Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

腹腔热化疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Clinical T4 (cT4) stage gastric cancer presents with frequent postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis. This study is to evaluate the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy combined with postoperative prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with cT4N + M0 gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    METHODS: We reviewed the clinicopathological data of 174 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy between June 2017 and December 2021. Among them, 142 were included in the non-HIPEC group, and 32 in the HIPEC group. Patients in both groups were paired based on propensity score in a 2:1 ratio to assess disparities in tumor recurrence and long-term survival.
    RESULTS: After matching, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. The peritoneum (16.1%) and distant organs (10.9%) were the most frequent locations for recurrence. Prior to matching, the recurrence rates were similar at all sites for both groups. Compared with those in the non-HIPEC cohort, the recurrence rates at all sites, the lung, and the peritoneum were notably lower in the HIPEC cohort. Prior to matching, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups; following matching, the HIPEC group exhibited notably greater survival rates than did the non-HIPEC group. The disparities in survival rates between the groups became even more pronounced after conducting a stratified analysis among patients with stage III disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic HIPEC after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can effectively reduce the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with cT4N + M0 advanced gastric cancer and significantly improve the prognosis of such patients, which is of great clinical value.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胰腺癌腹膜转移的预后具有挑战性,有限的有效治疗选择。本研究旨在评估细胞减灭术(CRS)与腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)联合作为该患者组治疗策略的有效性和安全性。
    方法:回顾性分析2017年3月至2023年12月在北京世纪坛医院接受CRS+HIPEC治疗的胰腺癌腹膜转移患者的临床资料。这项研究的重点是评估临床特征,严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率,总生存率(OS)。
    结果:本研究共纳入10例患者。中位OS为24.2个月,表明对传统疗法的改进。虽然注意到SAE,包括2例需要额外手术干预的严重并发症,没有围手术期死亡记录.CC0/1患者的总生存时间与CC2/3患者的总生存时间没有显着差异,并且没有确定预后预测因子。
    结论:CRS和HIPEC的组合似乎是胰腺癌腹膜转移患者的可行和有希望的治疗方式,提供提高的生存率和可控的安全问题。需要进一步的研究来完善患者选择标准,并探索这种方法的长期益处。
    OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜假粘液瘤(PMP)是一种惰性恶性综合征。PMP的标准治疗是细胞减灭术加腹腔热化疗(CRS+HIPEC)。然而,高复发率和潜在的临床症状和体征是进一步改善临床结局的主要障碍。此外,由于广泛的腹膜内转移,晚期患者从CRS+HIPEC中获益甚微.PMP治疗的另一个挑战涉及PMP细胞分泌粘液的进行性硬化,通常由于编码鸟嘌呤核苷酸结合蛋白α亚基(GNAS)的基因中的激活突变而增加。因此,迫切需要开发其他PMP疗法。几种免疫相关疗法已经显示出希望,包括使用细菌来源的非特异性免疫原性试剂,放射性免疫治疗剂,和肿瘤细胞衍生的新抗原,但是尚未建立公认的免疫疗法。在这篇综述中,讨论了GNAS突变在促进粘蛋白分泌和疾病发展中的作用。此外,讨论了PMP微环境的免疫学特征和免疫相关治疗,以总结目前对疾病关键特征的理解,并促进免疫疗法的发展.
    Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an indolent malignant syndrome. The standard treatment for PMP is cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). However, the high recurrence rate and latent clinical symptoms and signs are major obstacles to further improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, patients in advanced stages receive little benefit from CRS + HIPEC due to widespread intraperitoneal metastases. Another challenge in PMP treatment involves the progressive sclerosis of PMP cell-secreted mucus, which is often increased due to activating mutations in the gene coding for guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha subunit (GNAS). Consequently, the development of other PMP therapies is urgently needed. Several immune-related therapies have shown promise, including the use of bacterium-derived non-specific immunogenic agents, radio-immunotherapeutic agents, and tumor cell-derived neoantigens, but a well-recognized immunotherapy has not been established. In this review the roles of GNAS mutations in the promotion of mucin secretion and disease development are discussed. In addition, the immunologic features of the PMP microenvironment and immune-associated treatments are discussed to summarize the current understanding of key features of the disease and to facilitate the development of immunotherapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with rapid disease progression. Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) done immediately after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has become an important treatment for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients. However, different treatment options for HIPEC exist with potential influence on survival rates and prognosis in patients, exist. These treatment options include open or closed abdomen technique, perfusion solution, number of catheters, temperature, duration, and drug regimens. This paper aims to provide more evidence on standardization of HIPEC treatment options and technologies by systematically reviewing different drug regimens and technical approaches. The study included 2 randomized controlled trials, 3 phase I/II clinical trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 34 retrospective cohort studies, involving 1511 patients. The most common HIPEC option is to dissolve 50-75 mg/m2 of Cisplatin and 30-40 mg/m2 of Mitomycin C in 3-4 L saline solution at 42-43℃. After gastrointestinal anastomosis, 2-3 catheters are used in the HIPEC system with a perfusion flow rate of 500 ml/min. The duration is 60-90 minutes. Anastomotic leakage was low in studies where HIPEC was performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis. The utilization of open HIPEC and a two-drug regimen resulted in improved overall survival rates. The future development of HIPEC aims to enhance tumor-specific therapy by optimizing various aspects, such as identifying the safest and most effective chemotherapy regimens, refining patient selection criteria, and improving perioperative care.
    胃癌的腹膜转移与疾病迅速进展相关。细胞减灭术(CRS)后直接进行腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)已成为治疗胃癌腹膜转移患者的重要手段。然而,HIPEC存在不同的治疗方案,如开腹或闭腹、灌注液、管数、温度、持续时间以及不同的药物方案,可影响患者的生存率和预后。本文旨在通过对不同的HIPEC药物技术方案进行系统综述,为HIPEC治疗方案和技术的标准化提供更多参考证据。本文纳入两项随机对照试验、3项Ⅰ和Ⅱ期前瞻性临床试验、两项前瞻性队列研究和34项回顾性队列研究,共1 511例患者。最常见的HIPEC方案为将顺铂50~75 mg/m2和丝裂霉素C 30~40 mg/m2溶解于3~4 L生理盐水中,在42℃~43℃的温度下,胃肠吻合后,于闭腹的HIPEC系统中,使用2~3根导管,灌注液流速为500 ml/min,持续时间为60~90 min。在胃肠吻合后进行HIPEC的研究中,吻合口漏发生率较低。采用开腹HIPEC以及两种药物治疗方案的研究显示总体生存率更高。目前HIPEC的治疗方案存在较大异质性,在临床试验中,需进一步比较技术方法和不同的药物方案,以明确最佳治疗方案,使得该技术合乎标准化。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了在中国妇产科联合会(FIGO)IIIC期患者中,紫杉醇为基础的腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)联合序贯静脉新辅助化疗相对于单纯静脉新辅助化疗的潜在优势。IVA和IVB高级别浆液性卵巢/输卵管癌(HGSOC)。该中期分析侧重于两种方案的安全性和即时疗效,以确定计划试验(C-HOC试验)的可行性。
    方法:在单中心,开放标签,随机对照试验,FIGO阶段IIIC,IVA,和IVBHGSOC患者(腹腔镜探查期间FAGOTTI评分≥8分)不适合在原发性减瘤手术(PDS)中进行最佳细胞减量治疗,在腹腔镜探查期间以2:1的比例随机分组.实验组(HIPEC组)接受一个周期的腹腔新辅助腹腔镜腹腔热化疗(紫杉醇),随后三个周期的静脉化疗(紫杉醇加卡铂),对照组仅接受3个周期的静脉化疗。两组随后都进行了间隔减积手术(IDS)。化疗的不良反应,术后并发症,比较IDS后病理化疗反应评分(CRS)。
    结果:在65名入选患者中,39例HIPEC组和21例对照组患者接受IDS。3-4级化疗相关的不良反应主要是血液学的,两组之间没有显着差异。HIPEC集团表现出更高的CRS3比例(20.5%与4.8%;P=0.000)。IDS的R0切除率为69.2%(HIPEC组)和66.7%(对照组)。R2切除发生率为2.6%(HIPEC组)和14.3%(对照组)。无再次手术或术后死亡报告,并发症得到保守治疗.
    结论:HIPEC与IVNACT联合治疗卵巢癌具有安全性和可行性,没有增加化疗相关的不良反应或术后并发症。HIPEC改善肿瘤对新辅助化疗的反应,可能提高无进展生存期(PFS)。然而,最终的总体生存结果尚待确定,确定HIPEC联合IVNACT是否优于单独IVNACT。
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the potential superiority of combining paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with sequential intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy over intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC, IVA and IVB high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube carcinoma (HGSOC). This interim analysis focuses on the safety and immediate efficacy of both regimens to determine the feasibility of the planned trial (C-HOC Trial).
