Cytoreductive surgery

细胞减灭术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胰腺癌腹膜转移的预后具有挑战性,有限的有效治疗选择。本研究旨在评估细胞减灭术(CRS)与腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)联合作为该患者组治疗策略的有效性和安全性。
    方法:回顾性分析2017年3月至2023年12月在北京世纪坛医院接受CRS+HIPEC治疗的胰腺癌腹膜转移患者的临床资料。这项研究的重点是评估临床特征,严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率,总生存率(OS)。
    结果:本研究共纳入10例患者。中位OS为24.2个月,表明对传统疗法的改进。虽然注意到SAE,包括2例需要额外手术干预的严重并发症,没有围手术期死亡记录.CC0/1患者的总生存时间与CC2/3患者的总生存时间没有显着差异,并且没有确定预后预测因子。
    结论:CRS和HIPEC的组合似乎是胰腺癌腹膜转移患者的可行和有希望的治疗方式,提供提高的生存率和可控的安全问题。需要进一步的研究来完善患者选择标准,并探索这种方法的长期益处。
    OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肉瘤样肾细胞癌通常表示异常差的预后。患者很少存活超过一年。一名83岁的男性出现在我们医院,抱怨头痛和左侧肢体无力。头部和肺部的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示右颞叶内有肿块,伴有右侧大脑半球瘤周水肿。对比增强和弥散加权成像(DWI)的脑磁共振成像(MRI)描绘了右颞叶的肿块,测量3×3×3厘米。他先后在神经外科和泌尿外科接受了细胞减灭术。尽管经历了术后肿瘤复发,到目前为止,病人已经活了将近四年。该病例报告表明,细胞减灭术与全身药物治疗相结合仍然可以为老年患者带来显着的生存益处。
    Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma typically signifies an exceptionally poor prognosis, with patients rarely surviving beyond one year. An 83-year-old male presented to our hospital with complaints of headache and left-sided limb weakness. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the head and lungs disclosed a mass within the right temporal lobe, accompanied by peritumoral edema in the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) delineated a mass in the right temporal lobe, measuring 3 × 3 × 3 cm. He underwent cytoreductive surgery successively in the neurosurgery and urology departments. Despite experiencing postoperative tumour recurrence, the patient has lived close to four years to date. This case report illustrates that cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic pharmacotherapy can still confer significant survival benefits for elderly patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜癌指数(PCI)与晚期卵巢癌患者术后预后之间的关系的最新临床证据仍存在争议,并且没有大样本和多中心的研究来澄清这个问题。因此,在本文中,我们使用meta分析系统评估PCI对晚期卵巢癌患者的术后预后价值,以提供个体化治疗方案,从而改善患者预后.
    在Cochrane库中搜索了PCI与接受细胞减灭术(CRS)的晚期OC患者术后预后之间相关性的文献,Pubmed,Embase,和WebofScience从数据库开始到2023年4月20日。搜索于2024年2月28日更新。我们仅包括未接受新辅助化疗(NACT)或腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的晚期(FIGO阶段:III-IV)患者。之后,使用Endnote20软件进行文献筛选和数据提取。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估文献质量。最后,采用STATA15.0软件进行统计分析.
    纳入了5项774名患者的研究。结果表明,高PCI患者的预后比低PCI患者差。综合危险比为2.79[95CI:(2.04,3.82),高PCI患者的总生存期(OS)p<0.001。通过FIGO分期的进一步亚组分析显示,在III期[HR:2.61,95CI:(2.00,3.40),p<0.001]和III-IV期患者[HR:2.69,95CI:(1.66,4.36),p<0.001],PCI评分高与预后差显著相关.PCI评分对分期较高患者的OS影响较大。综合危险比为1.89[95CI:(1.51,2.36),p<0.001]用于高PCI患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。
    PCI可作为原发性减积术晚期OC患者的术后预后指标。高PCI表明预后较差。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现.
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/,标识符CRD42023424010。
    UNASSIGNED: The newest clinical evidence that the relationship between the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and the postoperative prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer patients remains controversial, and there are no large-sample and multicenter studies to clarify this matter. Therefore, in this paper, we used meta-analysis to systematically assess the postoperative prognostic value of PCI in subjects with advanced ovarian cancer to provide individualized treatment plans and thus improve the prognosis of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature on the correlation between PCI and the postoperative prognosis in subjects with advanced OC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) was searched in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science from the database inception to April 20, 2023. The search was updated on February 28, 2024. We only included late-stage (FIGO stage: III-IV) patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Afterwards, literature screening and data extraction were conducted using Endnote20 software. The literature quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Lastly, statistical analysis was performed with STATA 15.0 software.
