BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal metronomic chemotherapy duration (MTCD) as adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).
METHODS: This study involved LANPC patients treated with metronomic chemotherapy (MTC) using a 5-FU prodrug (S1, capecitabine, or tegafur) from May 2013 to September 2020. The optimal MTCD threshold was established using X-tile Bioinformatics software. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were compared between short-term and long-term groups using propensity score matching (PSM).
RESULTS: A total of 546 patients were analyzed. MTCD was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS (all P < 0.05). Patients were categorized into long-term (>3 months) and short-term (≤3 months) MTCD groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, significant differences were observed in 4-year OS (97.0 % vs. 87.1 %; P < 0.01), PFS (84.6 % vs. 70.9 %; P < 0.01), DMFS (87.3 % vs. 78.8 %; P < 0.01), and LRRFS (95.3 % vs. 87.4 %; P < 0.01) between the long-term and short-term groups. In the PSM-matched cohort of 196 patients per group, the long-term group demonstrated superior 4-year OS and LRRFS (97.3 % vs. 87.1 %, P < 0.01; 95.2 % vs. 90.0 %, P < 0.05). No significant differences in acute toxicities were observed between the groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Extended MTC with a 5-FU prodrug (>3 months) may benefit NPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

First line endocrine therapy is the gold standard for advanced estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. Adding CDK4/6 inhibitors has improved progression free survival. Metronomic Capecitabine has proven to be safe to combine with endocrine therapy with promising efficacy. We conducted a phase II randomized, open label, single centre clinical trial on patients with metastatic ER positive and HER 2 negative breast cancer. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to arm A: metronomic dose of capecitabine (500 mg/m2 BID) combined with letrozole (2.5 mg OD) or arm B: letrozole single agent. The primary endpoint was progression free survival. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual and 60 eligible patients out of the planned 204 were randomized. This clinical trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (MD-127-2019, NCT04571437). Between February 2019 and April 2022, 60 patients were randomized. This is the first report of the study, after a median follow-up of 18.6 months. The median age at diagnosis was 47 years with only 41.7% of patients post-menopausal. Half of our patients had bone-only disease, 45% had visceral metastasis (liver and lung) and 63% presented with endocrine sensitive disease. The estimated median PFS for the whole population was 16.2 months. Median PFS for capecitabine arm was 17.7 months versus 14.6 months for letrozole alone (p = 0.078). Overall response rate was 70% for capecitabine/letrozole arm and 56.6% for letrozole only. Clinical benefit rate was 90% in the capecitabine/letrozole arm versus 73.3% in the letrozole arm. Overall survival data is still immature after this short follow up duration. Adverse event assessment showed acceptable all grade and high grade toxicity profile consistent with the established adverse events of both capecitabine and letrozole. Anaemia (28.3%) and hand & foot syndrome (43.8%) were significantly more common in the capecitabine/letrozole arm. Capecitabine combined with letrozole have showed a trend towards improvement in progression free survival with potential more benefit to certain sub-groups and the combination showed acceptable safety profile consistent with the established known safety profile of both letrozole and capecitabine.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing chemotherapy to achieve disease and symptoms control is a noteworthy purpose in advanced breast cancer (ABC). We reported the activity and quality of life of a phase II study, comparing metronomic regimen with standard schedule as first line chemotherapy for ABC.
METHODS: Patients with HER2 negative ABC were randomized to non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD, 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and cyclophosphamide (CTX, 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) (Arm A) or NPLD (20 mg/m2 day, on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) and metronomic daily oral CTX 50 mg (ARM B). Primary end-points were overall response rate (ORR) and quality of life, secondary progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.
RESULTS: From August 2012 to December 2017, 121 patients were enrolled, 105 evaluable. Median follow-up was 21.3 months. Most patients had hormone receptor positive. ORR was 43 % in arm A and 50 % in arm B. Median PFS was 8.9 months in arm A and 6,4 months in arm B. There was no difference in OS. Total score was not clinically different between the two arms. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 12 patients and 16 patients respectively; alopecia G2 in 41 % (77 %) vs 14 (27 %) in arm A and in arm B respectively. One cardiac toxicity was observed (arm A).
CONCLUSIONS: First line metronomic chemotherapy for HER2 negative ABC had similar clinical activity and quite better tolerability than standard schedule and could be considered a further treatment option when chemotherapy is indicated.

Metronomic chemotherapy refers to the frequent administration of chemotherapeutic agents at a lower dose and presents an attractive alternative to conventional chemotherapy with encouraging response rates. However, the schedule of the therapy, including the dosage of the drug, is usually based on empiricism. The confounding effects of tumor-endothelial-immune interactions during metronomic administration of drugs have not yet been explored in detail, resulting in an incomplete assessment of drug dose and frequency evaluations. The present study aimed to gain a mechanistic understanding of different actions of metronomic chemotherapy using a mathematical model. We have established an analytical condition for determining the dosage and frequency of the drug depending on its clearance rate for complete tumor elimination. The model also brings forward the immune-mediated clearance of the tumor during the metronomic administration of the chemotherapeutic agent. The results from the global sensitivity analysis showed an increase in the sensitivity of drug and immune-mediated killing factors toward the tumor population during metronomic scheduling. Our results emphasize metronomic scheduling over the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define a model-based approach for approximating the optimal schedule of drug administration to eliminate tumors while minimizing harm to the immune cells and the patient\'s body.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter Phase I study (NCT03585465) evaluated nivolumab in combination with 3 metronomic chemotherapy (MC) regimens in children with refractory/relapsing solid tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the three regimens METHODS: Patients aged < 18 years were enrolled. Nivolumab was combined with cyclophosphamide and vinblastine (arm A), capecitabine (arm B), or cyclophosphamide, vinblastine and capecitabine (arm C). Arm A and B were allocated sequentially. Arm C opened only if A and B were deemed safe. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated over the first two cycles. Patients were evaluable if they received > 2 cycles and > 70% of the planned dose.
METHODS: Sixteen patients were enrolled, 3 in arm A, 6 in arm B, and 7 in arm C. Median age was 11.5 years (range, 5-19). Patients previously received a median of 3.5 (range, 1-4) lines of systemic treatment, 14 patients had surgery and 11 had radiotherapy.
RESULTS: Median number of cycles was 2 (1-24), median treatment duration was 56 days (18-714). In arm C, median number of cycles was 4 with median treatment duration of 95 days. No DLT was observed. Grade 3 adverse events (AE) and serious AE were observed in 8 patients (50%) and 1 patient (6%), respectively, over the first 2 cycles. No grade 4 AE occurred. The 6-month PFS and OS were 12% and 44%, respectively, in the whole population. Prolonged stable disease was observed in a high-grade glioma and an atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Arm C appears safe. A randomized phase II trial evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the triple MC is ongoing.

OBJECTIVE: Metronomic chemotherapy has the potential to offer tumor control with reduced toxicity when compared to standard dose chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. As metronomic chemotherapy may target the tumor microvasculature, it has the potential for synergistic effects with antiangiogenic agents such as the VEGF-A inhibitor bevacizumab.
METHODS: In this randomized phase II study, patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive metronomic oral cyclophosphamide and methotrexate (CM) combined with bevacizumab (Arm A) or CM alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were enrolled, with 34 patients treated on Arm A and 21 patients treated on Arm B. The ORR was modestly higher in Arm A (26%) than in Arm B (10%); neither met the 40% cutoff for further clinical evaluation. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.52 months (3.22-13.6) on Arm A and 1.82 months (1.54-6.70) on Arm B (log-rank p = 0.008). The median OS was 29.6 months (17.2-NA) on Arm A and 16.2 months (15.7-NA) on Arm B (log-rank p = 0.7). Common all-grade adverse events in both arms included nausea, fatigue, and elevated AST.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metronomic CM with bevacizumab significantly improved PFS over CM alone, although there was no significant difference in OS. Oral metronomic chemotherapy alone has limited activity in advanced breast cancer.
RESULTS: gov Identifier: NCT00083031. Date of Registration: May 17, 2004.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of orally administered metronomic capecitabine plus pyrotinib in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, we conducted a prospective phase II study with a single-arm design.
METHODS: HER2 positive patients received oral metronomic capecitabine 500 mg three times a day and pyrotinib 400 mg per day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety.
RESULTS: The study included 50 patients with MBC that was HER2-positive, while 1 patient was excluded due to nonstandard medication. The median PFS and OS was 11.9 months (95%CI 8.8-14.6) and 29.3 months (95%CI 24.4-34.8) respectively. ORR was 34.7%, and CBR was 81.6% with 2 CR (4.1%), 15 PR (30.6%) and 23 SD (46.9%). The mPFS in first- or second-line treatment was 12.2 months. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, vomiting and nausea. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 15(30.6%) patients, including hand-foot syndrome (12.2%), diarrhea (12.2%), vomiting (4.1%), and nausea (2.0%). 1 grade 4 adverse event of diarrhea (2.0%) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metronomic capecitabine and pyrotinib is a promising regimen with competitive efficacy and improved tolerability in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

