Paediatric Surgery

儿科手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发已经蔓延到100多个国家。儿童被批准易受SARS-CoV-2感染。在防控疫情的同时,确保儿科外科临床工作的有序开展已被证明是疫情期间患者和临床医生面临的一大挑战。根据SARS-CoV-2的传播特点和COVID-19的预防和控制要求,作者提出了一些具体措施和切实可行的应急管理策略。有限期限,以及流行期间的择期儿科手术。
    The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread to more than 100 countries. Children approved to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preventing and controlling the epidemic while ensuring orderly flows of pediatric surgery clinical work has proven to be a big challenge for both patients and clinicians during the epidemic. Based on the transmission characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and the requirements for prevention and control of COVID-19, the authors proposed some concrete measures and practical strategies of managing emergency, limited-term, and elective pediatric surgeries during the epidemic period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先天性膈疝(CDH)是一种发育缺陷,可导致腹部器官突出进入胸腔并具有显着的发病率。胸腔镜修复CDH是一种越来越普遍但有争议的手术技术,亚洲地区长期结果数据有限。这项研究的目的是比较亚洲主要的三级转诊中心儿科患者的开腹手术和胸腔镜下CDH修复。
    方法:我们对我院2002年7月至2021年11月间进行开腹手术或胸腔镜下CDH修补术的新生儿患者进行了回顾性分析。人口统计数据,围手术期参数,分析复发率和手术并发症。
    结果:确定了64例患者,左侧CDH54例。33例患者进行了产前诊断,35例患者接受了微创手术修复。开放修复和微创修复的复发率无显著差异(13%vs17%,P=0.713),复发时间(184±449天vs81±383天,P=0.502),或ICU住院时间中位数(11±14天vs13±15天,P=0.343),分别。开放组中7%的新生儿发生胃肠道并发症,胸腔镜组中没有发生胃肠道并发症。中位随访时间为9.5年。
    结论:这项研究是亚洲的一项大型先天性膈疝系列,长期随访显示复发率没有显着差异,开放和微创修复之间的复发时间或ICU住院时间中位数,提示与开放修复相比,胸腔镜入路是一种避免胃肠道并发症的非劣质手术选择。
    方法:
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a developmental defect that causes herniation of abdominal organs into the thoracic cavity with significant morbidity. Thoracoscopic repair of CDH is an increasingly prevalent yet controversial surgical technique, with limited long-term outcome data in the Asian region. The aim of this study was to compare open laparotomy versus thoracoscopic repair of CDH in paediatric patients in a major tertiary referral centre in Asia.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of neonatal patients who had open laparotomy or thoracoscopic repair for CDH in our institution between July 2002 and November 2021. Demographic data, perioperative parameters, recurrence rates and surgical complications were analysed.
    RESULTS: 64 patients were identified, with 54 left sided CDH cases. 33 patients had a prenatal diagnosis and 35 patients received minimally invasive surgical repair. There was no significant difference between open and minimally invasive repair in recurrence rate (13 % vs 17 %, P = 0.713), time to recurrence (184 ± 449 days vs 81 ± 383 days, P = 0.502), or median length of ICU stay (11 ± 14 days vs 13 ± 15 days, P = 0.343), respectively. Gastrointestinal complications occurred in 7 % of neonates in the open group and none in the thoracoscopic group. Median follow-up time was 9.5 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is a large congenital diaphragmatic hernia series in Asia, with long term follow-up demonstrating no significant difference in recurrence rate, time to recurrence or median length of ICU stay between open and minimally invasive repair, suggesting thoracoscopic approach is a non-inferior surgical option with avoidance of gastrointestinal complications compared to open repair.
    METHODS:
    METHODS: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声(US)传统上因其成像能力而被认可,但它在术后伤口管理中作为治疗方式的新兴作用,尤其是在儿科护理中,引起了极大的关注。这项荟萃分析旨在评估US对儿科患者术后伤口愈合和感染率的影响。从最初的1236篇文章中,七个被认为适合列入名单。术后伤口愈合使用红度评估,水肿,瘀斑,放电,和近似(REEDA)量表。值得注意的是,US治疗组和对照组的伤口愈合方式存在显着差异(I2=94%,标准化平均差[SMD]:-4.60,95%置信区间[CI]:-6.32至-2.88,p<0.01),如图4所示。此外,观察到两组之间伤口感染率存在显着差异(I2=93%,SMD:-5.86,95%CIs:-9.04至-2.68,p<0.01),如图5所示。研究结果强调了US在儿科手术环境中增强术后伤口愈合和降低感染率的潜在益处。然而,美国的申请应该是明智的,考虑个体患者需求和临床环境的细微差别。
    Ultrasound (US) has traditionally been recognised for its imaging capabilities, but its emerging role as a therapeutic modality in postoperative wound management, especially in paediatric care, has garnered significant attention. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of US on postoperative wound healing and infection rates in paediatric patients. From an initial pool of 1236 articles, seven were deemed suitable for inclusion. Postoperative wound healing was assessed using the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scale. Notably, there was a significant difference in wound healing patterns between the US-treated and control groups (I2 = 94%, standardized mean difference [SMD]: -4.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: -6.32 to -2.88, p < 0.01), as illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, a marked difference in wound infection rates was observed between the groups (I2 = 93%, SMD: -5.86, 95% CIs: -9.04 to -2.68, p < 0.01), as portrayed in Figure 5. The findings underscore the potential benefits of US in enhancing postoperative wound healing and reducing infection rates in paediatric surgical settings. However, the application of US should be judicious, considering the nuances of individual patient needs and clinical contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜脾切除术(LS),良性和恶性脾疾病的治疗方法,在脾肿大患者中可以证明在技术上具有挑战性。特别是,治疗儿童巨大脾肿大的最佳手术方式仍存在争议。
    方法:回顾性分析289例因脾肿大而行脾切除术的患儿的临床病理资料。因此,将患者分为LS手术组和开腹脾切除术(OS)手术组.在腹腔镜队列中,根据手术方法将其分为两个亚组:多切口腹腔镜脾切除术(MILS)和单切口腹腔镜脾切除术(SILS)手术组,分别。患者人口统计学,临床资料,手术,并发症,并对术后恢复情况进行分析。同时,我们使用单变量和多变量logistic回归比较了腹腔镜脾切除术不良结局的风险.
