BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is crucial in treating gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), but its impact on gonadotoxicity is unclear.
METHODS: This case-control study included 57 GTN patients and 19 age-matched patients with molar pregnancies (MP) in 2012-2018. Multiples of the median (MoM) of the serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups, and between patients using single-agent and combination chemotherapy, at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Their pregnancy outcomes were also compared.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the MoM of serum AMH between GTN and MP groups at all time points. Single-agent chemotherapy did not adversely affect the MoM. However, those receiving combination chemotherapy had lower MoM than those receiving single-agent chemotherapy at all time points. The trend of decline from the baseline was marginally significant in patients with combination chemotherapy, but the drop was only significant at 12 months (Z = -2.69, p = 0.007) but not at 24 months (Z = -1.90; p = 0.058). Multivariable analysis revealed that combination chemotherapy did not affect the MoM. There was no significant difference in the 4-year pregnancy rate and the livebirth rate between the single-agent and combination groups who attempting pregnancy, but it took 1 year longer to achieve the first pregnancy in the combination group compared to the single-agent group (2.88 vs. 1.88 years).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed combination chemotherapy led to a decreasing trend of MoM of serum AMH especially at 12 months after treatment, but the drop became static at 24 months. Although pregnancy is achievable, thorough counseling is still needed in this group especially those wish to achieve pregnancy 1-2 years after treatment or with other risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinicians\' attitudes, knowledge and practice relating to the anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) test.
METHODS: Cross-sectional nationwide survey.
METHODS: Australia.
METHODS: A total of 362 general practitioners (GPs), gynaecologists and reproductive specialists.
METHODS: Clinicians were recruited through relevant professional organisations, with data collected from May 2021 to April 2022.
METHODS: Clinicians\' attitudes, knowledge and practice relating to the AMH test, measured using multiple choice, Likert scales and open-ended items.
RESULTS: Fifteen percent of GPs (n = 27) and 40% of gynaecologists and other specialists (n = 73) order at least one AMH test per month. Specialists reported raising the idea of testing most of the time, whereas GPs reported that patient request was more common. Half of clinicians lacked confidence interpreting (n = 182, 51%) and explaining (n = 173, 48%) an AMH result to their patients. Five percent (n = 19) believed the test was moderately/very useful in predicting natural conception/birth and 22% (n = 82) believed the same for predicting premature menopause, despite evidence that the test cannot reliably predict either. Forty percent (n = 144) had previously ordered the test to help with reproductive planning and 21% (n = 75) to provide reassurance about fertility.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians reported use of AMH testing in clinical circumstances not supported by the evidence. With the proliferation of direct-to-consumer testing, efforts to support clinicians in the judicious use of testing and effectively navigating patient requests are needed.