OBJECTIVE: To investigate the epidemiological characteristics and mutation spectrum of monogenic diseases in Chinese population through a large-scale, multicenter carrier screening.
METHODS: This study was conducted among a total of 33 104 participants (16 610 females) from 12 clinical centers across China.Carrier status for 223 genes was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing and different PCR methods.
RESULTS: The overall combined carrier frequency was 55.58% for 197 autosomal genes and 1.84% for 26 X-linked genes in these participants.Among the 16 669 families, 874 at-risk couples (5.24%) were identified.Specifically, 584 couples (3.50%) were at risk for autosomal genes, 306(1.84%) for X-linked genes, and 16 for both autosomal and X-linked genes.The most frequently detected autosomal at-risk genes included GJB2(autosomal recessive deafness type 1A, 393 couples), HBA1/HBA2(α-thalassemia, 36 couples), PAH (phenylketonuria, 14 couples), and SMN1(spinal muscular atrophy, 14 couples).The most frequently detected X-linked at-risk genes were G6PD (G6PD deficiency, 236 couples), DMD (Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 23 couples), and FMR1(fragile X syndrome, 17 couples).After excluding GJB2 c.109G>A, the detection rate of at-risk couples was 3.91%(651/16 669), which was lowered to 1.72%(287/16 669) after further excluding G6PD.The theoretical incidence rate of severe monogenic birth defects was approximately 4.35‰(72.5/16 669).Screening for a battery of the top 22 most frequent genes in the at-risk couples could detect over 95% of at-risk couples, while screening for the top 54 genes further increased the detection rate to over 99%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the carrier frequencies of 223 monogenic genetic disorders in the Chinese population and provides evidence for carrier screening strategy development and panel design tailored to the Chinese population.In carrier testing, genetic counseling for specific genes or gene variants can be challenging, and the couples need to be informed of these difficulties before testing and provided with options for not screening these genes or gene variants.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the functional consequences of two common variants, p.V37I and c.299-300delAT in hearing loss associated gene GJB2.
UNASSIGNED: Connexin 26 expression and gap junctional permeability were studied in HEK 293T cells transfected with plasmids expressing GJB2 wild-type, p.V37I, or c.299-300delAT CX26 proteins with fluorescent tags. Functional analyses of different GJB2 haplotypes were performed to fully assess the alteration of ionic and small-molecule coupling.
UNASSIGNED: The p.V37I protein was localized at the plasma membrane, but failed to effectively transport intercellular propidium iodide or Ca2+ efficiently, indicating impairment of both biochemical and ionic coupling. The presence of GJB2 p.V37I appeared to increase the sensitivity of cells to H2O2 treatment. In contrast, the known variant c.299-300delAT protein was not transported to the cell membrane and could not form gap junctions, instead being confined to the cytoplasm. Ionic and biochemical coupling was defective in c.299-300delAT-transfected cells.
UNASSIGNED: The p.V37I and c.299-300delAT GJB2 mutations resulted in deficient gap junction-mediated coupling. Environmental factors may impact the functional consequences of GJB2 p.V37I. These results may inspire the development of molecular therapies targeting GJB2 mutations for hearing loss.

Hearing loss constitutes one of the most prevalent conditions within the field of otolaryngology. Recent investigations have revealed that mutations in deafness-associated genes, including point mutations and variations in DNA sequences, can cause hearing impairments. With the ethology of deafness remaining unclear for a substantial portion of the affected population, further screenings for pathogenic mutations are imperative to unveil the underlying mechanisms. On this study, by using next-generation sequencing, we examine 129 commonly implicated deafness-related genes in a Chinese family with hearing loss, revealing a novel heterozygous dominant mutation in the GJB2 gene (GJB2: c.65T>G: p. Lys22Thr). This mutation consistently occurs in affected family members but is not detected in unaffected individuals, strongly suggesting its causative role in hearing loss. Structural analysis indicates potential disruption to the Cx26 gap junction channel\'s hydrogen bond and electrostatic interactions, aligning with predictions from the PolyPhen and SIFT algorithms. In conclusion, our study provides conclusive evidence that the identified heterozygous GJB2 mutation (GJB2: c.65T>G: p. Lys22Thr), specifically the K22T alteration, is the primary determinant of the family\'s deafness. This contribution enhances our understanding of the interplay between common deafness-associated genes and hearing loss, offering valuable insights for diagnostic guidance and the formulation of therapeutic strategies for this condition.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the types and distribution of pathogenic variants for neonatal genetic diseases in Huzhou, Zhejiang Province.
METHODS: One thousand neonates (48 ~ 42 h after birth) born to Huzhou region were selected as the study subjects. Dry blood spot samples were collected from the newborns, and targeted capture high-throughput sequencing was carried out for pathogenic genes underlying 542 inherited diseases. Candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS: Among the 1 000 newborns, the male to female ratio was 1.02 : 1.00. No pathogenic variants were detected in 253 cases, whilst 747 cases were found to carry at least one pathogenic variant, which yielded a carrier rate of 74.7%. The most frequently involved pathogenic gene was FLG, followed by GJB2, UGT1A1, USH2A and DUOX2. The variants were classified as homozygous, compound heterozygous, and hemizygous variants. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 213 neonates were verified to have carried pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic variants, with a positive rate of 21.3%. The most commonly involved genes had included UGT1A1, FLG, GJB2, MEFV and G6PD.
CONCLUSIONS: Newborn screening based on high-throughput sequencing technology can expand the scope of screening and improve the positive predictive value. Genetic counseling based on the results can improve the patients\' medical care and reduce neonatal mortality and childhood morbidity, while provide assistance to family members\' health management and reproductive decisions.