    结果:与LS组相比,OS组的总手术时间明显缩短(149.87±61.44比188.20±52.51分钟,P<0.001)。相对于操作系统组,LS组术后疼痛评分降低,肠道恢复时间,术后住院时间(P<0.001)。术后并发症和死亡率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,SILS手术组的手术时间明显长于MILS手术组(200±46.11比171.39±40.30分钟,P=0.02)。同时,MILS和SILS的手术持续时间与脾长度呈显著正相关。此外,SILS的手术时间与年龄呈显著正相关,体重,和患病儿童的身高。脾长度被证明是不良结局的独立危险因素(P<0.001,OR1.378)。
    结论:对于脾肿大的儿科患者,可以耐受长时间的麻醉和手术操作,LS手术证明了最佳治疗方案。SILS仍然是一种新颖的手术疗法,可以被认为是治疗大量脾肿大的替代手术方法。
    Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), a treatment for both benign and malignant splenic diseases, can prove technically challenging in patients with massive splenomegaly. In particular, the optimal surgical modality for treating massive splenomegaly in children remains controversial.
    The clinicopathologic data of 289 pediatric patients undergoing splenectomy for massive splenomegaly were studied in a retrospective analysis. Accordingly, the patients were classified into the LS surgery group and open splenectomy (OS) surgery group. In the laparoscopy cohort, they were separated into two subgroups according to the method of surgery: the multi-incision laparoscopic splenectomy (MILS) and the single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy (SILS) surgery groups, respectively. Patient demographics, clinical data, surgery, complications, and postoperative recovery underwent analysis. Concurrently, we compared the risk of adverse laparoscopic splenectomy outcomes utilizing univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
    The total operation time proved remarkably shorter in the OS group in contrast to the LS group (149.87 ± 61.44 versus 188.20 ± 52.51 min, P < 0.001). Relative to the OS group, the LS group exhibited lowered postoperative pain scores, bowel recovery time, and postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.001). No remarkable difference existed in post-operation complications or mortality (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the operation duration was remarkably longer in the SILS surgery group than in the MILS surgery group (200 ± 46.11 versus 171.39 ± 40.30 min, P = 0.02). Meanwhile, the operative duration of MILS and SILS displayed a remarkable positive association with splenic length. Moreover, the operative duration of SILS displayed a remarkable positive association with the age, weight, and height of the sick children. Splenic length proved an independent risk factor of adverse outcomes (P < 0.001, OR 1.378).
    For pediatric patients with massive splenomegaly who can tolerate prolonged anesthesia and operative procedures, LS surgery proves the optimal treatment regimen. SILS remains a novel surgery therapy which may be deemed a substitutional surgery approach for treating massive splenomegaly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨眼内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)药物对早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)患儿屈光状态的影响。
    接受抗VEGF药物的ROP婴儿屈光状态的系统评价和荟萃分析。
    PubMed,截至2020年6月,搜索了WebofScience和Embase数据库以及ClinicalTrials.gov网站。
    我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究,比较了抗VEGF药物和激光治疗的屈光不正。
    数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两名独立审阅者进行。我们使用随机效应模型来汇集结果。结果测量是球形当量,轴向长度(AL),前房深度(ACD)和晶状体厚度(LT)。
    对涉及1850只眼的13项研究进行了评估:抗VEGF药物组914项,和936在对照(激光)组中。接受抗VEGF药物治疗的儿童近视程度低于接受激光治疗的儿童(平均差异=1.80D,95%CI0.97~2.63,p<0.0001,I2=78%)。AL,ACD和LT两组间差异无统计学意义。目前的证据表明,抗VEGF药物治疗ROP患儿的屈光安全性优于激光治疗。
    该荟萃分析表明,与激光治疗相比,抗VEGF药物治疗导致近视减少。然而,发表的关于ROP屈光不正的文章相对较少,因此,未来需要高质量和强大的RCT。
    CRD42020160673。
    To determine the effects of the intraocular injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs on the refractive status of infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive status of infants with ROP who receive anti-VEGF drugs.
