Physical Therapy Modalities

物理治疗模式
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨关节炎(OA)是肌肉骨骼疾病中最常见的关节疾病。非手术治疗是膝关节OA(KOA)的标准治疗方法。建议使用超声治疗来减轻OA的疼痛和功能障碍,但仍缺乏高质量的科学证据证明其在OA治疗中的有效性。因此,我们想分析常规物理治疗与低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)相结合是否可以提高常规治疗的疗效,从而改善KOA患者的症状。
    方法:这项随机对照试验旨在招募200名诊断为KOA的患者,38岁或以上,符合KOA临床诊断标准。患者将以1:1的比例随机分配到LIPUS治疗组或假超声治疗对照组。为期2周的治疗将包括每周五次疗程,评估将在基线进行,在最后一次干预当天和干预后1个月。主要结果指标将是西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学的分数。次要结果指标将是数字疼痛评分量表,Lequesne量表,测试的时间和膝盖的活动范围。将对辍学和缺失数据进行意向治疗分析。
    背景:本研究获得中国医科大学附属盛京医院伦理委员会批准(2023PS592K)。研究结果将传播给参与者,并提供给同行评审的期刊。
    背景:该试验已在中国临床试验注册平台(chictr.org。cn)2023年3月22日,注册ID为ChiCTR2300069643。
    BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder among musculoskeletal conditions. Non-surgical treatment is the standard therapy for knee OA (KOA). Ultrasound therapy is recommended for alleviating pain and dysfunction from OA, but high-quality scientific evidence for its effectiveness in OA treatment is still lacking.Therefore, we want to analyse whether combining conventional physical therapy with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) can enhance the efficacy of conventional therapy, thus improving symptoms in patients with KOA.
    METHODS: This randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 200 patients diagnosed with KOA, aged 38 years or above, who meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for KOA. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a LIPUS treatment group or a sham ultrasound treatment control group. The 2-week treatment will consist of five sessions per week and evaluations will take place at baseline, on the day of the last intervention and 1 month post intervention. The main outcome measures will be the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities\' scores. Secondary outcome indicators will be the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, the Lequesne scale, the time up and go test and the range of motion of the knee. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed for dropouts and missing data.
    BACKGROUND: The study was approved by the ethics committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (2023PS592K). Findings will be disseminated to participants and made available to peer-reviewed journals.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry platform (chictr.org.cn) on 22 March 2023, with the registration ID ChiCTR2300069643.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肩周炎是中后期个体中普遍存在的疾病。侵入性治疗在冻结肩的治疗中显示出有希望的结果,但是由于成本高昂和对先进医疗技术的需求,它的广泛采用受到了阻碍。因此,肩周炎患者通常求助于非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)以缓解症状.然而,NSAIDs的口服给药会对胃肠道产生不利影响,心血管,和泌尿系统。相比之下,局部NSAIDs因其在各种慢性疼痛中的优异疗效和较低的不良反应而受到关注.因此,我们的研究旨在探讨外用NSAIDs改善肩周炎患者疼痛和活动能力的有效性和安全性.
    方法:本研究共纳入108例因肩周炎而出现中度至重度疼痛和活动障碍的患者。参与者被随机分配到实验组(n=72)或对照组(n=36)。实验组除接受基础康复理疗外,每天接受洛索洛芬水凝胶贴片(LOX-P)治疗。对照组给予氟比洛芬巴布剂(FLU-C),每日2次,以及康复理疗。评估两种贴剂疗效的主要终点是Constant-Murley评分(CMS)。临床症状数据,不良事件,并记录患者满意度.
