Pneumonitis

肺炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用电离辐射治疗胸部肿瘤可引起放射性肺损伤(RILI),其中包括放射性肺炎和放射性肺纤维化。预防RILI对于控制肿瘤生长和改善生活质量至关重要。然而,传统RILI治疗方法的严重不良反应仍然是主要障碍,需要开发既安全又有效的新型治疗方案。这篇综述总结了RILI的分子机制,并探讨了新的治疗方案。包括天然化合物,基因治疗,纳米材料,和间充质干细胞。这些最近的实验方法显示了在临床实践中作为RILI的有效预防和治疗选择的潜力。
    The treatment of thoracic tumors with ionizing radiation can cause radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), which includes radiation pneumonitis and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Preventing RILI is crucial for controlling tumor growth and improving quality of life. However, the serious adverse effects of traditional RILI treatment methods remain a major obstacle, necessitating the development of novel treatment options that are both safe and effective. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of RILI and explores novel treatment options, including natural compounds, gene therapy, nanomaterials, and mesenchymal stem cells. These recent experimental approaches show potential as effective prevention and treatment options for RILI in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗体-药物缀合物(ADC)已证明在治疗各种癌症方面有效,特别是在靶向人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌方面表现出特异性。3期临床试验的最新进展扩大了目前对ADC的理解,尤其是曲妥珠单抗deruxtecan,用于治疗其他表达HER2的恶性肿瘤。这种知识的扩展导致美国食品和药物管理局批准曲妥珠单抗deruxtecan治疗HER2阳性和低HER2乳腺癌,HER2阳性胃癌,和HER2突变型非小细胞肺癌。同时在肿瘤学中使用越来越多的ADC,卫生保健专业人员越来越关注间质性肺病或肺炎(ILD/p)的发病率上升,与抗HER2ADC治疗相关。关于抗HER2ADC的研究报告了不同的ILD/p死亡率。因此,在接受抗HER2ADC治疗的患者中,制定ILD/p的诊断和治疗指南至关重要.为此,我们召集了一个由中国专家组成的小组,以制定一项战略方法,用于识别和管理抗HER2ADC治疗患者的ILD/p.本报告提出专家小组的意见和建议,旨在指导临床实践中抗HER2ADC治疗诱导的ILD/p的管理。
    Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating various cancers, particularly exhibiting specificity in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Recent advancements in phase 3 clinical trials have broadened current understanding of ADCs, especially trastuzumab deruxtecan, in treating other HER2-expressing malignancies. This expansion of knowledge has led to the US Food and Drug Administration\'s approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer, HER2-positive gastric cancer, and HER2-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer. Concurrent with the increasing use of ADCs in oncology, there is growing concern among health care professionals regarding the rise in the incidence of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (ILD/p), which is associated with anti-HER2 ADC therapy. Studies on anti-HER2 ADCs have reported varying ILD/p mortality rates. Consequently, it is crucial to establish guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ILD/p in patients receiving anti-HER2 ADC therapy. To this end, a panel of Chinese experts was convened to formulate a strategic approach for the identification and management of ILD/p in patients treated with anti-HER2 ADC therapy. This report presents the expert panel\'s opinions and recommendations, which are intended to guide the management of ILD/p induced by anti-HER2 ADC therapy in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了比较患有轻度和重度检查点抑制剂相关性肺炎(CIP)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者之间的预后差异,并探讨严重P型NSCLC患者的死亡原因及预后危险因素
    对2016年4月至2022年8月的116例不可切除的III期或IV期NSCLC患者进行回顾性研究。分析不同CIP分级患者的临床特点,根据CIP的等级将患者分为mildCIP组(1-2级,n=49)和重度CIP组(3-5级,n=67)。探讨重度P组OS相关危险因素,将患者分为预后良好(GP)组(≥中位OS,n=30)和预后不良(PP)组(<中位OS,n=37)基于他们的总生存期(OS)是否大于中位OS。收集基线临床和实验室数据用于分析。
    所有合并CIP的NSCLC患者的中位OS为11.4个月(95CI,8.070-16.100),mildCIP和严重CIP的中位OS分别为22.1个月和4.4个月(HR=3.076、95CI,1.904-4.970,P<0.0001)。结果表明,PP组重度CIP患者中最常见的死亡原因是CIP,GP组最常见的死亡原因是肿瘤。单因素回归分析显示暂停抗肿瘤治疗是预后不良的危险因素(OR=3.598,95CI,1.307~9.905,p=0.013)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,暂停抗肿瘤治疗(OR=4.24,95CI,1.067-16.915,p=0.040)和升高的KL-6(OR=1.002,95CI,1.001-1.002,p<0.001)是预后不良的独立危险因素。
