150mgbid)或埃索美拉唑铋四联疗法(20mgbid),铋(220mgbid),加甲硝唑(400毫克qid)和四环素(500毫克qid)。通过琼脂稀释和E-test方法评估抗微生物剂敏感性。
    结果:从2021年5月到2022年10月,共有364名受试者被随机分配。意向治疗的根除率,符合协议,改良意向治疗为89.0%(162/182,95%置信区间(CI)83.6%-92.8%),利福布汀三联组为94.0%(157/167,95%CI89.3%-96.7%)和93.6%(162/173,95%CI89.0%-96.4%)。对于铋四重组,它们是89.6%(163/182,95%CI84.3%-93.2%),95.3%(143/150,95%CI90.7%-97.7%)和93.7%(163/174,95%CI89.0%-96.4%)。
    结论:利福布汀三联疗法是经典铋剂四联疗法的替代方案,用于H.pylori的抢救治疗,具有较低的副作用和较高的依从性。
    We compared the efficacy and safety of rifabutin-containing triple therapy with bismuth quadruple therapy for rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori.
    This was a noninferiority study trial of H. pylori treatment for subjects who had failed at least 2 prior treatments. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive rifabutin triple therapy with 14-day esomeprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1.0 g), and rifabutin (150 mg) twice a day; or bismuth quadruple therapy with esomeprazole (20 mg) and bismuth (220 mg) twice a day, plus metronidazole (400 mg) and tetracycline (500 mg) 4 times a day. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by agar dilution and E-test.
    From May 2021 to October 2022, a total of 364 subjects were randomized. The eradication rates by intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and modified intention-to-treat were 89.0% (162/182; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83.6%-92.8%), 94.0% (157/167; 95% CI, 89.3%-96.7%), and 93.6% (162/173; 95% CI, 89.0%-96.4%) for rifabutin triple group. For bismuth quadruple group, they were 89.6% (163/182; 95% CI, 84.3%-93.2%), 95.3% (143/150; 95% CI, 90.7%-97.7%), and 93.7% (163/174; 95% CI, 89.0%-96.4%).
    The rifabutin triple therapy is an alternative to classical bismuth quadruple therapy for the rescue treatment of H. pylori with fewer side effects and higher compliance.
    NCT04879992.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:比较米诺环素与米诺环素的疗效和耐受性幽门螺杆菌含铋四联疗法中的四环素(H.幽门螺杆菌)抢救治疗。
    方法:这项研究是一个多中心,随机对照,非自卑审判。患有多重治疗失败的难治性幽门螺杆菌感染受试者被随机(1:1)分配接受埃索美拉唑20mgb.i.d.铋220毫克b.i.d,加甲硝唑400毫克q.i.d和米诺环素100毫克b.i.d(米诺环素组)或四环素500毫克q.i.d(四环素组)。主要结果是治疗结束后至少6周通过13C-尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌根除率。用E试验方法测定抗生素耐药性。
    结果:三百六十八名受试者被随机分组。在意向治疗分析中,米诺环素组和四环素组的根除率分别为88.0%(162/184,95%CI83.3-92.8%)和88.6%(163/184,95%CI83.9-93.2%),符合方案分析中的98.0%(149/152,95%CI95.8-100%)和97.4%(150/154,95%CI94.9-99.9%),改良意向治疗分析为93.1%(162/174,95%CI89.3-96.9%)和93.1%(163/175,95%CI89.4-96.9%)。米诺环素,四环素和甲硝唑耐药率为0.7%,1.4%和89.6%,分别。米诺环素的非劣效性得到证实(P<0.025)。甲硝唑耐药不影响两种疗法的疗效。两种疗法表现出相当的不良事件频率(55.4%vs.53.3%);其中几乎一半为轻度。头晕是米诺环素组最常见的不良事件。
    结论:米诺环素在含铋四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌经验性抢救治疗中可以替代四环素,不考虑甲硝唑耐药性。然而,应强调两种治疗方案的不良事件发生率相对较高.
    To compare the efficacy and tolerability of minocycline vs. tetracycline in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) rescue treatment.
    This study was a multi-center, randomized-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Refractory H. pylori-infected subjects with multiple treatment-failure were randomly (1:1) allocated to receive 14-day therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d, bismuth 220 mg b.i.d, plus metronidazole 400 mg q.i.d and minocycline 100 mg b.i.d (minocycline group) or tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d (tetracycline group). Primary outcome was H. pylori eradication rate evaluated by 13C-urea breath test at least 6 weeks after the end of treatment. Antibiotic resistance was determined using E test method.
