BACKGROUND: The potentially fatal attacks experienced by porphyria carriers are triggered by various porphyrinogenic drugs. However, determining the safety of particular drugs is challenging.
METHODS: We retrospectively used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify drugs associated with porphyria as an adverse event (AE) extracted from data from January 2004 to March 2022. The associated search terms included \"Porphyria,\" \"Porphyria screen,\" \"Porphyria non-acute,\" \"Porphyria acute,\" \"Acquired porphyria,\" and \"Pseudoporphyria.\" Signal mining analysis was performed to identify the association between drugs and AEs by four algorithms, namely the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker.
RESULTS: FAERS reported 1470 cases of porphyria-related AEs, and 406 drugs were screened after combining trade and generic names. All four algorithms identified 52 drugs with signals. The characteristics of all the reports and signaling drugs were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of drug-associated porphyria that provides critical information on drug porphyrogenicity, facilitating rational and evidence-based drug prescription and improving the accuracy of porphyrogenicity prediction based on model algorithms. Moreover, this study serves a reference for clinicians to ensure that porphyrinogenic drugs are not prescribed to carriers of porphyria genetic mutations.

With the extensive application of targeted drugs, the survival rate of cancer patients has been significantly improved. However, adverse reactions to the drugs have also become apparent, especially those affecting the ocular surface, which can severely impact patients\' vision and quality of life. The article systematically analyzes a variety of targeted drugs, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitors, fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase inhibitors, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and discusses their adverse reactions on the ocular surface. The review emphasizes the role of clinicians in monitoring and managing patients\' ocular surface health and the importance of early diagnosis and intervention to ensure that patients receive optimal visual protection while undergoing antitumor treatment.
随着靶向药物的广泛应用，癌症患者的生存率得到显著提升，但药物的不良反应也逐渐显现，特别是在眼表的不良反应可能严重影响患者的视力和生活质量。本文系统性地分析了包括表皮生长因子受体抑制剂、人表皮生长因子受体2抑制剂、成纤维细胞生长因子受体抑制剂、选择性雌激素受体调节剂、血管内皮生长因子受体抑制剂、芳香化酶抑制剂、蛋白酶体抑制剂、抗体-药物偶联物、布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、FMS样酪氨酸激酶3抑制剂和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂在内的多种靶向药物，并探讨了它们在眼表的不良反应。本文强调了临床医生在监测和管理患者眼表健康中的作用，以及早期诊断和干预的重要性，以确保患者在接受抗肿瘤治疗的同时获得最佳的视觉保护。.

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are critical medical issues during transition from hospital to home with high prevalence. The application of a variety of interventional strategies as part of the transitional care has been studied for preventing DRPs. However, it remains challenging for minimizing DRPs in patients, especially in older adults and those with high risk of medication discrepancies after hospital discharge. In this narrative review, we demonstrated that age, specific medications and polypharmacy, as well as some patient-related and system-related factors all contribute to a higher prevalence of transitional DPRs, most of which could be largely prevented by enhancing nurse-led multidisciplinary medication reconciliation. Nurses\' contributions during transitional period for preventing DRPs include information collection and evaluation, communication and education, enhancement of medication adherence, as well as coordination among healthcare professionals. We concluded that nurse-led strategies for medication management can be implemented to prevent or solve DRPs during the high-risk transitional period, and subsequently improve patients\' satisfaction and health-related outcomes, prevent the unnecessary loss and waste of medical expenditure and resources, and increase the efficiency of the multidisciplinary teamwork during transitional care.

This study aims to collect and analyze adverse event (AE) reports related to Nusinersen from the FAERS database. The study employed a combination of signal quantification techniques, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), to enhance the accuracy of signal detection and reduce the risk of false positives or negatives. Between the first quarter of 2017 and the third quarter of 2023, the FAERS database collected a total of 11,485,105 drug AE reports, of which 5772 were related to Nusinersen. Through signal mining analysis, 218 preferred term (PT) signals involving 27 system organ classes (SOCs) were identified. The study discovered AEs related to metabolism and nutrition disorders, psychiatric disorders, and cardiac disorders SOCs, which were not mentioned in the product information. Additionally, complications directly related to the intrathecal administration of Nusinersen, such as increased CSF pressure, positive CSF red blood cell count, and AEs related to the method of drug use, such as neuromuscular scoliosis and cerebrospinal fluid reservoir placement, were highlighted. Notably, AEs related to renal function abnormalities, such as abnormal Urine protein/creatinine ratio and protein urine presence, showed higher frequency and signal strength. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of comprehensive safety monitoring in the clinical application of Nusinersen. These results are significant for guiding future clinical practices, improving disease management strategies, and developing safer treatment protocols.

