Bruxism

Bruxism
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTA)注射是否可以缓解磨牙症引起的疼痛,存在不一致的证据。这项研究旨在评估BTA注射在不同随访时期缓解磨牙症引起的疼痛的效率。
    从2005年到2022年,使用与肉毒杆菌毒素和磨牙症相关的搜索词搜索了五个电子数据库。仅包括对照临床试验。两名调查人员审查了每篇文章,并讨论了任何分歧,直到达成共识。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛结果进行单臂和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。汇总数据是通过随机效应模型测量的。
    共纳入365名磨牙症患者的11项研究。根据汇总数据的单臂分析,在VAS上,注射BTA后磨牙症相关疼痛的减少为4.06分(95%CI=3.37至4.75),治疗后第6个月疼痛缓解显著(P<0.01)。根据贝叶斯分析,BTA还导致明显更大的疼痛缓解比口腔夹板(平均差异(MD),-1.5;95%可信间隔(CrI)=-2.7至-0.19)或生理盐水注射(MD,-3.3;95%CrI=-6.2至-0.32)。
    BTA可显著缓解注射后6个月磨牙症的疼痛,其疗效高于口腔夹板。然而,有必要进行进一步的长期随访随机对照试验,比较BTA与其他管理或药物.
    UNASSIGNED: There is inconsistent evidence regarding whether the botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection can relieve pain caused by bruxism. This study aimed to estimate the efficiency of BTA injection in relieving pain caused by bruxism at different follow-up periods.
    UNASSIGNED: Five electronic databases were searched from 2005 to 2022 using search terms related to botulinum toxin and bruxism. Only controlled clinical trials were included. Two investigators reviewed each article and discussed any disagreements until a consensus was reached. Pain outcomes as evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) were subjected to single-arm and Bayesian network meta-analyses. Pooling data were measured by a random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies with a total of 365 bruxism patients were included. According to the single-arm analyses of the pooled data, the reduction in bruxism-related pain after BTA injection measured 4.06 points (95% CI = 3.37 to 4.75) on the VAS, and the pain relief was significant in the first 6 months after treatment (P < 0.01). According to the Bayesian analysis, BTA also resulted in significantly greater pain relief than oral splinting (mean difference (MD), -1.5; 95% credible interval (CrI) = -2.7 to -0.19) or saline injection (MD, -3.3; 95% CrI = -6.2 to -0.32).
    UNASSIGNED: BTA significantly relieves the pain of bruxism for 6 months after injection, and its therapeutic efficacy was higher than that of oral splinting. Nevertheless, further long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials comparing BTA with other management or drugs are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Noncarious lesions, a multifactorial condition encompassing tooth attrition, abrasion, and erosion, have a surge in prevalence and required increased attention in clinical practice. These nonbacterial-associated tooth defects can compromise aesthetics, phonetics, and masticatory functions. When providing full-arch fixed occlusal rehabilitation for such cases, the treatment strategy should extend beyond by restoring dentition morphology and aesthetics. This report details a complex case of erosive dental wear addressed through a fully digital, full-arch fixed occlusal rehabilitation. A 4D virtual patient was created using multiple digital data sources, including intraoral scanning, 3D facial scanning, digital facebow registration, and mandibular movement tracing. With a comprehensive understanding of the masticatory system, various types of microinvasive prostheses were customized for each tooth, including labial veneers, buccal-occlusal veneers, occlusal veneers, overlays, inlays, and full crowns, were customized for each tooth. The reported digital workflow offered a predictable diagnostic and treatment strategy, which was facilitated by virtual visualization and comprehensive quality control throughout the process.
