Pus

脓液
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)的阳性检出率仍然太低,不能满足临床需要,而来自原发感染部位的脓液可能有利于病原体的鉴定。评估脓毒症患者使用脓液的mNGS的价值,收集了35个样本。比较了使用mNGS或培养方法获得的病原体鉴定和混合感染诊断。53个需氧或兼性厌氧菌,通过两种方法鉴定出59种专性厌氧菌和7种真菌。mNGS将诊断需氧或兼性厌氧菌感染的准确率从44.4%提高到94.4%;mNGS还将诊断专性厌氧菌感染的敏感性从52.9%提高到100.0%;mNGS在真菌感染方面没有显示任何优势。培养和mNGS确定了1例和24例混合感染患者,分别。对于专性厌氧菌,对微生物来源进行了分析。牙源性细菌均引起脓胸(n=7)或皮肤和软组织感染(n=5),而肠道来源的微生物均引起腹腔感染(n=7)。我们还比较了非专性厌氧和专性厌氧感染组的临床特征。SOFA得分[9.0(7.5,14.3)vs.5.0(3.0,8.0),P=0.005],降钙素原值[4.7(1.8,39.9)与2.50(0.7,8.0),P=0.035],感染性休克的比例(66.7%vs.35.3%,P=0.044)和急性肝损伤(66.7%vs.23.5%,非专性厌氧菌感染组P=0.018)明显高于专性厌氧菌感染组。在化脓性感染引起的败血症患者中,使用原发病灶脓液的mNGS可能会产生更有价值的微生物学信息。
    The positive detection rate of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was still too low to meet clinical needs, while pus from the site of primary infection may be advantageous for identification of pathogens. To assess the value of mNGS using pus in patients with sepsis, thirty-five samples were collected. Pathogen identification and mixed infection diagnosis obtained by use of mNGS or cultivation methods were compared. Fifty-three aerobic or facultative anaerobes, 59 obligate anaerobes and 7 fungi were identified by the two methods. mNGS increased the accuracy rate of diagnosing aerobic or facultative anaerobic infections from 44.4% to 94.4%; mNGS also increased the sensitivity of diagnosing obligate anaerobic infections from 52.9% to 100.0%; however, mNGS did not show any advantage in terms of fungal infections. Culture and mNGS identified 1 and 24 patients with mixed infection, respectively. For obligate anaerobes, source of microorganisms was analyzed. The odontogenic bacteria all caused empyema (n = 7) or skin and soft tissue infections (n = 5), whereas the gut-derived microbes all caused intra-abdominal infections (n = 7). We also compared the clinical characteristics of non-obligate anaerobic and obligate anaerobic infection groups. The SOFA score [9.0 (7.5, 14.3) vs. 5.0 (3.0, 8.0), P = 0.005], procalcitonin value [4.7 (1.8, 39.9) vs. 2.50 (0.7, 8.0), P = 0.035], the proportion of septic shock (66.7% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.044) and acute liver injury (66.7% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.018) in the non-obligate anaerobic infection group were significantly higher than those in the obligate anaerobic infection group. In patients with sepsis caused by purulent infection, mNGS using pus from the primary lesion may yield more valuable microbiological information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:评估结核分枝杆菌(MTB)-RNA在淋巴结结核(LNTB)快速诊断中的准确性。此外,确定使用不同标本的MTB-RNA诊断准确性的差异。
    UNASSIGNED:我们纳入了符合纳入标准的疑似LNTB患者,并对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),计算MTB-RNA和培养物的曲线下面积(AUC),并与最终临床诊断进行比较,评估其对LNTB的诊断准确性。
    未经评估:总的来说,285名患者被纳入研究。整体灵敏度,特异性,PPV,NPV,MTB-RNA的AUC为40.6%,100.0%,100.0%,17.0%,和0.70。这些值是30.8%,100.0%,100.0%,16.0%,和0.65,分别组织标本;34.2%,100.0%,100.0%,24.6%,和分别为0.67,穿刺标本;57.14%,100.0%,100.0%,5.3%,和0.79,分别用于脓液标本。这些培养值为24.4%,100.0%,100.0%,13.9%,和分别为0.62,所有标本;17.6%,100.0%,100.0%,13.8%,和分别为0.59,组织标本;25.3%,100.0%,100.0%,22.4%,和分别为0.63,穿刺标本;31.0%,100.0%,100.0%,3.3%,和0.65,分别用于脓液标本。
    UNASSIGNED:MTB-RNA对LNTB的快速诊断的诊断功效中等,但它的灵敏度很低。淋巴结脓液标本对MTB-RNA检测最敏感,其次是穿刺标本;组织最不敏感。如果仅将此测试用于诊断,则应优选获得脓液标本。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-RNA in the rapid diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB). Moreover, the difference in the diagnostic accuracy of MTB-RNA using different specimens was determined.
