BACKGROUND: Transitioning patients from their paediatric centres to adulthood is an important subject for many of these patients living with different chronic pathologies. There are few studies that assess its effectiveness in paediatric surgical pathologies. The overall objective of this scoping review is to assess the extent of the literature describing transitional programmes dedicated to young patients living with surgical conditions. The primary question will look to assess what transitional programmes are available for young patients living with surgical conditions either operated or not.
METHODS: The proposed scoping review will follow guidelines described by the Joanna Briggs Institute manual described by Peters et al in 2020. This protocol will employ the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist. The concept that will be included in this review is the exposure of these patients to a transition of care pathway or care programmes. Patients between the ages of 16 and 30 with a surgical condition will be included. There will be no comparator. No specific outcomes will be assessed, however, the outcomes that will be found from the transition programmes will be reviewed. A knowledge synthesis librarian will search MEDLINE All (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate) and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost). The literature search will be limited to 2000 onwards publications. No language or age group limitation will be applied. The reference list of all included sources of evidence will be screened for additional studies. Screening of search results and data extraction from included studies will be completed in Covidence by two independent reviewers. We will also use the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations) framework to report and summarise the results.
BACKGROUND: This review does not require ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy includes peer review publication, conference presentation, co-constructed guidelines with stakeholders and policymakers.
BACKGROUND: This review is registered on OSF.

Atypical facial clefts are rare anomalies that occur due to the failure of embryonic fusion of the branchial arches. The midline mandibular cleft or Tessier 30 cleft is one such rare anomaly. Such anomalies are diagnosed at birth and treated within a few months of age by establishing soft tissue and bony continuity, followed by orthognathic treatment in adulthood. It is very rare for such clefts to go untreated until adulthood. We present one such case report and our technique of management in a patient who presented to us at 25 years of age with a lower lip and mandible cleft with ankyloglossia, which was managed with a single-staged reconstruction.

This review explores the significant advancements in paediatric surgery in Africa during the twenty-first century, with a particular focus on capacity-building, education, infrastructural development, and research. Historically, paediatric surgery has been an overlooked sector, especially in low-and-middle-income countries in Africa. However, recent years have seen considerable progress. Collaborative efforts such as the Global Initiative for Children\'s Surgery, and the formation of the Pan African Paediatric Surgery Association, the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa and the West African College of Surgeons have facilitated knowledge sharing, collaboration, and advocacy for enhancing surgical standards. Local training programmes, including Master of Medicine programmes and fellowships, have been instrumental in building a skilled workforce. These initiatives have been complemented by infrastructural developments through non-governmental organisations like Kids Operating Room, which have expanded access to paediatric surgical care. Technological advancements, particularly in telemedicine, have further enhanced accessibility. Task-sharing strategies, where non-specialist physicians are trained in paediatric surgical skills, have also been utilised to address the shortage of specialised surgeons. Research in paediatric surgery has experienced an upswing, with local health professionals taking the lead. Research has been crucial for understanding the epidemiology of paediatric surgical conditions, and developing prevention strategies, and is increasingly leading to the inclusion of paediatric surgery in national health plans. Despite the progress, challenges remain, including the need for sustainable funding, continued investment in infrastructure, and training and retention of healthcare professionals. The review emphasises the importance of ongoing efforts in community engagement, innovative technologies, and health systems strengthening for the sustainable development of paediatric surgical services in Africa.

