Major adverse cardiac events

主要不良心脏事件
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定冠状动脉高强度斑块和左心室(LV)心肌应变对主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的长期预后价值。
    方法:本研究前瞻性招募了71例急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者。所有患者在PCI前均接受CMR,以确定斑块与心肌的信号强度比和LV菌株。MACE包括全因死亡,再梗死,和新的充血性心力衰竭。Mann-WhitneyU检验和卡方检验比较有无MACE的患者,Kaplan-Meier生存分析,Cox比例风险回归和C统计学评估预后,接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线分析以定义截止值。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:Cox比例风险分析表明,斑块与心肌信号强度比和整体纵向应变(GLS)与MACEs独立相关(斑块与心肌信号强度比:风险比(HR)2.80,95%CI,1.25-6.26,P=0.01;GLS:HR1.21,95%CI,1.07-1.38,P<0.01)。ROC显示1.65的斑块与心肌信号强度比和-10%的GLS是MACEs的最佳截断值。斑块与心肌信号强度比的C统计值,GLS,MACE的斑块-心肌信号强度比+GLS分别为0.691、0.792和0.825。与GLS相比,在GLS中添加斑块-心肌信号强度比,可使净重新分类指数增加0.664(P=0.017).
    结论:斑块-心肌信号强度比和GLS与MACEs显著相关。将斑块与心肌的信号强度比添加到GLS大大改善了对MACE的预测。我们的发现表明,斑块-心肌信号强度比结合GLS为MACEs提供了增量预后价值。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the long-term prognostic value of coronary hyper-intensity plaques and left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).
    METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 71 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). All patients underwent CMR before PCI to determine the plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and LV strains. The MACEs included all-cause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test to compare patients with and without MACE, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression and C-statistics to assess prognosis, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define the cutoff value. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were independently associated with MACEs (plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio: hazard ratio (HR) 2.80, 95% CI, 1.25-6.26, P = 0.01; GLS: HR1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.38, P<0.01). ROC showed that a plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio of 1.65 and a GLS of -10% were the best cutoff values for MACEs. The C-statistic values for plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio, GLS, and plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio+GLS for MACEs were 0.691, 0.792, and 0.825, respectively. Compared to GLS alone, the addition of plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS increased the net reclassification index by 0.664 (P = 0.017).
    CONCLUSIONS: Plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and GLS were significantly associated with MACEs. Adding plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS substantially improved the prediction for MACEs. Our findings indicate that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio combined with GLS provides incremental prognostic value for MACEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后联合使用伊伐布雷定和美托洛尔的疗效和安全性。
    80例AMI患者随机分为伊伐布雷定组和对照组。PCI术后伊伐布雷定组采用伊伐布雷定联合美托洛尔治疗,对照组单纯采用美托洛尔治疗。两组均连续治疗1年。超声心动图得出的参数,心率,心肺运动测试(CPET)数据,分析主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和心肌标志物。主要终点是左心室射血分数(LVEF)。安全性结果是血压,肝肾功能。
    在1周时,伊伐布雷定组的LVEF明显高于对照组,PCI术后3个月和1年。PCI术后1周和1个月,伊伐布雷定组心率明显低于对照组。VO2max,代谢当量,无氧阈心率,峰值心率,PCI术后1年,伊伐布雷定组8min心率恢复明显高于对照组。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,伊伐布雷定组一年的MACE总发生率明显低于对照组。PCI术后第2天和第3天,伊伐布雷定组的B型利钠肽明显低于对照组。PCI术后第5天伊伐布雷定组的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I水平明显低于对照组。
    AMI患者PCI术后早期使用伊伐布雷定可以实现有效的心率控制,减少心肌损伤,改善心脏功能和运动耐量,并可能降低主要不良心脏事件的发生率。(临床研究登记号:ChiCTR2000032731)。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effect and safety of the combined use of ivabradine and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients with AMI were randomly divided into the ivabradine group and the control group. The ivabradine group was treated with ivabradine combined with metoprolol after PCI, while the control group was treated with metoprolol only. Both groups were treated continuously for 1 year. Echocardiography-derived parameters, heart rate, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and myocardial markers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The safety outcomes were blood pressure, liver and kidney function.
