Mammogram

乳房 X 线照片
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经开发了几种基于图像的诊断方法来检查女性乳腺病变的特征,而通过双峰乳腺检查系统结合触诊成像和超声检查的价值仍然未知。
    在福建省妇幼保健院和福建省妇产科医院就诊的424名患者中进行了一项真实世界研究,并使用了双峰乳腺检查(BBE)系统,该系统结合了触诊成像和超声成像。其中,97名患者接受了额外的超声检查,乳房X线照片,或病理检查。这些患者用于评估BBE在解释乳腺病变特征方面的一致性和有效性,与超声检查结果相比,乳房X线照片,和病理检查。
    BBE系统通过触诊成像检测到1517个病变,超声检查1126个病灶(950个实性病灶和176个囊肿),391个非肿块性病变。其中,404例患者诊断为良性,20例诊断为恶性肿瘤。然而,12、9和4例超声诊断为恶性肿瘤,乳房X线照片和病理检查,分别。与超声的综合结果相比,乳房X线照片和病理学,BBE的灵敏度为55.6%,特异性为90.9%,卡帕系数为0.387(0.110,0.665),表明适度的一致性。
    在临床实践中,BBE可用于具有高特异性的乳腺病变特征的评估。诊断效能与超声的综合结果相当,乳房X线照相术,和病理检查。
    UNASSIGNED: Several image-based diagnostic methods have been developed to examine the features of breast lesions among women, while the value of combining palpation imaging and ultrasound by a bimodal breast examination system is still unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: A real-world study was conducted among 424 patients who visited Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital and Fujian Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, and used the Bimodal Breast Exam (BBE) systems which combines palpation imaging and ultrasound imaging. Among them, 97 patients had additional ultrasound, mammogram, or pathological examination. These patients were used to evaluate the consistency and efficacy of the BBE in interpreting the features of breast lesions as compared to results of ultrasound, mammogram, and pathological examinations.
    UNASSIGNED: The BBE system detected 1517 lesions with palpation imaging, 1126 lesions with ultrasound examination (950 solid lesions and 176 cysts), and 391 non mass lesions. Among them, 404 patients were diagnosed as benign and 20 were diagnosed as malignant tumor. However, 12, 9 and 4 cases were diagnosed as malignant tumors by ultrasound, mammogram and pathological examination, respectively. Compared with the integrative results of ultrasound, mammogram and pathology, the sensitivity of BBE is 55.6%, and the specificity is 90.9%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.387 (0.110, 0.665), indicating moderate consistency.
    UNASSIGNED: In clinical practice, BBE can be used to evaluate features of breast lesions with a high specificity. The diagnostic efficacy is comparable to the integrative results of ultrasound, mammography, and pathological examination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在乳房X线照片上检测到肿块代表了恶性乳腺癌的最早迹象之一。然而,由于致密的乳腺组织,肿块可能很难检测到,导致假阴性结果。在这项研究中,我们旨在探索基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的深度学习(DL)系统的临床应用,该系统在我们之前的工作中作为亚洲女性乳腺癌筛查和诊断的客观准确工具。
    这项回顾性分析包括2019年4月至12月在深圳市人民医院乳房X光检查中发现的324例肿块患者。(I)检测:两名初级放射科医生对相关结果视而不见,对图像进行了独立分析。然后,一位资深放射科医生在查看了所有相关信息作为参考后,对图像进行了分析。(II)分类:由两名初级放射科医师对肿块进行分类,并由另外两名老年人达成共识。图像也被输入到DL系统中。初级放射科医生和DL系统检测的灵敏度,不同因素的影响[乳腺密度;患者年龄;形态学,margin,尺寸,乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)类别的肿块]检测,准确性,灵敏度,和分类的特殊性,和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC),进行了评估。
    总共检测到618个质量。两名初级放射科医生的检测灵敏度[78.0%(482/618)和84.0%(519/618),分别]低于DL系统[86.2%(533/618)]。乳腺密度显著影响两名初级放射科医师的检测(均P=0.030),但不是由DL系统(P=0.385)。用于将质量分类为阴性(BI-RADS1、2、3)或阳性(BI-RADS4A,4B,4C,5)与两名初级放射科医生相比,DL系统明显更高,但与老年人相比没有显著差异[DL系统,0.697;初级,0.612和0.620(P=0.021,0.019);共识中的高级,0.748(P=0.071)]。
    基于CNN的DL系统可以帮助初级放射科医生改善肿块检测,并且不受乳腺密度的影响。这种DL系统可能在乳房致密的女性中具有临床实用性,包括减少由没有经验的放射科医师造成的影响和漏诊的可能性。
    UNASSIGNED: The detection of masses on mammogram represents one of the earliest signs of a malignant breast cancer. However, masses may be hard to detect due to dense breast tissue, leading to false negative results. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical application of the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning (DL) system constructed in our previous work as an objective and accurate tool for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in Asian women.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis included 324 patients with masses detected on mammograms at Shenzhen People\'s Hospital between April and December 2019. (I) Detection: images were independently analyzed by two junior radiologists who were blinded to relative results. Then, a senior radiologist analyzed the images after reviewing all the relevant information as the reference. (II) Classification: masses were classified by the same two junior radiologists and in consensus by two other seniors. Images were also input into the DL system. The sensitivity of detection by junior radiologists and the DL system, effects of different factors [breast density; patient age; morphology, margin, size, breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category of the mass] on detection, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of classification, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 618 masses were detected. The detection sensitivity of the two junior radiologists [78.0% (482/618) and 84.0% (519/618), respectively] was lower than that of the DL system [86.2% (533/618)]. Breast density significantly affected the detection by two junior radiologists (both P=0.030), but not by the DL system (P=0.385). The AUC for classifying masses as negative (BI-RADS 1, 2, 3) or positive (BI-RADS 4A, 4B, 4C, 5) for the DL system was significantly higher compared to those of the two junior radiologists, but not significantly different compared to seniors [DL system, 0.697; junior, 0.612 and 0.620 (P=0.021, 0.019); senior in consensus, 0.748 (P=0.071)].
    UNASSIGNED: The CNN-based DL system could assist junior radiologists in improving mass detection and is not affected by breast density. This DL system may have clinical utility in women with dense breasts, including reducing the impact caused by inexperienced radiologists and the potential for missed diagnoses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺癌是女性死亡的主要原因之一。此外,1/8的女性和1/833的男性将在2022年被诊断出患有乳腺癌。检测乳腺癌不仅可以降低治疗成本,还可以提高生存率。由于对癌症的认识增加,越来越多的女性正在接受乳腺癌筛查,导致全世界更多的病例被诊断,但是医生分析这些图像的能力是有限的。因此,他们超负荷,导致误解。计算机辅助诊断(CAD)的出现最大限度地减少了人的参与,并取得了良好的效果。CAD帮助医生自动检测和分析乳房中发现的异常。这种异常可能是良性或恶性肿瘤。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估使用7层乳房X光检查将乳腺癌分类为良性或恶性的有效性。
    方法:我们使用了322张图像的开源MIAS数据集,其中正常图像207张,异常图像115张。提出的CNN模型将图像卷积为七层,从输入图像中提取特征,这些特征用于将乳腺癌分类为恶性或良性。
    结果:提出的CNN使用了有限的数据集,与以前的工作相比取得了最好的结果。该方法获得的结果损失为0.39%,99.89%的准确度,99.85%精度,99.89%召回,99.87%F1分数,曲线下面积为100.0%。
    结论:CNN使用少量数据来确定异常;该方法将帮助医生确定特定患者是否患有癌症。
    BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among women. In addition, 1 in 8 women and 1 in 833 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2022. The detection of breast cancer can not only lower treatment costs but also increase survival rates. Due to increased cancer awareness, more women are undergoing breast cancer screening, leading to more cases being diagnosed worldwide, but doctors\' ability to analyze these images is limited. As a result, they get overloaded leading to misinterpretations. The advent of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) minimized man\'s involvement and achieved good results. CAD helps medical doctors automatically detect and analyze abnormalities found in the breast. Such abnormalities may be benign or malignant tumors.
    OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using seven layers to classify breast cancer as either benign or malignant using mammograms.
    METHODS: The open-source MIAS dataset of 322 images was used for our study, of which 207 were normal images and 115 were abnormal images. The proposed CNN model convolves an image into seven layers that extract features from the input images, and these features are used to classify breast cancer as malignant or benign.
    RESULTS: The proposed CNN used a limited data set and achieved the best result compared to previous work. The method achieved results with a 0.39% loss, 99.89% accuracy, 99.85% precision, 99.89% recall, 99.87% F1-score, and an area under the curve noted to be 100.0%.
