{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Diagnostic performance of mpox virus (MPXV) real-time PCR assays: multicenter assessment and extended sensitivity analysis.
{Author}: Li Z;Chen Y;Han Y;Diao Z;Huang T;Feng L;Ma Y;Liu C;Tian M;Li J;Feng W;Zhao Z;Jiang J;Li J;Zhang R;
{Journal}: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
{Volume}: 43
{Issue}: 8
{Year}: 2024 Aug 4
{Factor}: 5.103
{DOI}: 10.1007/s10096-024-04865-0
{Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively investigate the diagnostic performance of routinely used assays in MPXV testing, the National Center of Clinical Laboratories in China conducted a nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme and an evaluated nine assays used by ≥ 5 laboratories in the EQA.
METHODS: MPXV virus-like particles with 2700, 900 and 300 copies/mL were distributed to 195 EQA laboratories. For extended analysis, triple-diluted samples from 9000 to 4.12 copies/mL were repeated 20 times using the assays employed by ≥ 5 laboratories. The diagnostic performance was assessed by analyzing EQA data and calculating the limits of detection (LODs).
RESULTS: The performance was competent in 87.69% (171/195) of the participants and 87.94% (175/199) of the datasets. The positive percentage agreements (PPAs) were greater than 99% for samples at 2700 and 900 copies/mL, and 95.60% (761/796) for samples at 300 copies/mL. The calculated LODs for the two clades ranged from 228.44 to 924.31 copies/mL and were greater than the LODs specified by the respective kits. EasyDiagnosis had the lowest calculated LODs and showed superior performance in EQA, whereas BioGerm and Sansure, with higher calculated LODs, did not perform well in EQA.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information from the EQA data and evaluation of the diagnostic performance of MPXV detection assays. It also provided insights into reagent optimization and enabled prompt public health interventions for the outbreak.