    牙磨耗、磨损、酸蚀症等多因素导致的非龋性牙体缺损在口腔临床中的发病率呈上升趋势,通常伴随着不同程度的口腔美学缺陷及功能障碍。对其进行全牙列固定修复咬合重建时,不仅要恢复牙列的形态和美观,更要实现咬合关系与整体口颌系统的协调。本文报道1例酸蚀症伴重度磨耗的病例,利用多模态数字化数据(口内扫描、面部扫描、电子面弓、下颌运动轨迹描记等)构建4D虚拟患者,制定全面的修复方案,进行不同牙齿的个性化微创修复,采用唇贴面、颊牙合贴面、牙合贴面、高嵌体、嵌体、全冠等多种修复体,完成数字化全牙列咬合重建治疗,为该疾病的诊治提供可视化、可全程质控的全局观诊疗策略。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在通过对有或没有意识的个体的肌电图(EMG)数据进行比较分析,阐明昼夜咬肌活动与意识到昼夜清醒磨牙症(d-AB)之间的关系。利用从多个受试者收集的肌电图数据。
    方法:白天使用超微型可穿戴EMG设备进行单侧咬肌肌电图(EMG)记录。共有119名参与者(59名意识到昼夜咬牙[d-TC]和60名没有意识到d-TC)。两种振幅条件下大于0.25s的波形,超过基线的两倍,超过最大自愿握紧的5%,被提取。此外,突发和发作的数量(突发组),突发持续时间,并计算每个参与者的爆发峰值振幅。
    结果:了解d-TC和不了解d-TC的组之间的EMG参数没有显着差异。此外,EMG波形数量的频率分布在两组之间表现出很宽的范围和相当大的重叠。
    结论:爆发和发作次数的可变性,突发峰值振幅,受试者之间的爆发持续时间表明需要基于EMG值对d-AB严重程度进行客观分类。具有和不具有d-TC意识的组之间的频率分布不存在显着差异和较大重叠,这表明难以仅基于对d-AB的认识来预测肌肉活动。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between diurnal masseter muscle activity and awareness of diurnal awake bruxism (d-AB) by conducting a comparative analysis of electromyographic (EMG) data from individuals with and without awareness of diurnal awake bruxism (d-AB), utilizing EMG data gathered from multiple subjects.
    METHODS: Unilateral masseter electromyography (EMG) recordings were performed during the daytime using an ultraminiature wearable EMG device. A total of 119 participants (59 with awareness of diurnal tooth clenching [d-TC] and 60 without awareness of d-TC) were included. Waveforms longer than 0.25 s with the two amplitude conditions, exceeding twice the baseline and >5% of maximum voluntary clenching, were extracted. In addition, the number of bursts and episodes (groups of bursts), burst duration, and burst peak amplitude were calculated for each participant.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the EMG parameters between the groups with and without awareness of d-TC. Additionally, the frequency distribution of the number of EMG waveforms exhibited wide ranges and substantial overlap between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The variability in the number of bursts and episodes, burst peak amplitude, and burst duration among subjects suggests the need for an objective classification of d-AB severity based on EMG values. The absence of significant differences and large overlap in frequency distributions between the groups with and without awareness of d-TC indicate difficulty in predicting muscle activity solely based on awareness of d-AB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:随着磨牙症的日益重视,磨牙症的研究正在迅速增加。然而,在成人磨牙症领域仍然缺乏系统的文献计量学分析。本研究旨在全面探索和可视化1991-2021年成人磨牙症领域的全球趋势和研究热点。
    方法:该研究在没有语言限制的情况下搜索了1991-2021年在WebofScienceCoreCollection数据库中发表的文献。VOSviewer,应用CiteSpace和MicrosoftExcel对作者进行了分析,机构,期刊,国家,引用的参考文献,所包含出版物的关键词和其他信息,构建可视化合作网络。
    结果:最终共纳入878篇。在过去的30年中,最有成效的两位作者是LobbezooF和ManfrediniD.ACTA-Amsterdam,圣保罗大学,赫尔辛基大学,帕多瓦大学,蒙特利尔大学,etal.是这一领域的著名机构。《口腔康复杂志》在该领域做出了突出贡献。美国在这一领域制作的文件最多,其次是巴西。两国和作者在世界各地密切合作。被引用最多的两篇文章都集中在定义上,磨牙症的评估和分类。近年来,诊断标准和压力已经开始受到很多关注。
    结论:从1991年到2021年,成年人对磨牙症的关注持续增加。诊断标准和应激可能是该领域潜在的研究热点。本研究参考了相关学者的发展趋势和研究热点。
    OBJECTIVE: With the increasing attention to bruxism, the research on bruxism is increasing rapidly. However, there is still a lack of systematic bibliometric analysis in the field of bruxism in adults. This study aimed to comprehensively explore and visualize the global trends and research hotspots in the field of bruxism in adults during 1991-2021.
    METHODS: The study searched the literature published during 1991-2021 in the Web of Science Core Collection database without language restrictions. VOSviewer, CiteSpace and Microsoft Excel were applied to analyse the authors, institutions, journals, countries, cited references, keywords and other information of the included publications, and construct visualized cooperation networks.
    RESULTS: A total of 878 articles were finally included. The top two most productive authors in the past 30 years were Lobbezoo F and Manfredini D. ACTA-Amsterdam, Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Helsinki, Univ Padua, Univ Montreal, et al. were prominent institutions in this field. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation made outstanding contributions in this field. The United States produced the most documents in this field, followed by Brazil. Both countries and authors cooperated closely around the world. The two most cited articles focused on the definition, assessment and classification of bruxism. In recent years, diagnostic criteria and stress have begun to receive a lot of attention.
    CONCLUSIONS: From 1991 to 2021, the attention to bruxism in adults continued to increase. Diagnostic criteria and stress may be potential research hotspots in this field. This study references relevant scholars on development trends and research hotspots.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:牙合夹板通常用于磨牙症患者,以减少牙齿磨损并缓解口腔症状,例如肌筋膜疼痛。口颌系统主要由牙齿组成,遮挡,咀嚼肌,和颞下颌关节。咬合和咀嚼肌功能被认为是客观评估口颌系统状态的重要参数。然而,从准确的神经肌肉分析和咬合评估中,很少阐明咬合夹板对磨牙症患者的影响。本研究的目的是使用K7-J5神经肌肉分析系统和DentalPrescaleII(DP2)评估三种不同的夹板(两种临床上常见的全覆盖咬合板和一种改良的前夹板)对磨牙症患者的影响。
    方法:16名受试者声称患有夜间磨牙症,具有完整的牙列和稳定的咬合关系,被选中进行研究。记录所有受试者的颌间间隙和前颞肌和咬肌的EMG活动基线。参与者接受了三种不同的夹板治疗,结果由舒适指数估计,前颞肌和咬肌的闭塞和表面肌电图。
    结果:在牙齿紧握的位置,使用改良前夹板的参与者的EMG数据显着低于使用硬夹板的参与者,软咬合夹板或不带夹板(p<0.05)。最大咬合力和咬合面积出现在不使用夹板的受试者中,而在使用改良前夹板的受试者中发生的情况最少。由于J5(p<0.05),在休息位置,颌间间隙增加,咀嚼肌的EMG数据显着减少。
    结论:对于磨牙症患者,改良的前夹板似乎更舒适,更有效地降低了咬合力和颞前肌和咬肌的肌电图活动。
    Occlusal splints are always applied on individuals with bruxism to reduce tooth wear and relieve orofacial symptoms such as myofascial pain. The stomatognathic system is mainly composed of tooth, occlusion, masticatory muscles, and temporomandibular joint. The occlusion and masticatory muscles function are regarded as the important parameters for evaluating the stomatognathic system state objectively. However, the effects of occlusal splints on individuals with bruxism is rarely elucidated from accurate neuromuscular analysis and occlusion evaluation. The aim of the present study was to estimate the effects of three different splints (two clinically common full coverage occlusal splint and an modified anterior splint) on subjects with bruxism using K7-J5 neuromuscular analysis system and Dental Prescale II (DP2) to evaluate occlusion.
    Sixteen subjects claimed to be suffering from nocturnal bruxism,with complete dentition and stable occlusal relationship, were selected for study.The intermaxillary space and the baselines of EMG-activity of the anterior temporalis and masseter were recorded for all the subjects. The participants was treated with three different splints, and outcomes were estimated by comfort index, occlusion and surface electromyography of anterior temporalis and masseter.
    At teeth clenched position, EMG data were significantly lower in the participants with use of modified anterior splint than with hard, soft occlusal splint or without splint (p < 0.05). The maximum bite force and bite area occur in subjects without use of splint, while the minimal occur in subjects with use of modified anterior splint. Intermaxillary space increased and masticatory muscles presented significant reduction of EMG data at rest position as a result of J5 (p < 0.05).
    Modified anterior splint seems to be more comfortable and effective in reducing occlusion force and electromyographic activity of anterior temporalis and masseter for subjects with bruxism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:选择四个或六个植入物来支持直接全足弓固定假体(FAFP)在世界范围内仍然存在争议。本研究旨在分析和比较All-on-4和All-on-6的长期结果。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了217名患者,这些患者使用1222种植入物支持271种FAFP,包括由4个植入物(All-on-4组)支持的202个假体和由6个植入物(All-on-6组)支持的69个假体,并随访3-13年。种植体存活,假体存活,并发症,评估并比较两组的种植体边缘骨丢失(MBL)。患者特征包括年龄,性别,下巴,牙列相反的情况,吸烟习惯,磨牙症,骨的数量和质量,悬臂长度(CL),假体材料,并对其口腔卫生情况进行分析,评估其对两组临床结果的影响。六位外科医生和三位执行FAFP超过5年的修复医生被邀请进行问卷调查,评估患者和临床医生对植入物数量的相关影响。
    结果:一般来说,All-on-4组显示植入物存活率与All-on-6组无显着差异(植入物水平:风险比[HR]=1.0[95%置信区间(CI):0.8-1.2],P=0.96;假体水平:HR=0.8[95%CI:0.3-1.8],P=0.54),假体存活率(比值比[OR]=0.8[95%CI:0.3-2.8],P=0.56),生物并发症(OR=0.9[95%CI:0.5-1.8],P=0.78),临时假体的技术并发症(OR=1.3[95%CI:0.7-2.3],P=0.42),确定性假体的技术并发症(OR=1.1[95%CI:0.6-2.2],P=0.33)和第一,5th,10年MBL(P=0.65,P=0.28,P=0.14)。然而,对于特定的协变量,包括老年患者,相对的自然/固定牙列,吸烟,磨牙症,长CL,骨密度低,和所有丙烯酸临时假体,在某些临床测量中,All-on-6比All-on-4更可预测。种植体修复医生和中等经验的临床医生对All-on-6有显著的偏好(P<0.05)。
    结论:基于这项研究,长期临床结果显示,All-on-4和All-on-6组之间没有显着差异。然而,对于一些特定的特征,在某些临床测量中,All-on-6似乎比All-on-4更可预测。对于临床医生的决策,中等经验的临床医生和种植体修复医生对All-on-6表现出明显的偏好。
    OBJECTIVE: Choosing four or six implants to support immediate full-arch fixed prostheses (FAFPs) is still controversial worldwide. This study aims to analyze and compare the long-term results of All-on-4 and All-on-6.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 217 patients rehabilitated with 1222 implants supporting 271 FAFPs, including 202 prostheses supported by 4 implants (All-on-4 group) and 69 prostheses supported by 6 implants (All-on-6 group), and followed up for 3-13 years. Implant survival, prosthesis survival, complications, and implant marginal bone loss (MBL) were evaluated and compared between two groups. Patient characteristics including age, gender, jaw, opposite dentition condition, smoking habit, bruxism, bone quantity and quality, cantilever length (CL), prosthesis material, and oral hygiene were analyzed to assess their influence on the clinical results of the two groups. Six surgeons and three prosthodontists who performed FAFPs more than 5 years were invited for questionnaires, to assess patient- and clinician-related influences on implant number.