    CONCLUSIONS: CNN uses a small amount of data to determine abnormalities; the method will assist a medical doctor in determining whether or not a specific patient has cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    减肥手术是治疗肥胖症最有效的方法之一。它可以有效降低体重,降低肥胖相关乳腺癌的发病率。然而,关于减肥手术如何改变乳腺密度有不同的结论。这项研究的目的是阐明从减肥手术前后乳腺密度的变化。
    通过PubMed和Embase搜索相关文献以筛选研究。Meta分析用于阐明从减肥手术前后乳腺密度的变化。
    本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入7项研究,共535人。平均体重指数从术前45.3kg/m2降至术后34.4kg/m2。通过乳腺影像报告和数据系统评分,减重手术前后A级乳腺密度的比例下降了3.83%(183vs.176),B级(248与263)增加6.05%,C级(94vs.89)下降5.32%,和D级(1与4)增加了300%。从减肥手术前后乳腺密度无明显变化(OR=1.27,95%置信区间(CI)[0.74,2.20],P=0.38)。根据Volpara密度等级评分,术后乳腺体积密度增加(标准化平均差=-0.68,95%CI[-1.08,-0.27],P=0.001)。
    减肥手术后乳腺密度显著增加,但这取决于检测乳腺密度的方法。需要进一步的随机对照研究来验证我们的结论。
    Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective methods for treating obesity. It can effectively reduce body weight and reduce the incidence of obesity-related breast cancer. However, there are different conclusions about how bariatric surgery changes breast density. The purpose of this study was to clarify the changes in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery.
    The relevant literature was searched through PubMed and Embase to screen for studies. Meta-analysis was used to clarify the changes in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery.
    A total of seven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, including a total of 535 people. The average body mass index decreased from 45.3 kg/m2 before surgery to 34.4 kg/m2 after surgery. By the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score, the proportion of grade A breast density from before to after bariatric surgery decreased by 3.83% (183 vs. 176), grade B (248 vs. 263) increased by 6.05%, grade C (94 vs. 89) decreased by 5.32%, and grade D (1 vs. 4) increased by 300%. There was no significant change in breast density from before to after bariatric surgery (OR=1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.74, 2.20], P=0.38). By the Volpara density grade score, postoperative volumetric breast density increased (standardized mean difference = -0.68, 95% CI [-1.08, -0.27], P = 0.001).
    Breast density increased significantly after bariatric surgery, but this depended on the method of detecting breast density. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to validate our conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    深度卷积神经网络(CNN)已广泛应用于各种医学成像任务中。然而,由于卷积运算的内在局部性,CNN通常不能很好地对远程依赖进行建模,这对于准确识别或映射从未配准的多个乳房X线照片计算的相应乳房病变特征是重要的。这促使我们利用多视图视觉变压器的架构在一次检查中捕获来自同一患者的多个乳房X线照片的长期关系。为此,我们使用局部变压器块来分别学习从双侧(右/左)乳房的两个视图(CC/MLO)获得的四个乳房X线照片中的斑块关系。来自不同视图和侧面的输出被级联并馈送到全局变压器块中,共同学习代表左右乳房两种不同视图的四个图像之间的补丁关系。为了评估所提出的模型,我们回顾性地收集了一个包含949组乳房X线照片的数据集,其中包括470例恶性病例和479例正常或良性病例。我们使用五折交叉验证方法对模型进行了训练和评估。没有任何艰巨的预处理步骤(例如,最佳窗口裁剪,胸壁或胸肌切除,两视图像配准,等。),我们的四图像(两视图两侧)基于变压器的模型实现了ROC曲线下面积的案例分类性能(AUC=0.818±0.039),其显著优于AUC=0.784±0.016,由最先进的多视图CNN实现(p=0.009)。它还优于两个单视图双侧模型,它们的AUC为0.724±0.013(CC视图)和0.769±0.036(MLO视图),分别。该研究证明了使用变压器开发结合四个乳房X线照片的高性能计算机辅助诊断方案的潜力。
    Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely used in various medical imaging tasks. However, due to the intrinsic locality of convolution operations, CNNs generally cannot model long-range dependencies well, which are important for accurately identifying or mapping corresponding breast lesion features computed from unregistered multiple mammograms. This motivated us to leverage the architecture of Multi-view Vision Transformers to capture long-range relationships of multiple mammograms from the same patient in one examination. For this purpose, we employed local transformer blocks to separately learn patch relationships within four mammograms acquired from two-view (CC/MLO) of two-side (right/left) breasts. The outputs from different views and sides were concatenated and fed into global transformer blocks, to jointly learn patch relationships between four images representing two different views of the left and right breasts. To evaluate the proposed model, we retrospectively assembled a dataset involving 949 sets of mammograms, which included 470 malignant cases and 479 normal or benign cases. We trained and evaluated the model