    UNASSIGNED: Five studies with 774 patients were included. The result indicated that patients with high PCI had a worse prognosis than those with low PCI. The combined hazard ratio was 2.79 [95%CI: (2.04, 3.82), p<0.001] for overall survival (OS) in patients with high PCI. Further subgroup analysis by the FIGO staging revealed that in stage III [HR: 2.61, 95%CI: (2.00, 3.40), p<0.001] and stage III-IV patients [HR: 2.69, 95%CI: (1.66, 4.36), p<0.001], a high PCI score was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. The PCI score had a greater impact on the OS of patients with higher stages. The combined hazard ratio was 1.89 [95%CI: (1.51, 2.36), p<0.001] for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with high PCI.
    UNASSIGNED: PCI may be used as a postoperative prognosis indicator in patients with advanced OC on primary debulking surgery. High PCI indicates a worse prognosis. However, further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023424010.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前认为以顺铂为基础的联合化疗是转移性上尿路上皮癌(mUTUC)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,关于其他组合的疗效的研究较少。在这项研究中,我们探讨了细胞减灭术在接受不同类型全身治疗的mUTUC患者中的作用.
    从监视中提取了9,436条匿名记录的数据,流行病学,和2008-2018年的最终结果(SEER)数据库。其中,508名个体在诊断为mUTUC后接受了全身治疗。这些患者都接受了全身治疗,如化疗和/或放疗。在开始全身治疗之前,根据细胞减灭术状态将患者分为非手术组或手术组。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。然后使用Cox的比例风险模型分析与OS和CSS相关的预后因素。
    在508个案例中,36.8%(n=187)接受过细胞减灭术和全身治疗。其余63.2%(n=321)单独接受化疗和/或放疗。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,对于全身治疗的细胞减灭术,11.6%的患者有3年的OS[95%的机密间隔(CI):7.1-17.3],而单独的全身治疗为4.9%(95%CI:2.7-8.0)(P=0.001)。细胞减灭术加全身治疗的3年CSS为14.9%(95%CI:9.4-21.7%),仅全身治疗为6.0%(95%CI:3.4-9.8%)(P=0.003)。在多元回归分析下,主要输尿管部位OS的风险比(HR)为0.74(95%CI:0.58-0.95,P=0.02),CSSHR为0.72(95%CI:0.56-0.94,P=0.01).细胞减灭术OSHR为0.79(95%CI:0.65-0.95,P=0.02),CSSHR为0.75(95%CI:0.61-0.92,P=0.006)。此外,化疗的OSHR为0.46(95%CI:0.33-0.0.65,P<0.001),CSSHR为0.44(95%CI:0.31-0.63,P<0.001).骨骼和肝转移也表明预后较差。通过亚组分析进行验证,表明细胞减灭术仅对接受化疗或联合化疗的患者有效,而对单独放疗无效。
    细胞减灭术为在本研究中接受化疗或联合化疗的mUTUC患者提供了显著增加的OS和CSS。此外,尽管这是一个小且相对均匀的研究队列,但发现原发肿瘤和转移部位与改善患者生存率相关。因此,样本,需要进一步的研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy alone is currently considered the standard of care for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC). However, less research has been done on the efficacy of other combinations. In this study, we explored the role of cytoreductive surgery in patients with mUTUC receiving different types of systemic therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 9,436 anonymized records were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2008-2018. Of these, 508 individuals received systemic therapy subsequent to being diagnosed with mUTUC. These patients had all been treated with systemic therapies such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into either a non-surgical or surgical group based on cytoreductive surgery status before systemic therapeutics commenced. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox\'s proportional hazard models were then used to analyze prognostic factors related to OS and CSS.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 508 cases, 36.8% (n=187) had received cytoreductive surgery with systemic treatments. The remaining 63.2% (n=321) received either chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy alone. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that 11.6% had 3-year OS [95% confidential interval (CI): 7.1-17.3] for cytoreductive surgery with systemic treatment and 4.9% (95% CI: 2.7-8.0) for systemic treatment alone (P=0.001). The 3-year CSS was 14.9% for cytoreductive surgery plus systemic treatment (95% CI: 9.4-21.7%) and 6.0% (95% CI: 3.4-9.8%) for systemic treatments alone (P=0.003). Under multivariate regression analysis, primary ureter site OS had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58-0.95, P=0.02) and a CSS HR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.56-0.94, P=0.01). The cytoreductive surgery OS HR was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65-0.95, P=0.02) and the CSS HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.61-0.92, P=0.006). Additionally, chemotherapy had an OS HR of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33-0.0.65, P<0.001) and a CSS HR of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.31-0.63, P<0.001). Bones and liver metastases were also indicative of poorer prognosis. Validation was conducted through subgroup analysis which suggested cytoreductive surgery was effective only for patients who received chemotherapy or combined chemo-radiotherapy but not for radiotherapy alone.