BACKGROUND: The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for paediatric surgery has been on the rise since the early 2000s and is complicated by factors unique to paediatric surgery. The rise of robotic surgery has presented an opportunity in MIS for children, and recent developments in the reductions in port sizes and single-port surgery offer promising prospects. This study aimed to present a systematic overview and analysis of the existing literature around the use of robotic platforms in the treatment of paediatric gastrointestinal diseases.
METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA Statement, a systematic review on paediatric robotic gastrointestinal surgery was conducted on Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scopus. A critical appraisal of the study was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included, of which seven were on Hirschsprung\'s disease and eight on other indications. Included studies were heterogeneous in their populations, age, and sex, but all reported low incidences of intraoperative complications and conversions in their robotic cohorts. Only one study reported on a comparator cohort, with a longer operative time in the robotic cohort (180 vs. 152 and 156 min, p < 0.001), but no significant differences in blood loss, length of stay, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, or conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery may play a role in the treatment of paediatric gastrointestinal diseases. There is limited data available on modern robotic platforms and almost no comparative data between any robotic platforms and conventional minimally invasive approaches. Further technological developments and research are needed to enhance our understanding of the potential that robotics may hold for the field of paediatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a developmental defect that causes herniation of abdominal organs into the thoracic cavity with significant morbidity. Thoracoscopic repair of CDH is an increasingly prevalent yet controversial surgical technique, with limited long-term outcome data in the Asian region. The aim of this study was to compare open laparotomy versus thoracoscopic repair of CDH in paediatric patients in a major tertiary referral centre in Asia.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of neonatal patients who had open laparotomy or thoracoscopic repair for CDH in our institution between July 2002 and November 2021. Demographic data, perioperative parameters, recurrence rates and surgical complications were analysed.
RESULTS: 64 patients were identified, with 54 left sided CDH cases. 33 patients had a prenatal diagnosis and 35 patients received minimally invasive surgical repair. There was no significant difference between open and minimally invasive repair in recurrence rate (13 % vs 17 %, P = 0.713), time to recurrence (184 ± 449 days vs 81 ± 383 days, P = 0.502), or median length of ICU stay (11 ± 14 days vs 13 ± 15 days, P = 0.343), respectively. Gastrointestinal complications occurred in 7 % of neonates in the open group and none in the thoracoscopic group. Median follow-up time was 9.5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is a large congenital diaphragmatic hernia series in Asia, with long term follow-up demonstrating no significant difference in recurrence rate, time to recurrence or median length of ICU stay between open and minimally invasive repair, suggesting thoracoscopic approach is a non-inferior surgical option with avoidance of gastrointestinal complications compared to open repair.
METHODS:
METHODS: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Children born in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have an 85 % risk of requiring surgical care by the age of 15 [1,2]. Yet, children\'s surgery has been largely neglected by global health policies. National Surgical Obstetric and Anaesthetic Plans\' (NSOAPs) reflect countries\' strategic health priorities, policies, and targets related to surgical care. This study assessed the prioritisation of children\'s surgical care in national surgical care policies in SSA.
METHODS: This systematic review of national surgical care policies in SSA conducted in December 2022, analysed NSOAPs developed in SSA electronically for search terms \"child∗\", \"pediatric∗\", \"paediatric∗\" and evaluated manually for children\'s surgical care in relation to the NSOAP domains, health system building blocks, and surgical care. Policies were evaluated for collaboration.
RESULTS: Eight policies met the inclusion criteria. In the 797 (M = 99.63; SD = 34.83) text-containing pages analysed, there were 258 (15.5; 0-164) mentions of children\'s surgery search terms. Twenty-five percent (n = 2) of the NSOAPs dedicated sections to children\'s surgical care, 62.5 % (n = 5) mentioned children\'s surgery, and 12.5 % (n = 1) did not mention children\'s surgery. Children\'s surgery received citations in 25 % (n = 2) of backgrounds, 37.5 % (n = 3) of situational analyses, 87.5 % (n = 7) of strategic frameworks, 37.5 % (n = 3) of monitoring and evaluation, and 25 % (n = 2) of the costing sections. Overall, 62.5 % (n = 5) of countries included a children\'s surgery stakeholder.
CONCLUSIONS: NSOAPs are a pragmatic measure of national surgical care priorities. Our findings suggest children\'s surgery is not widely recognised even where commitments to improving surgical care exist. Greater prioritisation of children\'s surgery is needed in surgical policy development.

