背景:在中国引入胸痛中心(CPC)在缩短护理操作时间方面取得了巨大的成功,从而显着改善了ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的治疗和预后。由于护士注意力分散,护理交接期仍被认为是不良事件的高发期,潜在中断,责任不明确。在中共机制下,护理效率和患者预后,是否受护理交接的影响,仍然是研究中的知识空白。这也是本研究的目的所在。
方法:通过中国CPC数据库,对2018年1月至2019年12月来自四川省北部某三级医院的STEMI患者的数据进行了回顾性研究。根据患者在急诊科就诊的时间,将患者分为交接组和非交接组。D2FMC,FMC2FE,FMC2BS,FMC2CBR,FMC2FAD,选择D2W和D2W来衡量护理效率。主要不良心血管事件的发生,住院72小时内肌钙蛋白值最高,选择住院时间来衡量患者的预后.连续变量总结为平均值±SD,并对数据进行t检验。P值<0.05(双尾)被认为是统计学上显著的。
结果:共纳入231例,其中40例(17.3%)被分为交接期组,191人(82.6%)属于非交接期组。结果表明,移交期组在FMC2BS(P<0.001)和FMC2FAD(P<0.001)项目上花费的时间明显更长。尽管如此,D2FMC和FMC2FE没有显著差异,其他人的变化太少,没有临床意义,以及患者的结果。
结论:本研究证实,护理交接影响STEMI患者的护理效率,特别是在FMC2BS和FMC2FAD中。医院还应改革CPC建设后的护理交接规则,加强护士的分诊培训,以确保护理效率,使CPC更好地发挥作用。
The introduction of chest pain centers (CPC) in
China has achieved great success in shortening the duration of nursing operations to significantly improve the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The nursing
handover period is still considered the high incidence period of adverse events because of the distractibility of nurses\' attention, potential interruption, and unclear responsibilities. Under the CPC mechanism, the nursing efficiency and patients\' outcome, whether affected by the nursing handover, is still a knowledge gap in research. This is also the aim of this study.
A retrospective study was conducted with data from STEMI patients from a tertiary hospital in the north of Sichuan Province from January 2018 to December 2019 through the Chinese CPC database. Patients are divided into
handover and non-
handover groups according to the time they presented in the Emergency Department. D2FMC, FMC2FE, FMC2BS, FMC2CBR, FMC2FAD, and D2W were selected to measure nursing efficiency. The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, the highest troponin values within 72 h of hospitalization, and the length of hospitalization were selected to measure the patient outcomes. Continuous variables are summarized as mean ± SD, and t-tests of the data were performed. P-values < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant.
A total of 231 cases were enrolled, of which 40 patients (17.3%) were divided into the handover period group, and 191 (82.6%) belonged to the non-
handover period group. The results showed that the handover period group took significantly longer on items FMC2BS (P < 0.001) and FMC2FAD (P < 0.001). Still, there were no significant differences in D2FMC and FMC2FE, and others varied too little to be clinically meaningful, as well as the outcomes of patients.
This study confirms that nursing handover impacts the nursing efficiency of STEMI patients, especially in FMC2BS and FMC2FAD. Hospitals should also reform the nursing
handover rules after the construction of CPC and enhance the triage training of nurses to assure nursing efficiency so that CPC can play a better role.