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) has been rarely reported until recent years. Additionally, the existing method can not be used for challenging genome loci (eg, copy number variations, deletions, inversions, or gene recombinants) or on families without proband genotype. This study assessed the performance of relative haplotype dosage analysis (RHDO)-based NIPD for identifying fetal genotyping in pregnancies at risk of ARNSHL. Fifty couples carrying pathogenic variants associated with ARNSHL in either GJB2 or SLC26A4 were recruited. The RHDO-based targeted linked-read sequencing combined with whole gene coverage probes was used to genotype the fetal cell-free DNA of 49 families who met the quality control standard. Fetal amniocyte samples were genotyped using invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) to assess the performance of NIPD. The NIPD results showed 100% (49/49) concordance with those obtained through IPD. Two families with copy number variation and recombination were also successfully identified. Sufficient specific informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms for haplotyping, as well as the fetal cell-free DNA concentration and sequencing depth, are prerequisites for RHDO-based NIPD. This method has the merits of covering the entire genes of GJB2 and SLC26A4, qualifying for copy number variation and recombination analysis with remarkable sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it has clinical potential as an alternative to traditional IPD for ARNSHL.

BACKGROUND: Hmong-Mien (HM) speakers are linguistically related and live primarily in China, but little is known about their ancestral origins or the evolutionary mechanism shaping their genomic diversity. In particular, the lack of whole-genome sequencing data on the Yao population has prevented a full investigation of the origins and evolutionary history of HM speakers. As such, their origins are debatable.
RESULTS: Here, we made a deep sequencing effort of 80 Yao genomes, and our analysis together with 28 East Asian populations and 968 ancient Asian genomes suggested that there is a strong genetic basis for the formation of the HM language family. We estimated that the most recent common ancestor dates to 5800 years ago, while the genetic divergence between the HM and Tai-Kadai speakers was estimated to be 8200 years ago. We proposed that HM speakers originated from the Yangtze River Basin and spread with agricultural civilization. We identified highly differentiated variants between HM and Han Chinese, in particular, a deafness-related missense variant (rs72474224) in the GJB2 gene is in a higher frequency in HM speakers than in others.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated complex gene flow and medically relevant variants involved in the HM speakers\' evolution history.

Objective:To elucidate the correlation between the GJB2 gene and auditory neuropathy, aiming to provide valuable insights for genetic counseling of affected individuals and their families. Methods:The general information, audiological data（including pure tone audiometry, distorted otoacoustic emission, auditory brainstem response, electrocochlography）, imaging data and genetic test data of 117 auditory neuropathy patients, and the patients with GJB2 gene mutation were screened out for the correlation analysis of auditory neuropathy. Results:Total of 16 patients were found to have GJB2 gene mutations, all of which were pathogenic or likely pathogenic.was Among them, one patient had compound heterozygous variants GJB2[c. 427C>T][c. 358_360del], exhibiting total deafness. One was GJB2[c. 299_300delAT][c. 35_36insG]compound heterozygous variants, the audiological findings were severe hearing loss.The remaining 14 patients with GJB2 gene variants exhibited typical auditory neuropathy. Conclusion:In this study, the relationship between GJB2 gene and auditory neuropathy was preliminarily analyzed,and explained the possible pathogenic mechanism of GJB2 gene variants that may be related to auditory neuropathy.
目的：探究GJB2基因与听神经病之间的关系，为此类患者及家庭的遗传咨询提供参考。 方法：对117例听神经病患者的基本信息、听力学资料（包括纯音测听、畸变耳声发射、听性脑干反应、耳蜗电图）、影像学资料、遗传学检测等数据进行收集，并筛选出携带GJB2基因变异的患者对其进行听神经病相关分析。 结果：共计16例患者检出GJB2基因变异，变异位点致病性均为致病的或可能致病的，其中1例为GJB2[c.427C>T][c.358_360del]复合杂合变异，听力学表现为全聋，1例为GJB2[c.299_300delAT][c.35_36insG]复合杂合变异，听力学表现为重度听力损失，其余14例携带GJB2基因变异患者听力学表型均为典型听神经病。 结论：本研究初步分析了GJB2基因与听神经病的相关性，并阐述了GJB2基因变异可能与听神经病表型相关的致病机制。.

Deafness is a common sensory disorder. In China, approximately 70% of hereditary deafness originates from four common deafness-causing genes: GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and MT-RNR1. A single-tube rapid detection method based on 2D-PCR technology was established for nine mutation sites in the aforementioned genes, and Sanger sequencing was used to verify its reliability and accuracy. The frequency of hotspot mutations in deafness genes was analysed in 116 deaf students. 2D-PCR identified 27 genotypes of nine loci according to the melting curve of the FAM, HEX, and Alexa568 fluorescence channels. Of the 116 deaf patients, 12.9% (15/116) carried SLC26A4 mutations, including c.919-2A > G and c.2168A > G (allele frequencies, 7.3% and 2.2%, respectively). The positivity rate (29.3%; 34/116) was highest for GJB2 (allele frequency, 15.9% for c.235delC, 6.0% for c.299_300delAT, and 2.6% for c.176-191del16). Sanger sequencing confirmed the consistency of results between the detection methods based on 2D-PCR and DNA sequencing. Common pathogenic mutations in patients with non-syndromic deafness in Changzhou were concentrated in GJB2 (c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, and c.176-191del16) and SLC26A4 (c.919-2A > G and c.2168 A > G). 2D-PCR is an effective method for accurately and rapidly identifying deafness-related genotypes using a single-tube reaction, and is superior to DNA sequencing, which has a high cost and long cycle.

This study aimed to explore the molecular epidemiology characteristics of deafness susceptibility genes in neonates in northern Guangdong and provide a scientific basis for deafness prevention and control. A total of 10,183 neonates were recruited between January 2018 and December 2022 at Yuebei People\'s Hospital. Among these, a PCR hybridization screening group of 8276 neonates was tested for four deafness genes: GJB2, SLC26A4, mtDNA, and GJB3 by PCR hybridization. Another group used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect genetic susceptibility genes in 1907 neonates. In PCR hybridization screening group, 346 (4.18%) of 8276 neonates were found to be carriers of the deafness gene. Among these, 182 (2.2%) had GJB2 variants, 114 (1.38%) had SLC26A4 variants, 35 (0.42%) had mtDNA variants, and 15 (0.18%) had GJB3 variants. In NGS Screening Group, 195 out of 1907 neonates were found to be carriers of the deafness gene, with a positive rate of 10.22%. Among these, 137 (7.18%) had GJB2 variants, 41 (2.15%) had SLC26A4 variants, 11 (0.58%) had mtDNA variants, and 6 (0.31%) had GJB3 variants. The prevalence of deafness gene variants was high in Northern Guangdong Province. The most common gene for deafness was GJB2, followed by SLC26A4 and mtDNA. GJB3 variants are rare. Compared with PCR hybridization method, NGS technology can expand the screening scope and greatly improve the detection rate of deafness genes. The c.109G>A of GJB2 was found to occur at a high frequency, which should be considered. Therefore, it is important to conduct neonatal deafness gene screening to prevent and control hereditary deafness.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the genotype distribution and frequency of hearing loss genes in newborn population and evaluate the clinical value of genetic screening policy in China.
METHODS: Genetic screening for hearing loss was offered to 84,029 neonates between March 2019 and December 2021, of whom 77,647 newborns accepted the screening program with one-year follow-up. The genotyping of 15 hot spot variants in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 was performed on microarray platform.
RESULTS: A total of 3.05% (2369/77,647) newborns carried at least one genetic hearing loss-associated variant, indicated for early preventive management. The carrier frequency of GJB2 gene was the highest, at 1.48% (1147/77,647), followed by SLC26A4 gene at 1.07% (831/77,647), and GJB3 gene at 0.23% (181/77,647). GJB2 c.235delC variant and SLC26A4 IVS7-2A>G variant were the most common allelic variants with allele frequency of 0.6304% (979/155,294) and 0.3992% (620/155,294), respectively. 10 children are identified as homozygous or compound heterozygous for pathogenic variants (4 in GJB2, 6 in SLC26A4), and 7 of these infants had passed the hearing screening. Following up of the genetically screened newborns revealed that genetic screening detected more hearing-impaired infants than hearing screening alone. Genetic screening helped identify the infants who had passed the initial hearing screening, and reduced time for diagnosis and intervention of hearing aid. In addition, we identified 234 newborns (0.30%, 234/77,647) susceptible to preventable aminoglycoside antibiotic ototoxicity undetectable by hearing screening.
CONCLUSIONS: We performed the largest-scale neonatal carrier screening for hearing loss genes in Southeast China. Our results indicated that genetic screening is an important complementation to conventional hearing screening. Our practice and experience may facilitate the application and development of neonatal genetic screening policy in mainland China.