    总而言之,重度CIP患者预后不良,尤其是KL-6升高的患者,主要死亡原因是免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肺炎并发感染。此外,重度CIP患者的抗肿瘤治疗应及时恢复,且不应拖延太久.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the prognostic differences between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mild and severe checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis (CIP), and explore the causes of death and prognostic risk factors in NSCLC patients with severe CIP.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of a cohort of 116 patients with unresectable stage III or IV NSCLC with any grade CIP from April 2016 to August 2022 were conducted. To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with different CIP grades, patients were divided into mild CIP group (grade 1-2, n=49) and severe CIP group (grade 3-5, n=67) according to the grade of CIP. To explore the OS-related risk factors in the severe CIP group, the patients were divided into a good prognosis (GP) group (≥ median OS, n=30) and a poor prognosis (PP) group (< median OS, n=37) based on whether their overall survival (OS) were greater than median OS. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were collected for analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The median OS of all NSCLC patients combined with CIP was 11.4 months (95%CI, 8.070-16.100), The median OS for mild CIP and severe CIP was 22.1 months and 4.4 months respectively (HR=3.076, 95%CI, 1.904-4.970, P<0.0001). The results showed that the most common cause of death among severe CIP patients in the PP group was CIP and the most common cause in the GP group was tumor. The univariate regression analysis showed that suspension of antitumor therapy was a risk factor for poor prognosis (OR=3.598, 95%CI, 1.307-9.905, p=0.013). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that suspension of anti-tumor therapy (OR=4.24, 95%CI, 1.067-16.915, p=0.040) and elevated KL-6 (OR=1.002, 95%CI, 1.001-1.002, p<0.001) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, patients with severe CIP had a poor prognosis, especially those with elevated KL-6, and the main cause of death is immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis complicated with infection. In addition, anti-tumor therapy for severe CIP patients should be resumed in time and should not be delayed for too long.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂发生免疫相关性肺炎的风险,设计了荟萃分析。
    方法:通过两种不同的荟萃分析方法评估了PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂之间免疫相关性肺炎风险的差异,镜像配对和PRISMA指南。
    结果:共有88份报告用于荟萃分析,而32项研究用于镜像配对。PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂(单独使用或与化疗联合使用)都会增加发生免疫相关性肺炎的风险(P<0.00001;P<0.00001)。基于间接分析结果(子组分析),对照组化疗时,PD-L1诱导肺炎的风险弱于PD-1抑制剂(OR=3.33vs.5.43)或安慰剂(OR=2.53vs.3.19),差异无统计学意义(P=0.17;P=0.53)。对于基于镜像配对的荟萃分析,PD-1诱导肺炎的风险显著高于PD-L1抑制剂(OR=1.46,95CI[1.08,1.98],I2=0%,Z=2.47(P=0.01))。然而,这种差异并不显著,联合化疗时(OR=1.05,95CI[0.68,1.60],I2=38%,Z=0.21(P=0.84))。
    结论:PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂都会增加免疫相关性肺炎的风险,而PD-1诱导的肺炎风险明显高于PD-L1抑制剂。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of immune-associated pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, the meta-analysis was designed.
    METHODS: The difference in risk of immune-associated pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors was assessed by two different meta-analysis methods, the Mirror-pairing and the PRISMA guidelines.