    RESULTS: In general, All-on-4 group indicated no significant difference with All-on-6 group in the implant survival (implant-level: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.2], P = 0.96; prosthesis-level: HR = 0.8 [95% CI: 0.3-1.8], P = 0.54), prosthesis survival (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8 [95% CI: 0.3-2.8], P = 0.56), biological complications (OR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.5-1.8], P = 0.78), technical complications of provisional prosthesis (OR = 1.3 [95% CI: 0.7-2.3], P = 0.42), technical complications of definitive prosthesis (OR = 1.1 [95% CI: 0.6-2.2], P = 0.33) and the 1st, 5th, and 10th year MBL (P = 0.65, P = 0.28, P = 0.14). However, for specific covariates, including elderly patients, opposing natural/fixed dentition, smoking, bruxism, long CL, low bone density, and all acrylic provisional prostheses, All-on-6 was more predictable in some clinical measurements than All-on-4. The implant prosthodontists and the medium-experienced clinicians showed significant preference for All-on-6 (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the long-term clinical results showed no significant difference between All-on-4 and All-on-6 groups in general. However, for some specific characteristics, All-on-6 seemed to be more predictable in some clinical measurements than All-on-4. For the clinicians\' decision-making, medium-experienced clinicians and the implant prosthodontists showed significant preference for All-on-6.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:磨牙病是一种节律性咀嚼肌活动,在非生理功能状态下不由自主地发生。缺乏对磨牙症不同下颌运动类型(中心紧咬或偏心研磨)患者咀嚼肌功能状态进行分类的研究。
    目的:评估不同类型磨牙症患者咀嚼肌活动的差异。
    方法:从大学生中筛选出21名中心性磨牙症(CB)受试者和21名偏心性磨牙症(ECB)受试者。还招募了16名没有磨牙症的受试者。在不同的下颌位置和咀嚼任务期间,测量了颞前肌(TA)和浅表咬肌(MM)的表面肌电图(EMG)信号。然后分析EMG振幅和咀嚼周期持续时间参数。
    结果:CB组显示出更少的肌肉最大运动单位,随着MM更加明显,在相同的咀嚼活动负荷下,肌肉收缩的比例更高,和更长的咀嚼周期。ECB组在单侧咀嚼的非工作侧显示出更多的TA最大运动单位和更高的MM活动。
    结论:CB主要影响MM,CB患者咀嚼肌收缩效率和咀嚼周期效率降低。欧洲央行主要影响TA,和ECB患者显示非功能性外侧肌束收缩增强。
    BACKGROUND: Bruxism is a rhythmic masticatory muscle activity that occurs involuntarily in a non-physiologically functional state. There is a lack of research classifying the functional status of masticatory muscles in patients with different mandibular movement types (centric clenching or eccentric grinding) of bruxism.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences of the masticatory muscle activity in patients with different types of bruxism.
    METHODS: A total of 21 subjects with centric bruxism (CB) and 21 subjects with eccentric bruxism (ECB) were screened from college students according to a questionnaire and their tooth wear features. Sixteen subjects with no bruxism were also recruited. The surface electromyography (EMG) signals of the temporalis anterior (TA) and superficial masseter muscle (MM) were measured in different mandibular positions and during the chewing task. The EMG amplitude and chewing cycle duration parameters were then analyzed.
    RESULTS: The CB group showed fewer muscle maximal motor units, with the MM being more pronounced, a higher proportion of muscle contractions to be recruited for the same load of chewing activity, and a longer chewing cycle. The ECB group showed more TA maximal motor units and higher MM activity on the non-working side in unilateral chewing.
