Analytical performance

分析性能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用的大多数糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)分析试剂来自分析仪的制造商。然而,临床实验室需要更多的HbA1c分析试剂选择,以克服专用试剂用于特殊分析仪的局限性。我们开发了新的流动相缓冲液作为HbA1c诊断试剂,并评估了其对HbA1c测定的分析性能。
    使用不同浓度的钠盐制备用作HbA1c诊断试剂的不同流动相缓冲液。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)推荐指南,在ARKRAYHA-8160分析仪上评估了新开发的流动相缓冲液的分析性能。在这些实验中使用质量对照和临床血液样品。为了评估新开发的流动相缓冲液的质量,精度,准确度,线性度结转,干扰,偏见,与商业试剂的相关性,并对稳定性进行了分析。
    质量控制和临床的测定内精密度和测定间精密度的CV。使用新开发的流动相缓冲液进行少于1.00%的血液样品测定。准确度的RD小于1.00%。线性:在4.40%-17.30%的浓度范围内,R2=0.9998。结转:0.00%。试剂比较显示,Pearson回归方程为Y=0.984x+0.05692(R2=0.9977),两种分析试剂之间的Bland-Altman平均差为-0.02650%(CI:-0.211%-0.1591%)。在12个月内稳定性也是可接受的。该流动相缓冲器具有良好的抗干扰能力。
    新开发的流动相缓冲液显示出良好的分析性能,适用于ARKRAYHA-8160分析仪上的临床HbA1c测定。
    UNASSIGNED: Most glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analytical reagents used were obtained from the analyzer\'s manufacturer. However, clinical laboratories need more choices for HbA1c analytical reagents to overcome the limitations of dedicated reagents for special analyzers. We developed new mobile phase buffers as HbA1c diagnostic reagents and evaluated their analytical performance for the HbA1c assay.
    UNASSIGNED: Different mobile phase buffers used as HbA1c diagnostic reagents were prepared using different concentrations of sodium salts. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendation guidelines, the analytical performances of the newly developed mobile phase buffers were evaluated on an ARKRAY HA-8160 Analyzer. Both quality controls and clinical blood samples were used in these experiments. To assess the quality of the newly developed mobile phase buffers, precision, accuracy, linearity, carryover, interference, bias, correlation with commercial reagents, and stability were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The CVs of intra-assay precision and interassay precision of quality control and clinical.There were fewer than 1.00 % blood sample assays using the newly developed mobile phase buffer. The RDs of accuracy were less than 1.00 %. Linearity: R2 = 0.9998 in the concentration range of 4.40%-17.30 %. Carryover: 0.00 %. Reagent comparison revealed that the Pearson regression equation was Y = 0.9884x+0.05692 (R2 = 0.9977), and the Bland-Altman mean difference was -0.02650 % (CI: -0.2121 %-0.1591 %) between the two analytical reagents. Stability was also acceptable within 12 months. This mobile phase buffer showed good anti-interference ability.
    UNASSIGNED: The newly developed mobile phase buffers demonstrated good analytical performance and were suitable for clinical HbA1c assays on an ARKRAY HA-8160 Analyzer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了全面调查MPXV检测中常规使用的检测方法的诊断性能,中国国家临床实验室中心开展了一项全国性的外部质量评估(EQA)方案,并评估了EQA中≥5个实验室使用的9种检测方法.
    方法:将具有2700、900和300拷贝/mL的MPXV病毒样颗粒分配给195个EQA实验室。对于扩展分析,使用≥5个实验室采用的分析方法,将9000~4.12拷贝/mL的三倍稀释样品重复20次.通过分析EQA数据并计算检测限(LOD)来评估诊断性能。
    结果:在87.69%(171/195)的参与者和87.94%(175/199)的数据集中,表现良好。2700和900拷贝/mL样品的阳性百分比协议(PPAs)大于99%,和95.60%(761/796)的样品在300拷贝/mL。两个进化枝的计算的LOD范围为228.44至924.31拷贝/mL,并且大于由相应试剂盒规定的LOD。EasyDiagnosis的计算LOD最低,且在EQA方面表现优异,而生物细菌和桑瑟,计算的LOD较高,在EQA中表现不佳。
    结论:本研究从EQA数据和MPXV检测试验的诊断性能评估中提供了有价值的信息。它还提供了有关试剂优化的见解,并为爆发提供了及时的公共卫生干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively investigate the diagnostic performance of routinely used assays in MPXV testing, the National Center of Clinical Laboratories in China conducted a nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme and an evaluated nine assays used by ≥ 5 laboratories in the EQA.