    UNASSIGNED: The LVEF was significantly higher in the ivabradine group than in the control group at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after PCI. The heart rate of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 week and 1month after PCI. The VO2max, metabolic equivalents, anaerobic threshold heart rate, peak heart rate, and heart rate recovery at 8 min of the ivabradine group were significantly higher than those of the control group at 1 year after PCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the one-year total incidence of MACE in the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The B-type natriuretic peptide of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 2 and Day 3 after PCI. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I level of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 5 after PCI.
    UNASSIGNED: Early use of ivabradine in patients with AMI after PCI can achieve effective heart rate control, reduce myocardial injury, improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance, and may reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. (Clinical research registration number: ChiCTR2000032731).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(CAD)的演变与冠状动脉周围脂肪组织(PCAT)的改变密切相关。在最近的时代,PCAT的特征已逐渐成为CAD风险分层和个性化临床决策研究的重点。利用放射组学方法允许从这些脂肪沉积物中细致地提取成像特征。再加上机器学习范式,我们致力于建立主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发病的预测模型.
    目的:评价冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的PCAT影像特征在预测MACE中的预测作用。
    方法:我们回顾性地纳入了从2019年6月至2022年12月入住我们机构的314名疑似或确诊的CAD患者的数据。来自两个外部机构的242名患者的额外队列被纳入外部验证。考虑的终点是1年随访后MACE的发生。MACE被描述为心血管死亡率,新诊断的心肌梗死,因心力衰竭住院(或再次住院),和冠状动脉靶血管血运重建发生在CCTA检查后30天以上。所有入选患者均接受CCTA扫描。从CCTA图像的最佳舒张期轴向切片中精心提取了放射学特征。通过复合特征选择算法实现了特征约简,为放射学特征模型奠定基础。单变量和多变量分析均用于评估临床变量。多方面的逻辑回归分析有助于构建临床-放射学-放射学组合模型(或列线图)。接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线,校准,并描绘了决策曲线分析(DCA),计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量临床模型的预测能力,放射学模型,和合成的合奏。
    结果:确定了与MACE密切相关的12个放射学特征,以建立放射学模型。多因素logistic回归结果表明,吸烟,年龄,高血压,血脂异常与MACE显著相关。在综合列线图中,在临床上合并,成像,和放射学参数,诊断性能如下:0.970AUC,0.949精度(ACC),0.833灵敏度(SEN),0.981特异性(SPE),0.926阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)为0.955。校准曲线表明列线图的一致性值得称赞,决策曲线分析强调了其优越的临床实用性。
    结论:基于CCTA的PCAT放射学特征的整合,临床指标,和成像参数到列线图中是预测MACE事件的有前途的工具。
    BACKGROUND: The evolution of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD) is intricately linked to alterations in the pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT). In recent epochs, characteristics of the PCAT have progressively ascended as focal points of research in CAD risk stratification and individualized clinical decision-making. Harnessing radiomic methodologies allows for the meticulous extraction of imaging features from these adipose deposits. Coupled with machine learning paradigms, we endeavor to establish predictive models for the onset of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
    OBJECTIVE: To appraise the predictive utility of radiomic features of PCAT derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in forecasting MACE.
    METHODS: We retrospectively incorporated data from 314 suspected or confirmed CAD patients admitted to our institution from June 2019 to December 2022. An additional cohort of 242 patients from two external institutions was encompassed for external validation. The endpoint under consideration was the occurrence of MACE after a 1-year follow-up. MACE was delineated as cardiovascular mortality, newly diagnosed myocardial infarction, hospitalization (or re-hospitalization) for heart failure, and coronary target vessel revascularization occurring more than 30 days post-CCTA examination. All enrolled patients underwent CCTA scanning. Radiomic features were meticulously extracted from the optimal diastolic phase axial slices of CCTA images. Feature reduction was achieved through a composite feature selection algorithm, laying the groundwork for the radiomic signature model. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to assess clinical variables. A multifaceted logistic regression analysis facilitated the crafting of a clinical-radiological-radiomic combined model (or nomogram). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were delineated, with the area under the ROC curve (AUCs) computed to gauge the predictive prowess of the clinical model, radiomic model, and the synthesized ensemble.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 radiomic features closely associated with MACE were identified to establish the radiomic model. Multivariate logistic regression results demonstrated that smoking, age, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were significantly correlated with MACE. In the integrated nomogram, which amalgamated clinical, imaging, and radiomic parameters, the diagnostic performance was as follows: 0.970 AUC, 0.949 accuracy (ACC), 0.833 sensitivity (SEN), 0.981 specificity (SPE), 0.926 positive predictive value (PPV), and 0.955 negative predictive value (NPV). The calibration curve indicated a commendable concordance of the nomogram, and the decision curve analysis underscored its superior clinical utility.
