Family Planning Services

计划生育服务
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据第七次全国人口普查,中国的生育率低于1.5,标志着一个具有潜在风险的重大国家问题。为了应对这种低出生率,中国政府放宽了计划生育政策,出台了扶持措施。
    目的:生育政策的变化引起了中国人民的广泛关注。本文旨在以微博为窗口,研究公众对三胎抚养政策的反应。目标是对当前观点提供更平衡的评估,使政策制定者能够制定更好的生育率信息,特别是在预期公众对有争议的政策反应不佳的时候。
    方法:本研究使用爬虫从新浪微博收集数据。通过对微博有关三胎政策的意见挖掘,从关注内容和情感倾向两个角度分析了微博用户对三胎政策的在线观点。使用中断的时间序列,它检查了在线对政策的看法的变化,将政策文档与微博的时间节点进行匹配。
    结果:公众对与改善生育保险有关的政策表现出极大的兴趣,并提供了短期的积极反馈,出生奖励,和住房补贴。相比之下,对延长产假等政策一直有负面反应,这尤其引起了妇女对未来就业和婚姻权利保护的担忧。在社交媒体上,公众对三胎生育政策的关注主要集中在保护妇女权利上,特别是分娩后的合法权利,以及与身心健康有关的问题。育儿支持和经济压力也是热门话题,涉及多子女家庭的日常开支,托儿服务,住房压力。然而,这项研究还表明,不育或单身女性表达了强烈的生育愿望,但是由于个人医疗保险制度的局限性,这个愿望没有得到充分满足。
    我们的研究表明,使用近乎实时的社交媒体数据,快速灵活地评估公众对中国各种三胎支持政策的反应的可行性。这些信息可以帮助决策者预测公众对未来大流行三胎政策的反应,并确保有足够的资源用于解决面对科学知情但有争议的负面情绪和分歧程度的增加,限制。
    BACKGROUND: According to the Seventh National Census, China\'s fertility rate is less than 1.5, marking a significant national issue with potential risks. To counter this low birth rate, the Chinese government has relaxed family planning policies and introduced supportive measures.
    OBJECTIVE: Changes in birth policy have attracted considerable attention from the people of China. This article aims to study the public\'s response to the three-child support policy using Weibo as a window. The goal is to provide a more balanced evaluation of current perspectives, enabling policymakers to formulate better fertility information, particularly when anticipating a poor public response to controversial policies.
    METHODS: This research uses a crawler to gather data from Sina Weibo. Through opinion mining of Weibo posts on the three-child policy, Weibo users\' online opinions on the three-child policy are analyzed from two perspectives: their attention content and sentiment tendency. Using an interrupted time series, it examines changes in online views on the policy, matching policy documents to the time nodes of Weibo posts.
    RESULTS: The public has shown great interest in and provided short-term positive feedback on policies related to improving maternity insurance, birth rewards, and housing subsidies. In contrast, there has been a continuous negative response to policies such as extending maternity leave, which has particularly sparked concerns among women regarding future employment and marital rights protection. On social media, the public\'s attention to the three-child birth policy has focused mainly on the protection of women\'s rights, especially legal rights after childbirth, and issues related to physical and mental health. Child-rearing support and economic pressure are also hot topics, involving the daily expenses of multichild families, childcare services, and housing pressure. However, this study also revealed that infertile or single women express a strong desire to have children, but due to limitations in the personal medical insurance system, this desire has not been fully satisfied.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a rapid and flexible method for evaluating the public response to various three-child supportive policies in China using near real-time social media data. This information can help policy makers anticipate public responses to future pandemic three-child policies and ensure that adequate resources are dedicated to addressing increases in negative sentiment and levels of disagreement in the face of scientifically informed but controversial, restrictions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于中国户籍制度的影响,流动人口和户籍人口对国家基本公共卫生服务(NEPHS)的认知和使用存在差异。基本公共卫生和计划生育服务均等化(EBPHFPS)政策旨在通过增加流动人口获得基本公共卫生服务的机会来减少人口之间的差距。这项研究的目的是研究针对流动人口的EBPHFPS与注册居民和流动人口之间在获取和利用NEPHS方面的差异之间的关系。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:8个城市(地区,自治州)在中国。
    方法:八个城市的13998名流动人口和14000名户籍居民(地区,自治州)被纳入分析。
    方法:三个二项式变量,包括对Nephs的认识,接受健康教育和建立健康档案,用作结果指标,以检查EBPHFPS与流动人口和注册人口之间的差异之间的关系。
    方法:线性回归模型,使用公平差距计算和倾向得分匹配来探索相关性.