    METHODS: MPXV virus-like particles with 2700, 900 and 300 copies/mL were distributed to 195 EQA laboratories. For extended analysis, triple-diluted samples from 9000 to 4.12 copies/mL were repeated 20 times using the assays employed by ≥ 5 laboratories. The diagnostic performance was assessed by analyzing EQA data and calculating the limits of detection (LODs).
    RESULTS: The performance was competent in 87.69% (171/195) of the participants and 87.94% (175/199) of the datasets. The positive percentage agreements (PPAs) were greater than 99% for samples at 2700 and 900 copies/mL, and 95.60% (761/796) for samples at 300 copies/mL. The calculated LODs for the two clades ranged from 228.44 to 924.31 copies/mL and were greater than the LODs specified by the respective kits. EasyDiagnosis had the lowest calculated LODs and showed superior performance in EQA, whereas BioGerm and Sansure, with higher calculated LODs, did not perform well in EQA.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information from the EQA data and evaluation of the diagnostic performance of MPXV detection assays. It also provided insights into reagent optimization and enabled prompt public health interventions for the outbreak.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)在糖尿病管理中起着至关重要的作用。我们旨在评估用于HbA1c测量的新型酶法试剂盒的分析性能。酶法的性能,包括精度,准确度,和线性,进行了评估。此外,常规干扰物的干扰效应,Hb衍生物,Hb变体,和常见药物进行了评估。此外,酶方法之间HbA1c结果的一致性进行了比较,阳离子交换高效液相色谱(HPLC),和免疫测定。内部测定,在测定之间,HbA1c总精密度均低于2%。HbA1c在3.96-20.23%范围内呈良好的线性关系。酶测定产生的结果与外部质量控制样品一致,与目标值的偏差小于±6%。酶法无胆红素干扰,intralipal,维生素C,Hb衍生物,常见的Hb变体,以及解热镇痛药和降血糖药物。与从HPLC方法和免疫测定获得的结果相比,酶促测定的HbA1c结果显示出良好的一致性和准确性。在BS-600M化学分析仪上进行的酶法试剂盒是测量HbA1c的可靠且稳健的方法。它适用于临床化学实验室的常规实践。
    Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) plays a crucial role in diabetes management. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of a new enzymatic method kit for HbA1c measurement. The performance of the enzymatic method, including precision, accuracy, and linearity, was evaluated. Moreover, the interference effect from conventional interferents, Hb derivatives, Hb variants, and common drugs were assessed. In addition, the agreement of HbA1c results was compared between enzymatic methods, cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and immunoassays. The intra-assay, between-assay, and total precision of HbA1c were all lower than 2%. HbA1c showed good linearity within the range of 3.96-20.23%. The enzymatic assay yielded results consistent with the external quality control samples, with a bias of less than ± 6% from the target values. The enzymatic method showed no interference from bilirubin, intralipid, vitamin C, Hb derivatives, common Hb variants, as well as antipyretic analgesics and hypoglycemic drugs. The HbA1c results of the enzymatic assay showed good agreement and accuracy compared to those obtained from the HPLC method and the immunoassay. The enzymatic method kit performed on the BS-600M chemistry analyzer is a reliable and robust method for measuring HbA1c. It is suitable for routine practice in clinical chemistry laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)和乳铁蛋白(LTF)的临床价值已受到广泛关注。但是他们的检测方法不足,这限制了它的应用。本研究旨在开发一种基于稳定元素标记策略和电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)的SAA/LTF双重检测方法,并评估其是否可以在临床实践中广泛使用。
    方法:构建了基于夹心法的双重免疫测定系统。优化后,按照临床实验室标准研究所(CLSI)的指南进行方法学评价.最后,收集131份血浆样本,分析新方法是否适用于临床检测。
    结果:LoB,LLoQ,ULoQ,测定的线性范围为1.09ng/mL,3ng/mL,1500ng/mL,3-1500ng/mL的SAA和0.85ng/mL,2ng/mL,1200ng/mL,对于LTF分别为2-1200ng/mL。回收率为95.01%~106.26%,批次内精度低,中间,高水平样本<8%,它们的批次间<11%,干扰试验结果偏差小于±10%。SAA的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9809,LTF为0.8599,和0.9986的组合。
    结论:SAA/LTF的双重定量免疫测定具有较高的准确性,精度好,和高特异性,符合临床检测要求,可广泛应用于临床。
    OBJECTIVE: The clinical value of Serum amyloid A (SAA) and Lactoferrin (LTF) has received significant attention, but their detection methods are inadequate, which limits their application. This study aims to develop a dual detection method based on stable element labeling strategies and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for SAA/LTF and to assess whether it can be widely used in clinical practice.