    CONCLUSIONS: The integration of radiomic signatures from PCAT based on CCTA, clinical indices, and imaging parameters into a nomogram stands as a promising instrument for prognosticating MACE events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了接受β受体阻滞剂(BB)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或BB和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗的高Killip级(III/IV)急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的3年临床结局。
    方法:共有13,105名患者在国立卫生研究院(KAMIR-NIH)的韩国急性心肌梗死登记处登记。其中,将871例高Killip分级AMI患者分为BB+ACEI组(n=489)和BB+ARB组(n=381)。在倾向得分匹配之后,每组抽取343例患者。所有患者均完成3年随访。
    结果:结果表明BB+ACEI组和BB+ARB组在心源性死亡方面没有显著差异,复发性心肌梗死,和重复经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比率。然而,BB+ACEI组主要不良心脏事件的风险显著降低(HR=0.574,95%CI:0.421-0.783,p<.001),全因死亡率(HR=0.561,95%CI:0.404-0.778,p=.001),与BB+ARB组相比,非心源性死亡(HR=0.365,95%CI:0.208-0.639,p<.001)。
    结论:我们的结果表明,对于高Killip级AMI患者,BB+ACEI治疗比BB+ARB更有益。此外,与BB+ARB组相比,BB+ACEI组对死亡率具有更好的预防作用。
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the 3-year clinical outcomes of high Killip grade (III/IV) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated with either β-blockers (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or BB and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).
    METHODS: A total of 13,105 patients were registered at the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry at the National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH). Among them, 871 patients with high Killip classification AMI were divided into the BB + ACEI group (n = 489) and the BB + ARB group (n = 381). Following propensity score matching, 343 patients were selected in each group. All patients completed a 3-year follow-up period.
    RESULTS: The results indicate no significant differences between the BB + ACEI group and BB + ARB group in terms of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and the rate of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the BB + ACEI group exhibited significantly lower risks in major adverse cardiac events (HR = 0.574, 95% CI: 0.421-0.783, p < .001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.561, 95% CI: 0.404-0.778, p = .001), and non-cardiac death (HR = 0.365, 95% CI: 0.208-0.639, p < .001) compared to the BB + ARB group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BB + ACEI treatment is more beneficial than BB + ARB for high Killip grade AMI patients. Additionally, the BB + ACEI group has a superior preventative effect on mortality compared to the BB + ARB group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)是心血管疾病(CVDs)风险和临床结果的关键预测因子,我们旨在探讨累积AIP对主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的潜在预测价值,中风,心肌梗死(MI)和心血管死亡率。
    方法:从2011年12月至2012年4月建立了大规模的基于社区的前瞻性队列,并在2014年5月至7月进行了随访。终点结果是在2021年12月31日之前获得的。AIP计算为甘油三酯(TG)与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)的对数转换比,累积AIP为2012年和2014年AIP的平均值。
    结果:总共3820名参与者(男性占36.1%),平均(SD)年龄为59.1(8.7)岁,已注册。在7.5年的中位随访时间内,共有371名(9.7%)参与者被记录为MACE,293名(7.7%)参与者出现中风,68(1.8%)患有MI,65(1.7%)经历心血管死亡。多变量Cox回归分析显示累积AIP与MACE风险之间存在显著关联,中风和MI。关于MACE,在完全调整模型中,具有较高累积AIP单位的个体与经历MACE的发生率增加75%相关,将参与者分为四组,最高累积AIP四分位数的个体与MACE的发生率显着相关(HR=1.76,95CI:1.27-2.44,完全校正模型中p<0.001),卒中(HR=1.69,95CI:1.17-2.45,p=0.005)和MI(HR=2.82,95CI:1.18-6.72,p=0.019)。但在累积AIP和心血管死亡率之间没有观察到显著关联。在亚组分析中,在老年人中,累积AIP与卒中发生率的关联更为明显(HR:0.89vs.<65岁和≥65岁年龄组为2.41,相互作用的p=0.018)。
    结论:较高的累积AIP与MACE风险增加显著相关,在社区人群中,卒中和MI独立于传统的心血管危险因素,累积AIP与卒中的相关性在老年人群中尤为明显.
    BACKGROUND: Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) has been reported as a critical predictor on the risks and clinical outcomes of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and we aimed to explore the potential predictive value of cumulative AIP on major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular mortality.
    METHODS: A large-scale community-based prospective cohort was established from December 2011 to April 2012 and followed up in May to July 2014. The endpoint outcomes were obtained before December 31, 2021. AIP was calculated as the logarithmically transformed ratio of triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and cumulative AIP was the average value of AIP in 2012 and 2014.
    RESULTS: An overall of 3820 participants (36.1% male) with mean (SD) age of 59.1 (8.7) years, were enrolled. Within a median follow-up of 7.5 years, a total of 371 (9.7%) participants were documented with MACE, 293 (7.7%) participants developed stroke, 68 (1.8%) suffered from MI and 65 (1.7%) experienced cardiovascular mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed significant associations between cumulative AIP and the risk of MACE, stroke and MI. Regarding MACE, individuals with one higher unit of cumulative AIP were associated with 75% increment on the incidence of going through MACE in fully adjusted model, while categorizing participants into four groups, individuals in the highest cumulative AIP quartile were significantly associated with increased incidence of MACE (HR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.27-2.44, p < 0.001 in fully adjusted model), stroke (HR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.17-2.45, p = 0.005) and MI (HR = 2.82, 95%CI: 1.18-6.72, p = 0.019). But not a significant association was observed between cumulative AIP and cardiovascular mortality. In subgroup analysis, the association of cumulative AIP and the incidence of stroke was more pronounced in the elderly (HR: 0.89 vs. 2.41 for the age groups < 65 years and ≥ 65 years, p for interaction = 0.018).
    CONCLUSIONS: A higher cumulative AIP was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE, stroke and MI independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in a community-based population, and the association of cumulative AIP and stroke was particularly pronounced in the elderly population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高血糖与急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者和心力衰竭患者的不良预后相关。然而,入院血糖变异性(GV)在预测急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ASTEMI)后合并心力衰竭(HF)的糖尿病患者预后中的意义尚不清楚.这项研究旨在探讨入院GV和入院糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平在ASTEMI后诊断为2型糖尿病和HF的个体中的预后价值。
    我们在接受ASTEMI诊断为2型糖尿病和HF的484例连续患者入院时测量GV和HbA1c。GV,表示为血糖偏移的平均幅度(MAGE),使用连续葡萄糖监测系统(CGMS)进行评估。入院MAGE值分类为<3.9或≥3.9mmol/L,而HbA1c水平分为<6.5%或≥6.5%。对参与者进行为期12个月的前瞻性随访。分析入院MAGE和HbA1c与2型糖尿病合并HF患者ASTEMI后主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的关系。
    在484名登记患者中,根据MAGE类别,MACE的发生有显着差异(<3.9与≥3.9mmol/L),比率分别为13.6%和25.3%,分别(P=0.001)。而MACE的发生率因HbA1c类别而异(<6.5vs.≥6.5%)在15.7%和21.8%,分别为(P=0.086)。具有较高MAGE水平的患者表现出显著升高的心脏死亡风险和增加的HF再住院发生率。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析表明,与低MAGE水平组相比,高MAGE水平组的无事件生存率显着降低(对数秩检验,P<0.001),而HbA1c没有表现出类似的区别。在多变量分析中,高MAGE水平与MACE发生率显著相关(风险比3.645,95%CI1.287-10.325,P=0.015),而HbA1c没有显示出相当的相关性(风险比1.075,95%CI0.907-1.274,P=0.403).
    入院GV升高是2型糖尿病患者在ASTEMI后1年MACE的一个更重要的预测指标,超过HbA1c的预测价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as well as in patients with heart failure. However, the significance of admission glycemic variability (GV) in predicting outcomes among diabetes patients with heart failure (HF) following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of admission GV and admission glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI.
    UNASSIGNED: We measured GV and HbA1c upon admission in 484 consecutive patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI. GV, indicated as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), was assessed utilizing a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). admission MAGE values were categorized as < 3.9 or ≥ 3.9 mmol/L, while HbA1c levels were classified as < 6.5 or ≥ 6.5%. Participants were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The relationship of admission MAGE and HbA1c to the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI was analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 484 enrolled patients, the occurrence of MACE differed significantly based on MAGE categories (< 3.9 vs. ≥ 3.9 mmol/L), with rates of 13.6% and 25.3%, respectively (P = 0.001). While MACE rates varied by HbA1c categories (< 6.5 vs. ≥ 6.5%) at 15.7% and 21.8%, respectively (P = 0.086). Patients with higher MAGE levels exhibited a notably elevated risk of cardiac mortality and an increased incidence of HF rehospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier curves analysis demonstrated a significantly lower event-free survival rate in the high MAGE level group compared to the low MAGE level group (log-rank test, P < 0.001), while HbA1c did not exhibit a similar distinction. In multivariate analysis, high MAGE level was significantly associated with incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 3.645, 95% CI 1.287-10.325, P = 0.015), whereas HbA1c did not demonstrate a comparable association (hazard ratio 1.075, 95% CI 0.907-1.274, P = 0.403).
    UNASSIGNED: Elevated admission GV emerges as a more significant predictor of 1-year MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI, surpassing the predictive value of HbA1c.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:CaIMR被提出作为一种新颖的血管造影指标,旨在评估微循环,而无需压力线或充血剂。我们旨在探讨caIMR对预测STEMI患者临床结局的影响。
    方法:根据caIMR值将2021年10月至2022年9月在上海市普陀医院行PCI的150例STEMI患者分为CMD组和非CMD组。基线信息,与病人相关的检查,收集随访12个月时MACE的发生情况,探讨STEMI患者的危险因素。
    结果:我们根据caIMR结果将140例STEMI患者分为两组,包括61例诊断为CMD的患者和79例诊断为非CMD的患者。随访1年期间共发生21次MACE。与非CMD组相比,CMD患者出现MACE的风险显著增高.对患者进行多变量Cox回归模型,发现caIMR是STEMI患者预后的重要预测因子(HR:8.921)。将CMD患者分为罪犯血管CMD和非罪犯血管CMD,结果发现,罪犯血管CMD与MACE(OR:4.75)和心力衰竭(OR:7.50)的发生率有关。
    结论:CaIMR是临床结局的强预测因子,可以为STEMI患者提供客观的风险分层。白细胞指数之间有很强的相关性,使用呋塞米,Killips分类,和临床结果。
    BACKGROUND: CaIMR is proposed as a novel angiographic index designed to assess microcirculation without the need for pressure wires or hyperemic agents. We aimed to investigate the impact of caIMR on predicting clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.
    METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with STEMI who received PCI in Putuo Hospital of Shanghai from October 2021 to September 2022 were categorized into CMD and non-CMD groups according to the caIMR value. The baseline information, patient-related examinations, and the occurrence of MACE at the 12-month follow-up were collected to investigate risk factors in patients with STEMI.
    RESULTS: We divided 140 patients with STEMI enrolled into two groups according to caIMR results, including 61 patients diagnosed with CMD and 79 patients diagnosed with non-CMD. A total of 21 MACE occurred during the 1 year of follow-up. Compared with non-CMD group, patients with CMD showed a significantly higher risk of MACE. A multivariate Cox regression model was conducted for the patients, and it was found thatcaIMR was a significant predictor of prognosis in STEMI patients (HR: 8.921). Patients with CMD were divided into culprit vascular CMD and non-culprit vascular CMD, and the result found that culprit vascular CMD was associated with the incidence of MACE (OR: 4.75) and heart failure (OR: 7.50).
    CONCLUSIONS: CaIMR is a strong predictor of clinical outcomes and can provide an objective risk stratification for patients with STEMI. There is a strong correlation among leukocyte index, the use of furosemide, Killips classification, and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们最近发表的研究发现,外泌体microRNA(miR)-186-5p促进血管平滑肌细胞的活力和侵袭,从而促进动脉粥样硬化。本研究旨在探讨血清外泌体miR-186-5p对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)预后的影响。
    筛选了150名接受PCI的AMI患者和50名健康对照(HC)。通过逆转录-定量聚合酶链反应检测AMI患者入院时和PCI后以及入组后的HC中的血清外泌体miR-186-5p。在接受PCI的AMI患者随访期间记录主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。
    AMI患者血清外泌体miR-186-5p升高与HCs(P<0.001)。此外,血清外泌体miR-186-5p与体重指数呈正相关(P=0.048),血清肌酐(P=0.021),总胆固醇(P=0.029),和C反应蛋白(P=0.018);而与AMI患者估计的肾小球滤过率(P=0.023)呈负相关。有趣的是,血清外泌体miR-186-5p与ST段抬高型心肌梗死的诊断相关(P=0.034)。值得注意的是,PCI术后血清外泌体miR-186-5p降低与入院时(P<0.001)。6-,12-,18-,24个月累计MACE率为4.5%,8.9%,14.8%,AMI患者为14.8%。此外,PCI术后血清外泌体miR-186-5p≥3.39(HCs中的最大值)(P=0.021),其减少百分比<中位数(35%)减少(P=0.044)估计AMI患者MACE升高.