    UNASSIGNED: We included patients with suspected LNTB who met the inclusion criteria and retrospectively analyzed their clinical data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of MTB-RNA and culture were calculated and its diagnostic accuracy for LNTB was evaluated in comparison with the final clinical diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 285 patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of MTB-RNA were 40.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 17.0%, and 0.70, respectively. These values were 30.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 16.0%, and 0.65, respectively, for tissue specimens; 34.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 24.6%, and 0.67, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 57.14%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 5.3%, and 0.79, respectively, for pus specimens. These values of culture were 24.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.9%, and 0.62, respectively, for all specimens; 17.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.8%, and 0.59, respectively, for tissue specimens; 25.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 22.4%, and 0.63, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 31.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 3.3%, and 0.65, respectively, for pus specimens.
    UNASSIGNED: The diagnostic efficacy of MTB-RNA for the rapid diagnosis of LNTB was moderate, but its sensitivity was low. The lymph node pus specimens were the most sensitive for MTB-RNA testing, followed by puncture specimens; tissues were the least sensitive. Pus specimens should be preferably obtained in case only this test is to be used for diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假尿苷(Φ)是最丰富的转录后RNA修饰,并且广泛存在于多种RNA种类中。Φ影响RNA生物学的各个方面,赋予其装饰的RNA分子独特的结构和功能特性。然而,异常的假吡啶化导致多种人类疾病,包括癌症和遗传疾病。表位ranscriptome的失调可能起因于假尿嘧啶化机制的突变和异常表达,影响蛋白质翻译和其他细胞过程。随着对Φ在健康和疾病中的作用的深入理解,现在正在努力开发针对Φ的治疗和诊断方法。新出现的报告表明,Φ及其安装机器可能是治疗开发的潜在药理学靶标,并可能作为人类疾病的生物标志物。
    Pseudouridine (Ψ) is the most abundant post-transcriptional RNA modification and is widespread in multiple RNA species. Ψ impacts various aspects of RNA biology, conferring distinct structural and functional properties to the RNA molecules that it decorates. However, aberrant pseudouridylation contributes to a variety of human diseases, including cancer and genetic disorders. Dysregulation of the Ψ epitranscriptome can arise from mutations and abnormal expression of pseudouridylation machinery, impacting protein translation and other cellular processes. With advancing understanding of Ψ roles in health and disease, efforts are now invested in developing therapeutic and diagnostic approaches targeting Ψ. Emerging reports indicate that Ψ and its installation machinery could be potential pharmacological targets for therapeutic development and may serve as biomarkers for human diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by ESBLs producing bacteria have become a serious clinical concern worldwide as the prevalence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics continues to increase. The objective of this study was to analyze the bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of ESBLs producers using pus samples from IAIs patients caused by abdominal trauma.
    METHODS: A total of 113 pus samples aspirated from IAIs patients were collected. The BACTEC 9120 and Vitek 2 system were used for detecting positive pathogens and confirming ESBLs production. The results of susceptibility were determined following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.
    RESULTS: Among the pathogens causing IAIs, Escherichia coli (E. coli) (29.1 %) was the most commonly isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (22.5 %). The incidence rates of ESBLs production among E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Klebsiella oxytoca were 69.6, 45.1, and 25.0 %, respectively. All pathogens had high resistance rates against studied antibiotics, with imipenem (88.7 %) and ertapenem (90.7 %) remaining the only practical options. Trend analysis documented an increase in ESBLs producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and a decrease in susceptibility for carbapenems among ESBLs producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae.
    CONCLUSIONS: Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae were the major pathogens causing abdominal trauma associated IAIs. The most active agents against ESBLs producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae were ertapenem and imipenem. However, the ESBLs rates were alarmingly high and increasing among IAIs associated gram-negative bacilli infections in China, and most agents exhibited decreased susceptibility against ESBLs producing pathogens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the bacteriology and drug susceptibility of pus flora from abdominal trauma patients with severe intra-abdominal infection (SIAI). A total of 41 patients with SIAI induced by abdominal trauma were enrolled in the study, from which 123 abdominal pus samples were obtained. The results from laboratory microbiology and drug sensitivity were subjected to susceptibility analysis using WHONET software. A total of 297 strains were isolated in which Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi accounted for 53.5 (159/297), 44.1 (131/297) and 0.7% (2/297), respectively. Anaerobic bacteria accounted for 1.7%. The five predominant bacteria were Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). E. coli was highly susceptible to cefoperazone (91%) and imipenem (98%), while Gram-positive cocci were highly susceptible to teicoplanin (100%) and linezolid (100%). S. aureus was 100% susceptible to vancomycin and K. pneumoniae was highly susceptible to imipenem (100%) and amikacin (79%). P. aeruginosa was the most susceptible to ciprofloxacin (90%). Gram-negative bacterial infection was present in the majority of cases of SIAI. However, a large number of patients were infected by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly S. aureus that exhibited significant resistance to penicillin (100%), oxacillin (100%) and a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic cefotaxime (95%). Amongst the pathogenic bacteria that cause SIAI, both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria account for a high proportion, so high-level and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be initially used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号