    METHODS: A duplex immunoassay system based on sandwich method was constructed. After optimization, methodological evaluation was performed with the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Finally, 131 plasma samples were collected to analyze whether the new method is suitable for clinical detection.
    RESULTS: The LoB, LLoQ, ULoQ, and linear range of the assay were 1.09 ng/mL, 3 ng/mL, 1500 ng/mL, 3-1500 ng/mL for SAA and 0.85 ng/mL, 2 ng/mL, 1200 ng/mL, 2-1200 ng/mL for LTF respectively. The recovery rates were 95.01% to 106.26%, the intra-batch precision of low, intermediate, and high-level samples was <8%, and the inter-batch of them was <11%, the deviation of interference test results was less than±10%. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.9809 for SAA, 0.8599 for LTF, and 0.9986 for combination.
    CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative duplex immunoassay for SAA/LTF has high accuracy, good precision, and high specificity, which meets the clinical testing requirements and can be widely used in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:国家临床实验室中心(NCCL)进行了解脲脲原体(UU)分子检测的试点外部质量评估(EQA)方案,以评估临床实验室的测试能力以及基于DNA的核酸扩增测试(NAAT)和基于RNA的NAAT在临床环境中应用时的实际表现。
    方法:EQA面板包含十二个冻干样品,包括含有不同浓度UU的灭活细胞培养上清液的阳性样品和阴性样品的无菌盐水。阳性样本进一步分为三组高,中等和低浓度。将面板分发给参与者,并根据定性结果分析数据集。
    结果:共有365个实验室参加了EQA计划,收集了338个实验室提交的360个结果,其中96.11%(346/360)的返回结果和95.86%(324/338)的实验室被认为是合格的。高和中等浓度样品的正一致性百分比(PPA)≥97.5%,但是对于低浓度的样品来说差异很大,随着样品浓度的降低,从86.94%下降到51.94%。此外,对于低浓度样品,基于RNA的NAAT比基于DNA的NAAT显示更高的PPAs,但这些结果是本研究中使用的UU上清液特有的。
    结论:参与者使用的大多数UU检测试验通常与他们的估计检测限(LOD)一致。大多数参与者可以可靠地检测高和中等浓度的UU样品,而低浓度样品的较差分析性能需要进一步改进和优化。
    OBJECTIVE: A pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) was conducted by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) to evaluate the testing capabilities of clinical laboratories and the actual performance of DNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) and RNA-based NAATs when applied in clinical settings.
    METHODS: The EQA panel contained twelve lyophilized samples, including positive samples containing inactivated cell culture supernatants of UU at different concentrations and sterile saline for negative samples. The positive samples were further divided into three groups of high, moderate and low concentrations. The panels were distributed to the participants and the datasets were analyzed according to the qualitative results.