    UNASSIGNED: Cytoreductive surgery provided significantly increased OS and CSS for mUTUC patients who received chemotherapy or combined chemo-radiotherapy in this study. In addition, the primary tumor and metastatic sites were shown to be related to improved patient survival although this was a small and relatively homogeneous cohort of study, sample therefore, further research is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:CRS+HIPEC联合泌尿道切除和重建的安全性和有效性存在争议。本研究旨在总结CRS+HIPEC联合泌尿道切除重建的临床病理特征,评价其安全性和生存预后。
    方法:从我们的疾病特异性数据库中回顾性选择作为CRS手术一部分而接受尿路切除和重建的患者进行分析。临床病理特征,治疗相关变量,围手术期不良事件(AE),使用描述性方法和对数秩比较的K-M分析研究了生存结局。
    结果:纳入49例患者。11例(22.4%)患者围手术期出现严重不良事件(SAEs),3例患者发生尿SAE(6.1%)。此外,有23例(46.8%)涉及尿液不良事件(UAE)。整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为59.2(95CI:42.1-76.4)个月。UAE组和No-UAE组的中位OS为59.2个月(未达到95CI),和50.5(95CI:11.5至89.6)个月,分别,差异无统计学意义(P=0.475)。此外,根据UAE的等级或UAE的数量,OS没有显着差异(分别为P=0.562和P=0.622)。
    结论:CRS+HIPEC与尿路切除和重建的组合与I-II级UAE的高发生率相关,对操作系统没有影响。这种组合技术的安全性是可以接受的。然而,这是一个回顾性的单中心单臂分析,具有普适性和潜在选择偏差的局限性。这些发现需要高级验证。
    BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction are controversial. This study aims to summarize the clinicopathological features and to evaluate the safety and survival prognosis of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction.
    METHODS: The patients who underwent urinary tract resection and reconstruction as part of CRS surgery were retrospectively selected from our disease-specific database for analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment-related variables, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were studied using a descriptive approach and the K-M analysis with log-rank comparison.
    RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Perioperative serious AEs (SAEs) were observed in 11 patients (22.4%), with urinary SAEs occurring in 3 patients (6.1%). Additionally, there were 23 cases (46.8%) involving urinary adverse events (UAEs). The median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 59.2 (95%CI: 42.1-76.4) months. The median OS of the UAE group and No-UAE group were 59.2 months (95%CI not reached), and 50.5 (95%CI: 11.5 to 89.6) months, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.475). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in OS based on the grade of UAEs or the number of UAEs (P = 0.562 and P = 0.622, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS + HIPEC with urinary tract resection and reconstruction is associated with a high incidence of Grade I-II UAEs, which do not have an impact on OS. The safety profile of this combined technique is acceptable. However, this is a retrospective single-center single-arm analysis, with limitations of generalizability and potential selection bias. The findings need high-level validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤(LAMNs)是罕见且异质性的疾病,尽管发病率增加,有很好的区别,往往是无痛的,组织学上缺乏独特的侵入性特征,没有浸润性生长,破坏性渗透,或相关的促纤维增生反应。然而,这些肿瘤的生物学行为在术前或术中难以确定,破裂的可能性使患者面临腹膜假黏液性肿瘤(PMPs)的风险。低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤和腹膜假黏液性肿瘤患者病情进展缓慢,无法治愈,复发风险高,发病率,最终死亡,尽管报告的5年和10年生存率为50-86%和45-68%,分别。在这篇文章中,我们报告了一个80岁的男性,患有一个巨大的低级别阑尾粘液性肿瘤,与腹膜假粘液性肿瘤相关,并结合文献综述讨论巨大的低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤的诊断和治疗策略。
    Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases that, despite their increased incidence, are well differentiated, tend to be painless, and histologically lack distinctive invasive features without infiltrative growth, destructive infiltration, or associated pro-fibroproliferative responses. However, the biological behaviour of these tumours is difficult to determine preoperatively or intraoperatively, and the possibility of rupture puts patients at risk for peritoneal pseudomucinous neoplasms (PMPs).Patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumours and peritoneal pseudomucinous tumours experience slow disease progression and are incurable and have a high risk of recurrence, morbidity, and ultimately death, despite the reported 5- and 10-year survival rates of 50-86% and 45-68%, respectively. In this article, we report the case of a 80-year-old male with a giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumour associated with a peritoneal pseudomucinous tumour, and discuss the diagnostic and management strategies for giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumours in the context of a literature review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们旨在评估细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(PSM)的术后安全性,并对血流感染的危险因素及病原菌耐药性进行分析。
