Acceptor specificity

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2-O-α-D-吡喃葡萄糖基-L-抗坏血酸(AA-2G)是L-抗坏血酸(L-AA)的稳定衍生物,已广泛应用于食品和化妆品行业。糖分子,例如在AA-2G合成过程中由环糊精糖基转移酶(CGTase)产生的葡萄糖和麦芽糖可能与L-AA竞争作为受体,导致低AA-2G产量。多序列比对结合结构模拟分析表明CGTase位置191和255处的残基可能是底物特异性差异的原因。为了研究这两个残基对受体偏好和AA-2G产率的影响,五个单突变体BsF191Y,BsF255Y,BcY195F,来自嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌NO2(Bs)的三种CGTase的PmY195F和PmY260F,设计了用于AA-2G合成的环状芽孢杆菌251(Bc)和拟状芽孢杆菌(Pm)。在最优条件下,突变体BsF191Y和BsF255YAA-2G的AA-2G产量比BsCGTase低34.3%和7.9%,分别。BcY195F突变体的AA-2G产量,PmY195F和PmY260F为45.8%,比野生型CGTases高36.9%和12.6%,分别。动力学研究表明,在位置191和255的三个CGTase的残基是F,这降低了葡萄糖和麦芽糖的特异性,增加了L-AA的特异性。这项研究不仅首次提出AA-2G产量可以通过削弱CGTase对糖副产物的受体特异性来提高。同时也为催化双底物转糖基反应的CGTase修饰提供了新的见解。
    2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) is a stable derivative of L-ascorbic acid (L-AA), which has been widely used in food and cosmetics industries. Sugar molecules, such as glucose and maltose produced by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) during AA-2G synthesis may compete with L-AA as the acceptors, resulting in low AA-2G yield. Multiple sequence alignment combined with structural simulation analysis indicated that residues at positions 191 and 255 of CGTase may be responsible for the difference in substrate specificity. To investigate the effect of these two residues on the acceptor preference and the AA-2G yield, five single mutants Bs F191Y, Bs F255Y, Bc Y195F, Pm Y195F and Pm Y260F of three CGTases from Bacillus stearothermophilus NO2 (Bs), Bacillus circulans 251 (Bc) and Paenibacillus macerans (Pm) were designed for AA-2G synthesis. Under optimal conditions, the AA-2G yields of the mutants Bs F191Y and Bs F255Y AA-2G were 34.3% and 7.9% lower than that of Bs CGTase, respectively. The AA-2G yields of mutant Bc Y195F, Pm Y195F and Pm Y260F were 45.8%, 36.9% and 12.6% higher than those of wild-type CGTases, respectively. Kinetic studies revealed that the residues at positions 191 and 255 of the three CGTases were F, which decreased glucose and maltose specificity and increased L-AA specificity. This study not only proposes for the first time that the AA-2G yield can be improved by weakening the acceptor specificity of CGTase toward sugar byproducts, but also provides new insight on the modification of CGTase that catalyze the double-substrate transglycosylation reaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从基本观点和实际应用来看,了解酶特异性的机制越来越重要。由于其在体内和体外改善受体底物的功能特性方面的重要性,转糖基化引起了许多关注。环糊精葡聚糖转移酶(CGTase)是转糖基化的关键酶之一。它具有广泛的底物谱,并利用糖作为供体。然而,对CGTase的受体选择性知之甚少,这极大地阻碍了合理设计所需的转糖基化衍生物的努力。在这项研究中,我们发现来自环状芽孢杆菌的CGTase,BcCGTase,能够与多种人参皂苷形成糖基化产物。特别是,它不仅进行不同的单一,di-,甚至通过将葡萄糖部分转移到COGlc位置进行更高阶的糖基化,还可以糖基化人参皂苷的C3-OH位置。相比之下,地衣芽孢杆菌的另一种CGTase(BlCGTase)显示出相对特定的受体偏好,只有几种人参皂苷。BcCGTase和BlCGTase之间的结构比较表明,BcCGTase/BlCGTase受体结合位点内的Arg74/K81位置是人参皂苷F1催化特异性差异的原因。进一步的诱变证实了它们在受体选择中的作用。总之,我们的研究不仅证明了CGTases的受体选择性,而且还提供了对CGTases催化机理的见解,这将潜在地增加CGTase生物合成新的,合理设计的转糖基化衍生物。
    Understanding the mechanisms of enzyme specificity is increasingly important from a fundamental viewpoint and for practical applications. Transglycosylation has attracted many attentions due to its importance in improving the functional properties of acceptor substrates both in vivo and in vitro. Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) is one of the key enzymes in transglycosylation, it has a broad substrate spectrum and utilizes sugar as the donor. However, little is known about the acceptor selectivity of CGTase, which greatly hampers efforts toward the rational design of desirable transglycosylated derivatives. In this study, we found that the CGTase from Bacillus circulans, BcCGTase, was able to form glycosylated products with diverse ginsenosides. In particular, it not only carries out diverse mono-, di-, and even higher-order glycosylations via the transfer of glucose moieties to the COGlc positions, but also can glycosylate the C3-OH position of ginsenosides. In contrast, another CGTase from Bacillus licheniformis (BlCGTase) showed relatively specific acceptor preference with only several ginsenosides. Structural comparison between BcCGTase and BlCGTase revealed that the Arg74/K81 position within the acceptor-binding sites of BcCGTase/BlCGTase was responsible for the differences in catalytic specificity for ginsenoside F1. Further mutagenesis confirmed their roles in the acceptor selection. In conclusion, our study not only demonstrates the acceptor selectivity of CGTases, but also provides insight into the catalytic mechanism of CGTases, which will potentially increase the utility of CGTase for biosynthesis of new, rationally designed transglycosylated derivatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号