    METHODS: In a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial, FIGO stage IIIC, IVA, and IVB HGSOC patients (FAGOTTI score ≥ 8 during laparoscopic exploration) unsuitable for optimal cytoreduction in primary debulking surgery (PDS) were randomized 2:1 during laparoscopic exploration. The Experiment Group (HIPEC Group) received one cycle of intraperitoneal neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel) followed by three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin), while the Control Group received only three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Both groups subsequently underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS). The adverse effects of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and pathological chemotherapy response scores (CRS) after IDS were compared.
    RESULTS: Among 65 enrolled patients, 39 HIPEC Group and 21 Control Group patients underwent IDS. Grade 3-4 chemotherapy-related adverse effects were primarily hematological with no significant differences between the two groups. The HIPEC Group exhibited a higher proportion of CRS 3 (20.5% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.000). R0 resection rates in IDS were 69.2% (HIPEC Group) and 66.7% (Control Group). R2 resection occurred in 2.6% (HIPEC Group) and 14.3% (Control Group) cases. No reoperations or postoperative deaths were reported, and complications were managed conservatively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining HIPEC with IV NACT in treating ovarian cancer demonstrated safety and feasibility, with no increased chemotherapy-related adverse effects or postoperative complications. HIPEC improved tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, potentially enhancing progression-free survival (PFS). However, the final overall survival results are pending, determining if HIPEC combined with IV NACT is superior to IV NACT alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗的阑尾假性黏液瘤(PMP)患者腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)期间灌注管堵塞的影响因素。并构建一个列线图来预测输卵管阻塞的风险。
    方法:观察性研究。研究的地点和持续时间:胃肠外科,山东第一医科大学附属中心医院,济南,中国,从2017年6月到2023年12月。
    方法:管闭塞定义为无法实现30分钟的连续通畅灌注。统计方法,如单变量分析,多变量分析,采用Lasso回归进行数据分析。
    结果:结果显示,在383例腹腔热灌注化疗治疗中,有27%导致了导管闭塞事件。多因素logistic回归分析确定年龄,CA-125、CA19-9、病理类型为独立危险因素。构建了预测管闭塞的列线图,并验证了其预测准确性和临床实用性。
    结论:本研究成功地建立了列线图来预测腹膜假性黏液瘤患者在细胞减灭术联合腹腔热化疗治疗期间的导管阻塞风险。为临床实践提供有价值的指导,并帮助制定个性化治疗决策,以改善患者预后。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证模型的可靠性和临床适用性,以及研究导管闭塞对治疗结果的影响和相应的管理策略。
    背景:腹膜假粘液瘤,细胞减灭术,腹腔热灌注化疗治疗,导管闭塞,列线图。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors contributing to the blockage of perfusion tubes during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) undergoing combined cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment, and to construct a nomogram for predicting the risk of tube occlusion.
    METHODS: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China, from June 2017 to December 2023.
    METHODS: Tube occlusion was defined as the inability to achieve 30 minutes of continuous unobstructed perfusion. Statistical methods such as univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and Lasso regression were employed for data analysis.
    RESULTS: The results revealed that 27% of the 383 hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion treatments resulted in the tube occlusion events. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, CA-125, CA19-9, and pathological type as the independent risk factors. A nomogram predicting the tube occlusion was constructed and validated for its predictive accuracy and clinical utility.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully developed a nomogram to predict the tube occlusion risk during cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment for patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei, providing valuable guidance for clinical practice and aiding in personalised treatment decisions to improve patient prognosis. However, further research is needed to validate the reliability and clinical applicability of the model, as well as to investigate the impact of tube occlusion on treatment outcomes and corresponding management strategies.
    BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei, Cytoreductive surgery, Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment, Tube occlusion, Nomogram.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:CRS+HIPEC联合泌尿道切除和重建的安全性和有效性存在争议。本研究旨在总结CRS+HIPEC联合泌尿道切除重建的临床病理特征,评价其安全性和生存预后。
    方法:从我们的疾病特异性数据库中回顾性选择作为CRS手术一部分而接受尿路切除和重建的患者进行分析。临床病理特征,治疗相关变量,围手术期不良事件(AE),使用描述性方法和对数秩比较的K-M分析研究了生存结局。
    结果:纳入49例患者。11例(22.4%)患者围手术期出现严重不良事件(SAEs),3例患者发生尿SAE(6.1%)。此外,有23例(46.8%)涉及尿液不良事件(UAE)。整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为59.2(95CI:42.1-76.4)个月。UAE组和No-UAE组的中位OS为59.2个月(未达到95CI),和50.5(95CI:11.5至89.6)个月,分别,差异无统计学意义(P=0.475)。此外,根据UAE的等级或UAE的数量,OS没有显着差异(分别为P=0.562和P=0.622)。
    结论:CRS+HIPEC与尿路切除和重建的组合与I-II级UAE的高发生率相关,对操作系统没有影响。这种组合技术的安全性是可以接受的。然而,这是一个回顾性的单中心单臂分析,具有普适性和潜在选择偏差的局限性。这些发现需要高级验证。
    BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction are controversial. This study aims to summarize the clinicopathological features and to evaluate the safety and survival prognosis of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction.
    METHODS: The patients who underwent urinary tract resection and reconstruction as part of CRS surgery were retrospectively selected from our disease-specific database for analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment-related variables, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were studied using a descriptive approach and the K-M analysis with log-rank comparison.
    RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Perioperative serious AEs (SAEs) were observed in 11 patients (22.4%), with urinary SAEs occurring in 3 patients (6.1%). Additionally, there were 23 cases (46.8%) involving urinary adverse events (UAEs). The median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 59.2 (95%CI: 42.1-76.4) months. The median OS of the UAE group and No-UAE group were 59.2 months (95%CI not reached), and 50.5 (95%CI: 11.5 to 89.6) months, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.475). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in OS based on the grade of UAEs or the number of UAEs (P = 0.562 and P = 0.622, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS + HIPEC with urinary tract resection and reconstruction is associated with a high incidence of Grade I-II UAEs, which do not have an impact on OS. The safety profile of this combined technique is acceptable. However, this is a retrospective single-center single-arm analysis, with limitations of generalizability and potential selection bias. The findings need high-level validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤(LAMNs)是罕见且异质性的疾病,尽管发病率增加,有很好的区别,往往是无痛的,组织学上缺乏独特的侵入性特征,没有浸润性生长,破坏性渗透,或相关的促纤维增生反应。然而,这些肿瘤的生物学行为在术前或术中难以确定,破裂的可能性使患者面临腹膜假黏液性肿瘤(PMPs)的风险。低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤和腹膜假黏液性肿瘤患者病情进展缓慢,无法治愈,复发风险高,发病率,最终死亡,尽管报告的5年和10年生存率为50-86%和45-68%,分别。在这篇文章中,我们报告了一个80岁的男性,患有一个巨大的低级别阑尾粘液性肿瘤,与腹膜假粘液性肿瘤相关,并结合文献综述讨论巨大的低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤的诊断和治疗策略。
    Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases that, despite their increased incidence, are well differentiated, tend to be painless, and histologically lack distinctive invasive features without infiltrative growth, destructive infiltration, or associated pro-fibroproliferative responses. However, the biological behaviour of these tumours is difficult to determine preoperatively or intraoperatively, and the possibility of rupture puts patients at risk for peritoneal pseudomucinous neoplasms (PMPs).Patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumours and peritoneal pseudomucinous tumours experience slow disease progression and are incurable and have a high risk of recurrence, morbidity, and ultimately death, despite the reported 5- and 10-year survival rates of 50-86% and 45-68%, respectively. In this article, we report the case of a 80-year-old male with a giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumour associated with a peritoneal pseudomucinous tumour, and discuss the diagnostic and management strategies for giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumours in the context of a literature review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们旨在评估细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(PSM)的术后安全性,并对血流感染的危险因素及病原菌耐药性进行分析。
    我们回顾性分析了1500例接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的PSM患者术后血流感染的发生率。我们利用单变量和多变量分析来筛选与CRS合并HIPEC术后血流感染相关的独立危险因素。