    RESULTS: A total of 365 laboratories participated in the EQA scheme, and 360 results submitted by 338 laboratories were collected, of which 96.11 % (346/360) of the returned results and 95.86 % (324/338) of the laboratories were deemed competent. The positive percentage agreement (PPA) was ≥ 97.5 % for high and moderate concentration samples, but varied significantly for low concentration samples, decreasing from 86.94 % to 51.94 % as the sample concentration decreased. Additionally, for low concentration samples, RNA-based NAAT showed higher PPAs than DNA-based NAATs, but these results were specific to UU supernatants used in this study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most of UU detection assays employed by the participants were generally consistent with their estimated limit of detection (LOD), and the majority of participants can reliably detect UU samples with high and moderate concentrations, while the poor analytical performance for low concentration samples requires further improvement and optimization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生化分析仪是利用光电比色法原理量化体液中特定化学成分的重要仪器。该分析为诊断提供了关键数据,治疗,预后,以及临床实践中各种疾病的总体健康状况。然而,生化分析仪的性能可能在不同品牌之间或在同一品牌内随时间而显著不同。因此,必须定期评估分析仪的性能,以确保纵向研究的结果一致,并保持日常数据的一致性。此外,当使用多个分析仪时,有必要评估每个仪器的性能,以确保跨多个平台的准确结果。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了仪器分析性能的实验评估方案,生化分析仪的化学计量学,利用国家参考材料和患者血清作为实验对象。我们评估了光学系统的性能,温度控制系统,样品添加系统,和检测系统来证实该方案的可行性。我们还比较了不同品牌生化分析仪用于常规生化测试的分析性能,比如肝功能,肾功能,离子,血脂,血糖,和心肌酶谱。使用AU5400作为对照,使用ADVIA2400作为比较系统,在临床医学决策层面,仪器间比较数据的相对差异被认为是可接受的.总之,生化分析仪的性能可能在不同品牌之间或在同一品牌内随时间而显著不同。定期评估是必要的,以确保不同分析仪的准确和一致的结果。本研究为评价生化分析仪的分析性能提供了一种可行的方案,可用于保证实验室不同品牌自动化学分析仪结果的准确性和一致性。
    Biochemical analyzers are vital instruments that utilize the principle of photoelectric colorimetry to quantify a specific chemical composition in body fluids. This analysis provides critical data for the diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and overall health status of various diseases in clinical practice. However, the performance of a biochemical analyzer can vary significantly between different brands or over time within the same brand. Therefore, it is imperative to regularly assess the performance of the analyzer to ensure consistent results for longitudinal studies and to maintain day-to-day data consistency. Additionally, when multiple analyzers are utilized, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of each instrument to ensure accurate results across multiple platforms. In this study, we developed and verified an experimental evaluation scheme for the analytical performance of the instrument, chemometrics for biochemical analyzers, utilizing national reference materials and patient sera as the experimental subjects. We evaluated the performance of the optical system, temperature control system, sample-adding system, and detection system to confirm the feasibility of this scheme. We also compared the analytical performance of different brands of biochemical analyzers for routine biochemical tests, such as liver function, kidney function, ion, blood lipids, blood glucose, and myocardial enzyme spectrum. Using the AU 5400 as a control and the ADVIA 2400 as the comparison system, the relative variation in inter-instrument comparison data was found to be acceptable at the clinical medicine decision level. In conclusion, the performance of a biochemical analyzer can vary significantly between different brands or over time within the same brand. Regular evaluations are necessary to ensure accurate and consistent results across different analyzers. This study provides a feasible scheme for evaluating the analytical performance of biochemical analyzers that can be used to ensure the accuracy and consistency of the results of different brands of automatic chemical analyzers in the laboratory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    sigma度量为评估临床实验室的工艺性能提供了一个定量框架。本研究旨在评估血液学实验室中自动分析仪的分析性能,使用sigma度量选择最佳分析器作为内部参考分析器。
    从SNCS收集了6个月的内部质量控制(IQC)数据,并计算了实验室中9台血液学分析仪的sigma值。
    对于正常控制水平,对于所有自动化分析仪的所有研究参数,均观察到令人满意的平均sigma值≥3.对于低控制电平,仪器的血小板(PLT)计数(Inst。)G表现不佳,平均西格玛值<3。Inst.H,在所有参数\'sigma值>4的情况下,表现最佳,并被选为内部参考分析仪。
    sigma度量可以作为选择QC策略和计划QC频率的指南。它可以促进由多个系统进行的相同测定的比较。
    UNASSIGNED: The sigma metric offers a quantitative framework for evaluating process performance in clinical laboratories. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of automated analysers in haematology laboratories, using the sigma metric to choose the best analyser as an internal reference analyser.
    UNASSIGNED: internal quality control (IQC) data were collected for 6 months from SNCS, and the sigma value was calculated for 9 haematology analysers in the laboratory.
    UNASSIGNED: For the normal control level, a satisfactory mean sigma value ≥3 was observed for all of the studied parameters of all automated analysers. For the low control level, platelet (PLT) count by Instrument (Inst.) G performed poorly, with a mean sigma value <3. Inst. H, with all parameters\' sigma values >4, performed best and was chosen as the internal reference analyser.
