Pregabalin

普瑞巴林
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    普瑞巴林是一种处方药,最近被批准用于患有纤维肌痛的人,神经性疼痛,焦虑症,或癫痫。普瑞巴林有头晕的副作用,困倦,和血管性水肿.普瑞巴林诱导的横纹肌溶解很少有报道,到目前为止只有四份报告.我们报告了2例普瑞巴林治疗后横纹肌溶解症。一名90岁以上的男子表现出疲惫,肌肉疼痛,治疗第一天服用75mg普瑞巴林后,血清肌酸激酶浓度较高。一名90多岁的女性长期服用普瑞巴林,血清肌酸激酶浓度显著升高。两名患者都有长期服用他汀类药物的历史。普瑞巴林治疗停止,大量静脉输液,经常检查血清电解质。进行碱化具有优异的结果。Naranjo药物不良反应量表和先前的研究表明,普瑞巴林与横纹肌溶解症之间存在关联。临床医生应警惕使用普瑞巴林时发生横纹肌溶解的可能性,尤其是服用他汀类药物时。
    Pregabalin is a prescription medicine that has recently been approved for individuals who suffer from fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, anxiety disorder, or epilepsy. Pregabalin has the side effects of dizziness, sleepiness, and angioedema. Pregabalin-induced rhabdomyolysis has been rarely reported, with only four reports to date. We report two cases of rhabdomyolysis after pregabalin treatment. A man aged older than 90 years presented with exhaustion, muscle aches, and a high serum creatine kinase concentration after taking 75 mg of pregabalin on the first day of treatment. A woman in her 90s with long-term use of pregabalin presented with considerably elevated serum creatine kinase concentrations. Both patients had a long history of taking statins. Pregabalin therapy was stopped, high-volume intravenous fluids were administered, and serum electrolytes were frequently checked. Alkalinisation was performed with excellent outcomes. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction scale and previous research suggest an association between pregabalin and rhabdomyolysis. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of rhabdomyolysis occurring with the use of pregabalin, especially when taking statins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疼痛是常见的公共卫生问题,仍然是未满足的医疗需求。目前可用的镇痛药通常具有有限的功效或伴有许多不良副作用。通过多模式镇痛实现满意的疼痛缓解,奈福泮和加巴喷丁(普瑞巴林/加巴喷丁)的新组合被设计和评估在炎症,骨关节炎和神经性疼痛。进行等值线分析以分析在角叉菜胶引起的炎性疼痛中,奈福泮和加巴喷丁之间的相互作用。单碘酸盐诱导的小鼠骨关节炎疼痛和紫杉醇诱导的外周神经性疼痛。在角叉菜胶诱导的炎症反应和旋转试验中评估了单一疗法或其组合的抗炎作用和运动性能,分别。奈福泮(1、3、5、10、30mg/kg,p.o.),普瑞巴林(3、6、12、24mg/kg,p.o.)或加巴喷丁(25、50、75、100mg/kg,p.o.)在三种疼痛模型中剂量依赖性地逆转了机械性异常性疼痛。等值线分析表明,奈福泮和加巴喷丁的组合在炎症中发挥了协同的抗伤害性作用,骨关节炎,和神经性疼痛小鼠模型,如实验ED50(中值有效剂量)降至预测的相加线以下所证明。此外,奈福泮-普瑞巴林/加巴喷丁的组合减轻了角叉菜胶引起的炎症和水肿,并通过降低有效剂量来预防加巴喷丁类药物相关的镇静或共济失调。总的来说,奈福泮和加巴喷丁类药物的联合给药显示出协同镇痛作用,并可能导致治疗疼痛的改善治疗效果.
