Oligometastasis

寡转移
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大量诊断为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的个体有远处转移,寡转移非小细胞肺癌的概念在实现治愈方面显示出了希望。立体定向身体放射疗法(SBRT)目前被认为是有限数量的肿瘤转移的可行治疗选择。已经证明第三代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)可有效延长表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的NSCLC患者的生存期。因此,SBRT与第三代TKIs的组合具有增强寡转移EGFR突变NSCLC患者治疗疗效的潜力.这篇综述旨在评估SBRT与TKIs联合作为寡转移EGFR突变NSCLC患者最佳治疗选择的可能性。
    我们通过搜索PubMed进行了叙述性审查,WebofScience,Elsevier和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库收集了2009年1月至2024年2月以英语发表的文章,并回顾了关键参考文献的参考书目,以确定与将SBRT与第三代TKIs结合在寡转移EGFR突变的NSCLC中的重要文献。
    这篇综述旨在评估SBRT和EGFR-TKIs联合治疗寡转移EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌的可行性。目前的临床试验表明,当使用SBRT与EGFR-TKIs同时或与EGFR-TKIs合并时,联合疗法具有更好的无进展生存期(PFS)。此外,第三代EGFR-TKIs和SBRT联合治疗的研究表明,与之前的治疗相比,毒性水平可耐受,且无明显的额外不良反应.然而,需要进一步的临床试验来确定其有效性。
    SBRT和TKIs的联合方法可以有效阻止EGFR突变患者的寡转移NSCLC的进展,最值得注意的是,可以延长无进展生存率。然而,在临床试验中结合使用SBRT和第三代TKIs的可行性尚不清楚.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant number of individuals diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases, and the concept of oligometastatic NSCLC has shown promise in achieving a cure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently considered a viable treatment option for a limited number of tumor metastases. It has also been demonstrated that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in extending the survival of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC. Hence, the combination of SBRT with third-generation TKIs holds the potential to enhance treatment efficacy in patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This review aimed to assess the possibility of combining SBRT with TKIs as an optimum treatment option for patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a narrative review by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for articles published in the English language from January 2009 to February 2024 and by reviewing the bibliographies of key references to identify important literature related to combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: This review aimed to assess the viability of combining SBRT and EGFR-TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Current clinical trials suggest that the combined therapies have better progression free survival (PFS) when using SBRT as either concurrent with EGFR-TKIs or consolidated with EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, research with third-generation EGFR-TKIs and SBRT combinations has demonstrated tolerable toxicity levels without significant additional adverse effects as compared to prior therapies. However, further clinical trials are required to establish its effectiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: The combined approach of SBRT and TKIs can effectively impede the progression of oligometastatic NSCLC in patients harboring EGFR mutations and, most notably, can prolong progression-free survival rates. However, the feasibility of combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in clinical trials remains unclear.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠癌(CRC)肺寡转移的治疗仍然具有挑战性。这项回顾性研究旨在比较局部肿瘤控制,接受低剂量立体定向近距离放射治疗(L-SABT)与经皮微波消融(MWA)治疗肺寡转移的CRC患者的生存率和手术相关并发症。
    方法:对2017年11月至2020年12月的患者进行回顾性分析。在整个队列中分析局部肿瘤无进展生存期(LTPFS)和总生存期(OS),并基于肿瘤周围的最小消融边缘(MAM)进行分层分析。
    结果:最终分析包括122例患者:近距离放射治疗组和MWA组74例和48例,分别,中位随访时间为30.5个月和35.3个月。近距离放射治疗组的1年和3年LTPFS率为54.1%和40.5%,而MWA组为58.3%和41.7%(分别为P=0.524和0.889)。1年和3年OS率分别为75.7%和48.6%,分别为75.0%和50.0%(P=0.775和0.918)。在MAM为5-10mm和>10mm的患者之间,LTPFS和OS都没有显着差异。肺部并发症发生率在总体分析中没有差异,但在仅包括距关键结构10mm以内的病变患者的亚组分析中,MWA组明显更高(P=0.005)。增加的并发症主要是支气管胸膜瘘。
    结论:考虑到与L-SABT中放射性同位素使用相关的警告,MWA通常是优选的。在距关键肺结构10毫米以内的患者中,然而,由于支气管胸膜瘘的风险较低,L-SABT可被视为替代方案。
    BACKGROUND: The treatment for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This retrospective study aimed to compare the local tumor control, survival and procedure-related complications in CRC patients undergoing low-dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) versus percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for lung oligometastasis.
    METHODS: Patients between November 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in the entire cohort as well as by stratified analysis based on the minimal ablation margin (MAM) around the tumor.