    结果:与未实施EBPHFPS的地区相比,实施EBPHFPS的地区对NEPHS的认识提高了8.3%(p<0.01),个人接受健康教育的可能性提高了4.0%(p<0.05)。与注册居民相比,然而,流动人口在NEPHS认识和利用方面仍然面临巨大差距。与没有平等政策的地区相比,实施地区流动人口健康教育机会不平等程度显著降低(p<0.01),而流动人口中NEPHS意识的机会不平等没有显着差异(p>0.1)。该政策试点地区的流动人口在建立健康档案方面遇到较大差距(p<0.01)。
    结论:在一定程度上证明了EBPHFPS政策与流动人口中NEPHS意识和利用之间的正相关关系;然而,流动人口仍然面临着一定程度的机会不平等。政府需要制定面向目标的政策和保障机制,以确保流动人口获得NEPHS。
    OBJECTIVE: There are differences between the floating population and the registered population in the awareness and use of the National Essential Public Health Services (NEPHS) due to the influence of China\'s household registration system. The Equalization of Basic Public Health and Family Planning Services (EBPHFPS) policy aims to reduce disparities among populations by enhancing the migrant population\'s access to basic public health services. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the EBPHFPS targeted at the floating population and the disparities in access to and utilisation of NEPHS between registered residents and the floating population.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: 8 cities (regions, autonomous prefectures) in China.
    METHODS: 13 998 floating population and 14 000 registered residents in eight cities (regions, autonomous prefectures) were included in the analysis.
    METHODS: Three binomial variables, including awareness of NEPHS, acceptance of health education and establishment of health records, were used as outcome indicators to examine the relationship between the EBPHFPS and the disparities between the floating and registered populations.
    METHODS: A linear regression model, fairness gap calculation and propensity score matching were used to explore the associations.
    RESULTS: The areas that implemented EBPHFPS exhibited an 8.3% increase in awareness of the NEPHS (p<0.01) and a 4.0% increase (p<0.05) in the likelihood of individuals having received health education within the previous year compared with the areas without the policy implementation. In contrast to registered residents, however, the floating population still faces significant disparities in NEPHS awareness and utilisation. Compared with areas without the equalisation policy, the inequality of opportunity in health education of the floating population in implementation areas is significantly lower (p<0.01), whereas no significant difference is observed in the inequality of opportunity regarding NEPHS awareness among the floating population (p>0.1). The floating population in the pilot areas of the policy encountered greater disparities in the establishment of health records (p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Positive associations between the EBPHFPS policy and NEPHS awareness and utilisation among the floating population were demonstrated to some extent; however, the floating population was still confronted with a degree of inequality of opportunity. The government needs to develop target-oriented policies and a guaranteed mechanism to ensure access to NEPHS among the floating population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:推迟生育是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,已受到许多公共卫生专家的关注。然而,很少有研究调查结婚年龄的推迟,婚姻和受孕间隔,和怀孕年龄在人口和区域异质性方面。
    方法:这是一个横截面,基于注册表的研究,共纳入了13894601对参加国家免费孕前检查项目并在2013-2019年期间怀孕的未产夫妇.我们计算了结婚年龄的年度百分比变化和森林地块,婚姻和受孕间隔,和怀孕年龄。
    结果:晚婚(结婚年龄≥35岁),婚姻和受孕间隔长(婚姻和受孕间隔≥2年),晚期妊娠(妊娠年龄≥35岁)从1.20%增加,22.01%,2013年为1.88%至1.69%,32.75%,和2019年的2.79%。相应的年度百分比变化为6.55%,8.44%,8.17%。没有受过高等教育的参与者有更高的年度百分比变化,但与受过高等教育的参与者相比,长期婚姻和受孕间隔的患病率相当。居住在二线或新一线城市的参与者,中国东北地区父母推迟的患病率较高,相应的年度变化百分比也较高。
    结论:在2013-2019年期间,在计划怀孕的中国未分娩夫妇中观察到了具有人口统计学和区域异质性的父母结构性推迟。应在中国大陆发展和实施包容性和全面的育儿支持,以尽量减少推迟带来的负面健康影响,特别是对于没有受过高等教育,生活在新的一二线城市或中国东北的夫妇。
    The postponement of parenthood is a global public health issue that has received attention of many public health experts. However, few studies have investigated the postponement in marriage age, marriage and conception interval, and pregnancy age in terms of demographic and regional heterogenicities.