    Pain is a common public health problem and remains as an unmet medical need. Currently available analgesics usually have limited efficacy or are accompanied by many adverse side effects. To achieve satisfactory pain relief by multimodal analgesia, new combinations of nefopam and gabapentinoids (pregabalin/gabapentin) were designed and assessed in inflammatory, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain. Isobolographic analysis was performed to analyze the interactions between nefopam and gabapentinoids in carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain, mono-iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis pain and paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathic pain in mice. The anti-inflammatory effect and motor performance of monotherapy or their combinations were evaluated in the carrageenan-induced inflammatory responses and rotarod test, respectively. Nefopam (1, 3, 5, 10, 30 mg/kg, p.o.), pregabalin (3, 6, 12, 24 mg/kg, p.o.) or gabapentin (25, 50, 75, 100 mg/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently reversed mechanical allodynia in three pain models. Isobolographic analysis indicated that the combinations of nefopam and gabapentinoids exerted synergistic anti-nociceptive effects in inflammatory, osteoarthritis, and neuropathic pain mouse models, as evidenced by the experimental ED50 (median effective dose) falling below the predicted additive line. Moreover, the combination of nefopam-pregabalin/gabapentin alleviated carrageenan-induced inflammation and edema, and also prevented gabapentinoids-related sedation or ataxia by lowering their effective doses. Collectively, the co-administration of nefopam and gabapentinoids showed synergistic analgesic effects and may result in improved therapeutic benefits for treating pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究三种不同剂量的口服普瑞巴林对猫的最低肺泡浓度(MACISO)的影响。
    方法:前瞻性,随机化,安慰剂对照,失明,交叉试验。
    方法:一组8只24-48月龄的健康成年猫。
    方法:在MACISO测定前2小时,将猫随机分配给三种口服剂量的普瑞巴林(低剂量:2.5mgkg-1,中剂量:5mgkg-1,高剂量:10mgkg-1)或安慰剂,以最少7天的洗脱期给予多次治疗。用异氟烷在氧气中诱导和维持麻醉,直到气管插管完成,用异氟烷维持,容量控制通气。在普瑞巴林或安慰剂给药后120分钟,使用括号技术和尾钳法一式三份确定MACISO。在MACISO测定期间记录的生理变量(包括心率和血压)被平均并在普瑞巴林和安慰剂治疗之间进行比较。采用单因素方差分析和Friedman检验对正态分布和非正态分布数据进行差异评估,分别。Tukey测试用作事后分析。p<0.05的值被认为是显著的。
    结果:中、大剂量普瑞巴林治疗的MACISO分别为1.33±0.21%和1.23±0.17%,分别。安慰剂治疗后,这些指标显着低于MACISO(分别为1.62±0.13%;p=0.014,p<0.001),分别下降18±9%和24±6%。平均血浆普瑞巴林浓度与MACISO值呈负相关。治疗之间的生理变量没有显着差异。
    结论:剂量为5或10mgkg-1普瑞巴林,在确定MACISO之前2小时口服给药,在猫中具有显着的异氟烷节省作用。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of three different doses of oral pregabalin on minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane (MACISO) in cats.
    METHODS: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, crossover trial.
    METHODS: A group of eight healthy adult cats aged 24-48 months.
    METHODS: Cats were randomly assigned to three oral doses of pregabalin (low dose: 2.5 mg kg-1, medium dose: 5 mg kg-1, high dose: 10 mg kg-1) or placebo 2 hours before MACISO determination, with the multiple treatments administered with a minimum 7 day washout period. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen until endotracheal intubation was achieved, and maintained with isoflurane with volume-controlled ventilation. MACISO was determined in triplicate using the bracketing technique and tail clamp method 120 minutes after pregabalin or placebo administration. Physiologic variables (including heart rate and blood pressure) recorded during MACISO determination were averaged and compared between the pregabalin and placebo treatments. One-way analysis of variance and the Friedman test were used to assess the difference for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. The Tukey test was used as a post hoc analysis. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
    RESULTS: The MACISO with the medium- and high-dose pregabalin treatments were 1.33 ± 0.21% and 1.23 ± 0.17%, respectively. These were significantly lower than MACISO after placebo treatment (1.62 ± 0.13%; p = 0.014, p < 0.001, respectively), representing a decrease of 18 ± 9% and 24 ± 6%. The mean plasma pregabalin concentration was negatively correlated with MACISO values. Physiologic variables did not differ significantly between treatments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 5 or 10 mg kg-1 pregabalin, administered orally 2 hours before determining MACISO, had a significant isoflurane-sparing effect in cats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:他的研究旨在系统评价加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林治疗急性带状疱疹神经痛的临床疗效。包括疼痛控制和不良反应的发生。
    方法:2023年10月在PubMed进行了系统的计算机化搜索,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,VIP,CNKI,和万方数据库。检索了比较加巴喷丁类似物治疗急性带状疱疹神经痛的随机对照试验的数据。终点为视觉模拟评分(VAS)和第1、2和4周的不良反应。使用Revman5.4和Stata16提取符合纳入标准的研究数据进行荟萃分析和敏感性分析。
    结果:该研究包括来自6个随机对照试验的292名患者。其中,118人在加巴喷丁治疗组中,37人在普瑞巴林治疗组中,安慰剂对照组137例.加巴喷丁组疼痛减轻优于安慰剂组(P<0.05),但不良事件更常见.