    Three hundred and sixty-eight subjects were randomized. The eradication rates in minocycline group and tetracycline group were 88.0% (162/184, 95% CI 83.3-92.8%) and 88.6% (163/184, 95% CI 83.9-93.2%) in intention-to-treat analysis, 98.0% (149/152, 95% CI 95.8-100%) and 97.4% (150/154, 95% CI 94.9-99.9%) in per-protocol analysis, 93.1% (162/174, 95% CI 89.3-96.9%) and 93.1% (163/175, 95% CI 89.4-96.9%) in modified intention-to-treat analysis. Minocycline, tetracycline and metronidazole resistance rates were 0.7%, 1.4% and 89.6%, respectively. Non-inferiority of minocycline was confirmed (P < 0.025). Metronidazole resistance did not affect the efficacy of either therapy. The two therapies exhibited comparable frequencies of adverse events (55.4% vs. 53.3%); almost half of them were mild. Dizziness was the most common adverse events in the minocycline group.
    Minocycline can be an alternative for tetracycline in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori empirical rescue treatment, irrespective of metronidazole resistance. However, relatively high incidence of adverse events in both regimens should be emphasized.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:医源性因素在幽门螺杆菌根除失败中起重要作用,而它很容易被错过。因此,我们旨在调查和分析幽门螺杆菌根除失败的相关医源性因素。
    UNASSIGNED:在2019年12月至2022年2月进行的这项研究中,共纳入了508例幽门螺杆菌根除失败的患者。所有患者都填写了一份包括人口统计特征的问卷,治疗持续时间,方案,剂量,和抢救治疗的时间间隔。
    UNASSIGNED:在一线治疗中,89名患者(17.5%,89/508)在三联疗法和57例患者中使用了至少一种高耐药率的抗生素(11.2%,57/508)在四联疗法中使用了两种耐药率高的抗生素或其他不推荐的抗生素。在抢救治疗中,58例患者反复使用85个方案作为抢救方案(22.6%,58/257)和178种耐药率高的抗生素方案在85例患者中重复使用(33.1%,85/257)。
    未经批准:为了降低幽门螺杆菌根除失败的风险,医源性因素需要得到更多的关注。临床医生要加强教育培训,规范治疗方案,更好地管理幽门螺杆菌感染,最终提高根除率。
    Iatrogenic factors play an important role in H. pylori eradication failure, whereas it can be easily missed. Therefore, we aimed to investigate and analyze these related iatrogenic factors of H. pylori eradication failure.
    A total of 508 patients who experienced H. pylori eradication failure were included in this study conducted from December 2019 to February 2022. All the patients filled out a questionnaire including demographic characteristics, duration of treatment, regimens, dosage, and time intervals in rescue treatment.
    In the first-line treatment, 89 patients (17.5%, 89/508) used at least one antibiotic with high resistance rate in triple therapy and 57 patients (11.2%, 57/508) used two antibiotics with high resistance rates or other not recommended antibiotics in quadruple therapy. In the rescue therapy, 85 regimens were repeatedly used as salvage regimens in 58 patients (22.6%, 58/257) and 178 regimens containing antibiotics with high resistance rates were repeatedly used in 85 patients (33.1%, 85/257).
    To decrease the risk of H. pylori eradication failure, iatrogenic factors need to gain more attention. Clinicians should enhance their education and training to standardize the treatment regimens, better manage the H. pylori infection, and improve the eradication rate eventually.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:本研究的目的是评估抢救治疗的有效性和安全性,一种治疗方法,其中救援装置,如球囊血管成形术,阿波罗支架,翼展支架,接龙支架,在机械血栓切除术(MT)失败后使用或其他自膨胀支架,并确定MT失败后急性基底动脉闭塞(BAO)的最有效抢救措施。
    未经批准:对于这项研究,我们从BASILAR登记处招募患者.将所有参与者分为三组:再治疗与抢救治疗组,没有抢救的再通治疗组,和非重组组。比较90天和1年的临床结果。使用多变量逻辑回归分析估计通过抢救治疗成功再通的患者的抢救措施与有利结果(改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分为0-3)的关联。
    未经评估:在参与者中,112例患者再通失败,473例患者再通成功,218例患者接受抢救治疗,255例未接受抢救治疗。其中,111例(43.5%)患者在再通无抢救治疗组中,65例(29.8%)患者在再通抢救治疗组,非再通组中有9例(8.0%)患者在90天时取得了良好的结局.与未再通组相比,有抢救治疗的再通组和无抢救治疗的再通组在90天和1年均具有良好的预后。此外,在接受抢救治疗的患者中,翼展支架,阿波罗支架,与Solitaire支架相比,球囊血管成形术在90天和1年时具有更高的有利结局。
    未经授权:无论是否进行抢救治疗,再通导致急性BAO患者的良好结局。对于MT故障后的急性BAO,球囊血管成形术,翼展支架术,和Apollo支架可以被认为是有效和安全的救援选择,但不是Solitaire支架。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue therapy, a therapy in which rescue devices such as balloon angioplasty, Apollo stent, Wingspan stent, Solitaire stent, or other self-expanding stents are used after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and to determine the most effective rescue measure for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) after the failure of MT.
    UNASSIGNED: For this study, we recruited patients from the BASILAR registry. All participants were divided into three groups: the recanalized with rescue therapy group, the recanalized without rescue therapy group, and the non-recanalized group. Clinical outcomes at 90 days and 1 year were compared. The association of rescue measures with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-3) in patients achieving successful recanalization via rescue therapy was estimated using multivariate logistic regression analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the participants, recanalization failure was found in 112 patients and successful recanalization in 473 patients, with 218 patients receiving rescue therapy and 255 patients without rescue therapy. Of these, 111 (43.5%) patients in the recanalized without rescue therapy group, 65 (29.8%) patients in the recanalized with rescue therapy group, and nine (8.0%) patients in the non-recanalized group achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days. Both the recanalization with rescue therapy and the recanalization without rescue therapy groups were associated with favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year compared with the non-recanalized group. Moreover, in patients receiving rescue therapy, Wingspan stents, Apollo stents, and balloon angioplasty were associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year than Solitaire stents.
    UNASSIGNED: Whether rescue therapy is administered or not, recanalization leads to favorable outcomes in patients with acute BAO. For acute BAO after MT failure, balloon angioplasty, Wingspan stenting, and Apollo stenting could be considered effective and safe rescue options but not Solitaire stenting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于颅内动脉粥样硬化性严重狭窄(ICASS)导致M1段闭塞的急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗(EVT)仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估EVT治疗与ICASS相关的M1急性闭塞的安全性和有效性。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2015年1月至2020年12月在我们机构接受EVT的所有与ICASS相关的M1急性闭塞患者。临床表现,基线特征,血管造影和临床结果,技术可行性,围手术期并发症,并对随访结果进行评价。
    结果:纳入22例ICASS相关M1急性闭塞患者。八名患者(36.4%)接受桥接治疗,其他14例(63.6%)患者直接行EVT。15例患者(68.2%)接受球囊扩张和支架置入作为抢救治疗。6例患者(27.3%)接受单气囊血管成形术,其中5例患者接受分阶段支架置入治疗。1例(4.5%)首次EVT再通失败,一个月后实现了血运重建。平均手术时间为67.2±20.8分钟。95.5%(21/22)的患者实现了成功的血运重建(mTICI≥2b)。两名患者(9.1%)发生围手术期并发症,包括1例出血事件和1例血栓栓塞事件。20例患者(90.9%)获得了平均8.6±3.0个月的血管造影随访。与最初的结果相比,6例(30%)的狭窄程度更差(10-30%)。在3个月的随访中,19例患者(86.4%)获得了良好的结果(mRS≤2)。
    结论:M1段与ICASS相关的闭塞通常需要抢救治疗,包括带/不带支架的球囊血管成形术,这种治疗策略是安全有效的.但是第一次EVT的单球囊血管成形术通常不能获得满意的结果,并且通常需要分阶段的支架治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke with an occlusion of the M1 segment due to intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis (ICASS) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT for ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with an ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion who underwent EVT at our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. Clinical presentation, baseline characteristics, angiographic and clinical results, technical feasibility, perioperative complications, and follow-up results were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion were included. Eight patients (36.4%) received bridging therapy, and the other 14 patients (63.6%) directly underwent EVT. Fifteen patients (68.2%) treated with balloon dilations and stenting as rescue treatment. Six patients (27.3%) received single balloon angioplasty, and 5 of these patients were treated with staged stenting. One case (4.5%) failed recanalization at the first EVT, and successful revascularization was achieved a month later. The mean procedure time was 67.2 ± 20.8 min. Successful revascularization (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved in 95.5% (21/22) of patients. Perioperative complications developed in two patients (9.1%) including one hemorrhagic event and one thromboembolic event. Angiographic follow-up was available in 20 patients (90.9%) at an average of 8.6 ± 3.0 months. The degree of stenosis was worse (10-30%) in 6 cases (30%) compared with the initial outcomes. The favorable outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-month follow-up was achieved in 19 patients (86.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: ICASS-related occlusion in the M1 segment often required a rescue therapy including balloon angioplasty with/without stenting, and this treatment strategy was safe and effective. But single balloon angioplasty at the first EVT generally cannot achieve satisfactory results and often needed staged stenting treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号