    结果:治疗14天后,实验组有效率为66.67%(n=48),对照组有效率为41.67%(n=15)。总有效率差异为25.00%(95%CI=5.20-42.52;p=0.013)。两种外用药物的安全性相似,仅报告了一些不良事件。
    结论:洛索洛芬水凝胶贴剂在治疗冻结肩方面表现出明显的减轻肩痛和恢复肩关节功能的能力,不良反应最小。Chictr.org.cnID:ChiCTR2100052375。
    OBJECTIVE: Frozen shoulder is a prevalent condition among individuals in their middle and later years. Invasive therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of frozen shoulders, but its widespread adoption has been hampered by high costs and the need for advanced medical technology. As a result, patients with frozen shoulders often turn to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for symptomatic relief. However, the oral administration of NSAIDs can lead to troublesome adverse effects on the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and urinary systems. In contrast, topical NSAIDs have gained attention for their excellent efficacy and lower adverse effects in various chronic pain conditions. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of topical NSAIDs in improving pain and mobility among patients with frozen shoulders.
    METHODS: A total of 108 patients experiencing moderate to severe pain and mobility impairment due to frozen shoulder were enrolled in this study. The participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=72) or the control group (n=36). The experimental group received daily treatment with the loxoprofen hydrogel patch (LOX-P) in addition to basic rehabilitation physiotherapy. The control group was treated with flurbiprofen cataplasm (FLU-C) twice a day, along with rehabilitation physiotherapy. The primary endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of the two patches was the Constant-Murley score (CMS). Clinical symptom data, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were also recorded.
    RESULTS: After 14 days of treatment, the effective rate was 66.67% (n=48) in the experimental group and 41.67% (n=15) in the control group. The overall difference in the effective rates was 25.00% (95% CI=5.20-42.52; p=0.013). The safety profiles of the two topical agents were similar, with only a few adverse events reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The loxoprofen hydrogel patch demonstrates a significant ability to alleviate shoulder pain and restore shoulder function in the treatment of frozen shoulder, with minimal adverse reactions. Chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2100052375.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膝骨关节炎(KOA)是最常见的骨关节炎之一,给个人和社会带来巨大的经济和医疗负担。在中国,推拿已被选为补充和替代疗法,以缓解膝关节疼痛和功能障碍症状。然而,目前的证据不足以支持推拿疗法在治疗膝关节疼痛和改善身体功能方面的疗效.该试验旨在比较推拿与塞来昔布的有效性,这被认为是标准治疗,并通过结果测量的变化来评估其作为替代疗法的潜力。
    方法:将从8家亚中心医院招募360名年龄在40至70岁之间,分为Kellgren和LawrenceI-II级的KOA患者。参与者将被随机分配到治疗组(Tuina,Biw)或对照组(塞来昔布,Qd),两组均接受为期4周的干预阶段,然后进行为期8周的随访阶段。主要结果是与基线相比,第4周西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛分量表的变化。次要结果包括WOMAC刚度和功能分量表,WOMAC总分,36项简式健康调查,计时和测试,短物理性能电池,步态分析参数和疼痛药物记录将在第4、8和12周进行评估。在试验期间发生的任何不良事件将被及时记录。
    背景:本研究已获得上海市中医医院伦理委员会批准(2023SHL-KY-16-01,2023SHL-KY-16-02)。将获得所有参与者的书面知情同意书。研究结果将通过同行评审的期刊和会议演讲进行传播。
    背景:ChiCTR2300069416。
    BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common osteoarthritis, imposing substantial economic and medical burdens on both individuals and society. In China, Tuina has been selected as a complementary and alternative therapy to relieve knee pain and dysfunction symptoms. However, the current evidence is insufficient to support the efficacy of Tuina therapy in addressing knee pain and improving physical function. The trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Tuina with celecoxib, which is considered as the standard treatment, and to assess its potential as an alternative therapy through changes in outcome measures.
    METHODS: A total of 360 KOA patients aged between 40 and 70 years and classified as Kellgren and Lawrence grades I-II will be recruited from eight subcentral hospitals. The participants will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group (Tuina, Biw) or the control group (celecoxib, Qd), with both groups undergoing a 4-week intervention phase followed by an 8-week follow-up phase. The primary outcome is the change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale at week 4 compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes including WOMAC stiffness and function subscales, WOMAC total score, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Timed Up and Go test, Short Physical Performance Battery, gait analysis parameters and pain medication records will be assessed at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Any adverse events that occur during the trial will be promptly recorded.