    结论:加巴喷丁可有效减轻患者急性带状疱疹神经痛。普瑞巴林需要额外的随机对照试验来补充分析。
    CRD42023446643。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of acute herpes zoster (HZ) neuralgia, including pain control and the occurrence of adverse effects.
    METHODS: A systematic computerized search was conducted in October 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentin analogs for the treatment of acute HZ neuralgia were searched. Endpoints were visual analog scores (Visual Analog Scale) and adverse effects at 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted for meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis using Revman 5.4 and Stata16.
    RESULTS: The study included 292 patients from 6 RCTs. Of these, 118 were in the gabapentin-treated group, 37 were in the pregabalin-treated group, and 137 were in the placebo-controlled group. The gabapentin group showed superior pain reduction compared with the placebo group ( P < 0.05), but adverse events were more frequent.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin can effectively reduce acute HZ neuralgia in patients. Pregabalin requires additional RCTs to supplement the analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)和带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是具有挑战性且通常难以治疗的复杂医学疾病,对生活质量有重大影响。米罗加巴林,一种新型的电压门控Ca2+通道α2δ配体,被批准用于DPNP和PHN的适应症。然而,影响的时间进程尚未明确。我们旨在建立米罗加巴林和普瑞巴林在DPNP和PHN中的药效学和安慰剂效应模型。并定量比较疗效特征(最大疗效,发病时间,和其他药效学参数)和米罗加巴林和普瑞巴林的安全性。全面搜索公共数据库中的随机安慰剂对照临床试验。开发了基于模型的荟萃分析(MBMA)来描述药物疗效和安慰剂作用的时程。使用固定效应荟萃分析比较不良事件。包括5,147名参与者在内的16项研究符合这项研究的条件。安慰剂效应相对较高,并随时间逐渐增强,它需要至少八周才能达到平稳状态。药效学模型显示,米罗加巴林和普瑞巴林的最大纯药效约为-7.85%和-8.86%,米罗加巴林缓解DPNP和PHN的疗效均不优于普瑞巴林,两种药物具有相似的安全性。而普瑞巴林的起效率的速率常数大约是米加巴林的三倍。此外,基线疼痛水平是影响普瑞巴林疗效的重要因素.这些发现有助于评估米罗加巴林的临床推广价值。他们建议,在未来的电压门控Ca2通道神经镇痛药的研究和开发中,对患者进行分组时应考虑高安慰剂效应和疼痛的基线水平。
    Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are challenging and often intractable complex medical conditions, with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Mirogabalin, a novel voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, was approved for the indication of DPNP and PHN. However, the time course of effects has not yet been clarified.We aimed to establish pharmacodynamic and placebo effect models of mirogabalin and pregabalin in DPNP and PHN, and to quantitatively compare the efficacy characteristics (maximum efficacy, onset time, and other pharmacodynamic parameters) and safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin. Public databases were comprehensively searched for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was developed to describe the time course of drug efficacy and placebo effects. Adverse events were compared using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Sixteen studies including 5,147 participants were eligible for this study. The placebo effect was relatively high and gradually increased with time, and it required at least eight weeks to reach a plateau. The pharmacodynamic model revealed that the maximum pure efficacy for mirogabalin and pregabalin was approximately -7.85 % and -8.86 %, respectively; the efficacy of mirogabalin to relieve DPNP and PHN was not superior to that of pregabalin, and both drugs had similar safety. While the rate constant of the onset rate of pregabalin was approximately thrice as high as that of mirogabalin. In addition, the baseline level of pain was an important factor affecting pregabalin efficacy. These findings are helpful in evaluating the clinical extension value of mirogabalin. They suggest that the high placebo effect and the baseline level of pain should be considered when grouping patients in future research and development of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel neuroanalgesic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    普瑞巴林是治疗神经性疼痛的一线药物。由普瑞巴林引起的皮肤超敏反应的病例通常发生在开始用药的2周内。我们报告了一例罕见的由普瑞巴林引起的迟发型皮肤超敏反应,药物激发试验证实了这一点。一名72岁的患有严重带状疱疹神经痛的男子在接受多药联合镇痛40天后,出现了占其全身表面积80%至90%的斑丘疹药疹。普瑞巴林的药物激发试验为阳性。与以前的相关报告中类似情况的患者相比,开始用药与患者皮疹发作之间的时间间隔最长,并且他的皮肤受影响面积最大。由于普瑞巴林治疗神经性疼痛的长期过程,因此在治疗期间对可能的不良皮肤超敏反应保持警惕很重要。
