Fertility Agents, Female

生育剂,Female
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了确定子宫内膜厚度(EMT)在i)柠檬酸克罗米芬(CC)和促性腺激素(Gn)之间是否不同,使用患者作为自己的对照,和ii)受孕CC和未受孕CC的患者。此外,研究晚期卵泡EMT与妊娠结局之间的关系,在CC和Gn周期。
    回顾性研究。为了本研究的目的,分别进行了三组分析。在分析1中,我们纳入了最初接受CC/IUI(CC1,n=1252)的女性的所有周期,其次是Gn/IUI(Gn1,n=1307),要比较CC/IUI和Gn/IUI之间的EMT差异,利用女性作为自己的控制。在分析2中,我们纳入了所有CC/IUI周期(CC2,n=686),这些周期来自在同一研究期间最终受孕CC的女性,评估受孕CC(CC2)和未受孕CC(CC1)的患者之间的EMT差异。在分析3中,在CC/IUI和Gn/IUI周期中评估了不同EMT四分位数之间的妊娠结局,分开,探讨EMT与妊娠结局之间的潜在关联。
    在分析1中,当CC1与Gn1循环进行比较时,EMT明显变薄[中位数(IQR):6.8(5.5-8.0)与8.3(7.0-10.0)mm,p<0.001]。患者内,CC1与Gn1EMT相比平均薄1.7mm。广义线性混合模型,针对混杂因素进行了调整,结果相似(系数:1.69,95%CI:1.52-1.85,CC1为参考。).在分析2中,将CC1与CC2EMT进行了比较,前者在[中位数(IQR):6.8(5.5-8.0)与7.2(6.0-8.9)mm,p<0.001]和调整后(系数:0.59,95CI:0.34-0.85,CC1为参考。).在分析3中,随着CC周期中EMT四分位数的增加(Q1至Q4),临床妊娠率(CPRs)和持续妊娠率(OPR)得到改善(分别为p<0.001,p<0.001),而在Gn周期中没有观察到这种趋势(分别为p=0.94,p=0.68)。广义估计方程模型,针对混杂因素进行了调整,提示在CC周期中EMT与CPR和OPR呈正相关,但不是在Gn周期。
    患者内部,与Gn相比,CC通常导致更薄的EMT。子宫内膜变薄与CC周期中OPR降低有关,而在Gn周期中未检测到这种关联。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine whether endometrial thickness (EMT) differs between i) clomiphene citrate (CC) and gonadotropin (Gn) utilizing patients as their own controls, and ii) patients who conceived with CC and those who did not. Furthermore, to investigate the association between late-follicular EMT and pregnancy outcomes, in CC and Gn cycles.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study. Three sets of analyses were conducted separately for the purpose of this study. In analysis 1, we included all cycles from women who initially underwent CC/IUI (CC1, n=1252), followed by Gn/IUI (Gn1, n=1307), to compare EMT differences between CC/IUI and Gn/IUI, utilizing women as their own controls. In analysis 2, we included all CC/IUI cycles (CC2, n=686) from women who eventually conceived with CC during the same study period, to evaluate EMT differences between patients who conceived with CC (CC2) and those who did not (CC1). In analysis 3, pregnancy outcomes among different EMT quartiles were evaluated in CC/IUI and Gn/IUI cycles, separately, to investigate the potential association between EMT and pregnancy outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: In analysis 1, when CC1 was compared to Gn1 cycles, EMT was noted to be significantly thinner [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 8.3 (7.0-10.0) mm, p<0.001]. Within-patient, CC1 compared to Gn1 EMT was on average 1.7mm thinner. Generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for confounders, revealed similar results (coefficient: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.52-1.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 2, CC1 was compared to CC2 EMT, the former being thinner both before [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 7.2 (6.0-8.9) mm, p<0.001] and after adjustment (coefficient: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.34-0.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 3, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) improved as EMT quartiles increased (Q1 to Q4) among CC cycles (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), while no such trend was observed among Gn cycles (p=0.94, p=0.68, respectively). Generalized estimating equations models, adjusted for confounders, suggested that EMT was positively associated with CPR and OPR in CC cycles, but not in Gn cycles.