using a five-fold cross-validation method. Without any arduous preprocessing steps (e.g., optimal window cropping, chest wall or pectoral muscle removal, two-view image registration, etc.), our four-image (two-view-two-side) transformer-based model achieves case classification performance with an area under ROC curve (AUC = 0.818 ± 0.039), which significantly outperforms AUC = 0.784 ± 0.016 achieved by the state-of-the-art multi-view CNNs (p = 0.009). It also outperforms two one-view-two-side models that achieve AUC of 0.724 ± 0.013 (CC view) and 0.769 ± 0.036 (MLO view), respectively. The study demonstrates the potential of using transformers to develop high-performing computer-aided diagnosis schemes that combine four mammograms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在调查中国-澳大利亚女性的乳腺癌筛查方法及其相关因素。采用包括便利和滚雪球抽样在内的横断面定量调查方法,招募了居住在悉尼的115名华裔澳大利亚女性,使用自我管理的调查。总之,69.8%的参与者报告最近进行了临床乳房检查,73.3%的参与者进行了乳房X光检查。年龄,宗教,就业状况,和居住时间长短与临床乳房检查有关。收入与乳房X光检查有关。乳腺癌知识之间的关联,癌症相关的信念,并发现了筛查参与。在澳大利亚居住的时间长短是进行临床乳房检查和乳房X光检查的最强预测指标。乳房X光检查最常见的障碍是女性认为医生不推荐给她们。中国-澳大利亚妇女需要接受有关其通常乳房健康意识的教育,以了解任何变化,特别是如果妇女没有资格接受乳房X光检查或难以获得保健服务。量身定制的程序,改善筛查体验,并尽量减少感知障碍,以促进中国-澳大利亚妇女早期发现乳腺癌。
    This study aimed to investigate breast cancer screening practices and associated factors among Chinese-Australian women. A cross-sectional quantitative survey method including convenience and snowball sampling was used to recruit 115 Chinese-Australian women living in Sydney, using a self-administered survey. In all, 69.8% of participants reported recent clinical breast examinations and 73.3% had mammograms. Age, religion, employment status, and length of residence were associated with having a clinical breast examination. Income was related to having a mammogram. Associations between knowledge of breast cancer, cancer-related beliefs, and screening participation were found. Length of residence in Australia was the strongest predictor of having a clinical breast examination and mammogram. The most common barrier to mammography was if women felt that doctors did not recommend it to them. Chinese-Australian women need to be educated about awareness of their usual breast health to be aware of any changes, especially if women are not eligible for mammography or have difficulty in accessing health services. Tailored programs, improving screening experiences, and minimizing perceived barriers are needed to promote early detection of breast cancer among Chinese-Australian women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Many existing approaches for mammogram analysis are based on single view. Some recent DNN-based multi-view approaches can perform either bilateral or ipsilateral analysis, while in practice, radiologists use both to achieve the best clinical outcome. MommiNet is the first DNN-based tri-view mass identification approach, which can simultaneously perform bilateral and ipsilateral analysis of mammographic images, and in turn, can fully emulate the radiologists\' reading practice. In this paper, we present MommiNet-v2, with improved network architecture and performance. Novel high-resolution network (HRNet)-based architectures are proposed to learn the symmetry and geometry constraints, to fully aggregate the information from all views for accurate mass detection. A multi-task learning scheme is adopted to incorporate both Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and biopsy information to train a mass malignancy classification network. Extensive experiments have been conducted on the public DDSM (Digital Database for Screening Mammography) dataset and our in-house dataset, and state-of-the-art results have been achieved in terms of mass detection accuracy. Satisfactory mass malignancy classification result has also been obtained on our in-house dataset.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声(US)和乳房X线照片(MMG)是两种最常见的乳腺癌(BC)筛查工具。这项研究旨在评估循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)与US和MMG的组合如何提高诊断性能。
    CTC检测和成像检查,美国和MMG,在238例未接受治疗的BC患者中进行,217例良性乳腺疾病(BBD),20位健康女性CTC的相关性,对具有患者临床病理特征的US和MMG进行了评估。CTC的诊断性能,通过接收器工作特性曲线估计US和MMG。