    This is a cross-sectional, registry-based study, and a total of 13 894 601 nulliparous couples who participated in the National Free Pre-Pregnancy Check-ups Project and became pregnant during 2013-2019 were included. We calculated annual percentage change and forest plots for marriage age, marriage and conception interval, and pregnancy age.
    Late marriage (marriage age ≥ 35 years), long marriage and conception interval (marriage and conception interval ≥ 2 years), and advanced pregnancy (pregnancy age ≥ 35 years) increased from 1.20%, 22.01%, and 1.88% in 2013 to 1.69%, 32.75%, and 2.79% in 2019, respectively. The corresponding annual percentage changes were 6.55%, 8.44%, and 8.17%. Participants without higher education had a higher annual percentage change, but comparable prevalence for long marriage and conception interval with participants with higher education. Participants residing in second- or new first-tier cities, and the northeast of China who had a higher prevalence of parenthood postponement also had higher corresponding annual percentage changes.
    Structural postponement of parenthood with demographic and regional heterogenicities was observed among Chinese nulliparous couples with planned pregnancies during 2013-2019. Inclusive and comprehensive parenting support should be developed and implemented in mainland China to minimize the negative health effects arising from the postponement, especially for couples without higher education and living in new first/second-tier cities or the northeast China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行,连同随后的社会疏远措施,可能导致家庭和生育计划的转变。这项研究旨在探讨国际育龄女性样本中COVID-19大流行与生育意愿变化之间的关系。
    方法:多国,横断面研究基于10672名18-49岁女性的数据,这些女性参加了国际性健康和生殖健康(I-SHARE)研究,该组织在2020年7月至2021年2月期间组织了一项国际在线调查。使用多项概率回归模型探索了与生育意愿变化相关的因素。使用聚类稳健标准误差来计算模型参数。
    结果:在10672名育龄妇女中,14.4%的人报告说,由于大流行,他们的生育意愿发生了变化,推迟10.2%,加速4.2%。与没有被隔离/隔离的女性相比,曾经被隔离/隔离的女性更有可能推迟其生育意愿(调整后的优势比(AOR)=1.41;95%CI1.18至1.69);与稳定伴侣生活的女性相比,与未被隔离/隔离的女性更有可能更早地想要孩子(AOR=1.57;95%CI1.10至2.23);以及那些报告生气频率较高的女性,感到沮丧,或者担心他们的财务状况更有可能推迟他们的生育意愿。在敏感性分析中,主要发现是稳健的。
    结论:大多数因大流行而改变生育意愿的妇女推迟了扩大家庭的意愿。大流行引起的暴露与这些推迟有关。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic, together with the subsequent social distancing measures, could lead to shifts in family and fertility planning. This study aimed to explore the associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in fertility intentions among an international sample of reproductive-aged women.
    METHODS: A multi-country, cross-sectional study based on data from 10 672 women aged 18-49 years who participated in the International Sexual Health And REproductive Health (I-SHARE) study, which organised an international online survey between July 2020 and February 2021. Factors associated with changes in fertility intentions were explored using multinomial probit regression models. Cluster-robust standard errors were used to calculate model parameters.