    UNASSIGNED: Within-patient, CC generally resulted in thinner EMT compared to Gn. Thinner endometrium was associated with decreased OPR in CC cycles, while no such association was detected in Gn cycles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:患有多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的妇女通常被选择在IVF/ICSI治疗期间接受促排卵方案或在冻融胚胎移植(FET)中进行子宫内膜准备的程序化方案。程序化的方案允许灵活地安排胚胎移植,但需要长期使用外源性雌激素和更高剂量的黄体支持,而来曲唑排卵方案仅需要较低剂量的黄体支持。最近,多项研究表明,与程序化方案相比,来曲唑排卵方案可改善PCOS患者FET的妊娠结局.然而,这些研究大多是回顾性的,和前瞻性研究是迫切需要的,从角度研究的证据是不够的。
    方法:我们正在进行多中心,随机化,PCOS女性子宫内膜准备FET方案的对照临床试验。符合条件的妇女被随机分配到来曲唑排卵方案或子宫内膜准备的程序化方案。主要结果是临床妊娠率。
    结论:本研究结果将为子宫内膜准备来曲唑排卵方案是否可以改善接受FET的PCOS妇女的妊娠结局提供证据。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiCTR2200062244。2022年7月31日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are usually selected to undergo an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) during their IVF/ICSI treatment. The programmed regimen permits flexible scheduling of embryo transfer but requires long-term usage of exogenous estrogen and higher dosages of luteal support while the letrozole ovulation regimen needs lower dosages of luteal support only. Recently, multiple studies have shown that the letrozole ovulation regimen can improve pregnancy outcomes of FET in women with PCOS compared with the programmed regimen. However, most of these studies are retrospective, and prospective studies are urgently needed the evidence from the perspective study is insufficient.
    METHODS: We are undertaking a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial of an endometrial preparation regimen for FET in women with PCOS. The eligible women are randomly assigned to either the letrozole ovulation regimen or the programmed regimen for endometrial preparation. The primary outcome is the clinical pregnancy rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will provide evidence for whether the letrozole ovulation regimen for endometrial preparation could improve pregnancy outcomes in PCOS women undergoing FET.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244. Registered on 31 July 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年妇女辅助生殖技术成功率下降,归因于卵母细胞数量和质量的下降,提出了重大挑战。目前,对于接受IVF的老年女性的最佳卵巢刺激方案尚无共识.这项回顾性注册的队列研究旨在比较累积活产率(CLBR),活产时间(TTLB),35岁以上女性接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)或克罗米芬和促性腺激素联合治疗(CC联合治疗)卵巢刺激方案的成本效益。为了比较治疗结果,我们对2871个接受GnRHa或CC联合治疗方案的35岁以上女性IVF周期进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM),导致每组375个周期。此外,利用决策树模型评估两种方案的成本效益.在PSM之后,两组的基线特征相似.CC共同处理方案导致更高的周期取消率(13.07%vs.8.00%,p=0.032),但两组的受精率和胚胎质量相当。尽管在CC共处理组中TTLB更长,每个初始周期的CLBR(41.07%与45.33%,p=0.269),在24个月的随访中,两组的分娩结果相似。此外,CC共同治疗组的平均每次活产成本比GnRHa组低21.27%(¥32,301.42vs.¥39,174.22)。总之,对于35岁以上接受试管婴儿的女性,CC共处理协议提供了与GnRHa协议相当的CLBR,但成本较低,表明其作为一种可行且具有成本效益的卵巢刺激选择的潜力。临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/,标识符[ChiCTR2300076537]。
    The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种影响许多育龄妇女的内分泌妇科疾病。克罗米芬是PCOS患者的一线治疗药物,但是大多数人可能会对它产生抵抗力。本研究旨在评估地塞米松和氯米芬治疗PCOS患者的疗效。为临床医师研究和治疗PCOS提供理论依据。
    方法:中文和英文数据库,包括PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方医学网,和VIP信息中文期刊服务平台(VIP)从成立至2023年1月进行搜索。使用ReviewManager和Stata软件进行Meta分析。使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具评估符合条件的研究的偏倚风险。通过漏斗图评估出版偏倚,Begg\和Egger\的测试。
    结果:最终收录了12篇文献,共有1270名PCOS患者。与对照组相比,地塞米松联合克罗米芬能显著改善妊娠(RR=1.71,P<0.00001),排卵(RR=1.30,P<0.00001),黄体生成素水平(SMD=-0.94,P<0.00001),雌二醇水平(SMD=0.99,P=0.05),孕酮程度(SMD=5.08,P=0.002)和睾酮程度(SMD=-1.59,P<0.00001)。然而,对促排卵激素水平无显著影响(SMD=0.15,P=0.37),不良反应(RR=1.30,P=0.30),头晕(RR=1.50,P=0.45),呕吐(RR=1.67,P=0.48)。
    结论:地塞米松联合克罗米芬治疗有助于提高PCOS患者的排卵率和妊娠率。改善患者的激素水平。
    OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine gynecological disease affecting many women of reproductive age. Clomiphene is the first-line treatment for PCOS patients, but most individuals may be resistant to it. This study aims to assess the efficacy of dexamethasone and clomiphene in the treatment of PCOS patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to study and treat PCOS.