    CTC,US和MMG均可将BC患者与对照组区分开(p<0.0001)。CTC曲线下面积(AUC),US和MMG分别为0.855、0.861和0.759。尽管US具有0.79的最高灵敏度,但CTC和MMG具有0.92的相同特异性。值得注意的是,CTC的最高精度为0.83。与CTC的组合将US和MMG的AUC分别增加至0.922和0.899。将MMG与CTC或US组合可将MMG的敏感性提高到0.87,但是“CTCMMG”的特异性更高,为0.85。“CTC+US”在BC诊断中表现最好,后跟“CTC+MMG”,然后是“US+MMG”。
    CTC可用作BC筛查的诊断辅助手段。与CTC联合使用可提高常规BC筛查影像学检查的诊断效能,美国和MMG,在BC诊断中,尤其是MMG。
    OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) and mammogram (MMG) are the two most common breast cancer (BC) screening tools. This study aimed to assess how the combination of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with US and MMG would improve the diagnostic performance.
    METHODS: CTC detection and imaging examinations, US and MMG, were performed in 238 treatment-naive BC patients, 217 patients with benign breast diseases (BBD), and 20 healthy females. Correlations of CTC, US and MMG with patients\' clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Diagnostic performances of CTC, US and MMG were estimated by the receiver operating characteristic curves.
    RESULTS: CTC, US and MMG could all distinguish BC patients from the control (p < 0.0001). Area under curve (AUC) of CTC, US and MMG are 0.855, 0.861 and 0.759, respectively. While US has the highest sensitivity of 0.79, CTC and MMG have the same specificity of 0.92. Notably, CTC has the highest accuracy of 0.83. Combination with CTC increases the AUC of US and MMG to 0.922 and 0.899, respectively. Combining MMG with CTC or US increases the sensitivity of MMG to 0.87, however \"CTC + MMG\" has a higher specificity of 0.85. \"CTC + US\" performs the best in BC diagnosis, followed by \"CTC + MMG\" and then \"US + MMG\".
    CONCLUSIONS: CTC can be used as a diagnostic aid for BC screening. Combination with CTC increases the diagnostic potency of conventional BC screening imaging examinations, US and MMG, in BC diagnosis, especially for MMG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In breast mass detection, there are many different sizes of masses in the image. However, when the existing target detection model is directly used to detect the breast mass, it is easy to appear the phenomenon of misdetection and missed detection. Therefore, in order to improve the detection accuracy of breast masses, this paper proposed a target detection model D-Mask R-CNN based on Mask R-CNN, which is suitable for breast masses detection. Firstly, this paper improved the internal structure of FPN, and modified the lateral connection mode in the original FPN structure to dense connection. Secondly, modified the size of the anchor of RPN to improve the location accuracy of breast masses. Finally, Soft-NMS was used to replace the NMS in the original model to reduce the possibility that the correct prediction results may be eliminated during the NMS process. This paper used the CBIS-DDSM dataset for all experiments. The results showed that the mAP value of the improved model for detecting breast masses reached 0.66 in the test set, which was 0.05 higher than that of the original Mask R-CNN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Detecting breast soft-tissue lesions including masses, structural distortions and asymmetries is of great importance due to the high risk leading to breast cancer. Most existing deep learning based approaches detect lesions with only unilateral images. However, multi-view mammogram images provide highly related and complementary information which helps to make the clinical analysis more comprehensive and reliable. In this paper, we propose a multi-view network for breast soft-tissue lesion detection called C2-Net (Compare and Contrast, C2) that fuses information across different views. The proposed model contains the following three modules. The spatial context enhancing (SCE) module compares ipsilateral views and extracts complementary features to model lesion inherent 3D structure. The multi-scale kernel pooling (MKP) module contrasts contralateral views with added misalignment tolerance. Finally, the logic guided fusion (LGF) module fuses multi-view features by enhancing logic modeling capacity. Experimental results on both the public DDSM dataset and the in-house multi-center dataset demonstrate that the proposed method has achieved state-of-the-art performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号