BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal metronomic chemotherapy duration (MTCD) as adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).
METHODS: This study involved LANPC patients treated with metronomic chemotherapy (MTC) using a 5-FU prodrug (S1, capecitabine, or tegafur) from May 2013 to September 2020. The optimal MTCD threshold was established using X-tile Bioinformatics software. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were compared between short-term and long-term groups using propensity score matching (PSM).
RESULTS: A total of 546 patients were analyzed. MTCD was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS (all P < 0.05). Patients were categorized into long-term (>3 months) and short-term (≤3 months) MTCD groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, significant differences were observed in 4-year OS (97.0 % vs. 87.1 %; P < 0.01), PFS (84.6 % vs. 70.9 %; P < 0.01), DMFS (87.3 % vs. 78.8 %; P < 0.01), and LRRFS (95.3 % vs. 87.4 %; P < 0.01) between the long-term and short-term groups. In the PSM-matched cohort of 196 patients per group, the long-term group demonstrated superior 4-year OS and LRRFS (97.3 % vs. 87.1 %, P < 0.01; 95.2 % vs. 90.0 %, P < 0.05). No significant differences in acute toxicities were observed between the groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Extended MTC with a 5-FU prodrug (>3 months) may benefit NPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: NSCLC patients undergoing metronomic oral vinorelbine as second- and later-line regimens in Fujian Cancer Hospital from October 2018 to October 2022 were enrolled, and patients\' demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. The efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy and its combination therapy regimens were compared.
RESULTS: Of 57 study subjects, 63.2% received third- and later-line therapy, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 4 months, overall response rate (ORR) of 10.5%, and disease control rate (DCR) of 80.7%. The incidence of therapy-related adverse events was 42.1%, and there was only one case presenting grades 3 and 4 adverse events (1.8%). Among driver gene-negative participants, vinorelbine combination therapy regimens achieved longer mPFS (4.6 vs. 1.2 months, hazards ratio = 0.11, P < 0.0001) and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed the highest response, with mPFS of 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 months), ORR of 25%, and DCR of 81.3%. Among participants with gradual resistance to osimertinib, continuing osimertinib in combination with metronomic oral vinorelbine achieved mPFS of 6.3 months (95% CI 0.1 to 12.5 months) and DCR of 86.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy regimens are favorable options as second- and later-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients, with acceptable efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Vinorelbine combination therapy regimens show higher efficacy and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine may have a synergistic effect with immunotherapy and EGFR-TKI targeted therapy.

When applied as the standard therapeutic modality, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves local control and survival rates in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, distant metastasis continues to be the leading cause of treatment failure. Here, we review the most recent optimization strategies for combining chemotherapy with IMRT in high-risk patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. We focus on major clinical trials on induction chemotherapy and metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy, emphasizing their efficacy in mitigating distant metastasis and prognosis. We also highlight innovations in reducing toxicity in low-risk patients, particularly through approaches of excluding chemotherapy, adopting equivalent low-toxicity drugs, or selectively exempting lymph nodes with low metastatic risk from irradiation. These approaches have provided positive treatment outcomes and significantly enhanced patients\' quality of life. Finally, we provide an overview of the evolving immunotherapy landscape, with a focus on the ongoing trials and future potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced NPC treatment.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the efficacy and safety of using metronomic S1 adjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected data on patients diagnosed with LANPC between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients were treated with induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without metronomic chemotherapy (MC). Toxicities during MC were recorded. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier methods, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox proportional hazards model were used for statistical analyses.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 474 patients were identified, including 64 (13.5%) and 410 (83.5%) patients with or without receiving MC, respectively. Patients who received metronomic S1 had significantly better 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (100% vs. 90.9%, p=0.038), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (98.5% vs. 84.1%, p=0.002), disease-free survival (DFS) (98.4% vs. 77.5%, p<0.001), and overall survival (OS) (98.0% vs. 87.7%, p=0.008) compared to those without metronomic S1. The multivariate prognostic analysis revealed that metronomic S1 was identified as an independent prognostic factor associated with better DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.074, p=0.010), DFS (HR 0.103, p=0.002) and OS (HR 0.127, P=0.042), but not in LRFS (p=0.071). Similar results were found using PSM. Common adverse events observed in the metronomic S1 group included leukopenia, neutropenia, increased total bilirubin, anorexia, rash/desquamation, and hyperpigmentation. All patients with adverse events were grade 1-2.
UNASSIGNED: It is worth conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of metronomic S1 on survival outcomes and toxicities of LANPC.