    METHODS: Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Medical Network, and VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform (VIP) were searched from the inception to January 2023. Review Manager and Stata software were used for meta- analysis. The risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed using Cochrane\'s risk of bias tool. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots, Begg\'s and Egger\'s tests.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 literatures were finally included, with a total of 1270 PCOS patients. Compared with the control group, dexamethasone combined with clomiphene could significantly improve pregnancy (RR = 1.71, P < 0.00001), ovulation (RR = 1.30, P < 0.00001), luteinizing hormone level (SMD = -0.94, P < 0.00001), estradiol level (SMD = 0.99, P = 0.05), progesterone level (SMD = 5.08, P = 0.002) and testosterone level (SMD = -1.59, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant effects on ovulation-stimulating hormone level (SMD = 0.15, P = 0.37), adverse reactions (RR = 1.30, P = 0.30), dizziness (RR = 1.50, P = 0.45), and vomiting (RR = 1.67, P = 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of dexamethasone combined with clomiphene is helpful to improve the ovulation and pregnancy rate in patients with PCOS, and improve the hormone levels of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of luteal phase and follicular phase progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with clomiphene citrate supplementation (LPPOS+CC and FPPOS+CC) in young women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).
    METHODS: A total of 483 women aged ≤35 years with DOR, who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/embryo transfer (ET) with controlled ovarian stimulation using LPPOS+CC (n=257) or FPPOS+CC (n=226) protocols during June 2018 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, were included in this retrospective study. The baseline characteristics, superovulation results, laboratory related indicators between the two groups, and the pregnancy outcomes of women who achieved at least one high-quality cleavage-stage embryo or good-morphology blastocyst were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with respect to age, duration of infertility, proportion of secondary infertility, previous failed cycles, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count, basal luteinizing hormone level, basal progesterone level, number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rate, high-quality cleavage-stage embryo cycle rate, the percentage of women with profound pituitary suppression, live birth rate and preterm birth rate (all P>0.05). The LH levels on the day of trigger [4.0 (2.7, 5.3) vs. 5.1 (3.2, 7.2) IU/L], the percentage of women with LH levels of >10 IU/L on the trigger day (3.13% vs. 10.67%), and the two pronucleus (2PN) rate of ICSI oocytes (72.16% vs. 79.56%) were significantly lower in the LPPOS+CC group than those in the FPPOS+CC group (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The duration of stimulation [11 (9, 12) vs. 9 (8, 11) d], the consumption of total gonadotropin [2213 (1650, 2700) vs. 2000 (1575, 2325) IU], the progesterone levels on the day of trigger [1.3 (0.8, 2.9) vs. 0.9 (0.6, 1.2) ng/mL], the clinical pregnancy rate [61.88% vs. 46.84%], and implantation rate [42.20% vs. 31.07%] in the LPPOS+CC group were significantly higher than those in the FPPOS+CC group (all P<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to FPPOS+CC, the LPPOS+CC protocol appears to have better pregnancy outcomes for young women with DOR undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET.