    BACKGROUND: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2023SHL-KY-16-01, 2023SHL-KY-16-02). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300069416.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究平衡运动和快走对非运动和运动症状的影响,平衡和步态功能,步行能力,并在训练后和6个月随访时平衡对帕金森病(PD)的信心。
    方法:双臂,评估者盲法随机对照试验地点:大学研究实验室和社区参与者:99名符合条件的轻度至中度PD干预者:参与者被随机分为平衡和快走组(B&B,n=49)或主动对照组(CON,n=50)。B&B在物理治疗师的监督下接受了10次90分钟的平衡练习和快走,为期6个月(第1-6周:每周,第7-26周:每月),而CON则以相同的剂量(180分钟/周)进行全身柔韧性和上肢力量锻炼。两组在干预期间每周进行2-3次无监督的家庭锻炼,并继续随访。
    方法:主要结果是运动障碍协会帕金森病统一评分量表非运动(MDS-UPDRS-I)和运动(MDS-UPRDS-III)评分。次要结果是迷你平衡评估系统测试(Mini-BEST)评分,舒适的步态速度(CGS),六分钟步行距离(6MWD)双任务定时和执行(DTUG)时间,和特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC)得分。
    结果:83名个体完成了为期6个月的干预,没有严重的不良反应。MDS-UPDRS非运动评分的平均组间差异(95%CI)在6个月时为1.50(0.19-2.81),在12个月时为1.09(-0.66-2.85)。MDS-UPDRS运动评分的平均组间差异(95%CI)在6个月时为3.75(0.69-6.80),在12个月时为4.57(1.05-8.01)。在6个月和12个月时,B&B组的Mini-BEST评分在组间有显著改善,CGS,6MWD和DTUG时光。
    结论:这种结合平衡和快走运动的运动计划可以减轻非运动和运动症状,并提高步行能力,balance,训练后的步态功能,除了非运动结果之外,对所有人都有积极的结转效应,在轻度至中度PD的6个月随访中。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of balance exercise and brisk walking on nonmotor and motor symptoms, balance and gait functions, walking capacity, and balance confidence in Parkinson disease (PD) at posttraining and 6-month follow-up.
    METHODS: Two-arm, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial SETTING: University research laboratory and the community PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-nine eligible individuals with mild-to-moderate PD INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to balance and brisk walking group (B&B, n=49) or active control group (n=50). B&B received ten 90-minute sessions of balance exercises and brisk walking supervised by physical therapists for 6 months (week 1-6: weekly, week 7-26: monthly), whereas control practiced whole-body flexibility and upper limb strength exercise at same dosage (180 min/wk). Both groups performed unsupervised home exercises 2-3 times/wk during intervention and continued at follow-up.
    METHODS: Primary outcomes were Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale nonmotor (MDS-UPDRS-I) and motor (MDS-UPRDS-III) scores. Secondary outcomes were mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BEST) score, comfortable gait speed (CGS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), dual-task timed-Up-and-Go (DTUG) time, and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale score.
    RESULTS: Eighty-three individuals completed the 6-month intervention with no severe adverse effects. The mean between-group (95% CI) difference for the MDS-UPDRS nonmotor score was 1.50 (0.19-2.81) at 6 months and 1.09 (-0.66 to 2.85) at 12 months. The mean between-group (95% CI) difference for the MDS-UPDRS motor score was 3.75 (0.69-6.80) at 6 months and 4.57 (1.05-8.01) at 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, there were significant between-group improvements of the B&B group in mini-BEST score, CGS, 6MWT, and DTUG time.