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) regimens may be associated with risks to the patient due to the ambiguity surrounding low dosages and schedules. In the present study, metronomic regimens of vinorelbine (NVB) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) or fluorouracil (5‑FU) were chosen to study the dose‑response associations with tumor growth and metastasis, along with the underlying mechanisms in angiogenesis, apoptosis and tumor immunity, using experimental techniques such as immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, western blotting and flow cytometry. The results demonstrated a dual‑directional pharmacological action of promoting and suppressing tumor growth or metastasis in BALB/c mice bearing a 4T1 tumor at certain low and high doses of the drugs. Low doses of NVB combined with CDDP or 5‑FU accelerated tumor growth by enhancing angiogenesis, increasing the expression of angiogenic proteins, NF‑κB and osteopontin in tumor tissues, and inducing the accumulation of myeloid‑derived suppressor cells and macrophages. By contrast, higher doses inhibited tumor growth by suppressing these effects. Notably, the upregulation of apoptotic proteins was observed after low‑ and high‑dose treatments. Furthermore, at low concentrations, NVB combined with CDDP or 5‑FU stimulated certain functions of endothelial and tumor cells, including migration and invasion, whereas at higher concentrations they suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. Therefore, the results of the present study suggested the potential risks of metronomic combination chemotherapy by demonstrating that, at certain low doses, tumor growth or metastasis was promoted, and emphasized the existence of an effective dose interval that changes with different drug combinations. However, further studies are needed before a specific metronomic combination regimen can be administered clinically for cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: It is generally accepted that low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy mostly exerts its antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. However, there is some evidence that LDM chemotherapy subsequently promotes tumor angiogenesis under certain regimens in animal models. The mechanisms responsible for these contradictory results are unclear.
METHODS: Cisplatin (CDDP) was intraperitoneally administered to tumor-bearing mice at doses of 0.05-3 mg/kg every other day. The effects of LDM chemotherapy with CDDP on tumor growth and angiogenesis were observed. To determine the involved mechanisms, we analyzed the expression of vascular basement membrane proteins, transcription of angiogenesis-related genes in tumor tissues, and mobilization of proangiogenic bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) in circulating blood.
RESULTS: The mean tumor weight with the 3 mg/kg q.o.d. regimen CDDP was significantly lower (by 57.3%) in the CDDP than in the control group. However, the tumor weight was 52.1% higher for the 0.19 mg/kg q.o.d. regimen in the CDDP group, which could be antagonized using 30 mg/kg all-trans retinoic acid. For the 0.19 mg/kg q.o.d., more tumor vascular structures were observed in the CDDP than in the control group (47.9±5.0 vs. 22.3±0.8, p<0.001). The mobilization of VEGFR2+ BMDCs and the mRNA expression of the proangiogenic genes MMP9, VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VE-cadherin were increased in the 0.19 mg/kg regimen.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that metronomic CDDP promoted tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth via increased mobilization of proangiogenic BMDCs at certain low doses. This implies a potential therapeutic risk from an inappropriate LDM chemotherapy dosage and suggests that optimizing the LDM chemotherapy regimen is urgently needed.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of orally administered metronomic capecitabine plus pyrotinib in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, we conducted a prospective phase II study with a single-arm design.
METHODS: HER2 positive patients received oral metronomic capecitabine 500 mg three times a day and pyrotinib 400 mg per day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety.
RESULTS: The study included 50 patients with MBC that was HER2-positive, while 1 patient was excluded due to nonstandard medication. The median PFS and OS was 11.9 months (95%CI 8.8-14.6) and 29.3 months (95%CI 24.4-34.8) respectively. ORR was 34.7%, and CBR was 81.6% with 2 CR (4.1%), 15 PR (30.6%) and 23 SD (46.9%). The mPFS in first- or second-line treatment was 12.2 months. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, vomiting and nausea. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 15(30.6%) patients, including hand-foot syndrome (12.2%), diarrhea (12.2%), vomiting (4.1%), and nausea (2.0%). 1 grade 4 adverse event of diarrhea (2.0%) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metronomic capecitabine and pyrotinib is a promising regimen with competitive efficacy and improved tolerability in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