Detailed data on safety associated with drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between Linezolid (LZD) and other antibiotics are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety signals related to these DDIs and to provide a reference for clinically related adverse drug event monitoring. Adverse event (AE) information from 1 January 2004 to 16 June 2022 of the target antibiotics including LZD using alone or in combination with LZD was extracted from the OpenVigil FDA data platform for safety signal analysis. The combined risk ratio model, reporting ratio method, Ω shrinkage measure model, and chi-square statistics model were used to analyze the safety signals related to DDIs. Meanwhile, we evaluated the correlation and the influence of sex and age between the drug(s) and the target AE detected. There were 18991 AEs related to LZD. There were 2293, 1726, 4449, 821, 2431, 1053, and 463 AE reports when LZD was combined with amikacin, voriconazole, meropenem, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and azithromycin, respectively. Except for azithromycin, there were positive safety signals related to DDIs between LZD and these antibiotics. These DDIs might influence the incidence of 13, 16, 7, 7, 6, and 15 types of AEs, respectively, and is associated with higher reporting rates of AEs compared with use alone. Moreover, sex and age might influence the occurrence of AEs. We found that the combinations of LZD and other antibiotics are related to multiple AEs, such as hepatotoxicity, drug resistance and electrocardiogram QT prolonged, but further research is still required to investigate their underlying mechanisms. This study can provide a new reference for the safety monitoring of LZD combined with other antibiotics in clinical practice.

This study utilized a prospective, large-sample, multi-center, and registered key specialty approach of hospitals to monitor the application of Reduning Injection. A total of 100 249 adolescent patients aged 14 years and below who received Reduning Injection were monitored, resulting in 83 cases of adverse events, with 76 of them being classified as adverse drug reaction(ADR). The calculated incidence rate of ADR for Reduning Injection was 0.076%, indicating a very rare ADR. The main symptoms of ADR were pruritus, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, high fever, dyspnea, convulsion, and chills. All ADR cases were reported for the first time, including three new ADR cases and 73 known ADR cases. The categories of ADR was general ADR. All ADR was mild in severity. There were more males than females in ADR patients. One patient had a history of ADR, and the drug causing ADR was buprofen. The largest number of ADR cases occurred when the dosage of Reduning injection was 5-10 mL. The dropping speed was 30 drops or less per min, and the solvent type was 5% glucose injection. The most common manifestation of ADR patients was pruritus, followed by diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, high fever, dyspnea, convulsions, and chills. 72 patients(94.74% of ADR patients) discontinued the drug, and three patients(3.95% of ADR patients) were given oxygen inhalation. 47 cases(61.84% of ADR patients) were treated with medication, of which dexamethasone was the most used(24 cases, 46.15% of ADR patients). 76 ADR patients were cured or improved. ADRs are more likely to occur when diagnosed with acute bronchitis by western medicine and cough by traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), TCM syndrome type is wind heat syndrome, and the combination medicine is ambroxol hydrochloride and bromhexine hydrochloride injection, ascorbic acid/vitamin C injection. This result provides an evidence-based safety basis for active pharmacovigilance of Reduning Injection in adolescents aged 14 years and below.