    RESULTS: A total of eighty-eight reports were used for meta-analysis, while thirty-two studies were used for the Mirror-pairing. Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (used alone or combined with chemotherapy) increased the risk of developing immune-related pneumonitis (P < 0.00001; P < 0.00001). Based on indirect analyses results (subgroup analyses), the risk of PD-L1-induced pneumonitis was weaker than that of PD-1 inhibitors when the control group was chemotherapy (OR = 3.33 vs. 5.43) or placebo (OR = 2.53 vs. 3.19), while no obvious significant differences were found (P = 0.17; P = 0.53). For the Mirror-pairing-based meta-analysis, the risk of PD-1-induced pneumonitis was significantly higher than that of PD-L1 inhibitors (OR = 1.46, 95%CI [1.08, 1.98], I2 = 0%, Z = 2.47 (P = 0.01)). However, this difference was not significant, when they were combined with chemotherapy (OR = 1.05, 95%CI [0.68, 1.60], I2 = 38%, Z = 0.21 (P = 0.84)).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors increased the risk of immune-related pneumonitis, while the risk of PD-1-induced pneumonitis was significantly higher than that of PD-L1 inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前涉及曲妥珠单抗deruxtecan(DS-8201)的风险-收益分析的研究表明了这种治疗的益处,尽管它可能会增加某些患者间质性肺病(ILD)和/或肺炎的风险。本研究旨在评估DS-8201的安全性。
    方法:在四个电子数据库中搜索相关文章:PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,和ClinicalTrials.gov.截至2022年11月2日发布的所有报告都包括在内,研究类型仅限于临床试验;最后一次搜索更新至2023年1月10日.我们还通过Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册和非随机研究方法学指数工具评估了文献的质量。然后用R版本4.2.1进行荟萃分析。
    结果:本研究共纳入13篇文献报道的1428例患者。分析显示,最常见的所有级别治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)是恶心和疲劳。最常见的3级或以上(≥3级)的TEAE是中性粒细胞减少症。全等级和≥3级TEAE的ILD和/或肺炎发生率分别为12.5%和2.2%,分别。
    结论:对临床试验中与DS-8201相关的TEAE发生率的全面总结为临床医生提供了重要的指导。最常见的TEAE是胃肠道反应和疲劳;同时,最常见的≥3级TEAE是血液学毒性.ILD和/或肺炎是与DS-8201相关的特定药物不良反应,其中医生应特别注意其较高的发病率和≥3级TEAE的发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies involving risk-benefit analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) have indicated the benefit of this treatment, although it may increase the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or pneumonitis in certain patients. This study aimed to assess the safety of DS-8201.
    METHODS: A search was done for relevant articles in four electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. All reports published up until November 2, 2022, were included, and study types were restricted to clinical trials; the last search was then updated to January 10, 2023. We also assessed the quality of the literature with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool, and then performed a meta-analysis with R version 4.2.1.
    RESULTS: A total of 1428 patients reported in 13 articles were included in this study. The analysis revealed that the most common all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea and fatigue. The most common TEAE of grade 3 or above (grade ≥3) was neutropenia. The incidences of ILD and/or pneumonitis for all-grade and grade ≥3 TEAEs were 12.5% and 2.2%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive summary of the incidence of TEAEs associated with DS-8201 in clinical trials provides an important guide for clinicians. The most common TEAEs were gastrointestinal reactions and fatigue; meanwhile, the most common grade ≥3 TEAE was hematological toxicity. ILD and/or pneumonitis were specific adverse drug reactions associated with DS-8201, of which physicians should be particularly aware for their higher morbidity and rates of grade ≥3 TEAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在肺癌中显示出很高的疗效。在放化疗中加入ICI可能会提高治疗效果,而单独应用ICIs或放化疗可诱发治疗相关性肺炎,因此,联合治疗是否会增加肺炎的风险需要仔细评估。本研究旨在回顾性分析放化疗联合ICIs与单纯放化疗患者肺炎的发生率,并探讨联合治疗肺炎的危险因素。
    这是一项回顾性队列研究。在2020年1月至2021年12月期间在华西医院接受最小总剂量为50Gy的常规胸部放疗治疗肺癌的患者进行回顾性分析,并在放疗后至少6个月进行随访。根据放化疗是否有或没有ICI,将患者分为两组。在门诊至少每2个月通过胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)评估肺炎。临床特点,包括性,年龄,吸烟史,病理诊断,基线肺部疾病[包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和间质性肺疾病(ILD)],治疗策略,记录原发肿瘤的位置和放射剂量学参数.进行卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,以分析组合组和对照组之间分类变量的差异,以及连续变量的Mann-WhitneyU检验。通过逻辑回归进行单变量和多变量分析。
    共纳入152例接受放化疗的患者。中位年龄为59岁。共有115例(75.7%)患者为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),22(14.5%)为小细胞肺癌(SCLC),其他病理类型15例(9.9%)。其中,58例接受化学放射联合ICI,94例仅接受化学放射。联合治疗组≥2级肺炎的发生率明显更高(39.7%vs.22.3%,P=0.028),并与使用ICIs[比值比(OR):2.641,95%置信区间(CI):1.244-5.608,P=0.011]和接受≥30Gy的肺体积百分比(V30)(OR:1.728,95%CI:1.214-2.460,P=0.002)。慢性肺病史是≥3级肺炎的独立危险因素(OR:6.359,95%CI:1.953~20.705,P=0.002)。在组合组中,单因素和多因素分析显示,V5、V20、V30和平均肺剂量(MLD)与肺炎无关,而慢性肺病史是≥3级肺炎的独立危险因素(OR:8.351,95%CI:1.469~47.484,P=0.017)。
    ICIs联合放化疗的肺炎发生率高于单纯放化疗,但易于管理。联合治疗应谨慎使用,尤其是在有慢性肺病史的患者中。
    UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown high efficacy in lung cancer. Adding ICIs to chemoradiation might increase the treatment efficacy, while the application of ICIs or chemoradiation alone can induce treatment-related pneumonitis, so whether combination therapy would increase the risk of pneumonitis needs careful evaluation. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the incidence of pneumonitis in patients who underwent chemoradiation combined with ICIs compared with chemoradiation alone and explore the risk factors of pneumonitis in combination therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients who received conventional thoracic radiation with a minimum total dose of 50 Gy for lung cancer between January 2020 and December 2021 at West China Hospital were retrospectively reviewed and followed up for at least 6 months after radiation. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether chemoradiation was administered with or without ICIs. Pneumonitis was evaluated by chest computed tomography (CT) at least every 2 months in outpatient department. The clinical characteristics, including sex, age, smoking history, pathological diagnosis, baseline pulmonary disease [including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD)], treatment strategy, location of primary tumor and radiological dosimetric parameters were recorded. Chi-squared tests or Fisher\'s exact tests were performed to analyze the difference between the combination group and control group for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 152 patients who received chemoradiation were enrolled. The median age was 59 years. A total of 115 (75.7%) patients were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 22 (14.5%) were small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and 15 (9.9%) were other pathological types. Among them, 58 received chemoradiation combined with ICIs and 94 received chemoradiation alone. The rate of grade ≥2 pneumonitis was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (39.7% vs. 22.3%, P=0.028) and was associated with the use of ICIs [odds ratio (OR): 2.641, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.244-5.608, P=0.011] and percent volume of the lung receiving ≥30 Gy (V30) (OR: 1.728, 95% CI: 1.214-2.460, P=0.002). The history of chronic lung disease was the independent risk factor (OR: 6.359, 95% CI: 1.953-20.705, P=0.002) of grade ≥3 pneumonitis. In the combination group, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that V5, V20, V30, and mean lung dose (MLD) were not associated with pneumonitis, whereas the history of chronic lung disease was an independent risk factor of grade ≥3 pneumonitis (OR: 8.351, 95% CI: 1.469-47.484, P=0.017).
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of pneumonitis of ICIs combined with chemoradiation was higher than chemoradiation alone, but manageable. The combination therapy should be applied with caution especially in patients with history of chronic lung disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:放化疗(CRT)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是不可切除和局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在确定在CRT中添加ICI是否与肺炎风险增加相关。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库被搜索2015年1月1日至2023年7月31日之间发表的符合条件的研究。感兴趣的结果是肺炎的发生率。使用随机效应模型进行统计分析。
    结果:共纳入185项研究,共24,527名患者。CRT加ICIs的≥2级肺炎的合并率明显高于单独的CRT(29.6%;95%CI,25.7%-33.6%vs20.2%;95%CI,17.7%-22.8%;P<.0001),但不属于≥3级(5.7%;95%CI,4.8%-6.6%;5.6%;95%CI,4.7%-6.5%;0.1%CI-0.5%;P=.前瞻性研究的亚组分析结果,回顾性研究,亚洲和非亚洲研究,并发CRT(CCRT),和durvalumab合并与总体结果相当.然而,与单独使用CRT或cCRT加PD-L1抑制剂相比,CRT或cCRT加PD-1抑制剂不仅显着增加了≥2级肺炎的发生率,而且也增加了≥3级肺炎的发生率。
    结论:与单独的CRT相比,CRT后的durvalumab巩固似乎与中度肺炎的发生率较高相关,CRT+PD-1抑制剂可增加重度肺炎的风险.然而,这些发现基于观察性研究,需要在未来的大型头对头研究中进行验证.
    OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to determine whether the addition of ICIs to CRT is associated with an increased risk of pneumonitis.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for eligible studies published between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2023. The outcome of interest was the incidence rate of pneumonitis. A random-effects model was used for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 185 studies with 24,527 patients were included. The pooled rate of grade ≥2 pneumonitis for CRT plus ICIs was significantly higher than that for CRT alone (29.6%; 95% CI, 25.7%-33.6% vs 20.2%; 95% CI, 17.7%-22.8%; P < .0001) but not that of grade ≥3 (5.7%; 95% CI, 4.8%-6.6% vs 5.6%; 95% CI, 4.7%-6.5%; P = .64) or grade 5 (0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2% vs 0.3%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%; P = .68). The results from the subgroup analyses of prospective studies, retrospective studies, Asian and non-Asian studies, concurrent CRT (cCRT), and durvalumab consolidation were comparable to the overall results. However, CRT or cCRT plus PD-1 inhibitors not only significantly increased the incidence of grade ≥2 but also that of grade ≥3 pneumonitis compared to CRT alone or cCRT plus PD-L1 inhibitors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CRT alone, durvalumab consolidation after CRT appears to be associated with a higher incidence of moderate pneumonitis and CRT plus PD-1 inhibitors with an increased risk of severe pneumonitis. Nevertheless, these findings are based on observational studies and need to be validated in future large head-to-head studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸部放疗和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的组合已成为恶性肿瘤的新型治疗方法。然而,重要的是要考虑与这种治疗方式相关的肺损伤的潜在加重。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),炎症标记物,有望作为评估这种联合治疗毒性的非侵入性指标。为了进一步调查,我们进行了一项涉及80例接受胸部放疗联合ICIs的患者的研究.这些患者分为两组:同步治疗组和序贯治疗组。进行logistic回归分析以确定≥2级肺炎的危险因素。在倾向得分匹配之后,我们检查了同时组和序贯组之间的NLR值,以评估差异.建立小鼠放射性肺炎模型,和ICIs在不同的时间点给药。肺损伤的形态学评价采用H&E染色,同时通过流式细胞术检测外周血的NLR值。Logistic回归分析显示,辐射剂量学参数(平均肺剂量,总剂量和V20),肺炎发作时的炎症指数NLR,和治疗顺序(同时或序贯)被确定为≥2级治疗相关性肺炎的独立预测因子.形态学评估结果表明,在胸部放疗期间给予程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)阻断的情况下,肺组织损伤的严重程度更大,与放疗后14天给予PD-1阻断的病例相比。此外,本研究表明,称为NLR的非侵入性指标有可能准确反映上述损伤.
    The combination of thoracic radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a novel treatment approach for malignant tumors. However, it is important to consider the potential exacerbation of lung injury associated with this treatment modality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory marker, holds promise as a non-invasive indicator for assessing the toxicity of this combination therapy. To investigate this further, a study involving 80 patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy in conjunction with ICIs was conducted. These patients were divided into two groups: The concurrent therapy group and the sequential therapy group. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain risk factors for grade ≥2 pneumonitis. Following propensity score matching, the NLR values were examined between the concurrent group and the sequential group to evaluate any disparity. A mouse model of radiation pneumonitis was established, and ICIs were administered at varying time points. The morphological evaluation of lung injury was conducted using H&E staining, while the NLR values of peripheral blood were detected through flow cytometry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that radiation dosimetric parameters (mean lung dose, total dose and V20), the inflammatory index NLR at the onset of pneumonitis, and treatment sequences (concurrent or sequential) were identified as independent predictors of grade ≥2 treatment-related pneumonitis. The results of the morphological evaluation indicated that the severity of lung tissue injury was greater in cases where programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade was administered during thoracic radiotherapy, compared with cases where PD-1 blockade was administered 14 days after radiotherapy. Moreover, the present study demonstrated that the non-invasive indicator known as the NLR has the potential to accurately reflect the aforementioned injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗癌药物诱发的间质性肺病(DIILD)越来越受到临床关注,相关指导文件的质量变得至关重要。我们的目的是评估抗癌DIILD文件的质量并总结建议。临床实践指南(CPG)和评估建议的共识声明,治疗,并在电子数据库中搜索了抗癌DIILD的监测,指南组织的网站,和专业社团。文件的质量使用评估指南II(AGREEII)方法进行评估,并对具体建议进行汇总和比较,以分析文档之间的一致性。共有11份文件符合资格,包括6个CPG和5个共识声明。AGREEII评估的质量差异很大,文档域之间和跨域文档之间。范围和目的以及演示文稿清晰度的领域获得了最高的中位数得分,而利益相关者参与领域得分最低。文件之间的建议不一致,特别是关于类固醇方案的选择。指导文件的方法质量需要提高,特别是在利益相关者参与的领域。关于具体评价建议的文件存在不一致之处,治疗和,监测抗癌DIILD,多学科专家之间需要进一步讨论以达成协议。特别是,我们将注意力集中在类固醇治疗方案的差异上,未来仍需研究与激素治疗相关的不良事件的风险,并发现精确的生物标志物.
    Anticancer drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) has received increasing clinical attention, and the quality of relevant guidance documents has become critical. Our purpose was to assess the quality of documents for anticancer DIILD and summarize the recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements with recommendations were searched in electronic databases, websites of guideline organizations, and professional societies. The quality of documents was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) methodology, and the specific recommendations were aggregated and compared. A total of 11 documents were eligible, including 6 CPGs and 5 consensus statements, and the quality of AGREE II assessments differed greatly. The domains of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation received the highest median scores, while the stakeholder involvement domain received the lowest score. Recommendations were inconsistent between documents, particularly regarding the selection of steroid regimens. The methodological quality of the guidance documents needs to be enhanced, especially in the domain of stakeholder involvement. Inconsistencies exist in documents, and further discussions among multidisciplinary experts are needed. Particularly, differences in steroid regimens require attentions, and researches on the risks of adverse events and discovery of precise biomarkers are necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    随着免疫检查点抑制剂广泛用于治疗各种癌症,肺毒性已成为人们日益关注的话题。抗黑素瘤分化相关基因5(抗MDA5)抗体与临床无肌病性皮肌炎患者的快速进行性间质性肺病(RP-ILD)密切相关。然而,在发生免疫相关不良事件的患者中,尚未有抗MDA5抗体表达的报道.我们介绍了一名74岁的肺腺癌患者,该患者在使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后发展为RP-ILD。进一步调查显示多种自身抗体,包括抗MDA5抗体。他最初对全身性糖皮质激素有反应,免疫抑制剂,和托珠单抗,但最终死于纵隔肺炎恶化。这个病例是第一个表明检查点抑制剂肺炎可以表现为RP-ILD与阳性的抗MDA5抗体,这可能预示着不良的预后。
    With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat various cancers, pulmonary toxicity has become a topic of increasing concern. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibodies are strongly associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. However, anti-MDA5 antibody expression has not been reported in patients with immune-related adverse events. We present the case of a 74-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma who developed RP-ILD after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further investigation revealed multiple autoantibodies, including anti-MDA5 antibodies. He initially responded to systemic glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and tocilizumab but eventually died from worsening pneumomediastinum. This case is the first one to suggest that checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis can present as RP-ILD with positive anti-MDA5 antibodies, which may be predictive of a poor prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号