    我们回顾性分析了1500例接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的PSM患者术后血流感染的发生率。我们利用单变量和多变量分析来筛选与CRS合并HIPEC术后血流感染相关的独立危险因素。
    在接受CRS合并HIPEC的1500例患者中,207例(13.8%)发生血流感染。共分离培养病原菌233株,由151个革兰氏阳性球菌组成,52革兰阴性杆菌,和30种真菌。革兰阳性球菌(54.94%)为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(SCN),而肺炎克雷伯菌亚种。肺炎(7.30%)和大肠埃希菌(5.58%)以革兰阴性杆菌为主。白色念珠菌是主要真菌。葡萄球菌对替加环素表现出高度敏感性,利奈唑胺,万古霉素,和奎尼普汀/达福普汀。然而,肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌对亚胺培南耐药。此外,五个参数与血流感染的发展相关:年龄(P=0.040),手术史(P=0.033),先前的肿瘤治疗(P<0.001),肿瘤组织类型(P=0.034),和细胞减灭术(CC)评分的完整性(P=0.004)。其中,年龄(P=0.013),先前的肿瘤治疗(P=0.001),肿瘤组织类型(P=0.032),和CC评分(P=0.002)是CRS合并HIPEC患者术后血流感染的独立危险因素。
    接受CRS合并HIPEC的PSM患者的术后血流感染主要归因于SCN,肺炎克雷伯菌亚种。肺炎,还有白色念珠菌.值得注意的是,肠杆菌科细菌对碳青霉烯具有抗性。PSM术后感染的独立危险因素包括年龄、先前的肿瘤治疗,肿瘤组织类型,和细胞减少评分的完整性。
    UNASSIGNED: In this study we aimed to evaluate the postoperative safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM), and analyzed the risk factors and pathogen resistance associated with bloodstream infections.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative bloodstream infections in 1500 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for PSM. We utilized univariate and multivariate analyses to screen for independent risk factors associated with postoperative bloodstream infections in CRS combined with HIPEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 1500 cases of individuals undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC, 207 cases (13.8%) experienced bloodstream infections. A total of 233 strains of pathogens were isolated and cultured, consisting of 151 gram-positive cocci, 52 gram-negative bacilli, and 30 fungi. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCN) were the gram-positive cocci (54.94%), while Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae (7.30%) and Escherichia coli (5.58%) dominated the Gram-negative bacilli. Candida albicans was the predominant fungus. Staphylococci exhibited high sensitivity to tigecycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. However, K. pneumoniae and E. coli were resistant to imipenem. Furthermore, five parameters were associated with the development of bloodstream infections: age (P = 0.040), surgical history (P = 0.033), prior tumor treatment (P < 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.034), and completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (P = 0.004). Among these, age (P = 0.013), prior tumor treatment (P = 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.032), and CC score (P = 0.002) emerged as independent risk factors for postoperative bloodstream infections in patients undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative bloodstream infections in patients with PSM undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC are predominantly attributed to SCN, K. pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae, and C. albicans. Notably, Enterobacteriaceae exhibited resistance to carbapenem. Independent risk factors for postoperative infections in PSM include age, prior tumor treatment, tumor tissue type, and completeness of cytoreduction score.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:伴有腹膜转移的肝细胞癌(HCC-PM)前景不佳。传统治疗对生存的影响有限。在其他腹膜癌中已经显示了细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRSHIPEC)的安全性和有效性。本研究评估了CRS+HIPEC在HCC-PM中的作用。
    方法:回顾性分析2017年3月至2023年12月在北京世纪坛医院接受CRS+HIPEC治疗的HCC-PM患者,评估临床特征,严重不良事件(SAE),和总生存率(OS)。
    结果:研究人群包括10名接受CRS+HIPEC的HCC-PM患者。中位腹膜癌指数(PCI)为25,半数患者达到完全细胞减灭术(CC0~1)。3例患者在术后30天内出现SAE。1年,3年,5年OS率为89.0%,89.0%,和21.0%,OS1中位数为107.8个月,OS2中位数为49.9个月。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.0个月。
    结论:CRS+HIPEC的应用为HCC-PM患者提供了显著的益处。选定的一组患者可以达到延长的PFS。因此,将CRS+HIPEC纳入治疗范式可以被认为是HCC-PM患者的战略治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis (HCC-PM) has a poor outlook. Traditional treatments have limited effect on survival. The safety and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) have been shown in other peritoneal cancers. This study evaluates the role of CRS + HIPEC in HCC-PM.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of HCC-PM patients treated with CRS + HIPEC at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023 was conducted, assessing clinical features, severe adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS) rates.