This single-arm prospective phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of the dual oral metronomic vinorelbine and capecitabine (mNC) regimen in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.
The mNC regimen was administered to the enrolled cases, including oral vinorelbine (VNR) 40 mg three times weekly (on days 1, 3 and 5 every week) and capecitabine (CAP) 500 mg three times a day, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Stratified factors included treatment lines and hormone receptor (HR) status.
Between June 2018 and March 2023, 29 patients were enrolled into the study. The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 2.0-53.8). In the entire group, the 1-year PFS rate was 54.1%. ORR, DCR and CBR were 31.0%, 96.6% and 62.1%, respectively. The mPFS was 12.5 months (range, 1.1-28.1). Subgroup analysis revealed that ORRs were 29.4% and 33.3% in first- and ≥second-line chemotherapy, respectively. ORRs were 29.2% (7/24) and 40.0% (2/5) for HR-positive MBC and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), respectively. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were neutropenia (10.3%) and nausea/vomiting (6.9%).
The dual oral mNC regimen showed very good safety features and improved compliance without loss of efficacy in both first- and second-line treatments. The regimen also reached an excellent ORR in the mTNBC subgroup.

UNASSIGNED: Locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with radical chemoradiation have unsatisfactory outcomes. Oral metronomic chemotherapy improves outcomes in comparison to maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy in the palliative setting. Limited evidence suggests that it may do so in an adjuvant setting. Hence this randomized study was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Patients of head and neck (HN) cancer with primary in oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, with PS 0-2 post radical chemoradiation with documented complete response were randomized 1:1 to either observation or oral metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy (MAC) for 18 months. MAC consisted of weekly oral methotrexate (15 mg/m2) and celecoxib (200 mg PO BD). The primary endpoint was OS and the overall sample size was 1038. The study had 3 planned interim analyses for efficacy and futility. Trial registration- Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI): CTRI/2016/09/007315 [Registered on: 28/09/2016] Trial Registered Prospectively.
UNASSIGNED: 137 patients were recruited and an interim analysis was done. The 3 year PFS was 68.7% (95% CI 55.1-79.0) versus 60.8% (95% CI 47.9-71.4) in the observation and metronomic arm respectively (P value = 0.230). The hazard ratio was 1.42 (95% CI 0.80-2.51; P value = 0.231). The 3 year OS was 79.4% (95% CI 66.3-87.9) versus 62.4% (95% CI 49.5-72.8) in the observation and metronomic arm respectively (P value = 0.047). The hazard ratio was 1.83 (95% CI 1.0-3.36; P value = 0.051).
UNASSIGNED: In this phase 3 randomized study, oral metronomic combinations of weekly methotrexate and daily celecoxib failed to improve the PFS or OS. Hence observation post-complete response post radical chemoradiation remains the standard of care.
UNASSIGNED: ICON funded this study.

UNASSIGNED: Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is increasingly used in oncology due to its favorable therapeutic index. There is still a lack of evidence for MCT in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective unicenter study, we demonstrated real-word data on MCT in MBC.
UNASSIGNED: MBC patients who received metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (50 mg daily) and methotrexate (MTX) (2.5 mg every other day), CTX and capecitabine (CAPE) (500 mg thrice daily), CTX, or vinorelbine (VRL) (30 mg daily) alone for at least 4 weeks between 2009 and 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) ≥24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patient characteristics and therapy response were analyzed using χ2 test. For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test were used.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-two patients were identified. Sixty-two patients received CTX/MTX, three CTX/CAPE, two CTX, and five VRL. Median age at diagnosis MBC and at start of MCT was 59.0 years and 64.5 years, respectively. 72.2% tumors were hormone receptor positive and 27.8% were triple-negative. 54.2% patients had more than two different metastases. 80.6% patients showed visceral involvement. 31.9% patients achieved DCR ≥24 weeks. Median PFS was 17.0 weeks (95% CI 14.5-19.5) and median OS was 58.0 weeks (95% CI 29.0-87.0). MCT showed similar DCR ≥24 weeks and clinically meaningful but not statistically significant shorter median PFS compared to prior therapy (31.9% versus 32.8% [p = 0.570] and 17.0 weeks versus 20.0 weeks [p = 0.093], respectively) and statistically significant higher DCR ≥24 weeks and longer median PFS compared to subsequent therapy (31.9% versus 17.4% [p = 0.038] and 17.0 weeks versus 12.0 weeks [p = 0.006], respectively). Three (4.2%) patients terminated MCT because of toxicity.
UNASSIGNED: In this real-world retrospective study, MCT was effective and well tolerated and may thus represent a valuable treatment option in selected MBC patients.