    UNASSIGNED: The sigma metric can be used as a guide to choose the QC strategy and plan QC frequency. It can facilitate the comparison of the same assay performed by multiple systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)是诊断急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的关键生物标志物。我们对高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)(CLIA)测定的分析性能和临床诊断性能进行了全面评估,将其与雅培建筑师hs-cTnI测定进行比较。
    方法:从424名男性和408名女性的健康人群中确定性别特异性第99百分位数参考上限(URL)。通过检查健康人群队列中性别特异性URL的不精确性和LoD以上的可检测结果来评估高敏感性表现。在934例疑似ACS患者中验证了hs-cTnI(CLIA)测定的诊断性能。
    结果:女性的第99百分位数URL为15.3ng/L,男性31.3ng/L,总人口24.2ng/L。性别特异性第99百分位数URL附近的总不精确性<5%。76.74%的女性,97.12%的男性和86.69%的总人口的cTnI值超过LoD,符合高灵敏度肌钙蛋白测定的标准。没有发现交叉反应性或干扰。诊断灵敏度,特异性,PPV,NPV,hs-cTnI(CLIA)测定的AUC为97.97,分别为90.70、79.02、99.21%和0.9885,与建筑师hs-cTnI测定相当。
    结论:hs-cTnI(CLIA)测定法是一种高灵敏度的肌钙蛋白I方法,具有很高的精密度,敏感性和特异性。hs-cTnI(CLIA)的临床诊断性能与已建立的ARCHITECThs-cTnI测定相当。Mindray的hs-cTnI(CLIA)检测是诊断心肌梗死的一种有吸引力的替代方法,具有很高的准确性和安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the key biomarker for diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We performed a complete assessment of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) (CLIA) assay on the analytical performance and clinical diagnostic performance, which was compared with Abbott ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay.
    METHODS: Sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) were determined from a healthy population of 424 males and 408 females. High-sensitivity performance was assessed by examining the imprecision at sex-specific URLs and the detectable results above LoD in a cohort of healthy population. The diagnostic performance of the hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay was validated in a population of 934 patients with suspected ACS.
    RESULTS: The 99th percentile URLs were 15.3 ng/L for female, 31.3 ng/L for male and 24.2 ng/L for overall population. The total imprecision near the sex-specific 99th percentile URLs were <5 %. 76.74 % of females, 97.12 % of males and 86.69 % of overall population had cTnI values exceeding the LoD, which met the criteria of high-sensitivity troponin assay. No cross-reactivity or interference was identified. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay were 97.97 , 90.70, 79.02, 99.21 % and 0.9885, respectively, which were comparable to ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay.
    CONCLUSIONS: hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay is a high-sensitivity troponin I method with high precision, sensitivity and specificity. The clinical diagnostic performance of hs-cTnI (CLIA) is comparable to the established ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay. Mindray\'s hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay is an attractive alternative for diagnosis of myocardial infarction with a high level of accuracy and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    sST2已成为儿科心脏病和炎性疾病的潜在疾病生物标志物。本研究旨在评估新型PylonsST2检测的性能,并建立中国儿童和青少年sST2的参考区间。
    关于精度的实验,线性度进行了干扰物和样品稳定性的影响,以评估分析性能。共有240名健康参与者,年龄在2至17岁之间。非参数方法用于计算年龄和性别指定的参考间隔。在患有不同疾病的儿童中测量sST2水平以评估该测定的诊断性能。
    在19.5ng/ml时,测定的可重复性和实验室内不精确CV分别为6.0%和7.6%,在289.8ng/ml时分别为3.1%和5.9%,分别。该方法显示在2.5和918.5ng/ml之间的线性。还值得注意的是,在血红蛋白(2mg/ml)的存在下,sST2水平不受影响,甘油三酯(30毫克/毫升),胆红素(0.3毫克/毫升)和胆固醇(5毫克/毫升)。发现sST2在血清样品中在4°C稳定5天。参考区间一般确定为2.1-21.0ng/ml。没有观察到明显的性别差异。然而,sST2随着年龄的增长而不断增加,尤其是男性。在系统性红斑狼疮患者中发现sST2升高,脓毒症,克罗恩病,呼吸衰竭和心脏手术后。
    PylonsST2测定显示出良好的分析性能。在儿童和青春期建立参考间隔,sST2在儿科的几种疾病中显示出潜在的临床价值。
    UNASSIGNED: sST2 has emerged as a potential disease biomarker of cardiac and inflammatory diseases in pediatrics. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the new Pylon sST2 assay and establish the reference intervals of sST2 in children and adolescence in China.