    RESULTS: Of 10 672 included reproductive-aged women, 14.4% reported changing their fertility intentions due to the pandemic, with 10.2% postponement and 4.2% acceleration. Women who had ever been isolated/quarantined were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.41; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.69) compared with those who had not; women who lived with a steady partner were more likely to want children sooner (AOR=1.57; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.23) compared with those who did not; and those who reported a higher frequency of getting angry, feeling frustrated, or worrying about their finances were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions. The main findings were robust in the sensitivity analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most women who changed fertility intentions because of the pandemic have postponed intentions to expand their families. The pandemic-induced exposures were associated with these postponements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇数据文章提供了来自中国移民动态调查(CMDS)的数据,多波,2009-2018年中国国内移民大规模全国横断面调查。CMDS是由中华人民共和国前国家卫生和计划生育委员会(NHFPC)进行的年度问卷调查。这项调查包括的受访者是15岁以上的内部移民。样本来自中国流动人口信息系统,采用多阶段分层抽样方法和概率大小比例(PPS)整群抽样策略。2009年至2018年,共有来自23个省的1527650名国内移民,5个自治区和4个直辖市参加了调查。调查工具是由NHFPC设计和实施的一系列自行设计的具有高度继承性和一致性的问卷。问卷主要包含被调查者及其家庭成员的基本信息,迁移状态,医疗保健或健康行为,公共卫生服务利用,社会保险,社会融合,和计划生育。该数据集是目前使用最广泛的中国内部移民调查数据,提供有关迁移模式的信息,医疗保健和健康行为,利用公共卫生服务,获得社会保障,社会融合,计划生育,这对健康规划很有价值,健康决策,和健康公平研究。
    This data article presents data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS), a multi-wave, large-scale national cross-sectional survey of China\'s internal migrants from 2009 to 2018. The CMDS is an annual questionnaire survey conducted by the former National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) of the People\'s Republic of China. The respondents included in this survey are internal migrants over 15 years old. The sample was drawn from the China Migrant Population Information System, using multi-stage stratified sampling method and the probability proportional-to-size (PPS) cluster sampling strategy. Between 2009 and 2018, there were 1,527,650 internal migrants from 23 provinces, 5 autonomous regions and 4 municipalities participated in the surveys. The survey tools were a series of self-designed questionnaires with high inheritance and consistency designed and implemented by the NHFPC. The questionnaires mainly contain basic information of the respondents and their family members, migration status, healthcare or health behaviors, public health service utilization, social insurance, social integration, and family planning. The dataset is currently the most widely used survey data on China\'s internal migrants, offering information on migration patterns, healthcare and health behaviors, use of public health services, access to social security, social integration, and family planning, which are valuable for health planning, health decision-making, and health equity research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从技术理性的角度研究政府决策的政策变化,忽略了一个事实,即政策变化是一个复杂的社会建设过程,涉及多个参与者。本研究使用修改后的倡导联盟框架来解释中国计划生育政策的变化,并通过话语网络分析来展示多个参与者(中央政府,地方政府,专家,媒体,和公众)。研究发现,主导联盟和少数联盟可以互相学习和调整深刻的核心信念;行为者政策信念的共享和流动驱动网络结构的变化;当中央文件颁布时,行为者明显的优先依恋,都有助于改变政策。本研究可以从微观角度解释宏观政策变迁,揭示中国专制政权政策变迁的过程和机制。
    Studies on policy change focus on governmental decision-making from a technical rationality perspective, ignoring the fact that policy change is a complicated social construction process involving multiple actors. This study used the modified advocacy coalition framework to explain changes in China\'s family planning policy and discourse network analysis to show the debate on the birth control policy among multiple actors (central government, local governments, experts, media, and the public). It found that the dominant coalition and the minority coalition can learn and adjust deep core beliefs from each other; the sharing and flow of actors\' policy beliefs drive change in the network structure; and actors\' obvious preferential attachment when the promulgation of the central document, are all helpful in policy change. This study can explain macro-policy changes from a micro-perspective to reveal the process and mechanism of policy changes in China\'s authoritarian regime.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解使用者在避孕来源方面的差异对于改善避孕工具的获取和维护公平和可持续的未来至关重要。因此,这项研究探讨了城市居住和个人财富是否与女性获得避孕的地方相关(例如,政府,私人,或非政府组织提供者),并评估这些协会是否被受访者居住国的收入水平所修改。
    方法:我们分析了2009年至2020年在25个国家/地区进行的人口健康调查的横截面数据。最终的数据集包括25,081名年龄在15至24岁之间的年轻女性,他们正在使用避孕药具。建立多项逻辑回归模型来评估我们的结果变量,即,各种避孕来源,我们的主要独立变量,即,城市住宅和财富指数。我们还评估了按国家收入水平对上述协会的潜在影响。
    结果:我们观察到城乡和贫富在使用避孕来源的几率上存在明显差异。一般来说,生活在城市住宅和富裕与所有避孕药具来源呈正相关。然而,这些协会大多是根据国家收入水平进行修改的。居住在城市住宅中的人们利用了更多的私人资源,特别是在低收入人群中(β系数,B=0.973)和中高收入国家(B=1.361)。所有分析国家的城市地区的年轻女性也更有可能使用其他来源的避孕药具(B=0.267)。此外,来自贫困家庭的妇女不太可能使用私人来源(B=-1.166)和其他来源(B=-0.547)。
    结论:尽管年轻女性可能更喜欢私人来源的避孕药具,因为她们的保密性和灵活的时间,这些来源对富裕和城市年轻妇女的好处比对贫穷和农村妇女的好处更多。可及性和可负担性的差异可能是在使用避孕药具来源方面观察到的城乡和贫富差异的原因,分别,一个国家的收入水平可能会改变这种差距。
    Appreciating user differences in contraceptive sources is essential for improving contraceptive access and safeguarding an equitable and sustainable future. Therefore, this study explored whether urban residence and individual wealth are associated with where women access contraception (e.g., government, private, or nongovernmental organization provider) and assessed whether these associations are modified by the income level in the respondents\' country of residence.