    CONCLUSIONS: This combined balance and brisk walking exercise program alleviates nonmotor and motor symptoms and improves walking capacity, balance, and gait functions posttraining, with positive carryover effects for all except nonmotor outcomes, at 6-month follow-up in mild-to-moderate PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期意识障碍(pDoC)是脑损伤后的灾难性疾病,治疗选择很少。经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS),一个保险箱,非侵入性干预调节丘脑-皮层连通性和脑功能,是pDoC的可能治疗选择。我们开发了一项随机对照研究的方案,以评估taVNS对pDoC(TAVREC)患者意识恢复的有效性。
    方法:TAVREC程序是一个多中心,三盲,4周干预后4周随访的随机对照试验.将招募至少116名合格的pDoC患者,并随机接受以下任意一项:(1)常规治疗加taVNS(30s单相平方电流,脉冲宽度为300μs,频率为25Hz,强度为1mA,然后休息30s,60分钟,一天两次,4周);或(2)常规治疗加taVNS安慰剂。TAVREC的主要结果是基于第4周的昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)的意识水平改善率。次要结果是CRS-R总分和子量表得分,格拉斯哥昏迷评分,无响应得分的完整轮廓,心电图参数,脑干听觉诱发电位,上体感诱发电位,来自正电子发射断层扫描/功能MRI的神经成像参数,与意识水平和不良事件相关的血清生物标志物。
    背景:本研究经南京医科大学第一附属医院研究伦理委员会审查批准(参考号:2023-SR-392)。研究结果将在同行评审的期刊上传播,并在相关会议上发表。
    背景:ChiCTR2300073950。
    BACKGROUND: Prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) are a catastrophic condition following brain injury with few therapeutic options. Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS), a safe, non-invasive intervention modulating thalamo-cortical connectivity and brain function, is a possible treatment option of pDoC. We developed a protocol for a randomised controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of taVNS on consciousness recovery in patients with pDoC (TAVREC).
    METHODS: The TAVREC programme is a multicentre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial with 4 weeks intervention followed by 4 weeks follow-up period. A minimum number of 116 eligible pDoC patients will be recruited and randomly receive either: (1) conventional therapy plus taVNS (30 s monophasic square current of pulse width 300 μs, frequency of 25 Hz and intensity of 1 mA followed by 30 s rest, 60 min, two times per day, for 4 weeks); or (2) conventional therapy plus taVNS placebo. Primary outcome of TAVREC is the rate of improved consciousness level based on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) at week 4. Secondary outcomes are CRS-R total and subscale scores, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score, ECG parameters, brainstem auditory evoked potential, upper somatosensory evoked potential, neuroimaging parameters from positron emission tomography/functional MRI, serum biomarkers associated with consciousness level and adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: This study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Reference number: 2023-SR-392). Findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300073950.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下腰痛(LBP)是导致残疾的主要原因。神经动员(NM)作为一种物理治疗技术,提供一定程度的症状改善。然而,一些研究表明,NM可以显着减轻LBP的症状,而其他人则未能找到类似的积极影响。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨NM治疗LBP的有效性。
    方法:在五个数据库中进行了文献检索(MEDLINE,Embase,科克伦图书馆,PubMed,和WebofScience)从成立到2023年12月。研究主要措施评估疼痛,残疾,和直腿抬高角度,以确定患者的改善程度。
    结果:七项随机对照试验纳入分析。结果表明,NM干预在改善LBP患者的视觉模拟量表评分(平均差异=0.62,95%CI(0.03,1.21))和Oswestry残疾指数评分(平均差异=7.54,95%CI(4.98,10.10))方面比对照组更有效。直腿抬高结果没有显着差异(平均差异=0.18,95%CI(-0.08,0.44))。
    结论:NM在改善LBP患者的视觉模拟量表和Oswestry残疾指数结局方面显示出有效性,但是直腿抬高的结果仍然不确定,直到包括更多高质量的研究,NM对SLR的有效性仍然未知。
    BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability. Neuromobilization (NM) as a physical therapy technique, offers some degree of symptom improvement. However, some studies have shown that NM can significantly reduce the symptoms of LBP, while others have failed to find similar positive effects.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of NM for LBP.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their inception to December 2023. Study main measures assessed pain, disability, and straight leg raise angle to determine the degree of improvement in patients.
    RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that NM interventions in patients with LBP were more effective than control groups in improving Visual Analog Scale scores (mean difference = 0.62, 95% CI (0.03, 1.21)) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (mean difference = 7.54, 95% CI (4.98, 10.10)). There was no significant difference in straight leg raise results (mean difference = 0.18, 95% CI (-0.08, 0.44)).
    CONCLUSIONS: NM demonstrated effectiveness in improving Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in patients with LBP, but straight leg raise outcomes are still uncertain and until more high-quality studies are included, the effectiveness of NM for SLR remains unknown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性下腰痛(CLBP)造成相当大的财政和社会负担,对药物和手术治疗反应不佳。或者,传统上,针灸和静脉切除术(Fasd)用于减轻伤害性和肌肉骨骼疼痛。本研究旨在评估针灸和静脉穿刺对CLBP和患者功能的有效性和安全性。
    当前的研究是单盲的,均衡分配的随机临床试验,在物理医学和康复医学系进行,2022年。没有背痛引起的结构性或重大疾病的105名CLBP患者被随机分配到三个平行的手臂中,并接受物理治疗(PTG)。针灸(APG),或手术(VSG)。在研究期间,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估疼痛严重程度和功能方面。将VAS和ODI评分定义为主要结果。
    对95例患者进行了最终分析(PTG=33,APG=30,VSG=31)。人口统计学数据显示组分布相等。统计分析显示,所有程序在第一次会议后立即降低了VAS评分,在最后一次会议之后,在后续行动之后;然而,APG和VSG值均明显降低(P<0.05)。与PTG相比,APG和VSG在随访期间的疼痛减轻结果更可持续(P<0.01)。ODI结果显示,在最后一次治疗后,所有组的总体改善,APG结果更显著(P<0.05)。在后续期间,VSG的ODI仍然趋于下降,APG没有显著增加,PTG显著增加。只有两名患者在接受静脉切除术后报告昏厥。
    考虑到疼痛和功能评分,针刺和开腹都能重现可靠的结果。即使在治疗终止后,针刺和静脉穿刺均对患者的疼痛和日常功能有持续影响。而物理治疗在疼痛和功能限制方面复发更多。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) imposes considerable financial and social burden with poor response to medical and surgical treatments. Alternatively, acupuncture and venesection(Fasd) are traditionally used to alleviate nociceptive and musculoskeletal pains. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of acupuncture and venesection on CLBP and patient functionality.
    UNASSIGNED: The current study was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial with balanced allocation, conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine, in 2022. One hundred five CLBP patients who had no back pain-attributable structural or major diseases were randomly allocated into three parallel arms and received either physical therapy (PTG), acupuncture (APG), or venesection (VSG). Pain severity and functional aspects were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) during the study. VAS and ODI scores were defined as the primary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety-five patients were reviewed in the final analysis (PTG=33, APG=30, VSG=31). Demographic data showed equal group distribution. Statistical analysis showed all procedures had reduced VAS score immediately after the first session, after the last session, and after follow-up; however, APG and VSG values were significantly lower (P<0.05). Pain reduction results in follow-up period were more sustainable in APG and VSG as compared to PTG (P<0.01). ODI results revealed global improvement after the last session of the treatment in all groups, while APG had more significant results (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, ODI still tended to decrease in VSG, non-significantly increased in APG, and significantly increased in PTG. Only two patients reported fainting after receiving venesection.