In children, open inguinal hernia repair has been the gold standard for treatment, but with recent technical advancements in laparoscopy, laparoscopic hernia repair is gaining popularity. Despite available results from comparative studies, there is still no consensus regarding the superiority of open versus laparoscopic treatment strategy. An important reason for lack of consensus is the large heterogeneity in the trials\' reported outcomes and outcome definitions, which limits comparisons between studies and precludes conclusions regarding the superiority of treatment strategies. The development and implementation of a core outcome set (COS) is a solution for this heterogeneity in the selection, measurement and reporting of trial outcome measures across studies. Currently, there is no COS for the treatment of paediatric inguinal hernia.
The aim of this project is to reach international consensus on a minimal set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all future clinical trials investigating inguinal hernia repair in children. The development process comprises three phases. First, we identify outcome domains associated with paediatric inguinal hernia repair from a patient perspective and through a systematic review of the literature using EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases. Second, we conduct a three-step Delphi study to identify and prioritise \'core\' outcomes for the eventual minimal set. In the third phase, an expert meeting is held to establish the final COS and develop implementation strategies with participants from all stakeholder groups: healthcare professionals, parents and patients\' representatives. The final COS will be reported in accordance with the COS-Standards for Reporting statement.
The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam UMC confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and that full approval by the committee is not required. Electronic informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed academic journals and at relevant conferences.
CRD42021281422.

Ultrasound (US) has traditionally been recognised for its imaging capabilities, but its emerging role as a therapeutic modality in postoperative wound management, especially in paediatric care, has garnered significant attention. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of US on postoperative wound healing and infection rates in paediatric patients. From an initial pool of 1236 articles, seven were deemed suitable for inclusion. Postoperative wound healing was assessed using the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scale. Notably, there was a significant difference in wound healing patterns between the US-treated and control groups (I2 = 94%, standardized mean difference [SMD]: -4.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: -6.32 to -2.88, p < 0.01), as illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, a marked difference in wound infection rates was observed between the groups (I2 = 93%, SMD: -5.86, 95% CIs: -9.04 to -2.68, p < 0.01), as portrayed in Figure 5. The findings underscore the potential benefits of US in enhancing postoperative wound healing and reducing infection rates in paediatric surgical settings. However, the application of US should be judicious, considering the nuances of individual patient needs and clinical contexts.

Review of age of onset of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) in very preterm (≤32 weeks) and/or very low birthweight (VLBW, ≤1500 g) infants.
Preregistered review undertaken according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in July 2021 and updated October 2021.
MEDLINE/ PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Eligible studies reported age of onset of NEC and/or FIP in randomised controlled trials of >200 or observational studies of >500 infants.
Titles/abstracts were screened; eligible articles underwent data extraction. Age of onset as day of life (DOL) and/or corrected gestational age (CGA) were extracted alongside study information, such as NEC definition, included population, intervention, location and dates studied. Weighted means were used to compare onset by birth gestation, study type, NEC definition, trial intervention, location and dates studied. Comparison was done by Mann-Whitney U test or one-way analysis of variance.
Of the 747 screened studies 188 were eligible. Removal of duplicates, studies without onset data and ineligible populations left 10 RCTs and 14 observational studies contributing 51 NEC cohorts; 49 reported onset DOL and 14 CGA. 2984 cases of NEC had average DOL onset of 16.7 (15.5 in RCTs, 16.9 in observational studies), and CGA onset of 30.1 weeks. Gestation did not impact DOL onset. No other demographic feature impacted NEC onset. Few studies included data on FIP.
Average onset of NEC in exclusively very preterm/very low birthweight infants is in the third week of life and unlike in cohorts including more mature or heavier infants is not impacted by birth gestation.

Children undergoing appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis are at an increased risk of post-operative morbidity. Placement of an intra-peritoneal drain to prevent post-operative complications is controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic drain placement to prevent complications in children with complicated appendicitis. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 2022 for studies directly comparing drain placement to no drain placement in children ≤ 18 years of age undergoing operative treatment of complicated appendicitis. A total of 5108 children with complicated appendicitis were included from 16 studies; 2231 (44%) received a drain. Placement of a drain associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-peritoneal abscess formation (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.24, p = 0.004) but there was no significant difference in wound infection rate (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.74-2.88, p = 0.28). Length of stay was significantly longer in the drain group (mean difference 2.02 days, 95% CI 1.14-2.90, p < 0.001). Although the quality and certainty of the available evidence is low, prophylactic drain placement does not prevent intra-peritoneal abscess following appendicectomy in children with complicated appendicitis.