    血清外泌体miR-186-5p在PCI后降低,其在PCI后的高水平或轻微降低估计会增加AMI患者的MACE风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Our recently published study discovers that exosomal microRNA (miR)-186-5p promotes vascular smooth muscle cell viability and invasion to facilitate atherosclerosis. This research aimed to explore the prognostic implication of serum exosomal miR-186-5p in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and fifty AMI patients receiving PCI and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were screened. Serum exosomal miR-186-5p was detected by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay in AMI patients at admission and after PCI, as well as in HCs after enrollment. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were recorded during follow-up in AMI patients receiving PCI.
    UNASSIGNED: Serum exosomal miR-186-5p was raised in AMI patients vs. HCs (P < 0.001). Besides, serum exosomal miR-186-5p was positively linked to body mass index (P = 0.048), serum creatinine (P = 0.021), total cholesterol (P = 0.029), and C-reactive protein (P = 0.018); while it was reversely linked with estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.023) in AMI patients. Interestingly, serum exosomal miR-186-5p was correlated with the diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.034). Notably, serum exosomal miR-186-5p was decreased after PCI vs. at admission (P < 0.001). The 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month accumulating MACE rates were 4.5%, 8.9%, 14.8%, and 14.8% in AMI patients. Furthermore, serum exosomal miR-186-5p ≥3.39 (maximum value in HCs) after PCI (P = 0.021) and its decrement percentage UNASSIGNED: Serum exosomal miR-186-5p is reduced after PCI, and its post-PCI high level or minor decrease estimates increased MACE risk in AMI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的研究表明,血糖水平相似的人的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平不同,仅依赖HbA1c可能导致临床决策错误。血红蛋白糖化指数(HGI)量化了个体之间HbA1c的差异,并与心血管疾病的风险密切相关。然而,目前尚不清楚这一现象与急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者不良结局之间的联系.
    这次回顾展,单中心队列研究纳入了2010年9月至2020年1月1531例ADHF住院患者.根据观察到的和预测的HbA1c值之间的差异计算HGI[预测的HbA1c=0.024X空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)(mg/dL)+3.1]。研究中检查的终点包括全因死亡,心血管(CV)死亡,和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。我们拟合了多变量校正的Cox比例风险模型来研究HGI和临床结果之间的关联。
    在为期五年的随访期间,427名(27.9%)患者死于各种原因,232(15.6%)来自CV死亡,和848(55.4%)来自MACE。限制性三次样条分析还显示,随着HGI的增加,全因死亡和CV死亡的累积风险线性下降。根据多变量Cox比例风险模型,HGI的最高三元组与全因死亡和心血管死亡[全因死亡,校正风险比(HR):0.720,95%置信区间(CI):0.563-0.921,p=0.009;CV死亡,调整后的HR:0.619,95%CI:0.445-0.861,p=0.004]。HGI增加1%与全因死亡风险降低12.5%和心血管死亡风险降低20.8%相关。
    高HGI与全因死亡和心血管死亡的减少直接相关,但与MACE无关。这些发现可能有助于ADHF患者的治疗。
    最近的研究表明,HbA1c和实际血糖水平之间的显著差异可能导致临床决策错误。先前研究结果的不一致表明,HGI在患有不同疾病的人群中可能具有不同的预测能力。
    A growing number of studies show that people with similar blood glucose levels have different levels of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and relying only on HbA1c may lead to clinical decision-making errors. The haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) quantifies the difference in HbA1c among individuals and is strongly linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the connection between this phenomenon and the poor outcomes of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is currently unknown.