    Pregabalin is the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Cases of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions caused by pregabalin generally occur within 2 weeks of initiating medication. We report a rare case of a delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction caused by pregabalin, which was confirmed by a drug provocation test. A 72-year-old man with severe herpes zoster neuralgia developed maculopapular drug eruption covering 80% to 90% of his total body surface area after 40 days of combined multidrug analgesia. A drug provocation test for pregabalin was positive. The time interval between initiating medication and the onset of the patient\'s rash was the longest and he also had the largest area of skin affected compared with patients with a similar condition in previous related reports. Remaining vigilant for possible adverse cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions during treatment is important because of the long-term course of pregabalin treatment for neuropathic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    本研究旨在阐明双氢青蒿素(DHA)联合普瑞巴林(PGB)对小鼠神经病理性疼痛(NP)的影响,并探讨其神经炎症调控机制。采用脊神经结扎法建立NP小鼠模型,假手术组暴露脊神经,不结扎。将小鼠随机分为假手术组,模型组,PGB组低,中等,和高剂量(PGB-L,PGB-M,和PGB-H,22、45和91mg·kg〜(-1)),DHA组(16mg·kg~(-1)),和DHA结合PGB组的低,中等,和高剂量(DHA+PGB-L,DHA+PGB-M,和DHA+PGB-H)。在建模后18天通过管饲法施用。VonFrey和冷板用于检测小鼠的机械痛阈值和冷痛敏感性。悬尾试验和强迫游泳试验用于研究抑郁行为,并采用空场测验估计焦虑行为。使用Morris水迷宫评估认知功能。采用液体悬浮芯片技术对免疫炎症相关因子进行定量分析。免疫荧光法检测CC趋化因子配体3(CCL3)和跨膜蛋白119(TMEM119)的表达。结果显示,与假手术组相比,模型组机械性疼痛和冷痛敏感阈值明显降低,在尾部悬吊试验和强迫游泳试验中挣扎时间显著增加。在开场试验中,中心区域的活动时间显著减少。第二/第四象限的停留时间明显长于其他象限,在Morris水迷宫实验中,平台退出后平台爬升的潜伏期显着增加。CCL3表达显著增长;TMEM119阳性细胞数和细胞体面积显著增长。与模型组相比,DHA+PGB-M组显着增加机械性疼痛和冷痛的敏感性阈值,以及在尾部悬挂测试和强迫游泳测试中挣扎时间显着增加。开放场试验中心区域的活动时间显著减少。第二/第四象限的停留时间明显短于其他象限,平台退出后平台爬升的延迟时间明显缩短。与PGB-M组相比,DHA+PGB-M组D14-17的机械痛阈值明显升高,强迫游泳期间的挣扎时间显著增加。Morris水迷宫第二/第四象限的停留时间明显短于其他象限。与模型组相比,CCL3的表达,TMEM119阳性细胞数,DHA+PGB-M组细胞体面积显著减小。本研究表明DHA+PGB可以增强PGB对NP小鼠的镇痛作用,突破了PGB容差的限制,弥补了PGB在抗抑郁和认知改善方面的不足。其机制可能与通过抑制小胶质细胞活化和CCL3表达调节神经炎症有关。
    This study aims to clarify the effects of dihydroartemisinin(DHA) combined with pregabalin(PGB) on neuropathic pain(NP) in mice and explore the neuroinflammatory regulatory mechanism. NP mice model was established using spinal nerve ligation, whereas the sham group exposed the spinal nerve without ligation. The mice were randomly divided into sham group, model group, PGB groups of low, medium, and high doses(PGB-L, PGB-M, and PGB-H, with 22, 45, and 91 mg·kg~(-1)), DHA group(16 mg·kg~(-1)), and DHA combined with PGB groups of low, medium, and high doses(DHA + PGB-L, DHA + PGB-M, and DHA + PGB-H). Administration by gavage 18 days after modeling. Von Frey and cold plate were used to detect mechanical pain threshold and cold pain sensitivity in mice. The tail suspension test and forced swimming test were used to investigate depressive behavior, and the open field test was used to estimate anxiety behavior. The Morris water maze was used to evaluate cognitive function. Liquid suspension chip technology was used to quantitatively analyze immune inflammation-related factors. Immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of CC chemokine ligand 3(CCL3) and transmembrane protein 119(TMEM119). The results showed that compared with the sham group, the mechanical pain and cold pain sensitivity thresholds of the model group were significantly reduced, and the struggle time was significantly increased in the tail suspension test and forced swimming test. The activity time in the central area was significantly reduced in the open field test. The residence time in the second/fourth quadrant was significantly longer than that in other quadrants, and the latency time of platform climbing significantly