    UNASSIGNED: The experiments on precision, linearity, effects of interferents and sample stability were carried out to evaluate the analytical performances. A total of 240 healthy participants, aged from 2 to 17 years were enrolled. The nonparametric method was used to calculate the age- and sex-specified reference intervals. sST2 levels were measured in children with different diseases to evaluate the assay\'s diagnostic performance.
    UNASSIGNED: The repeatability and within-laboratory imprecision CVs of the assay were 6.0% and 7.6% at 19.5 ng/ml, and 3.1% and 5.9% at 289.8 ng/ml, respectively. The method showed linearity between 2.5 and 918.5 ng/ml. It was also noteworthy that the sST2 level was not affected in the presence of hemoglobin (2 mg/ml), triglyceride (30 mg/ml), bilirubin (0.3 mg/ml) and cholesterol (5 mg/ml). sST2 was found stable for 5 days at 4 °C in serum sample. The reference interval was determined as 2.1-21.0 ng/ml in general. No significant variation was observed by sex. However, sST2 increased constantly with age, especially in male. Increased sST2 was found in patients of systemic lupus erythematosus, sepsis, Crohn\'s diseases, respiratory failure and post cardiac surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The Pylon sST2 assay showed good analytical performances. The reference intervals were established in children and adolescence and sST2 showed potential clinical values in several diseases in pediatrics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原检测是后大流行时代流行病监测不可或缺的工具。面对不规范的表现,国家临床实验室中心(NCCL)进行了全面的外部质量评估(EQA)方案,以评估SARS-CoV-2抗原测试的分析性能和状态.
    方法:EQA小组包括十个冻干样品,其中包含OmicronBA.1和BA.5菌株的灭活SARS-CoV-2阳性上清液的5倍稀释度和阴性样品,分为“验证”样本和“教育”样本。根据每个样品的定性结果分析数据。
    结果:中国共有339个实验室参加了该EQA计划,共收集有效结果378例。所有验证样本均由90.56%(307/339)的参与者和90.21%(341/378)的数据集正确报告。对于浓度为2×107拷贝/mL的样品,阳性百分比一致性(PPA)>99%,但对于4×106拷贝/mL为92.20%(697/756),对于8×105拷贝/mL为25.26%(382/1,512)样品。胶体金是最常用的(84.66%,320/378),但PPA最低(57.11%,1,462/2,560)与荧光免疫层析(90%,36/40)和乳胶色谱(79.01%,335/424)。在10多个临床实验室使用的11种检测方法中,ACON显示出比其他测定更高的灵敏度。
    结论:EQA研究可以帮助验证是否有必要更新制造商的抗原检测试验,并为参与者提供有关试验性能的信息,以迈出常规上市后监测的第一步。
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen detection is an indispensable tool for epidemic surveillance in the post-pandemic era. Faced with irregular performance, a comprehensive external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was conducted by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) to evaluate the analytical performance and status of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests.
    The EQA panel included ten lyophilized samples containing serial 5-fold dilutions of inactivated SARS-CoV-2-positive supernatants of the Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 strains and negative samples, which were classified into \"validating\" samples and \"educational\" samples. Data were analyzed according to qualitative results for each sample.
    A total of 339 laboratories in China participated in this EQA scheme, and 378 effective results were collected. All validating samples were correctly reported by 90.56 % (307/339) of the participants and 90.21 % (341/378) of the datasets. The positive percent agreement (PPA) was >99 % for samples with concentrations of 2 × 107 copies/mL but was 92.20 % (697/756) for 4 × 106 copies/mL and 25.26 % (382/1,512) for 8 × 105 copies/mL samples. Colloidal gold was the most frequently used (84.66 %, 320/378) but showed the lowest PPAs (57.11 %, 1,462/2,560) for positive samples compared with fluorescence immunochromatography (90 %, 36/40) and latex chromatography (79.01 %, 335/424). Among 11 assays used in more than 10 clinical laboratories, ACON showed a higher sensitivity than other assays.
    The EQA study can help to validate whether it\'s necessary to update antigen detection assays for manufacturers and provide participants with information about the performance of assays to take the first step toward routine post-market surveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号