    目的: 比较卵泡期和黄体期启动高孕激素状态超促排卵(PPOS)方案在35岁及以下卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者中的应用效果。方法: 回顾性分析2018年6月至2021年12月在温州医科大学附属第一医院生殖医学中心采用PPOS方案行体外受精/卵胞质内单精子注射-胚胎移植的483例35岁及以下DOR患者的资料,其中采用卵泡期PPOS方案226例(FPPOS+CC组),黄体期PPOS方案257例(LPPOS+CC组)。比较两组的基线特征、超促排卵结果和实验室相关指标,并比较获得第三天(以下简称D3)优质胚胎的患者超促排卵后第一次冻融胚胎移植的妊娠结局。结果: 两组间年龄、不孕年限、继发不孕占比、既往治疗周期数、体重指数、抗米勒管激素、窦状卵泡数、基础黄体生成素、基础孕酮水平、平均获卵数、MⅡ卵率、D3优质胚胎率、深度垂体抑制发生率、活产率和早产率等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与FPPOS+CC组比较,LPPOS+CC组诱发排卵日黄体生成素(LH)水平[分别为4.0(2.7,5.3)和5.1(3.2,7.2)IU/L]、早发LH峰发生率(分别为3.13%和10.67%)、卵胞质内单精子注射双原核受精率(分别为72.16%和79.56%)均更低(P<0.05或P<0.01),而促性腺激素(Gn)天数[分别为11(9,12)和9(8,11)d]、Gn总量[分别为2213(1650,2700)和2000(1575,2325)IU]、诱发排卵日孕酮水平[分别为1.3(0.8,2.9)和0.9(0.6,1.2)ng/mL]、冻融胚胎移植的临床妊娠率(分别为61.88%和46.84%)和着床率(分别为42.20%和31.07%)均更高(均P<0.01)。结论: 35岁及以下DOR患者采用LPPOS+CC方案后冻融胚胎移植临床妊娠结局更佳。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是育龄妇女中最常见的生殖内分泌疾病,是无排卵性不孕的主要原因,占病例的70%至80%。促排卵是PCOS不孕患者的主要治疗方法。用于此目的的常用药物是柠檬酸氯米芬(CC)和来曲唑(LE)。枸橼酸氯米芬的排卵率从60%到85%不等。虽然怀孕率限制在35%到40%,活产率进一步下降。来曲唑显示出略高的妊娠率和活产率相比,克罗米芬柠檬酸盐,尽管在更长的刺激周期方面仍然存在挑战,多胎妊娠,和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险。临床报告表明,针灸疗法在治疗PCOS相关性不孕症患者方面显示出有希望的疗效。尽管对其潜在机制有部分不清楚的理解。
    方法:在本研究中,1例患者尽管使用枸橼酸氯米芬和来曲唑诱导排卵超过1年,但仍未实现妊娠.然而,在接受面颊针灸疗法3个月后,她成功怀孕并生下了一个活体婴儿。另一名患者经过2个月的独家脸颊针灸治疗后获得了自然受孕和活产。
    方法:PCOS。
    方法:面颊针灸疗法。
    结果:他们两个都成功怀孕并生下了一个活生生的婴儿。
    结论:这些发现表明,面针疗法可以有效刺激卵泡发育和排卵,可能改善子宫内膜容受性。根据全息理论,脸颊区域内有一个生物全息模型,与人体结构具有同源性。该模型为脸颊穴位刺激对下丘脑-垂体-卵巢轴(HPO)的调节作用提供了解释,从而影响患者的卵泡发育和排卵。因此,当面颊针灸疗法单独应用或与促排卵药物联合应用时,患者有能力成功怀孕并顺利分娩。
    BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common reproductive endocrine disorder among women of childbearing age and is the primary cause of anovulatory infertility, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases. Ovulation induction is the main treatment approach for infertile patients with PCOS. Commonly utilized medications for this purpose are clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole (LE). Clomiphene citrate administration results in an ovulation rate ranging from 60% to 85%, while the pregnancy rate is limited to 35% to 40%, and a further reduction is observed in live birth rates. Letrozole demonstrates a slightly higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to clomiphene citrate, although challenges persist in terms of longer stimulation cycles, multiple pregnancies, and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Clinical reports indicate that acupuncture therapy shows promising efficacy in treating patients with PCOS-related infertility, despite a partially unclear understanding of its underlying mechanisms.
    METHODS: In this study, one patient did not achieve pregnancy despite more than a year of ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate and letrozole. However, after 3 months of receiving cheek acupuncture therapy, she successfully conceived and gave birth to a liveborn baby. Another patient achieved natural conception and live birth after 2 months of exclusive cheek acupuncture therapy.
    METHODS: PCOS.
    METHODS: Cheek acupuncture therapy.
    RESULTS: Both of them successfully conceived and gave birth to a liveborn baby.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cheek acupuncture therapy can effectively stimulate follicle development and ovulation, potentially improving endometrial receptivity. According to holographic theory, there is a biologically holographic model within the cheek region that shares a homology with the human body structure. This model provides an explanation for the regulatory effects of cheek acupuncture point stimulation on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian axis (HPO), which subsequently influences follicle development and ovulation in patients. Consequently, when cheek acupuncture therapy is applied alone or in combination with ovulation induction medication, patients have the ability to achieve successful pregnancy and experience a smooth delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    在患有多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的不育女性中,在刺激排卵和促进妊娠方面,连续使用来曲唑2.5mg/卵泡刺激素(FSH)是否比来曲唑5mg/FSH更有效?
    该研究被设计为前瞻性,单中心,随机化,对照语用临床试验。从2023年4月至2023年7月,招募了220名年龄在20至40岁之间的不育妇女,这些妇女符合鹿特丹的PCOS标准,并且没有其他确定的不育原因。参与者以1:1的比例随机分为两组。一组在第3-7个周期接受2.5mg来曲唑,在第8-10个周期顺序注射75IUFSH(n=110),而另一组在第3-7个周期接受5mg来曲唑,在第8-10个周期顺序注射75IUFSH(n=110)。FSH治疗的持续时间取决于卵泡发育阶段。每个参与者经历一到三个治疗周期,直到达到怀孕。主要结果是所有参与者的累积妊娠率。次要结局包括所有干预周期的特征和临床妊娠率。
    对于所有220名参与者,序贯来曲唑2.5mg/FSH治疗组的累积妊娠率明显高于来曲唑5mg/FSH治疗组(72.7%vs59.1%,RR(95CI)=1.23(1.02,1.49),P值=0.033)。对于所有468个干预周期,来曲唑2.5mg/FSH组的临床妊娠率明显高于来曲唑5mg/FSH组(36.2%对26.3%,P值=0.021),在排卵率或不良反应方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异.
    数据表明,在PCOS不孕妇女中,序贯来曲唑2.5mg/FSH方案可能比序贯来曲唑5mg/FSH方案更有效。
    www.chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR2300069638。
    In infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is the sequential use of letrozole 2.5 mg/follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) more effective than letrozole 5 mg/FSH in stimulating ovulation and promoting pregnancy?
    The study was designed as a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled pragmatic clinical trial. 220 infertile women between the ages of 20 and 40, who matched the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and had no other identified reasons for infertility were enrolled from April 2023 to July 2023.The participants were randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. One group received 2.5 mg of letrozole on cycle days 3-7 with a sequential injection of 75 IU FSH on cycle days 8-10 (n = 110), while the other group received 5 mg of letrozole on cycle days 3-7 with a sequential injection of 75 IU FSH on cycle days 8-10 (n = 110). The duration of FSH treatment varied depending on the follicular development stage. Each participant underwent one to three treatment cycles until achieving pregnancy.The primary outcome was the cumulative pregnancy rate of all the participants. Secondary outcomes included characteristics and clinical pregnancy rates of all the intervention cycles.
    For all 220 participants, the sequential letrozole 2.5 mg/FSH treatment group had a significantly higher cumulative pregnancy rate compared to the letrozole 5 mg/FSH treatment group (72.7% versus 59.1%, RR (95%CI) = 1.23 (1.02, 1.49), P-value = 0.033). For all 468 intervention cycles, letrozole 2.5 mg/FSH group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate than the letrozole 5 mg/FSH group (36.2% versus 26.3%, P-value = 0.021), no statistically significant differences were observed in ovulation rates or adverse effects.
    The data indicate that the sequential letrozole 2.5mg/FSH protocol may be more effective than the sequential letrozole 5mg/FSH protocol for promoting pregnancy in infertile women with PCOS.
    www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300069638.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较孕激素引发的卵巢刺激方案与拮抗剂方案在接受IVF的预期高卵巢反应的女性中进行卵巢刺激后第一次冷冻胚胎移植的活产率设计:随机对照试验背景:三级辅助生殖中心患者:年龄<43岁的不孕症妇女,接受第一个IVF周期,并接受窦间孕激素治疗,直到每天注射>15mg促排卵方案:在拮抗剂方案中,从卵巢刺激第6天至排卵触发日,每天给予拮抗剂0.25mg.妇女或医生不可能失明,但生物统计学家对小组分配视而不见。
    方法:第一个冷冻胚胎移植周期的活产率结果:从2020年6月和2021年10月招募784名妇女,以1:1的比例随机分为两组:孕激素促排卵组(n=392)和拮抗剂组(n=392)。在孕激素引发的卵巢刺激组中,有62名(62/392,15.8%)妇女的胚胎移植被取消或推迟,在拮抗剂组中,有65名(65/392,16.6%)妇女的胚胎移植被取消或推迟,原因是没有可移植的胚胎或在随机化后的6个月内没有冷冻胚胎移植。两组的人口统计学特征和获得/受精的卵母细胞数量相似,切割胚胎的数量,第3天的优质胚胎数量,发育的囊胚数量和冷冻的胚胎/囊胚数量。根据两种治疗意向,孕激素引发的卵巢刺激和拮抗剂组之间的第一个冷冻胚胎移植周期的活产率没有统计学上的显着差异[37.5.0%(147/392)和32.7%(128/392),RR1.148(95%CI=0.949-1.390),P=0.16]和每个方案分析[44.5%(147/330)对39.1。%(128/327),RR1.138(95CI=0.950-1.364),P=0.16]。两组均显示具有可比性的临床妊娠,正在怀孕,流产,多胎妊娠,异位妊娠和累积活产率。
    结论:孕激素引发的卵巢刺激和拮抗剂方案后,首次冷冻胚胎移植的活产率在预期卵巢反应较高的妇女中相当。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after ovarian stimulation by the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response who were undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: A tertiary assisted reproduction center.
    METHODS: Women with infertility aged <43 years undergoing the first in vitro fertilization cycle and having antral follicle count of >15.
    METHODS: Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger in the PPOS protocol. In the antagonist protocol, an antagonist 0.25 mg daily was given from the sixth day of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger. Blinding was not possible for women or physicians but the biostatistician was blinded to the group assignment.
    METHODS: Live birth rate of the first FET cycle.
    RESULTS: A total of 784 women were recruited from June 2020 and October 2021 and assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: PPOS group (n = 392) and antagonist group (n = 392). Embryo transfer was either cancelled or postponed in 62 women (62/392, 15.8%) in the PPOS group and 65 (65/392, 16.6%) in the antagonist group because of no transferable embryos or no FET within 6 months after randomization. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics and the numbers of oocytes obtained or fertilized, cleaving embryos, good-quality embryos at day 3, blastocysts developed, and embryos or blastocysts frozen. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of the first FET cycle between the PPOS and antagonist groups on the basis of both the intention-to-treat analysis (37.5.0% [147/392] vs. 32.7% [128/392]; relative risk, 1.148 [95% confidence interval, 0.949-1.390]) and per-protocol analysis (44.5% [147/330] vs. 39.1% [128/327]; relative risk, 1.138 [95% confidence interval, 0.950-1.364]). Both groups showed comparable clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and cumulative live birth rates.
    CONCLUSIONS: The live birth rates of the first FET following the PPOS and antagonist protocols were comparable in women with an anticipated high ovarian response.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04414761 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    采用非靶向代谢组学方法研究克罗米芬(CC)对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)大鼠卵泡液代谢产物及相关代谢途径的影响,并确定CC如何治疗PCOS患者排卵障碍。将SpragueDawley大鼠随机分为对照组,模型,CC组。用来曲唑建立PCOS模型。体重,卵巢重量,发情周期,血清激素水平,收集大鼠的卵巢组织病理学进行进一步评估。此外,通过超高效液相色谱-质谱,对卵泡液代谢产物的研究揭示了CC的作用机制。CC降低了PCOS大鼠的卵巢重量,调节了动情周期和血清激素水平,但不影响其体重。此外,代谢组学结果显示,CC调整了153种代谢物,其中16种交叉代谢物,如睾酮,雄烯二酮,17α-羟孕酮,和胆酸被认为是CC改善PCOS大鼠排卵障碍的潜在生物标志物。京都百科全书的基因和基因组途径富集也表明,CC组主要从事色氨酸代谢和类固醇激素的生物合成。CC可以改善大鼠的排卵障碍,其机制与调节血清激素和卵泡液代谢产物的分泌和改善多代谢途径有关。
    To examine the effects of clomiphene citrate (CC) on follicular fluid metabolites and related metabolic pathways in rats with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using non-targeted metabolomics and determine how CC treats ovulation disorder in PCOS. The Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into control, model, and CC groups. A PCOS model was established with letrozole. Body weight, ovarian weight, estrus cycles, serum hormone levels, and ovary histopathology of the rats were collected for further evaluation. Moreover, through ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, the study of follicular fluid metabolites revealed the mechanism of action of CC. CC reduced ovarian weight and regulated estrous cycles and serum hormone levels in PCOS rats but did not affect their body weight. Moreover, the metabolomic results showed that CC adjusted 153 metabolites, among which 16 cross metabolites like testosterone, androstenedione, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, and cholic acid were considered as potential biomarkers for CC to improve ovulation disorders in PCOS rats. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment also showed that the CC group mainly engaged in tryptophan metabolism and steroid hormone biosynthesis. CC can improve ovulation disorders in rats, and its mechanism is related to the regulation of the secretion of serum hormone and follicular fluid metabolites and the amelioration of multi-metabolic pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    这项研究的目的是评估三种促排卵疗法治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者不孕症的疗效。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了90例宫腔内人工授精(IUI)患者的成功率,他们被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:来曲唑(LE)+尿促性腺激素(HMG),氯米芬(CC)+HMG,或HMG单独。使用超声波扫描,我们检查了成熟卵泡的数量,排卵率,临床妊娠率,子宫内膜厚度,和血液流动。与其他两组相比,LE+HMG组的成熟卵泡水平明显较高,排卵率,临床妊娠率,雌二醇,和促黄体生成素注射日对子宫内膜容受性的影响(P<0.05)。三组流产率无统计学差异,异位妊娠率,或不良反应。在这项研究中,我们发现,联合LE和HMG可以有效治疗PCOS患者的不孕症。这个方案增加了排卵,提高生育率,子宫内膜容受性增强,不良反应无增加。因此,这可能是PCOS患者诱导排卵和治疗不孕症的有用临床方法。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    The purpose of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 ovulation induction therapies for treating infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this retrospective study, we compared the success rates of 90 patients who underwent intrauterine insemination, who were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: letrozole (LE) + urinary gonadotropin (human menopausal gonadotropin [HMG]), clomiphene (CC) + HMG, or HMG alone. Using ultrasound scanning, we examined the number of mature follicles, ovulation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness, and blood flow. When compared to the other 2 groups, the LE + HMG group had significantly higher levels of mature follicles, ovulation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone on the day of the human chorionic gonadotropin injection and endometrial receptivity (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in terms of abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, or adverse reactions. In this research, we found that infertility in patients with PCOS could be effectively treated by combining LE with HMG. This protocol increased ovulation, boosted fertility, and enhanced endometrial receptivity with no increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, it may be a useful clinical approach for inducing ovulation and treating infertility in patients with PCOS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号