    The PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were searched up to June 2020.
    We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared refractive errors between anti-VEGF drug and laser therapies.
    Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were conducted by two independent reviewers. We used a random-effect model to pool outcomes. The outcome measures were the spherical equivalents, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT).
    Thirteen studies involving 1850 eyes were assessed: 914 in the anti-VEGF drug group, and 936 in the control (laser) group. Children who received anti-VEGF drug treatment had less myopia than those who received laser therapy (mean difference=1.80 D, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.63, p<0.0001, I2=78%). The AL, ACD and LT did not reach statistical significance difference between the two groups. The current evidence indicates that the refractive safety in children with ROP is better for anti-VEGF drug treatment than for laser therapy.
    This meta-analysis indicates that anti-VEGF drug therapy results in less myopia compared with laser therapy. However, there are relatively few published articles on refractive errors in ROP, and so high-quality and powerful RCTs are needed in the future.
    CRD42020160673.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将内在手术风险纳入儿科术前风险预测评分(PRPS)模型,构建更全面的风险评分系统(改良PRPS),提高儿科患者术后重症监护病房(ICU)入院的预测准确性。
    这是一项于2016年1月1日至12月30日进行的回顾性研究。年龄数据,美国麻醉学学会身体状况(ASA-PS),氧饱和度,早产,非禁食状态,收集手术的严重程度和手术后立即转移到ICU.在推导队列中通过逻辑回归开发了改良的PRPS;通过Hosmer-Lemeshow检验对其进行了测试并与儿科PRPS和ASA-PS进行了比较,验证队列中的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和Kappa分析。
    中国以医院为基础的研究。
    包括在全身麻醉下接受手术的儿科患者(≤14岁),而因手术并发症需要再次手术或术前留在ICU的患者被排除在外.
    ICU入院率,定义为任何患者在手术后立即从手术室直接处置到ICU。
    本研究共纳入9261名儿科患者,418名患者入住ICU。在验证队列中,改进的PRPS模型与测试数据拟合良好(风险拟合优度χ2=6.84,p=0.077)。改良PRPS的ROC曲线下面积,儿科PRPS和ASA-PS分别为0.963、0.941和0.870(p<0.05),Kappa值分别为0.620、0.286和0.267。队列中的分析表明,改良的PRPS优于儿科PRPS和ASA-PS。
    整合内在手术风险的改良PRPS比以前的PRPS显示出更好的预测准确性。
    To integrate intrinsic surgical risk into the paediatric preoperative risk prediction score (PRPS) model to construct a more comprehensive risk scoring system (modified PRPS) and improve the prediction accuracy of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission in paediatric patients.
    This was a retrospective study conducted between 1 January and 30 December 2016. Data on age, American Society of Anaesthesiology physical status (ASA-PS), oxygen saturation, prematurity, non-fasted status, severity of surgery and immediate transfer to the ICU after surgery were collected. The modified PRPS was developed by logistic regression in the derivation cohort; it was tested and compared with the paediatric PRPS and ASA-PS by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kappa analysis in the validation cohort.
    Hospital-based study in China.
    Paediatric patients (≤14 years) who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia were included, and those who needed reoperation due to surgical complications or stayed in the ICU preoperatively were excluded.
    ICU admission rate, defined as any patients\' direct disposition from the operating room to the ICU immediately after the surgery.
    A total of 9261 paediatric patients were included in this study, with 418 patients admitted to the ICU. In the validation cohort, the modified PRPS model fit the test data well (deciles of risk goodness-of-fit χ2=6.84, p=0.077). The area under the ROC curve of the modified PRPS, paediatric PRPS and ASA-PS were 0.963, 0.941 and 0.870, respectively (p<0.05), and the Kappa values were 0.620, 0.286 and 0.267. Analyses in the cohort indicated that the modified PRPS was superior to the paediatric PRPS and ASA-PS.
    The modified PRPS integrating intrinsic surgical risk shows better prediction accuracy than the previous PRPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines integrate evidence-based practices into multimodal care pathways designed to optimise patient recovery following surgery. The objective of this project is to create an ERAS protocol for neonatal abdominal surgery. The protocol will identify and attempt to bridge the gaps between current practices and best evidence. Our study is the first paediatric ERAS protocol endorsed by the International ERAS Society.
    A research team consisting of international clinical and family stakeholders as well as methodological experts have iteratively defined the scope of the protocol in addition to individual topic areas. A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus. The second phase will include a series of knowledge syntheses involving a rapid review coupled with expert opinion. Potential protocol elements supported by synthesised evidence will be identified. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system will be used to determine strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. The third phase will involve creation of the protocol using a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Group consensus will be used to rate each element in relation to the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation and the appropriateness for guideline inclusion. This protocol will form the basis of a future implementation study.
    This study has been registered with the ERAS Society. Human ethics approval (REB 18-0579) is in place to engage patient families within protocol development. This research is to be published in peer-reviewed journals and will form the care standard for neonatal intestinal surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号