    在接受CRS合并HIPEC的1500例患者中,207例(13.8%)发生血流感染。共分离培养病原菌233株,由151个革兰氏阳性球菌组成,52革兰阴性杆菌,和30种真菌。革兰阳性球菌(54.94%)为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(SCN),而肺炎克雷伯菌亚种。肺炎(7.30%)和大肠埃希菌(5.58%)以革兰阴性杆菌为主。白色念珠菌是主要真菌。葡萄球菌对替加环素表现出高度敏感性,利奈唑胺,万古霉素,和奎尼普汀/达福普汀。然而,肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌对亚胺培南耐药。此外,五个参数与血流感染的发展相关:年龄(P=0.040),手术史(P=0.033),先前的肿瘤治疗(P<0.001),肿瘤组织类型(P=0.034),和细胞减灭术(CC)评分的完整性(P=0.004)。其中,年龄(P=0.013),先前的肿瘤治疗(P=0.001),肿瘤组织类型(P=0.032),和CC评分(P=0.002)是CRS合并HIPEC患者术后血流感染的独立危险因素。
    接受CRS合并HIPEC的PSM患者的术后血流感染主要归因于SCN,肺炎克雷伯菌亚种。肺炎,还有白色念珠菌.值得注意的是,肠杆菌科细菌对碳青霉烯具有抗性。PSM术后感染的独立危险因素包括年龄、先前的肿瘤治疗,肿瘤组织类型,和细胞减少评分的完整性。
    UNASSIGNED: In this study we aimed to evaluate the postoperative safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM), and analyzed the risk factors and pathogen resistance associated with bloodstream infections.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative bloodstream infections in 1500 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for PSM. We utilized univariate and multivariate analyses to screen for independent risk factors associated with postoperative bloodstream infections in CRS combined with HIPEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 1500 cases of individuals undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC, 207 cases (13.8%) experienced bloodstream infections. A total of 233 strains of pathogens were isolated and cultured, consisting of 151 gram-positive cocci, 52 gram-negative bacilli, and 30 fungi. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCN) were the gram-positive cocci (54.94%), while Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae (7.30%) and Escherichia coli (5.58%) dominated the Gram-negative bacilli. Candida albicans was the predominant fungus. Staphylococci exhibited high sensitivity to tigecycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. However, K. pneumoniae and E. coli were resistant to imipenem. Furthermore, five parameters were associated with the development of bloodstream infections: age (P = 0.040), surgical history (P = 0.033), prior tumor treatment (P < 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.034), and completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (P = 0.004). Among these, age (P = 0.013), prior tumor treatment (P = 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.032), and CC score (P = 0.002) emerged as independent risk factors for postoperative bloodstream infections in patients undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative bloodstream infections in patients with PSM undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC are predominantly attributed to SCN, K. pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae, and C. albicans. Notably, Enterobacteriaceae exhibited resistance to carbapenem. Independent risk factors for postoperative infections in PSM include age, prior tumor treatment, tumor tissue type, and completeness of cytoreduction score.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Peritoneal metastasis is one of the common site of colorectal cancer metastasis and associated with a poor prognosis. The core strategy for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis primarily revolves around a comprehensive treatment approach with cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy as the mainstay, supplemented by intraperitoneal chemotherapy. As an important supplement to treatment, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has broad application prospects. The main modalities are hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (SPIC), normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). To promote the standardized application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, further research on the mechanisms underlying peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer, selection of effective intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents, determination of optimal timing and administration protocols, exploration of the feasibility of sequential intraperitoneal chemotherapy and conduction of valuable basic and clinical research are currently needed. This paper will review the development and origins of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, treatment modalities, as well as the current application status and prospects of various treatment approaches in the context of peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer.
    腹膜转移是结直肠癌常见的转移部位之一,且预后差。结直肠癌腹膜转移的核心治疗策略是以肿瘤细胞减灭术及全身系统化疗为主,腹腔内化疗为辅的综合治疗技术。作为治疗的重要补充,腹腔内化疗具有广阔的应用前景,其模式主要有腹腔内热灌注化疗、新辅助腹腔内化疗联合全身化疗、术后早期腹腔内化疗、术后序贯腹腔内化疗、常温腹腔内化疗及加压气溶胶腹腔内化疗等。目前需要进一步研究结直肠癌腹膜转移的机制,选择有效的腹腔内化疗药物及用药时机、给药模式,探索序贯腹腔内化疗的可行性,进行有价值的基础和临床研究,从而推动腹腔内化疗的规范化开展。本文将综述腹腔内化疗的起源发展、治疗方式及其在结直肠癌腹膜转移中的应用现状和前景。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号