    RESULTS: The final analysis included 122 patients: 74 and 48 in the brachytherapy and MWA groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 30.5 and 35.3 months. The 1- and 3-year LTPFS rate was 54.1% and 40.5% in the brachytherapy group versus 58.3% and 41.7% in the MWA group (P = 0.524 and 0.889, respectively). The 1- and 3-year OS rate was 75.7% and 48.6% versus 75.0% and 50.0% (P = 0.775 and 0.918, respectively). Neither LTPFS nor OS differed significantly between the patients with MAM of 5-10 mm versus > 10 mm. Pulmonary complication rate did not differ in the overall analysis, but was significantly higher in the MWA group in the subgroup analysis that only included patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key structures (P = 0.005). The increased complications was primarily bronchopleural fistula.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering the caveats associated with radioisotope use in L-SABT, MWA is generally preferable. In patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key pulmonary structures, however, L-SABT could be considered as an alternative due to lower risk of bronchopleural fistula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: In the realm of cancer studies,the differences among the biological behavior of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa), localized prostate cancer (LPCa), and widely prostate cancer (WPCa) are still unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the clinical and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters of tumor burden in OPCa. In addition, the correlation between clinical and IVIM parameters and the prostate-specific antigen nadir (PSAN) and time to nadir (TTN) during initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in OPCa was explored. It was found that the IVIM parameters could effectively differentiate LPCa and WPCa, as well as LPCa and OPC. Moreover, Gleason score (GS) was positively correlated with PSAN, while prostate volume was positively correlated with TTN.
    METHODS: About 54 patients were included in this retrospective study (mean age=74±7.4 years). ADC, D, D*, and f were acquired according to the biexponential Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) model. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the differences in clinical and IVIM parameters among the three groups. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination abilities. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test. Furthermore, Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between clinical and IVIM parameters of PSAN and TTN during initial ADT with OPCa.
    RESULTS: There were significant differences among the three groups observed for age, PSA, GS, ADC, D and D* values (P<0.05). Multi-parameter pairwise comparison results showed that significant differences between LPCa and WPCa were observed for the age, PSA, GS, ADC, D and D* values (P<0.05). However, D* was different between the LPCa and OPCa groups (P=0.032). GS showed a significant positive correlation with PSAN (Rho=0.594, P=0.042), and prostate volume showed a significant positive correlation with TTN (Rho=0.777, P=0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: The IVIM parameters can effectively differentiate LPCa and WPCa, as well as LPCa and OPCa. Moreover, there was a certain trend in their distribution, which could reflect the tumor burden of PCa.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    目的:复发性/转移性鼻咽癌(R/MNPC)的初始治疗通常涉及吉西他滨加顺铂,有或没有PD-1抑制剂。然而,PD-1抑制剂的有效性各不相同,促使更好的治疗。本研究探讨PD-1抑制剂联合放化疗治疗寡转移鼻咽癌患者的疗效和安全性。
    方法:低转移性鼻咽癌患者接受PD-1抑制剂和化疗的根治性治疗,然后是PD-1抑制剂和放化疗,然后维持PD-1抑制剂。通过irRECIST-1.1计算客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR),并使用CTCAE-4.0评估毒性。
    结果:该研究纳入了47名患者,中位年龄为46岁。中位随访时间为16.5个月,转移性病变接受45Gy的中位放射剂量。PD-1抑制剂和化疗的中位疗程分别为9.5和5。转移部位包括肺(40.8%),肝脏(21.1%),纵隔淋巴结(7.9%),腹部淋巴结(3.9%),骨(21.1%),肾上腺(3.9%),和大脑(1.3%)。放疗后3个月ORR和DCR分别为85.1%和100%。中位生存期尚未达到,1年和2年OS率分别为93.1%和78.4%。中位PFS为18个月,1年和2年PFS率分别为70.2%和47.7%。PD-L1表达与PFS呈正相关。25例患者出现3级或4级不良事件(AE),可能与化疗有关。没有观察到5级AE。
    结论:PD-1抑制剂和放化疗的协同作用对寡转移NPC患者具有良好的疗效和可接受的毒性。
    OBJECTIVE: Initial treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (R/M NPC) often involves Gemcitabine plus cisplatin with or without PD-1 inhibitors. However, PD-1 inhibitors\' effectiveness varies, prompting for better treatments. This study explores effect and safety of combining PD-1 inhibitors with chemoradiotherapy for oligometastatic NPC patients.
    METHODS: Oligometastatic NPC patients underwent radical treatment with PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, followed by concurrent PD-1 inhibitors and chemoradiotherapy, and then maintenance PD-1 inhibitors. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated by irRECIST-1.1, and CTCAE-4.0 was used to evaluate the toxicity.
    RESULTS: The study enrolled 47 patients with a median age of 46. The median follow-up lasted 16.5 months, with metastatic lesions receiving a median radiation dose of 45 Gy. The median courses of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy were 9.5 and 5 respectively. The metastasis sites included lung (40.8 %), liver (21.1 %), mediastinal lymph node (7.9 %), abdominal lymph nodes (3.9 %), bone (21.1 %), adrenal gland (3.9 %), and brain (1.3 %). ORR and DCR were 85.1 % and 100 % at 3 months after radiotherapy. The median survival was not reached yet, and 1 and 2-year OS rates were 93.1 % and 78.4 %. The median PFS was 18 months, with 1 and 2-year PFS rates of 70.2 % and 47.7 % respectively. PD-L1 expression showed a positive correlation for PFS. Twenty-five patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) that were possibly related to chemotherapy. No grade 5 AE was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The synergy of concurrent PD-1 inhibitors and chemoradiotherapy shows promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity for oligometastasis NPC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    本文介绍了一个多学科团队(MDT)讨论和综合治疗一例晚期胃癌的过程,该胃癌的程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)检测呈阳性。在诊断过程中,患者表现为晚期胃癌和小网膜淋巴结中许多不可切除的转移,双肺,肝脏,和左侧顶叶枕叶。为肿瘤科安排了一次会议,胃肠手术,放射治疗,成像,和病理学来讨论这个案子。最初,患者对一线治疗有部分反应,这是pembrolizumab和化疗的组合。然而,十九个月后,患者出现左额叶异时孤立性病变。肿瘤科双方达成协议后,脑部手术,胃肠手术,放射治疗,成像,还有病理科,颅内病变行切除。在此之后,手术辅以立体定向放射治疗(SRT)和全脑放射治疗(WBRT).病人在手术后表现出极好的康复迹象,经过16个月的随访,她的一般状况仍然良好。尽管如此,晚期胃癌患者的前景仍然令人沮丧.通过多学科团队(MDT)讨论,诊断为晚期胃癌的患者可以接受规范化的诊断和治疗方法,制定合理、个性化的综合治疗方案。这样的计划有助于提高患者的生活质量,有效延长患者的生存时间。
    This article describes the process of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion and comprehensive treatment of a case of advanced gastric cancer that tested positive for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). During diagnosis, the patient presented with advanced gastric cancer and numerous unresectable metastases in the lesser omental lymph nodes, both lungs, liver, and left parietal occipital lobe. A meeting was arranged for the departments of oncology, gastrointestinal surgery, radiotherapy, imaging, and pathology to discuss the case. Initially, the patient had a partial response to the first-line treatment, which was a combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. However, after nineteen months, the patient presented with a metachronous isolated lesion in the left frontal lobe. After mutual agreement among the oncology, brain surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, radiotherapy, imaging, and pathology departments, the intracranial lesion underwent resection. Following this, the operation was supplemented by stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The patient showed excellent signs of recovery after the operation, and her general condition remained favorable after 16 months of follow-up. Nonetheless, the outlook for patients facing advanced-stage gastric cancer remains distressing. Through multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions, patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer can receive standardized diagnostic and treatment approaches to develop reasonable and personalized comprehensive treatment plans. Such plans help to improve the quality of life of patients and effectively prolong their survival time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对侧腋窝淋巴结转移(CAM)很少见。CAM是否应被视为区域性或远处转移性疾病仍存在争议。我们的研究旨在探讨CAM的准确临床定位和管理。
    方法:2000年至2014年诊断为乳腺癌并确认发展为CAM的两百九十九名女性患者,这项研究包括复旦大学上海癌症中心(FUSCC)的寡转移(OM)或局部复发(LRR)。分析并比较三组的基线信息和生存结果。
    结果:CAM患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)与OM患者相似,但比LRR差(HR:0.47[95%CI:0.27-0.85],p=0.0097;HR:0.39[95%CI:0.24-0.63],p分别<0.0001)。考虑到出现CAM或OM的患者作为一个整体,我们发现,局部治疗联合全身治疗的生存获益并不优于单纯全身治疗.
    结论:CAM类似于寡转移样疾病,患有这些疾病的患者可能会从全身治疗中受益。添加局部处理未能显著改善OS。
    BACKGROUND: Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (CAM) is rare. It remains controversial whether CAM should be regarded as a regional or distant metastatic disease. Our study aims to investigate the accurate clinical orientation and management of CAM.
    METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-nine female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2000 to 2014 and confirmed to develop CAM, oligometastasis (OM) or locoregional recurrence (LRR) at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) were included in this study. Baseline information and survival outcomes were analyzed and compared among the three groups.
    RESULTS: Patients with CAM exhibited similar overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to those with OM, but worse than those with LRR (HR: 0.47 [95 % CI: 0.27-0.85], p = 0.0097; HR:0.39 [95 % CI: 0.24-0.63], p < 0.0001, respectively). Considering the patients presented with CAM or OM as a whole, we found that local treatment combined with systemic treatment did not provide a superior survival benefit over systemic treatment alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: CAM was similar to an oligometastatic-like disease, and patients with these diseases may benefit from systemic treatment. Adding local treatment failed to significantly improve OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种典型的难治性恶性肿瘤。许多患者在诊断时就有远处器官转移,如肝转移和腹膜播散。不可切除的PDAC伴远处器官转移(UR-M)的标准治疗方法是化疗,但预后仍然很差。然而,随着最近化疗的戏剧性发展,预后逐渐好转,一些患者的转移灶明显缩小或消失。随着这种趋势,已经尝试切除少量转移瘤(所谓的寡转移瘤)与原发性肿瘤联合,或在一段时间后对抗癌治疗有良好反应的患者中切除原发性和转移性肿瘤(所谓的转化手术).2022年7月,在京都举行的国际胰腺学协会(IAP)第26届会议和日本胰腺学会(JPS)第53届年会期间,举行了关于UR-MPDAC手术治疗的国际共识会议。演讲者展示了UR-MPDAC的适应症和手术治疗结果,并与专家讨论了它们的优缺点。尽管这些报告仅限于少数患者,研究结果表明,对于化疗有显著反应的UR-MPDAC患者,这些手术治疗可能有助于预后延长生存期.我们希望,总结会议讨论和协议的这篇文章将成为未来审判和指导方针的基础。
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a typical refractory malignancy, and many patients have distant organ metastases at diagnosis, such as liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination. The standard treatment for unresectable PDAC with distant organ metastasis (UR-M) is chemotherapy, but the prognosis remained poor. However, with recent dramatic developments in chemotherapy, the prognosis has gradually improved, and some patients have experienced marked shrinkage or disappearance of their metastatic lesions. With this trend, attempts have been made to resect a small number of metastases (so-called oligometastases) in combination with the primary tumor or to resect the primary and metastatic tumor in patients with a favorable response to anti-cancer treatment after a certain period of time (so-called conversion surgery). An international consensus meeting on surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. The presenters showed their indications for and results of surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC and discussed their advantages and disadvantages with the experts. Although these reports were limited to a small number of patients, findings suggest that these surgical treatments for patients with UR-M PDAC who have had a significant response to chemotherapy may contribute to a prognosis of prolonged survival. We hope that this article summarizing the discussion and agreements at the meeting will serve as the basis for future trials and guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:目前,化疗联合免疫治疗是晚期胃癌(GC)的既定一线标准治疗方法。此外,放疗和免疫治疗的结合被认为是一种有前景的治疗策略.
    方法:在本报告中,我们介绍了一例通过综合疗法实现高度晚期GC几乎完全缓解的病例。一名67岁的男性患者被转诊到医院,因为他出现了几天的消化不良和黑便。基于氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDGPET/CT),内窥镜检查和腹部CT,他被诊断为GC,有一个巨大的病灶和两个远处转移病灶。患者接受mFOLFOX6方案化疗,nivolumab和针对原发性病变的短疗程大分割放疗(4Gy×6个部分)。这些治疗完成后,肿瘤和转移性病变显示部分反应。在一个多学科小组讨论了这个案子之后,病人接受了手术,包括全胃切除术和D2淋巴结清扫术。术后病理显示原发灶病理基本消退。手术四周后开始化疗,每三个月进行一次检查。手术后,患者病情稳定,健康,无复发迹象.
    结论:放疗和免疫治疗联合治疗GC值得进一步探索。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is the established first-line standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC). In addition, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is considered a promising treatment strategy.
    METHODS: In this report, we present a case of achieving nearly complete remission of highly advanced GC with comprehensive therapies. A 67-year-old male patient was referred to the hospital because he presented with dyspepsia and melena for several days. Based on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT), endoscopic examination and abdominal CT, he was diagnosed with GC with a massive lesion and two distant metastatic lesions. The patient received mFOLFOX6 regimen chemotherapy, nivolumab and a short course of hypofractionated radiotherapy (4 Gy × 6 fractions) targeting the primary lesion. After the completion of these therapies, the tumor and the metastatic lesions showed a partial response. After having this case discussed by a multidisciplinary team, the patient underwent surgery, including total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative pathology showed that major pathological regression of the primary lesion was achieved. Chemoimmunotherapy started four weeks after surgery, and examination was performed every three months. Since surgery, the patient has been stable and healthy with no evidence of recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for GC is worthy of further exploration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    光热免疫疗法,光热热疗和免疫疗法的结合,是一种非侵入性和理想的治疗策略,以解决传统光热消融用于肿瘤治疗的不足。然而,光热治疗后T细胞活化不足是达到满意治疗效果的瓶颈.在这项工作中,在基于聚吡咯的磁性纳米药物的基础上,通过抗CD3和抗CD28单克隆抗体的T细胞激活剂修饰,合理设计和设计了多功能纳米平台,它们实现了强大的近红外激光触发的光热消融和持久的T细胞激活,通过恢复肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞,实现光热热疗后诊断成像指导的免疫抑制肿瘤微环境调节。凭借高效的免疫原性细胞死亡和树突状细胞成熟结合T细胞活化,这种纳米系统显着抑制原发性和腹腔镜肿瘤以及转移性肿瘤,在体内副作用可忽略不计,通过建立长期记忆免疫反应来发挥抑制肿瘤复发和转移的特定功能。
    Photothermal immunotherapy, the combination of photothermal hyperthermia and immunotherapy, is a noninvasive and desirable therapeutic strategy to address the deficiency of traditional photothermal ablation for tumor treatment. However, insufficient T-cell activation following photothermal treatment is a bottleneck to achieve satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness. In this work, a multifunctional nanoplatform is rationally designed and engineered on the basis of polypyrrole-based magnetic nanomedicine modified by T-cell activators of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies, which have achieved robust near infrared laser-triggered photothermal ablation and long-lasting T-cell activation, realizing diagnostic imaging-guided immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment regulation following photothermal hyperthermia by reinvigorating tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. By virtue of high-efficient immunogenic cell death and dendritic cell maturation combined with T-cell activation, this nanosystem markedly restrains primary and abscopal tumors as well as metastatic tumors with negligible side effects in vivo, exerting the specific function for suppressing tumor recurrence and metastasis by establishing a long-term memory immune response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:Neo-REGATTA研究评估了多西他赛的有效性和安全性,奥沙利铂,和S-1(DOS方案),然后根治性切除术与单一不可治愈因素的晚期胃腺癌患者的化疗。
    方法:这项队列研究前瞻性地纳入了2017年11月至2021年6月患有单一不可治愈因素的晚期胃腺癌患者。将DOS4个周期后无进展的患者分为切除组和化疗组。结果包括总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。还通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行了有效性分析。
    结果:共纳入73例患者,13例患者在4个周期的DOS后因疾病进展退出。之后,35和25名参与者在切除和化疗组,分别。中位随访时间30.0个月后,中位PFS和OS为9.0个月,化疗组18.0个月,但在切除组中没有达到。PSM之后,每组有19名匹配的参与者,切除组的中位PFS和OS长于化疗组。切除组和化疗组最常见的3级或4级不良反应为中性粒细胞减少(5.7%,8.0%)和白细胞减少症(5.7%,8.0%)。
    结论:在DOS后疾病得到控制的晚期胃腺癌患者中,与单纯连续化疗相比,根治性切除术可能提供生存益处。具有良好的安全性。
    背景:研究方案已在ClinicalTrial.gov(NCT03001726,23/12/2016)上注册。
    BACKGROUND: The Neo-REGATTA study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS regimen) followed by radical resection vs. chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor.
    METHODS: This cohort study prospectively enrolled advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor between November 2017 and June 2021. Patients without progression after four cycles of DOS were divided into resection group and chemotherapy group. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Effectiveness analysis was also performed by propensity score matching (PSM).
    RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were enrolled and 13 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression after 4 cycles of DOS. Afterwards, 35 and 25 participants were in the resection and chemotherapy groups, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 30.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 9.0 months, and 18.0 months for the chemotherapy group, but not reached in the resection group. After PSM, 19 matched participants were in each group, and the median PFS and OS were longer in resection group than that in chemotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events both in the resection group and chemotherapy groups were neutropenia (5.7%, 8.0%) and leukopenia (5.7%, 8.0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection might provide survival benefit compared with continuous chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had a disease control after DOS, with a good safety profile.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03001726, 23/12/2016).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号