    CONCLUSIONS: CB mainly affects the MM, and patients with CB show reduced masticatory muscle contraction efficiency and chewing cycle efficiency. ECB mainly affects the TA, and patients with ECB show enhanced contraction of non-functional lateral muscle bundles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体和神经典型个体的磨牙症。
    结果:通过Ovid在MedLine进行了搜索,Embase通过Ovid,Cochrane系统评价数据库,Scopus,WebofScience,拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学(LILACS)巴西牙科图书馆(BBO)和SciELO数据库,灰色文献和截至2020年12月的手工搜索,对语言或出版年份没有限制(CRD42020211307)。对于荟萃分析,磨牙症的频率被提取出来,使用RevManager中的随机效应模型计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用建议分级评估来评估证据的确定性,开发和评估(等级)。17项病例对照研究纳入定性综合,15项纳入荟萃分析,总人口3850人。ASD组比对照组更容易发生磨牙症(OR:3.80;95%CI:2.06-7.01)。对于ASD和对照个体之间磨牙症的发生,证据的确定性被归类为“非常低”。
    结论:ASD患者是否比健康对照组更容易患磨牙症还不确定。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate bruxism in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical individuals.
    RESULTS: Searches were conducted in the MedLine via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), Brazilian Library of Dentistry (BBO) and SciELO databases, grey literature and a hand search up to December 2020 with no restrictions imposed regarding language or year of publication (CRD42020211307). For the meta-analysis, the frequency of bruxism was extracted, with the calculation of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random effects model in RevManager. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Seventeen case-control studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 15 were included in the meta-analysis, totaling a population of 3850 individuals. The ASD group was more likely to develop bruxism than the controls (OR: 3.80; 95% CI: 2.06-7.01). The certainty of the evidence was classified as \"very low\" for the occurrence of bruxism between ASD and control individuals.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether individuals with ASD are more likely to have bruxism than healthy controls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估种植体周围边缘骨丢失(MBL)及其危险因素可以阐明全对4(5或6)策略的危险因素,并进一步提高其生存率。
    目的:这项回顾性临床研究的目的是评估植入物的存活率,MBL,以及CBCT随访1至4年后4(5或6)假体的相关危险因素。
    方法:在2015年10月至2019年12月期间,共有56名参与者使用全对4(5或6)概念修复了325个植入物。结果指标是累积植入物存活率(生命表分析)和MBL。四次CBCT扫描,手术后立即扫描(T0),手术后1年的扫描(T1),手术后2年的扫描(T2),治疗后3到4年的扫描(T3),获得了对MBL的评价。采用Pearson相关系数分析和线性混合模型评估MBL的潜在危险因素(α=0.05)。
    结果:种植体存活率为99.38%,假体存活率为100%。垂直颊骨高度(△VBBH)减少0.74±0.10mm(T0-T1),0.37±0.12mm(T1-T2),和0.15±0.14mm(T2-T3)。除T2-T3外,△VBBH在T0-T1和T1-T2差异显著(P≤0.05)。垂直近骨高度(VMBH)的变化,垂直远端骨高度(VDBH),垂直舌骨高度(VLBH)与VBBH的趋势相似。△VBBH(T0-T3)与水平颊骨厚度(HBBT)(T0)呈负相关(r=-.394,P<.001)。线性混合模型显示,吸烟等因素(P=.001),下颌骨植入部位(P<.001),立即植入(P=.026),倾斜种植体(P<.001),女性(P=0.003),全身性疾病(P=0.025),磨牙症(P=0.022)对MBL有负面影响。悬臂长度(CL)对远端延伸处的植入物周围的MBL也有负面影响(P<.001)。
    结论:植入物和假体的高存活率和低MBL证实了全对4(5或6)概念的可预测性。吸烟,下颌骨植入部位,全身性疾病,磨牙症,女性性别,立即植入,倾斜的植入物,和CL被确定为MBL的潜在危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Assessing peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) and its risk factors with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may clarify the risk factors for the all-on-4 (5 or 6) strategy and further improve its survival rate.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the implant survival rate, MBL, and associated risk factors of all-on-4 (5 or 6) prostheses after 1 to 4 years of follow-up with CBCT.