    We analyzed the cross-sectional data of Demographic Health Surveys conducted between 2009 and 2020 in 25 countries. The final data set included 25,081 young women aged between 15 and 24 years who are using contraceptives. Multinomial logistic regression models were established to assess the associations of our outcome variable, namely, various contraceptive sources, with our main independent variables, namely, urban residence and wealth index. We also assessed the potential effect modification by country income level on the above associations.
    We observed obvious urban-rural and rich-poor disparities in odds of using contraceptive sources. Generally, living in urban residences and being wealthy were positively associated with all sources of contraceptives. However, these associations were mostly modified by country income level. People living in urban residences utilized more private sources, especially in low-income (beta coefficient, B = 0.973) and upper-middle-income countries (B = 1.361). Young women in urban areas across all analyzed countries were also more likely to use contraceptives from other sources (B = 0.267). In addition, women from poor households were less likely to use private sources (B = -1.166) and other sources (B = -0.547).
    Even though young women may prefer private sources of contraceptives due to their confidentiality and flexible hours, these sources carry more benefits for rich and urban young women than for poor and rural women. The differential accessibility and affordability may account for the observed urban-rural and rich-poor disparities in using contraceptive sources, respectively, and the income level of a country is likely to modify such disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,越来越多的妇女参与人口流动,其中大多数是育龄妇女。随着这一群体人口规模的不断扩大,其生育意愿将对我国人口的发展产生重大影响。因此,这项研究的目的是评估流动妇女生育二胎的意愿和影响因素。本研究采用了2018年全国移民动态监测调查数据。使用自行设计的问卷收集信息,如社会人口统计学和生育意愿。进行描述性统计分析,得到主要变量的基本特征。用卡方检验和方差分析三组女性的基本特征差异(有意向,没有意图,也不确定要生第二个孩子)。采用多项logistic回归分析流动女性生育意愿的影响因素。这项研究的结果表明,只有13.07%的流动女性有生育第二个孩子的意向,而67.73%的人无意再生育一个孩子。在多变量分析中,年龄,第一个孩子的性别和年龄,生殖健康教育,就业状况和医疗保险是生育意愿的显著影响因素(p<0.05),而教育水平和户籍类型与生育第二个孩子的愿望无关(p&gt;0.05)。总的来说,全面两孩政策实施后,育龄妇女生育第二个孩子的意愿降低。生殖健康教育和医疗保险在保证流动妇女生育方面发挥着重要作用。这提醒政府部门在制定下一步工作计划时,要综合考虑以上因素。
    In recent years, an increasing number of women participate in population mobility and most of them are of childbearing age. With the continuous expansion of the population size of this group, their fertility intention will have a great impact on the development of China\'s population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the fertility intention and influencing factors on having a second child in floating women. This study employed the data from the 2018 National Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey data. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect information, such as socio-demographics and fertility intention. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out to obtain the basic characteristics of the main variables. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to analyze the differences in the basic characteristics between three groups of women (with intention, without intention and unsure about having a second child). Multinomial logistic regression was employed to analyze influencing factors associated with fertility intention among the floating women. The results of this study indicated that only 13.07% of the floating women had the intention to have a second child, while 67.73% had no intention of having another child. In the multivariate analysis, age, gender and age of the first child, reproductive health education, employment status and medical insurance were found to be significant influencing factors of fertility intention (p < 0.05), while education level and household registration type were not associated with the desire to have a second child (p > 0.05). Overall, after the implementation of the universal two-child policy, floating women of childbearing age have reduced intention to have a second child. Reproductive health education and medical insurance play an important role in ensuring the fertility of floating women. This reminds government departments to consider the above factors comprehensively when formulating the next work plan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多学术辩论都集中在孟加拉国的计划生育计划(FPP)降低该国的生育率。本研究旨在调查使用现代和传统避孕方法的患病率,并确定解释避孕方法使用的因素。
