背景:甲状腺相关眼病引起的眼球突出和视神经压迫症状的主要治疗方法是眼眶减压手术。中下壁减压和平衡减压是两种常用的手术方法。然而,在临床上如何选择不同的眼眶减压手术方案没有统一的共识。
目的:通过Meta分析比较内侧壁减压术和平衡减压术的效果,为临床优化决策提供参考。
方法:数据库,包括PubMed,WebofScience,奥维德,科克伦图书馆,和ClinicalTrials.gov,我们搜索了从开始到2023年3月21日发表的关于甲状腺相关眼病减压手术的随机对照试验和队列研究。使用RevMan5.3软件,基于以下结果指标进行了荟萃分析:复视率,眼内压,视敏度,和并发症发生率。
结果:本分析包括2项随机对照试验和5项队列研究,共377例患者。平衡减压手术后,甲状腺相关眼病患者的眼球突出度显著降低[MD=4.92,95%CI(4.26,5.58),P<0.0001]。平衡减压可提高术后视力[MD=-0.35,95%CI(-0.56,-0.13),P=0.001和眼压[MD=5.33,95%CI(3.34,7.32),P<0.0001]。突眼率[MD=0.33,95%CI(-1.80,2.46),P=0.76]和复视[OR=1.20,95%CI(0.38,3.76),P=0.76]在接受内侧壁减压和平衡减压的患者之间没有差异。
结论:平衡减压术和内侧壁减压术在临床上均是甲状腺相关眼病手术治疗的有效选择。
BACKGROUND: The main treatment for the symptoms of proptosis and optic nerve compression caused by thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy is orbital decompression surgery. Medial inferior wall decompression and balanced decompression are two frequently used surgical procedures. However, there is no unified consensus on how to choose different surgical options for orbital decompression in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of medial inferior wall decompression and balanced decompression surgery through meta-analysis and to provide reference for clinical optimal decision making.
METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on decompression surgery for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy published from inception to March 21, 2023. Using RevMan 5.3 software, a meta-analysis was conducted based on the following outcome indicators: proptosis, diplopia rate, intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and complication rate.
RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and five cohort studies with a total of 377 patients were included in this analysis. After balanced decompression surgery, patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy experienced a significant decrease in proptosis [MD = 4.92, 95% CI (4.26, 5.58), P < 0.0001]. Balanced decompression can improve postoperative visual acuity [MD = - 0.35, 95% CI (- 0.56, - 0.13), P = 0.001] and intraocular pressure [MD = 5.33, 95% CI (3.34, 7.32), P < 0.0001]. The rates of proptosis [MD = 0.33, 95% CI (- 1.80, 2.46), P = 0.76] and diplopia [OR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.38, 3.76), P = 0.76] did not differ between patients who underwent medial inferior wall decompression and those who underwent balanced decompression.
CONCLUSIONS: Balanced decompression and medial inferior wall decompression are both effective options for surgical treatment of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy in clinical practice.