Anti‐müllerian hormone

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨激素替代疗法-冻融胚胎移植(HRT-FET)首次胚胎移植患者抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平与早孕丢失的关系,并分析阈值效应。
    方法:对2016年1月至2021年12月河南省人民医院生殖医学中心行HRT-FET的孕妇进行回顾性队列分析。根据波塞冬标准,根据AMH浓度将患者分为四组:A组(≤1μg/L),B组(1-≤2μg/L),C组(2-≤6μg/L),D组(>6μg/L)。单变量分析,多变量逻辑回归分析,平滑曲线拟合,应用阈值效应分析探讨AMH对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射和HRT-FET周期早期妊娠丢失结局的影响。
    结果:在6597名孕妇中,早期妊娠丢失发生893例,早期妊娠丢失率为13.54%。单因素回归分析表明,年龄,女性体重指数,AMH,窦卵泡计数,子宫内膜转化日子宫内膜厚度,检索到的卵母细胞总数,怀孕次数,不孕的持续时间,不孕症的类型,胚胎移植数均是影响早期妊娠丢失率的因素(P<0.050)。多因素Logistic回归分析,在调整了混杂因素后,进一步对不同年龄段患者进行分层分析。以A组为对照组,结果显示,当年龄小于35岁时,B组的妊娠损失率,C,D组低于A组,有统计学意义(P<0.050);当年龄在35岁或以上时,两组间结局指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.050)。阈值效应分析表明,AMH阈值为2.83μg/L。当AMH浓度小于2.83μg/L时,随着AMH浓度的增加,早期妊娠损失率显着降低;AMH每增加一个单位,早期妊娠损失率降低21%(比值比0.79;95%置信区间0.71-0.88;P<0.001);当AMH浓度为2.83μg/L以上时,早期妊娠丢失率的变化无统计学差异(比值比1.01;95%置信区间0.99-1.03;P=0.383).
    结论:对于首次胚胎移植后的孕妇,AMH水平对35岁以下患者早期妊娠损失率的影响之间存在曲线关系.当AMH水平小于2.83μg/L时,随着AMH水平的升高,早期妊娠损失率显著下降.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and early pregnancy loss in patients who underwent their first embryo transfer by hormone replacement therapy-frozen-thawed embryo transfer (HRT-FET) and analyze the threshold effect.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on pregnant women undergoing HRT-FET at the Reproductive Medical Center of Henan Provincial People\'s Hospital from January 2016 to December 2021. The patients were divided into four groups based on AMH concentration according to the Poseidon criteria: group A (≤1 μg/L), group B (1-≤2 μg/L), group C (2-≤6 μg/L), and group D (>6 μg/L). Univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis, smooth curve fitting, and threshold effect analysis were applied to investigate the influence of AMH on the outcome of early pregnancy loss in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and HRT-FET cycles.
    RESULTS: Of the 6597 pregnant women, early pregnancy loss occurred in 893, giving an early pregnancy loss rate of 13.54%. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that age, female body mass index, AMH, antral follicle count, endometrial thickness at endometrial transformation day, total retrieved oocyte number, number of pregnancies, duration of infertility, type of infertility, and the number of embryos transferred were all factors influencing the early pregnancy loss rate (P < 0.050). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounders, further stratified the analysis of patients of different ages. With group A as the control group, the results showed that when age was younger than 35 years, the pregnancy loss rates in groups B, C, and D were lower than that in group A, with statistical significance (P < 0.050); when age was 35 years or older, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome indicators between the groups (P > 0.050). A threshold effect analysis revealed that the AMH threshold was 2.83 μg/L. When the AMH concentration was less than 2.83 μg/L, the early pregnancy loss rate decreased significantly with increasing AMH concentration; the early pregnancy loss rate decreased by 21% for each unit increase in AMH (odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.88; P < 0.001); when the AMH concentration was 2.83 μg/L or more, there was no statistical difference in the change in early pregnancy loss rate (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.03; P = 0.383).
    CONCLUSIONS: For pregnant women after their first embryo transfer, there is a curvilinear relationship between the influences of AMH levels on early pregnancy loss rates in patients younger than 35 years. When the AMH level was less than 2.83 μg/L, the early pregnancy loss rate declined significantly with increasing AMH levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:化疗对于治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)至关重要,但其对性腺毒性的影响尚不清楚。
    方法:这项病例对照研究包括2012-2018年57例GTN患者和19例年龄匹配的磨牙妊娠(MP)患者。比较两组患者血清AMH水平中位数(MoM)的倍数,以及使用单药和联合化疗的患者之间,在基线,治疗后6、12和24个月。还比较了他们的妊娠结局。
    结果:在所有时间点,GTN和MP组之间的血清AMHMoM均无显着差异。单药化疗对MoM无不良影响。然而,在所有时间点,接受联合化疗的患者的MoM均低于接受单药化疗的患者.联合化疗患者从基线下降的趋势不明显,但下降仅在12个月时显著(Z=-2.69,p=0.007),而在24个月时则不显著(Z=-1.90;p=0.058).多变量分析显示联合化疗对MoM无影响。尝试怀孕的单药组和组合组之间的4年妊娠率和活产率没有显着差异,但与单药组相比,联合组需要1年的时间才能实现首次怀孕(2.88vs.1.88年)。
    结论:本研究显示联合化疗导致血清AMHMoM呈下降趋势,尤其是在治疗后12个月。但是下降在24个月时变得静态。虽然怀孕是可以实现的,在这一群体中,尤其是那些希望在治疗后1-2年或有其他危险因素的人,仍需要进行彻底的咨询.
    BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is crucial in treating gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), but its impact on gonadotoxicity is unclear.
    METHODS: This case-control study included 57 GTN patients and 19 age-matched patients with molar pregnancies (MP) in 2012-2018. Multiples of the median (MoM) of the serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups, and between patients using single-agent and combination chemotherapy, at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Their pregnancy outcomes were also compared.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the MoM of serum AMH between GTN and MP groups at all time points. Single-agent chemotherapy did not adversely affect the MoM. However, those receiving combination chemotherapy had lower MoM than those receiving single-agent chemotherapy at all time points. The trend of decline from the baseline was marginally significant in patients with combination chemotherapy, but the drop was only significant at 12 months (Z = -2.69, p = 0.007) but not at 24 months (Z = -1.90; p = 0.058). Multivariable analysis revealed that combination chemotherapy did not affect the MoM. There was no significant difference in the 4-year pregnancy rate and the livebirth rate between the single-agent and combination groups who attempting pregnancy, but it took 1 year longer to achieve the first pregnancy in the combination group compared to the single-agent group (2.88 vs. 1.88 years).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed combination chemotherapy led to a decreasing trend of MoM of serum AMH especially at 12 months after treatment, but the drop became static at 24 months. Although pregnancy is achievable, thorough counseling is still needed in this group especially those wish to achieve pregnancy 1-2 years after treatment or with other risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号