    This retrospective, single-centre-based cohort study included 1531 hospitalized patients with ADHF from September 2010 to January 2020. The HGI is calculated from the difference between the observed and predicted HbA1c values [predicted HbA1c = 0.024 × fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (mg/dL)+3.1]. The endpoints examined in the study included all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We fitted multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models to investigate the association between the HGI and clinical outcomes.
    During the five-year follow-up, 427 (27.9%) patients died from all causes, 232 (15.6%) from CV death, and 848 (55.4%) from MACE. The restricted cubic spline analysis also showed that the cumulative risk of all-cause and CV deaths decreased linearly with increasing HGI. According to multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, the highest tertile of the HGI was associated with a lower incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths [all-cause death, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.720, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.563-0.921, p = 0.009; CV death, adjusted HR: 0.619, 95% CI: 0.445-0.861, p = 0.004]. A 1% increase in the HGI was associated with a 12.5% reduction in the risk of all-cause death and a 20.8% reduction in the risk of CV death.
    A high HGI was directly associated with a reduction in all-cause and CV deaths but was not associated with MACE. These findings may be helpful in the management of patients with ADHF.
    Recent studies have demonstrated that significant discrepancies between HbA1c and actual blood glucose levels may lead to clinical decision-making errors.The inconsistency of previous research results suggests that the HGI may have different predictive ability in populations with different diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:心血管疾病(CVD)是全球范围内死亡的主要原因之一。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,已经提出了几种抗血小板方案。在这个分析中,我们的目的是显示有糖尿病(DM)的患者与无糖尿病(DM)的患者在PCI后接受替格瑞洛和阿司匹林的短期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后,与替格瑞洛单药治疗相关的不良临床结局.
    方法:从2023年9月至11月,四位作者搜索了电子数据库。心血管结局和出血事件是本分析的终点。采用Revman5.4软件进行荟萃分析。使用风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示生成的结果。
    结果:本分析包括2013年至2019年的三项研究,共有22,574名参与者。这项分析的结果表明,DM与主要不良心血管事件的风险显着相关(RR:1.73,95%CI:1.49-2.00;P=0.00001),全因死亡率(RR:2.15,95%CI:1.73-2.66;P=0.00001),心源性死亡(RR:2.82,95%CI:1.42-5.60;P=0.003),卒中(RR:1.78,95%CI:1.16-2.74;P=0.009),与无DM患者相比,心肌梗死(RR:1.63,95%CI:1.17-2.26;P=0.004)和支架内血栓形成(RR:1.74,95%CI:1.03-2.94;P=0.04).然而,心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)定义为轻微和主要出血,根据学术研究联盟(BARC)3c型(RR:1.31,95%CI:0.14-11.90;P=0.81)和BARC2,3或5型(RR:1.17,95%CI:0.85-1.62;P=0.34)定义的出血无显著差异.
    结论:在替格瑞洛和阿司匹林的短疗程DAPT后接受替格瑞洛单药治疗的患者中,DM是心血管不良结局显著增加的独立危险因素。然而,TIMI和BARC定义的出血事件与无DM患者相比无显著差异。
    BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one among the major causes of mortality all round the globe. Several anti-platelet regimens have been proposed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this analysis, we aimed to show the adverse clinical outcomes associated with ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor and aspirin following PCI in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus (DM).
    METHODS: Electronic databases were searched by four authors from September to November 2023. Cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints of this analysis. Revman 5.4 software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the results which were generated.
    RESULTS: Three studies with a total number of 22,574 participants enrolled from years 2013 to 2019 were included in this analysis. Results of this analysis showed that DM was associated with significantly higher risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.49 - 2.00; P = 0.00001), all-cause mortality (RR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.73 - 2.66; P = 0.00001), cardiac death (RR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.42 - 5.60; P = 0.003), stroke (RR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.16 - 2.74; P = 0.009), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.17 - 2.26; P = 0.004) and stent thrombosis (RR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03 - 2.94; P = 0.04) when compared to patients without DM. However, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined minor and major bleedings, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) type 3c (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.14 - 11.90; P = 0.81) and BARC type 2, 3 or 5 (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.85 - 1.62; P = 0.34) were not significantly different.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients who were treated with ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT with ticagrelor and aspirin, DM was an independent risk factor for the significantly increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, TIMI and BARC defined bleeding events were not significantly different in patients with versus without DM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号