    METHODS: A total of 56 participants rehabilitated with 325 implants by using the all-on-4 (5 or 6) concept between October 2015 and December 2019 were included. Outcome measures were cumulative implant survival (life-table analysis) and MBL. Four CBCT scans, a scan immediately after surgery (T0), a scan 1 year after surgery (T1), a scan 2 years after surgery (T2), and a scan 3 to 4 years after treatment (T3), were obtained to evaluate the MBL. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis and linear mixed models were performed to assess the potential risk factors for MBL (α=.05).
    RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 99.38%, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100%. The reductions in the vertical buccal bone height (△VBBH) were 0.74 ±0.10 mm (T0-T1), 0.37 ±0.12 mm (T1-T2), and 0.15 ±0.14 mm (T2-T3). Except for T2-T3, the △VBBH showed a significant difference at T0-T1 and T1-T2 (P≤.05). The alterations in vertical mesial bone height (VMBH), vertical distal bone height (VDBH), and vertical lingual bone height (VLBH) were similar to the trend observed in VBBH. The △VBBH (T0-T3) was negatively correlated with the horizontal buccal bone thickness (HBBT) (T0) (r=-.394, P<.001). Linear mixed models revealed that factors such as smoking (P=.001), mandible implant site (P<.001), immediate implant (P=.026), tilted implant (P<.001), female sex (P=.003), systemic disease (P=.025), and bruxism (P=.022) negatively affected MBL. The cantilever length (CL) also had a negative effect on MBL around the implants at the distal extension (P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The high implant and prosthesis survival rates and low MBL confirmed the predictability of the all-on-4 (5 or 6) concept. Smoking, mandible implant site, systemic disease, bruxism, female sex, immediate implant, tilted implant, and CL were identified as potential risk factors for MBL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的探讨肉毒杆菌A(BTX-A)治疗夜间磨牙症的疗效。五个电子数据库(PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦,Embase和临床试验)进行搜索,以确定截至2020年9月1日的相关随机对照试验。提取了5个评价指标,即,休息和咀嚼时的疼痛(PR和PC),磨牙症事件(NBE)的数量和患者的自我评估(SA),评估BTX-A治疗磨牙症的疗效。所有数据分析均使用ReviewManager(5.3版;Cochrane协作,伦敦,联合王国)。本综述包括6项研究。样本由148名参与者组成。与安慰剂组相比,BTX-A组的PR指数得分显著提高(MD,1.16厘米;95CI,0.65至1.67厘米;p<0.00001),PC指数得分略有提高(SMD,0.25;95CI-0.14至0.64;p=0.21),与注射后相比,注射前组的NBE显着降低(MD,1.72;95CI,0.60至2.85;p=0.003)。这项研究的结果表明,BTX-A具有缓解疼痛和磨牙症事件的显着治疗效率。然而,注射肉毒杆菌毒素后磨牙症事件是否会复发或反弹还需要更多的随访临床证据.
    The purpose of this study was to explore the treatment efficacy of botulinum-A (BTX-A) in nocturnal bruxism. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and Clinical Trials) were searched to identify related randomised controlled trials up to September 1, 2020. Five evaluation indices were extracted, namely, the pain at rest and at chewing (PR and PC), the number of bruxism events (NBE) and the self-assessment by patients (SA), to assess the treatment efficacy of BTX-A in bruxism. All data analyses were conducted using Review Manager (Version 5.3; The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). Six studies were included in this review. The sample was composed of 148 participants. Compared with the placebo group, the BTX-A group showed the significantly improved the PR index scores (MD, 1.16 cm; 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.67 cm; p < 0.00001), slightly improved the PC index scores (SMD, 0.25; 95%CI -0.14 to 0.64; p = 0.21), and the NBEs were significantly decreased in the before-injection group compared with that in the after-injection group (MD, 1.72; 95%CI, 0.60 to 2.85; p = 0.003). The results of this study suggest that BTX-A possesses significant therapeutic efficiency for the relief of pain and events of bruxism. However, whether the events of bruxism would recur or rebound after botulinum toxin injection needs more follow-up clinical evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号