    UNASSIGNED: Considering the pain and functional scores, both acupuncture and venesection can reproduce reliable results. Acupuncture and venesection both have sustained effects on pain and daily function of the patients even after treatment termination, while physical therapy had more relapse in pain and functional limitations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:姿势控制和平衡等基本身体功能对于保持日常生活至关重要,影响个人的生活质量。舞蹈是一种身体活动,可在各个生命阶段提供健康优势。然而,舞蹈干预对身体机能的影响,姿势控制,老年人的生活质量仍然不足。该综述旨在研究舞蹈干预对中年和老年人身体功能和生活质量的证据强度。
    方法:对四个数据库进行了系统评价(PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和Medline),重点研究涉及超过四周的舞蹈干预。搜索中使用了MeSH术语[舞蹈或舞蹈干预或舞蹈康复或舞蹈运动]和[运动功能或功能能力或姿势控制或功能活动性或活动性或姿势平衡或灵活性或步态]和[幸福感或生活质量或生活满意度]。这篇评论在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42023422857)中注册。使用Cochrane偏差风险评估纳入的研究。
    结果:搜索显示885项研究,16人符合入选标准。比较了各种舞蹈类型对身体机能和生活质量的影响。大多数研究表明,舞蹈干预改善了身体功能,balance,姿势控制和生活质量。与物理治疗相比,舞蹈干预显示出很高的依从性,自我照顾,常规治疗,有氧和阻力运动。
    结论:在改善身体机能和生活质量方面,结构化舞蹈是一种安全和相对有效的替代运动。注意舞蹈干预中动作选择和强度的影响。随着音乐跳舞可能会增加参与者的兴趣,鼓励中老年人进行更多的体育锻炼。
    BACKGROUND: Fundamental physical functions such as postural control and balance are vital in preserving everyday life, affecting an individual\'s quality of life. Dance is a physical activity that offers health advantages across various life stages. Nevertheless, the effects of dance interventions on physical function, postural control, and quality of life among older adults have remained underexplored. The review aimed to examine the strength of evidence for dance interventions on physical function and quality of life among middle-aged and older adults.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline), focusing on studies involving more than four weeks of dance interventions. MeSH terms [dance or dance intervention or dance rehabilitation or dance movement] and [motor function or functional capacity or postural control or functional mobility or mobility or postural balance or balance or flexibility or gait] and [well-being or quality of life or life satisfaction] were utilized in the search. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023422857). Included studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias.
    RESULTS: The search revealed 885 studies, and 16 met the inclusion criteria. The effects of various dance genres on physical functions and quality of life were compared. Most studies showed that dance intervention improved physical function, balance, postural control and quality of life. Dance intervention showed a high level of adherence compared to physiotherapy, self-care, conventional therapy, and aerobic and resistance exercise.
    CONCLUSIONS: In terms of improving physical function and quality of life, structured dance is a safe and relatively effective alternative to exercise. Note the effect of movement selection and intensity in the dance interventions. Dance with music may increase participants\' interest, encouraging more physical activity among middle-aged and older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS),作为一种常见的男性泌尿生殖系统疾病,近年来在物理治疗领域取得了重大进展。具有非侵入性的特点,副作用低,明确的有效性和高患者依从性,物理疗法已逐渐成为治疗CP/CPPS的重要方法之一。在慢性前列腺炎的物理治疗中,常用的方法主要有前列腺按摩,生物反馈,磁疗,超声和冲击波治疗,热疗,针灸和电生理疗法。这些方法最终通过不同的身体效果缓解患者的疼痛和其他不适症状。本文将就物理治疗CP/CPPS的最新研究进展作一综述,分析它们的机理和各自的优缺点,为临床治疗提供参考,并为研究人员提供新的概念和思路。
    Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), as a common male urogenital system disease, has made significant progress in the field of physical therapy in recent years. With the characteristics of non-invasiveness, low side effects, clear effectiveness and high patient compliance, physical therapy has gradually become one of the vital methods for the treatment of CP/CPPS. In the physical therapy of chronic prostatitis, the commonly used methods mainly include prostate massage, biofeedback, magnetic therapy, ultrasound and shock wave therapy, hyperthermia, acupuncture and electrophysiological therapy. These methods ultimately alleviate the patient\'s pain and other discomfort symptoms through different physical effects. This article will summarize the latest research progress of physical therapy for CP/CPPS, analyze their mechanisms and their respective advantages and disadvantages, forthe reference in clinical treatment, and also inorderto provide new concepts and ideas for researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号