OBJECTIVE: Pimavanserin, a novel 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, has been approved for the treatment of Parkinson\'s disease psychosis (PDP). This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the adverse events (AEs) of pimavanserin by analyzing the FDA\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
METHODS: AE reports related to pimavanserin in the FAERS database from the second quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were mined. Signal detection methods, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were employed to identify and classify AEs.
RESULTS: The study collected 12,839,687 AE reports, with 30,997 reports primarily suspecting pimavanserin, identifying 166 Preferred Terms (PTs) across 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs). The data showed that males reported more frequently than females, with the highest reporting in patients aged 75 and above. Reports increased over time, with a significant rise in 2023 compared to 2016. Major categories of AEs included hallucination, death, product dose omission issue, and confusional state, with death being notably the second most reported issue. Strong and new potential AEs were identified, including sleep-related issues like somnolence, insomnia, and sleep talking; cognitive and behavioral issues such as alexithymia, belligerence, and aggression; dose-related issues like prescribed underdose and underdose; and other AEs like nonspecific reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals potential AEs of pimavanserin, including sleep disorders and cognitive changes, underscoring the importance of careful monitoring and personalized treatment in managing PDP.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the underexplored prevalence of placebo-reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials.
METHODS: We searched public databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving ICI versus placebo treatments in patients with malignancies. Study characteristics and irAEs occurrences were extracted for meta-analyses using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: Proportions of patients reported to experience any grade and grade 3 to 5 placebo irAEs; the risk ratio (RR) of reporting \'false\' irAEs in the experiment arm (defined as \'false-irAE ratio\', calculated by dividing the proportion of patients documented with irAEs in the placebo arm by that in the experimental arm).
RESULTS: 47 RCTs with 30,119 patients were analyzed. The pooled proportion of patients reported to experience any grade and grade 3 to 5 irAEs among placebo participants was 22.85 % (17.33 %-29.50 %) and 3.40 % (2.35 %-4.63 %), respectively. The pooled proportion of placebo-treated patients who experienced serious irAEs was 0.67 % (0.03 %-1.91 %). Treatment discontinuation and death due to placebo irAEs occurred in 0.69 % (<0.01 %-1.30 %) and 0.12 % (<0.01 %-0.40 %) of patients, respectively. The false-irAE ratio for any grade and grade 3 to 5 irAEs were 0.49 and 0.28. The false-irAE ratio was significantly higher in RCTs with control arms of placebo plus non-immunotherapy than in those with placebo alone (any grade: 0.57 vs. 0.32, P < 0.001; grade 3 to 5: 0.36 vs. 0.12, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses of placebo-treated participants in ICI RCTs document the common occurrence of placebo irAEs. These findings are important for interpreting irAE profiles, avoiding inappropriate therapeutic interventions.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone palmitate (DEP), a prodrug of dexamethasone (DEX), is a synthetic corticosteroid medication distinguished by the inclusion of a fatty acid component known as palmitate. This study introduces DEP as a novel therapeutic option for spinal epidural injection, aiming to provide safer and longer-lasting pain relief as an alternative to for patients with spinal stenosis.
METHODS: 40 rats were randomly divided into four groups: those receiving epidural administration of normal saline (NS), and DEP in the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) model, and non-model rats receiving epidural NS administration. Paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimulation and motor function (neurogenic intermittent claudication) were observed for up to 21 days. Hematology and blood chemistry analyses were performed 1 week after drug therapy. Tissue samples were collected for steroid pathology examination to evaluate adhesion degree, perineural area inflammation, and chromatolysis in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), and adrenal gland.
RESULTS: The DEX and DEP groups demonstrated significant recovery from mechanical allodynia and motor dysfunction after 2 weeks of drug therapy (p<0.001). However, by the third week, the effect of DEX started to diminish while the effect of DEP persisted. Furthermore, the DEP group exhibited reduced fibrosis and less chromatolysis than the NS group. No steroid overdose or toxin was observed in any group.
CONCLUSIONS: The epidural administration of DEP demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in reducing allodynia and hyperalgesia resulting from chronic DRG compression, thus offering prolonged pain relief. These findings underscore the potential of DEP as a promising treatment alternative for pain associated with LSS, serving as a viable substitute for .

To fully understand the safety of DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination, we evaluated the differences between DTaP-IPV/Hib co-administration and separate administration of the DTaP, IPV and Hib vaccines (DTaP+IPV+Hib) based on adverse events following immunization (AEFI). All AEFI reported in Hebei Province, China, between 2020 and 2022 were included in this study. The risk difference (RD%), relative risk (RR), and Chi-square value were used to compare the differences in reported rates of AEFI between the DTaP-IPV/Hib and DTaP+IPV+Hib groups. From 2020 to 2022, 130 AEFI cases were reported in Hebei Province after DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination, corresponding to an AEFI reported rate of 66.9/million doses, which was significantly lower than that for DTaP+IPV+Hib (9836 AEFI with a reported rate of 637.8/million doses). The overall reported rate of non-severe AEFI for DTaP+IPV+Hib vaccines was 9.5 times that of DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.0, 11.3]. Meanwhile, the reported rate of AEFI among infants aged 0-1 y was 9.8 times higher for DTaP+IPV+Hib than for DTaP-IPV/Hib (95% CI: 8.2, 11.7). DTaP+IPV+Hib vaccination also resulted in higher risks of high fever, localized redness and swelling, localized induration, and allergic rash compared with DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination. The risk of AEFI, which were mostly mild reaction, was higher after vaccination with DTaP+IPV+Hib than after DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination.