DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS AND ADVERSE REACTIONS

药物相关副作用和不良反应
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗更大的患者群体有越来越大的趋势.然而,值得注意的是,免疫相关的不良事件(irAEs)经常出现。因此,精确的患者监测变得至关重要。我们介绍了在国际卫生福利大学成田医院(简称“我们医院”)进行的一项回顾性研究的结果,该研究旨在确定与irAE发生相关的风险因素。这项研究侧重于分析各种因素,包括治疗和生活方式背景,以及接受ICI治疗并随后被诊断为irAE的患者的实验室值。该研究包括符合ICI(单一药物和联合治疗)以及ICI与抗癌药物组合的资格标准的患者。该研究的纳入期为2020年4月至2022年5月,在我们医院。根据irAE的严重程度,将50例患者分为两组:第一组为irAE2级或以下(称为irAE2级以下)的患者。而第二组包括irAE3级或更高(称为irAE3级以上)的患者。统计学分析显示,当比较两组时,背景因素之间的年龄(p=0.027)和CRP(C反应蛋白)水平(p=0.008)存在显着差异。此外,在不同ICI治疗组的irAE发生率方面观察到统计学上的显著差异(p=0.035).然而,这表明是一种相对较弱的相关性。往前走,我们将重点转移到检查与暴露相关的irAE的频率。然而,我们没有观察到暴露与irAE分级之间的任何显著相关性.此外,即使通过使用ipilimumab与ICIs结合使用(称为“Mod暴露”),没有发现相关性。暴露进一步分为三组:PD-1组,PD-L1组,PD-1+CTLA-4组。然而,这些组中的任何暴露与irAE等级之间均未观察到显着相关性。同样,固定剂量组和基于体重的剂量组的ICI剂量与暴露量和irAE分级之间未观察到显著相关性.根据我们的研究结果,年龄和CRP水平与3级或更高irAE的发生之间存在暗示性关系.这些因素可能在导致更严重的IRAE的发展中起作用。
    In recent years, there has been a growing trend in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating a larger patient population. However, it is important to note that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) frequently arise as a result. Therefore, precise patient monitoring becomes essential. We present the findings of a retrospective study conducted at the International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital (referred to as \"our hospital\") that aimed to identify risk factors linked to the occurrence of irAEs. The study focused on analyzing various factors, including therapeutic and lifestyle backgrounds, as well as laboratory values of patients who received ICI treatment and were subsequently diagnosed with irAE. The study included patients who met the eligibility criteria for ICIs (both single agent and combination therapy) as well as ICI in combination with anticancer drugs. The inclusion period for the study encompassed April 2020 to May 2022 at our hospital. The fifty patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of irAEs: the first group consisted of patients with irAE Grade 2 or lower (referred to as irAE Grade under 2), while the second group included patients with irAE Grade 3 or higher (referred to as irAE Grade over 3). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in age (p=0.027) and CRP (C-reactive protein) levels (p=0.008) among the background factors when comparing the two groups. Additionally, statistically significant differences were observed among different ICI treatment groups in the occurrence of irAEs (p=0.035). however, it was indicated to be a relatively weak correlation. Moving forward, we shifted our focus to examine the frequency of irAEs in relation to exposure. However, we did not observe any significant correlation between exposure and irAE grade. Additionally, even when exposure was doubled through the use of ipilimumab in combination with ICIs (referred to as \"Mod exposure\"), no correlation was found. Exposure was further categorized into three groups: the PD-1 group, PD-L1 group, and PD-1 + CTLA-4 group. However, no significant correlation was observed between exposure in any of these groups and the grade of irAEs. Similarly, no significant correlation was observed between the dosage of ICI in the fixed-dose group and the weight-based dosage group with exposure and irAE Grade. Based on our study findings, there is a suggestive relationship between age and CRP levels and the occurrence of irAEs of Grade 3 or higher. These factors may play a role in contributing to the development of more severe irAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估FeelBetter机器学习系统准确识别在布莱根妇女医院就诊和住院风险最高的多重性老年患者的能力,并评估系统为这些患者提供准确用药建议的能力。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:系统使用药物,人口统计,诊断,实验室结果,医疗保健利用模式,以及对患者急诊就诊和住院风险进行分层的成本。根据系统生成的ED就诊或住院风险百分位数,将22个风险水平中的1个分配给患者。使用Logistic回归模型来估计与每个连续风险水平相关的ED就诊和住院的几率,与第45至第50百分位数相比。分层后,随机选择100名高风险(第95-100百分位数)和100名中等风险(第45-55百分位数)患者,以生成药物建议。两名临床药师回顾了系统生成的针对这些患者的药物建议。
    结果:预测3个月利用率的Logistic回归模型显示,与第45至第50百分位数相比,处于前1%风险百分位数的患者ED就诊和住院的OR分别为7.9和17.3,分别。每位患者药物清单上的前5种高优先级药物与6.65(4.09)的平均警告(SD)相关。在1290条警告中,1151(89.2%)被评估为正确。
    结论:FeelBetter系统可有效地对患有多种疾病的老年患者使用ED和住院风险进行分层。该系统提供的药物治疗建议在很大程度上是准确的,并且可能对患者护理有益。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the FeelBetter machine learning system\'s ability to accurately identify older patients with multimorbidity at Brigham and Women\'s Hospital at highest risk of medication-associated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, and to assess the system\'s ability to provide accurate medication recommendations for these patients.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: The system uses medications, demographics, diagnoses, laboratory results, health care utilization patterns, and costs to stratify patients\' risk of ED visits and hospitalizations. Patients were assigned 1 of 22 risk levels based on their system-generated risk percentile of either ED visits or hospitalizations. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of ED visits and hospitalizations associated with each successive risk level compared with the 45th to 50th percentiles. After stratification, 100 high-risk (95th-100th percentiles) and 100 medium-risk (45th-55th percentiles) patients were randomly selected for generation of medication recommendations. Two clinical pharmacists reviewed the system-generated medication recommendations for these patients.
    RESULTS: Logistic regression models predicting 3-month utilization showed that compared with the 45th to 50th percentiles, patients in the top 1% risk percentile had ORs of 7.9 and 17.3 for ED visits and hospitalizations, respectively. The first 5 high-priority medications on each patient\'s medication list were associated with a mean (SD) of 6.65 (4.09) warnings. Of 1290 warnings reviewed, 1151 (89.2%) were assessed as correct.
    CONCLUSIONS: The FeelBetter system effectively stratifies older patients with multimorbidity at risk of ED use and hospitalizations. Medication recommendations provided by the system are largely accurate and can potentially be beneficial for patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Ad26RSV.在一项2b期研究中,preF/RSVpreF蛋白疫苗在保护老年人对抗呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)相关下呼吸道疾病方面的作用.该研究比较了代表2b期临床研究的疫苗临床试验材料(CTM)与3期临床研究中使用的CTM的免疫原性。共有248名60-75岁的成年人,以1:1的比例随机化,接受一次剂量的3期CTM或2b期CTM。引起的不良事件(AE),未经请求的AE,并评估严重的AE(SAE)7天,28-d,接种疫苗后6个月,分别。在接种前和接种后14d测量RSVpreF-ELISA抗体滴度和RSV中和滴度。第15天CTM诱导的preF-ELISA反应,几何平均滴度,显示不劣于2b期CTM诱导的。在第15天,两组的RSV中和抗体滴度也相似。在征求的AE方面的安全性,未经请求的AE,或SAE在3期CTM和2b期CTM组之间总体相似,征询的不良事件大多为轻度至中度。未报告相关严重不良事件,没有发现安全问题。
    The Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine has previously demonstrated efficacyin protecting older adults against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related lower respiratory tract disease in a phase 2b study. This study compared the immunogenicity of vaccine clinical trial material (CTM) representative of phase 2b clinical studies with CTM used in phase 3 clinical studies. A total of 248 adults aged 60-75 years, randomized in a 1:1 ratio, received one dose of either phase 3 CTM or phase 2b CTM. Solicited adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed for 7-d, 28-d, and 6-month periods post-vaccination, respectively. RSV preF-ELISA antibody titers and RSV neutralizing titers were measured before and 14 d after vaccination. The phase 3 CTM-induced preF-ELISA response at Day 15, in terms of geometric mean titer, was shown to be non-inferior to that induced by phase 2b CTM. The RSV neutralizing antibody titers were also similar in the two groups at Day 15. The safety profile in terms of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs, or SAEs was in general similar between the phase 3 CTM and phase 2b CTM groups, and solicited AEs were mostly mild to moderate in intensity. No related SAEs were reported, and no safety concerns were identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT2)抑制剂的处方由于其额外的益处而不断增加,包括减肥,心脏保护和肾脏保护。因此,人们担心严重药物不良反应(ADR)的潜在上升,如尿路感染,糖尿病酮症酸中毒,体积耗尽,和低血糖。该协会已经宣布了关于适当使用SGLT2抑制剂的建议。我们旨在阐明最近发生的严重ADR,需要停用SGLT2抑制剂或住院治疗。
    方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了在2017年4月至2023年3月期间入院时接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗的391例糖尿病患者.其中,68例因ADR以外的原因停用SGLT2抑制剂的患者被排除在外。根据SGLT2抑制剂的治疗期将患者分为2017组和2020组,比较两组患者的ADR发生情况和患者背景。
    结果:总共323名合格患者被确定。2020组SGLT2抑制剂的停药率下降(p<0.05)。然而,因虚弱而中断的人数增加(p<0.05)。由于ADR而住院,特别是尿路感染,糖尿病酮症酸中毒,或体积耗尽,没有特别减少(p=0.273)。
    结论:这项研究表明,人们对正确使用SGLT2抑制剂的认识有所改善,并且仍需要继续进行启蒙活动。
    BACKGROUND: The prescription of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been increasing due to their additional benefits, including weight loss, cardioprotection and renoprotection. Accordingly, there are concerns about the potential rise in severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as urinary tract infections, diabetic ketoacidosis, volume depletion, and hypoglycemia. The Society has announced recommendations on the proper use of SGLT2 inhibitors. We aimed to elucidate the recent occurrence of severe ADRs which need discontinuation of SGLT2 inhibitors or hospitalization.
    METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 391 diabetic patients who were prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors upon admission to our hospital between April 2017 and March 2023. Of these, 68 patients who discontinued SGLT2 inhibitors for reasons other than ADRs were excluded. Patients were classified into the 2017 group and the 2020 group based on the treatment period of SGLT2 inhibitors, and the occurrence of ADRs and patient backgrounds were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 323 eligible patients were identified. Discontinuations of SGLT2 inhibitors decreased in the 2020 group (p < 0.05). However, discontinuations due to frailty increased (p < 0.05). Hospitalization due to ADRs, specifically those due to urinary tract infections, diabetic ketoacidosis, or volume depletion, did not specifically decrease (p = 0.273).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that there has been some improvement in the awareness of the proper use of SGLT2 inhibitors and there is still a need to continue enlightenment activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Mitrofanova等人设计了一种能够产生肠粘液屏障的人结肠体外模型,具有预测药物引起的胃肠道毒性的潜在应用。这种改进的系统为更准确和有效的药物开发过程铺平了道路。
    Mitrofanova et al.1 engineer a human colonic in vitro model capable of producing an intestinal mucus barrier, with potential applications for predicting drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. This improved system paves the way for more accurate and efficient drug development processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的药物警戒风险评估委员会(PRAC)启动了一项策略,以检查主要监管干预措施对公共卫生的影响,旨在将药品的风险降至最低。我们对2015年至2023年之间完成的影响研究进行了经验教训分析。
    方法:我们调查了参与12项影响研究评估的PRAC发起人和(共同)报告员(10项由EMA委托,2项由成员国合作进行),以探讨这些研究如何支持监管决策。问题涵盖了学习目标的实现,风险最小化有效性,增加监管决策的价值,以及对未来影响研究的建议。使用主题内容分析生成主题。
    结果:来自10个欧盟成员国的15个PRAC赞助商和(共同)报告员的调查答复被纳入分析。在四项横断面调查和八项药物利用研究中,50%实现了所有目标,其他研究部分是由于局限性。两项研究得出的结论是,风险最小化措施总体上是有效的,两个在不同国家的情况下是有效的,两项部分有效,4项研究显示疗效有限.由于局限性,两项研究被认为是不确定的。可以使用混合方法方法来探索风险最小化有效性有限的原因。研究可行性评估和有效性测量的先验讨论很重要。
    结论:尽管存在局限性,影响研究通过解决知识差距并提供有关监管干预措施的意外后果的更多信息,为监管决策增加了价值。我们的建议将有助于改善规划,进行和解释未来的影响研究。
    OBJECTIVE: The European Medicines Agency\'s (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) launched a strategy to examine the public health impact of major regulatory interventions aimed at minimising risks of medicinal products. We conducted a lessons learnt analysis of impact studies completed between 2015 and 2023.
    METHODS: We surveyed PRAC Sponsors and (Co-)Rapporteurs involved in the evaluation of 12 impact studies (10 commissioned by EMA and 2 conducted collaboratively by Member States) to explore how these support regulatory decision-making. Questions covered achievement of study objectives, risk minimisation effectiveness, added value for regulatory decision-making, and recommendations for future impact studies. Themes were generated using thematic content analysis.
    RESULTS: Survey responses from 15 PRAC Sponsors and (Co-)Rapporteurs from 10 European Union Member States were included in the analysis. Among four cross-sectional surveys and eight drug utilisation studies, 50% achieved all objectives, the other studies partially due to limitations. Two studies concluded that risk minimisation measures were overall effective, two were effective with variation across countries, two were partially effective and four studies showed limited effectiveness. Two studies were deemed inconclusive due to limitations. The reasons for the limited effectiveness of risk minimisation may be explored using mixed-method approaches. Assessment of study feasibility and a priori discussion of effectiveness measurements is important.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, impact research adds value to regulatory decision-making by addressing knowledge gaps and providing additional information on unintended consequences of regulatory interventions. Our recommendations will help to improve planning, conducting and interpretating future impact studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卟啉病携带者经历的潜在致命攻击是由各种卟啉类药物引发的。然而,确定特定药物的安全性具有挑战性。
    方法:我们回顾性地使用美国食品和药物管理局的不良事件报告系统(FAERS),从2004年1月至2022年3月的数据中,将与卟啉症相关的药物确定为不良事件(AE)。相关的搜索词包括\"卟啉症,\"\"卟啉症屏幕,\"\"非急性卟啉症,\"\"急性卟啉症,\"\"获得卟啉症,“和”假卟啉症。“通过四种算法进行信号挖掘分析以识别药物和AE之间的关联,即报告赔率比,比例报告比率,贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络,和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器。
    结果:FAERS报告了1470例卟啉症相关不良事件,在结合贸易名称和通用名称后,筛选了406种药物。所有四种算法都识别出52种具有信号的药物。分析了所有报告和信号药物的特征。
    结论:这是关于药物相关卟啉症的第一份报告,提供了关于药物卟啉性的关键信息,促进合理和循证的药物处方,提高基于模型算法的卟啉性预测的准确性。此外,这项研究为临床医生提供了参考,以确保不会给卟啉症基因突变的携带者开处方。
    BACKGROUND: The potentially fatal attacks experienced by porphyria carriers are triggered by various porphyrinogenic drugs. However, determining the safety of particular drugs is challenging.
    METHODS: We retrospectively used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify drugs associated with porphyria as an adverse event (AE) extracted from data from January 2004 to March 2022. The associated search terms included \"Porphyria,\" \"Porphyria screen,\" \"Porphyria non-acute,\" \"Porphyria acute,\" \"Acquired porphyria,\" and \"Pseudoporphyria.\" Signal mining analysis was performed to identify the association between drugs and AEs by four algorithms, namely the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker.
    RESULTS: FAERS reported 1470 cases of porphyria-related AEs, and 406 drugs were screened after combining trade and generic names. All four algorithms identified 52 drugs with signals. The characteristics of all the reports and signaling drugs were analyzed.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of drug-associated porphyria that provides critical information on drug porphyrogenicity, facilitating rational and evidence-based drug prescription and improving the accuracy of porphyrogenicity prediction based on model algorithms. Moreover, this study serves a reference for clinicians to ensure that porphyrinogenic drugs are not prescribed to carriers of porphyria genetic mutations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    系统性抗癌疗法(SACTs)是药物诱发的间质性肺病(ILD)的主要原因。随着越来越多的新型SACTs获得批准,这种潜在危及生命的不良事件(AE)的发生率可能会增加.早期发现SACT相关ILD可以迅速实施特定药物管理建议,提高AE分辨率的可能性,在某些情况下,扩大患者未来癌症治疗选择的资格。ILD需要通过与患者的多学科团队合作进行排除诊断,以排除新的或恶化的呼吸体征和症状的其他可能病因。在1级时,ILD无症状,因此放射科医师是在疾病严重程度恶化之前检测AE的关键。除了评估肿瘤对治疗的反应外,还应检查计划的计算机断层扫描是否存在ILD。当ILD被怀疑时,应立即进行高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)扫描.HRCT扫描,切片厚度<2-mm,是检测ILD的最合适方法。存在多种ILD模式,这可能会影响患者的预后。四种主要模式包括急性间质性肺炎/急性呼吸窘迫综合征,机化肺炎,过敏性肺炎,和非特异性间质性肺炎;它们独特的放射学特征,以及更罕见的模式,在这里讨论。此外,HRCT对于遵循ILD的过程至关重要,可能有助于确定AE管理的强度和SACT重新挑战的适当性,其中由特定药物处方信息指示。应密切监测ILD事件,直至完全解决。关键相关声明:随着越来越多的新疗法获得批准,潜在治疗限制和危及生命的全身性抗癌治疗相关间质性肺病(SACT相关ILD)事件的发生率可能会增加。这篇综述为放射科医生早期发现SACT相关ILD提供了最佳实践建议。要点:放射科医师在严重程度/预后恶化之前检测无症状(1级)ILD至关重要。高分辨率计算机断层扫描是检测ILD的最合适方法。药物诱导的ILD是一种排除性诊断,涉及一个多学科团队。熟悉常见的HRCT模式,在这里描述,是提示检测的关键。医师应在扫描要求中强调具有间质性肺病(ILD)已知风险的全身抗癌疗法(SACTs)。
    Systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) are the leading cause of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). As more novel SACTs become approved, the incidence of this potentially life-threatening adverse event (AE) may increase. Early detection of SACT-related ILD allows for prompt implementation of drug-specific management recommendations, improving the likelihood of AE resolution and, in some instances, widening the patient\'s eligibility for future cancer treatment options. ILD requires a diagnosis of exclusion through collaboration with the patient\'s multidisciplinary team to rule out other possible etiologies of new or worsening respiratory signs and symptoms. At Grade 1, ILD is asymptomatic, and thus the radiologist is key to detecting the AE prior to the disease severity worsening. Planned computed tomography scans should be reviewed for the presence of ILD in addition to being assessed for tumor response to treatment, and when ILD is suspected, a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan should be requested immediately. An HRCT scan, with < 2-mm slice thickness, is the most appropriate method for detecting ILD. Multiple patterns of ILD exist, which can impact patient prognosis. The four main patterns include acute interstitial pneumonia / acute respiratory distress syndrome, organizing pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and non-specific interstitial pneumonia; their distinct radiological features, along with rarer patterns, are discussed here. Furthermore, HRCT is essential for following the course of ILD and might help to determine the intensity of AE management and the appropriateness of re-challenging with SACT, where indicated by drug-specific prescribing information. ILD events should be monitored closely until complete resolution. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The incidence of potentially treatment-limiting and life-threatening systemic anticancer therapy-related interstitial lung disease (SACT-related ILD) events is likely increasing as more novel regimens become approved. This review provides best-practice recommendations for the early detection of SACT-related ILD by radiologists. KEY POINTS: Radiologists are crucial in detecting asymptomatic (Grade 1) ILD before severity/prognosis worsens. High-resolution computed tomography is the most appropriate method for detecting ILD. Drug-induced ILD is a diagnosis of exclusion, involving a multidisciplinary team. Familiarity with common HRCT patterns, described here, is key for prompt detection. Physicians should highlight systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) with a known risk for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) on scan requisitions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号