Treatment options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after osimertinib failure are limited, and osimertinib continuation is recommended for selected patients. Metronomic oral vinorelbine is an effective treatment with less toxicity for advanced NSCLC.
The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of osimertinib plus metronomic oral vinorelbine on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced NSCLC beyond limited progression on osimertinib.
We have reviewed the medical records of 28 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who had received osimertinib continuation plus metronomic oral vinorelbine beyond limited progression on osimertinib. We also evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients, as well as the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment.
After a median follow-up period of 14.1 months, 57.1% (16/28) of cases showed NSCLC progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) period under osimertinib plus metronomic oral vinorelbine was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 1.562-17.238 months), with a disease control rate of 89.3% and objective response rate of 17.9%. PFS did not differ between patients who had previously received osimertinib as first- (n = 16) and second-line (n = 12) therapy (median, 11.4 and 4.7 months, P = 0.391). In addition, the median PFS duration did not differ according to the efficacy (PFS2 ≥ 6 months vs. <6 months) of previous osimertinib monotherapy (median, 5.8 and 9.4 months, P = 0.677).
Osimertinib continuation in conjunction with metronomic oral vinorelbine may enable overcoming TKI resistance and prolong the survival of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC beyond limited progression on osimertinib treatment.

This single-arm prospective phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of the dual oral metronomic vinorelbine and capecitabine (mNC) regimen in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.
The mNC regimen was administered to the enrolled cases, including oral vinorelbine (VNR) 40 mg three times weekly (on days 1, 3 and 5 every week) and capecitabine (CAP) 500 mg three times a day, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Stratified factors included treatment lines and hormone receptor (HR) status.
Between June 2018 and March 2023, 29 patients were enrolled into the study. The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 2.0-53.8). In the entire group, the 1-year PFS rate was 54.1%. ORR, DCR and CBR were 31.0%, 96.6% and 62.1%, respectively. The mPFS was 12.5 months (range, 1.1-28.1). Subgroup analysis revealed that ORRs were 29.4% and 33.3% in first- and ≥second-line chemotherapy, respectively. ORRs were 29.2% (7/24) and 40.0% (2/5) for HR-positive MBC and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), respectively. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were neutropenia (10.3%) and nausea/vomiting (6.9%).
The dual oral mNC regimen showed very good safety features and improved compliance without loss of efficacy in both first- and second-line treatments. The regimen also reached an excellent ORR in the mTNBC subgroup.

The liver is the most common and lethal metastatic site in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and median survival with current standard treatment is only 9-10 months from diagnosis. Clinical observations show that a complete response (CR) is extremely rare in ES-SCLC patients with liver metastasis. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, complete regression of liver metastasis induced by the abscopal effect, boosted primarily by permanent radioactive iodine-125 seeds implantation (PRISI), combined with a low-dose metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) regimen, has not been recorded. Here, we present the case of a 54-year-old male patient who developed multiple liver metastases from ES-SCLC after multiple lines of chemotherapy. The patient was given partial PRISI therapy (two out of six tumor lesions; 38 iodine-125 seeds in one dorsal lesion and 26 seeds in one ventral lesion), which was combined with TMZ metronomic chemotherapy (50 mg/m2/day, days 1-21, every 28 days). The abscopal effect was observed for 1 month after PRISI treatment. After about 1 year, all the liver metastases had completely disappeared, and the patient experienced no relapse. The patient eventually died of malnutrition caused by a non-tumor intestinal obstruction and had an overall survival of 58.5 months after diagnosis. PRISI combined with TMZ metronomic chemotherapy might be considered a potential therapy to trigger the abscopal effect in patients with liver metastases.