increased after platform withdrawal in the Morris water maze experiment. The expression of CCL3 was significantly increased; the number of TMEM119 positive cells and the cell body area were significantly increased. Compared with the model group, the DHA + PGB-M group showed a significant increase in mechanical pain and cold pain sensitivity thresholds, as well as a significant increase in struggle time in the tail suspension test and forced swimming test. The activity time in the central area of the open field test was significantly reduced. The residence time in the second/fourth quadrant was significantly shorter than that in other quadrants, and the latency time of platform climbing after platform withdrawal was significantly reduced. Compared with the PGB-M group, the mechanical pain threshold of D14-17 in the DHA + PGB-M group was significantly increased, and the struggle time during forced swimming was significantly increased. The residence time in the second/fourth quadrant of the Morris water maze was significantly shorter than that in other quadrants. Compared with the model group, the expression of CCL3, the number of TMEM119 positive cells, and the cell body area in the DHA + PGB-M group were significantly decreased. This study indicates that DHA + PGB can enhance the analgesic effect of PGB on NP mice, break through the limitations of PGB tolerance, and make up for the shortcomings of PGB in antidepressant and cognitive improvement. Its mechanism may be related to regulating neuroinflammation by inhibiting the activation of microglial cells and expression of CCL3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    比较普瑞巴林和卡马西平在中央性卒中后疼痛(CPSP)患者中的疗效和安全性。
    纳入研究的患者被随机分配到灵活剂量普瑞巴林治疗组或卡马西平治疗组。主要疗效变量是面部视觉模拟量表(F-VAS),第二次疗效评估采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评估治疗对心理健康的影响。
    普瑞巴林组的平均基线疼痛评分F-VAS为6.47,卡马西平治疗组为6.58。治疗后普瑞巴林组(1.64)的F-VAS显著低于卡马西平治疗组(3.94)。在治疗后的HAMA和HAMD终点评估中,普瑞巴林明显优于卡马西平。F-VAS和HAMD早在第2周就显示出功效,并在整个研究期间保持。12周研究中的平均普瑞巴林剂量为214.6(150-375)mg/天。患者接受卡马西平的平均剂量(范围)为275.0(200-400)mg/天。轻度或中度,通常是瞬态的,嗜睡和头晕是最常见的不良事件(AES)。两组之间的副作用差异无统计学意义。
    普瑞巴林,但卡马西平不是,可能有效改善F-VAS,CPSP患者的HAMA和HAMD。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and carbamazepine in patients with central post-stroke pain (CPSP).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients included in the study were randomly assigned to either flexible-dose pregabalin treatment group or carbamazepine treatment group. The primary efficacy variable was face visual analog scale (F-VAS), the second efficacy assessment was used to assess the effect of treatment on mental health by Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD).
    UNASSIGNED: The mean baseline pain score F-VAS was 6.47 in the pregabalin group and 6.58 in carbamazepine treatment group. F-VAS was significantly lower in the pregabalin group (1.64) than (3.94) carbamazepine treatment group after treatment. Pregabalin was significantly superior to carbamazepine in endpoint assessments on the HAMA and HAMD after treatment. F-VAS and HAMD were showed efficacy as early as week 2 and maintained for whole duration of the study. The average pregabalin dose in the 12-week study was 214.6 (150-375) mg/day. The mean dose (range) of carbamazepine received by the patients was 275.0 (200-400) mg/day. Mild or moderate, typically transient, somnolence and dizziness were the most common adverse events (AES). The differences of the side effects between the two groups were not significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Pregabalin, but not carbamazepine, may be effective in improving F-VAS, HAMA and HAMD in patients with CPSP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:普瑞巴林可能具有减轻胸外科手术后疼痛的潜力,本荟萃分析旨在探讨普瑞巴林对胸外科手术患者疼痛强度的影响。
    方法:PubMed,EMBase,WebofScience,系统地搜索了EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆数据库,我们纳入了评估普瑞巴林对胸部手术后疼痛强度影响的随机对照试验(RCT).