    RESULTS: The study population comprised 10 HCC-PM patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 25, and complete cytoreduction (CC0 ~ 1) was achieved in half of the patients. Three patients experienced SAEs within 30 days postoperatively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were recorded as 89.0%, 89.0%, and 21.0% respectively, with a median OS1 of 107.8 months and OS2 of 49.9 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of CRS + HIPEC offers significant benefits to patients with HCC-PM. A selected group of patients may achieve prolonged PFS. Incorporating CRS + HIPEC into the treatment paradigm can thus be considered a strategic therapeutic option for patients with HCC-PM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜假粘液瘤(PMP)是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是在阑尾或其他器官的原发性粘液性肿瘤破裂后广泛的腹膜植入和大量粘液分泌。细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)是目前首选的治疗方法,具有优异的疗效和安全性,并与长期疾病控制和延长生存期的突破性进展有关。然而,PMP的高复发率是其治疗的关键挑战,这限制了多轮CRS-HIPEC的临床应用,并且不能从常规的全身化疗中获益。因此,针对难治性或复发性PMP患者开发替代疗法至关重要.有关PMP研究进展和治疗的文献在WebofScience中检索,PubMed,和谷歌学者数据库,并进行了文献综述。生物研究的概述,治疗状态,潜在的治疗策略,当前研究的局限性,并提出了与PMP相关的未来方向,专注于CRS-HIPEC治疗和替代或联合治疗策略,并强调了粘液溶解剂和靶向治疗等潜在治疗策略的临床转化前景。为PMP的治疗提供了理论参考和未来研究的主要方向。
    Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease characterized by extensive peritoneal implantation and mass secretion of mucus after primary mucinous tumors of the appendix or other organ ruptures. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently the preferred treatment, with excellent efficacy and safety, and is associated with breakthrough progress in long-term disease control and prolonged survival. However, the high recurrence rate of PMP is the key challenge in its treatment, which limits the clinical application of multiple rounds of CRS-HIPEC and does not benefit from conventional systemic chemotherapy. Therefore, the development of alternative therapies for patients with refractory or relapsing PMP is critical. The literature related to PMP research progress and treatment was searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, and a literature review was conducted. The overview of the biological research, treatment status, potential therapeutic strategies, current research limitations, and future directions associated with PMP are presented, focuses on CRS-HIPEC therapy and alternative or combination therapy strategies, and emphasizes the clinical transformation prospects of potential therapeutic strategies such as mucolytic agents and targeted therapy. It provides a theoretical reference for the treatment of PMP and the main directions for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细胞减灭术联合胸腔内热化疗(S-HITHOC)可有效治疗伴有胸膜扩散或复发的胸腺上皮肿瘤(TET)。这项研究将评估S-HITHOC治疗胸膜扩散或复发的TET的安全性和有效性。
    这项研究是一项开放的,单臂,前瞻性审判。将招募约37名在复旦大学附属中山医院诊断为胸膜扩散或复发的TET患者,并接受S-HITHOC治疗。该研究的共同主要结果是术后住院时间,并发症,和整体生活质量(QoL)。次要结果包括排水持续时间,volume,和累积疼痛评分。
    本试验经中山医院研究伦理委员会批准。研究结果将通过手稿出版物和会议演示文稿积极传播。信息表将提供给每个参与者,每次评估将获得知情的书面同意。这项前瞻性研究将评估手术切除联合HITHOC手术在中国治疗胸膜扩散或复发的TET的有效性,并将支持该程序的标准化。
    该试验已在Clinialtrial.gov上注册(编号:NCT05446935)。
    UNASSIGNED: Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (S-HITHOC) may be effective in treating thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) with pleural spread or recurrence. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-HITHOC in the treatment of TETs with pleural spread or recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is an open, single-arm, prospective trial. Approximately 37 patients diagnosed with TETs with pleural spread or recurrence at the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University will be recruited and treated with S-HITHOC. The co-primary outcomes of the study are the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, and overall quality of life (QoL). The secondary outcomes include drainage duration, volume, and cumulative pain scores.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial was approved by the Zhongshan Hospital Research Ethics Committee. The study findings will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations. Information sheets will be provided to each participant, and informed written consent will be obtained for each evaluation. This prospective study will evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical resection combined with the HITHOC procedure in treating TETs with pleural spread or recurrence in China and will support the standardization of the procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial was registered on Clinialtrial.gov (No. NCT05446935).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号