    方法:该研究使用了2017-18年孟加拉国人口与健康调查(BDHS)的数据,其中包括11,452名(加权)15-49岁的女性。使用多水平多项逻辑回归来确定与避孕方法使用相关的因素。
    结果:使用现代避孕方法的患病率为72.16%,在孟加拉国,14.58%的女性使用传统方法。与15-24岁年龄段的女性相比,老年女性(35~49岁)更不愿意使用现代避孕方法(RRR:0.28,95%CI:0.21~0.37).至少有一个活着孩子的妇女更有可能使用传统和现代避孕方法(RRR:4.37,95%CI:3.12-6.11)。同样,与未分娩的妇女相比,在过去5年中分娩对使用现代方法的影响增加了2.41倍(RRR:2.41,95%CI:1.65-3.52)。丈夫/伴侣决定使用/不使用避孕方法与使用传统方法(RRR:4.49,95%CI:3.04-6.63)和现代方法(RRR:3.01,95%CI:2.15-4.17)呈正相关。这项研究表明,农村参与者使用现代方法的可能性比城市参与者低21%(RRR:0.79,95%CI:0.67-0.94)。
    结论:孟加拉国仍然是避孕药具使用的重点,因为它是南亚人口最多的国家之一。为了降低生育率,政策制定者可能会设计干预措施来提高认识,特别是针对未受过教育的人,和孟加拉国的农村育龄妇女。该研究还强调了男性伴侣对女性使用避孕药具的决策的重要性。
    Much scholarly debate has centered on Bangladesh\'s family planning program (FPP) in lowering the country\'s fertility rate. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of using modern and traditional contraceptive methods and to determine the factors that explain the contraceptive methods use.
    The study used data from the 2017-18 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS), which included 11,452 (weighted) women aged 15-49 years in the analysis. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with the contraceptive method use.
    The prevalence of using modern contraceptive methods was 72.16%, while 14.58% of women used traditional methods in Bangladesh. In comparison to women in the 15-24 years age group, older women (35-49 years) were more unwilling to use modern contraceptive methods (RRR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.21-0.37). Women who had at least a living child were more likely to use both traditional and modern contraceptive methods (RRR: 4.37, 95% CI: 3.12-6.11). Similarly, given birth in the previous 5 years influenced women 2.41 times more to use modern method compared to those who had not given birth (RRR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.65-3.52). Husbands\'/partners\' decision for using/not using contraception were positively associated with the use of both traditional (RRR: 4.49, 95% CI: 3.04-6.63) and modern methods (RRR: 3.01, 95% CI: 2.15-4.17) rather than using no method. This study suggests rural participants were 21% less likely to utilize modern methods than urban participants (RRR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.94).
    Bangladesh remains a focus for contraceptive use, as it is one of the most populous countries in South Asia. To lower the fertility rate, policymakers may design interventions to improve awareness especially targeting uneducated, and rural reproductive women in Bangladesh. The study also highlights the importance of male partners\' decision-making regarding women\'s contraceptive use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非政府组织招募宗教领袖作为撒哈拉以南非洲的卫生行为者。计划设计者既将宗教领袖构造为计划生育干预措施的反对者,又将其劝阻信徒使用计划生育,并说服信徒使用计划生育。本文调查了一个计划生育项目,该项目在Morogoro招募了宗教领袖,坦桑尼亚。研究结果表明,二元谈话混淆了高生育率的结构基础。好的和坏的宗教领袖的静态二进制文件的构建观察到与人民自己的现实不匹配,它错过了演员自己的道德行为的生动细微差别。
    NGOs recruit religious leaders as health actors in Sub-Saharan Africa. Program designers both construct religious leaders as opponents of family planning interventions who discourage their congregants from using family planning and as proponents who persuade their congregants to use them. This article investigates a family planning project that recruited religious leaders in Morogoro, Tanzania. Research findings show that binary talk obfuscates the structural underpinning of high fertility rates. The construction of static binaries of good and bad religious leaders observed mismatches with peoples\' own realities and it misses the lifelike nuances of actors\' own ethical action.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号