    结果:5个随机对照试验最终纳入meta分析。总的来说,与胸外科手术的对照干预相比,普瑞巴林与0h时疼痛评分显著降低相关(平均差[MD]=-0.70;95%置信区间[CI]=-1.10至-0.30;P=0.0005),24h疼痛评分(MD=-0.47;95%CI=-0.75至-0.18;P=0.001)和神经性疼痛(奇数比[OR]=0.24;95%CI=0.12至0.47;P<0.0001),但对头晕发生率无明显影响(OR=1.07;95%CI=0.15~7.46;P=0.95),头痛(OR=1.00;95%CI=0.30~3.35;P=1.00)或恶心(OR=1.24;95%CI=0.46~3.35;P=0.68)。
    结论:普瑞巴林可有效缓解胸外科术后疼痛。
    BACKGROUND: Pregabalin may have some potential in alleviating pain after thoracic surgery, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of pregabalin on pain intensity for patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pregabalin on pain intensity after thoracic surgery.
    RESULTS: Five RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for thoracic surgery, pregabalin was associated with significantly reduced pain scores at 0 h (mean difference [MD]=-0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.10 to -0.30; P = 0.0005), pain scores at 24 h (MD=-0.47; 95% CI=-0.75 to -0.18; P = 0.001) and neuropathic pain (odd ratio [OR] = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.47; P < 0.0001), but demonstrated no obvious impact on the incidence of dizziness (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.15 to 7.46; P = 0.95), headache (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.30 to 3.35; P = 1.00) or nausea (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 0.46 to 3.35; P = 0.68).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin may be effective to alleviate the pain after thoracic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在癫痫药物治疗中,延迟或错过剂量是不可避免的。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)针对不依从性建议的当前补救措施是通用的,缺乏临床证据。
    目的:使用蒙特卡洛模拟评估癫痫患者延迟或错过普瑞巴林剂量的治疗策略。
    方法:使用已发表的普瑞巴林群体药代动力学模型进行蒙特卡罗模拟。通过模拟八个人群的各种不良依从性情况,评估了五个拟议的治疗方案以及FDA建议的适用性。包括肾功能不全的患者.
    结果:所有建议的治疗策略均与延迟持续时间和肾功能相关。当延迟相对较短时,建议立即定期剂量。对于轻度肾功能损害和肾功能正常的患者,采取常规剂量作为治疗方案的截止时间点为1、2、4和12h,中度肾功能损害,严重肾功能损害,和终末期肾病,分别。然而,当延迟与给药间隔密切相关时,常规剂量与部分剂量相结合证明是有效的。一般来说,在下一个预定时间补充1.3倍的常规剂量可以充分补偿错过的剂量.
    结论:基于模型的模拟为普瑞巴林剂量缺失或延迟的治疗策略的有效性和可行性提供了定量证据。
    BACKGROUND: Delayed or missed doses are inevitable in epilepsy pharmacotherapy. The current remedial measures recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for non-adherence are generic and lack clinical evidence.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess remedial strategies for delayed or missed pregabalin doses in patients with epilepsy using Monte Carlo simulations.
    METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a published population pharmacokinetic model for pregabalin. The applicability of five proposed remedial regimens as well as FDA recommendations was evaluated by simulating various poor adherence scenarios in eight populations, including those with renal dysfunction.
    RESULTS: All proposed remedial strategies were associated with delay duration and renal function. When delays are relatively short, an immediate regular dose is advised. The cut-off time points for taking the regular dose as a remedial regimen were 1, 2, 4, and 12 h for patients with mild renal impairment and normal renal function, moderate renal impairment, severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively. However, when delay aligns closely with a dosing interval, a regular dose combined with a partial dose proves effective. Generally, supplementing 1.3-fold the regular dose at the next scheduled time adequately compensates for the missed dose.
    CONCLUSIONS: Model-based simulations provided quantitative evidence for the effectiveness and feasibility of remedial strategies for missed or delayed pregabalin doses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号