BACKGROUND: A first-line biologic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still controversial. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of first-line cetuximab versus bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC.
METHODS: In March 2018, an electronic search of the following biomedical databases was performed: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Knowledge. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or observational cohort studies (OCSs) were included. Subgroup analyses of all RCTs were performed in all outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.3.
RESULTS: Two RCTs and three OCSs, involving a total 2576 patients, were included. The meta-analysis reported that cetuximab was associated with a longer overall survival (OS) [HR 0.89, 95% CI (0.81-0.98); p = 0.02], a higher ORR [RR 1.11, 95% CI (1.03-1.19); p = 0.006], higher complete response [RR 3.21, 95% CI (1.27-8.12); p = 0.01] and a greater median depth of response than bevacizumab. However, no significant difference was observed between cetuximab and bevacizumab groups for PFS, DCR, partial response, progressive disease, curative intent metastasectomy, EORR and incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events. In the subgroup meta-analyses of the RCTs, inconsistent results compared to the main analysis, however, were found, in the ORR, DCR and curative intent metastasectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence indicates that compared to bevacizumab treatment, cetuximab provides a clinically relevant effect in first-line treatment against mCRC, at the cost of having lower stable disease.

In KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors (wt-GISTs), BRAF mutations are regarded as alternative pathogenic events driving tumorigenesis. In our study, we aimed at analyzing a large cohort (n=444) of GISTs for BRAF mutations using molecular and immunohistochemical methods. More than 3000 GIST samples from caucasian patients were available in our GIST and Sarcoma Registry NRW. Of these, we selected 172 wt-GISTs to evaluate the frequency of BRAF mutations. Furthermore, 272 GISTs with a representative KIT and PDGFRA mutational status were selected. BRAF mutational status was evaluated by high-resolution melting analysis, Sanger sequencing, and VE1 immunohistochemistry. A BRAF mutation (p.V600E) was found in 7 cases (3.9%) of the wt-GIST cohort. In 2 cases, multiple synchronous tumors harbored the same somatic BRAF mutation. VE1 immunohistochemical staining had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 97.5% to detect BRAF p.V600E mutations. Analyzing our cases and the cases reported in the literature (n=37), the percentage of intermediate and high-risk BRAF-mutated wt-GISTs (17/31; 54.8%) was comparable to that recorded for large GIST cohorts irrespective of the mutational status. BRAF mutations are rare events in wt-GISTs, and VE1 immunohistochemistry appears to be a valuable pre-screening tool for the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations. BRAF mutations in GISTs do not seem to have a prognostic value per se. However, as BRAF inhibition represents a therapeutic option to control disease, we suggest the assessment of the BRAF mutational status, especially in the setting of advanced GIST disease.

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) catalyze the biotransformation of many endobiotics and xenobiotics, and are coded by polymorphic genes. However, knowledge about the effects of these polymorphisms is rarely used for the individualization of drug therapy. Here, we present a quantitative systematic review of clinical studies on the impact of UGT variants on drug metabolism to clarify the potential for genotype-adjusted therapy recommendations. Data on UGT polymorphisms and dose-related pharmacokinetic parameters in man were retrieved by a systematic search in public databases. Mean estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted for each group of carriers of UGT variants to assess their effect size. Pooled estimates and relative confidence bounds were computed with a random-effects meta-analytic approach whenever multiple studies on the same variant, ethnic group, and substrate were available. Information was retrieved on 30 polymorphic metabolic pathways involving 10 UGT enzymes. For irinotecan and mycophenolic acid a wealth of data was available for assessing the impact of genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics under different dosages, between ethnicities, under comedication, and under toxicity. Evidence for effects of potential clinical relevance exists for 19 drugs, but the data are not sufficient to assess effect size with the precision required to issue dose recommendations. In conclusion, compared to other drug metabolizing enzymes much less systematic research has been conducted on the polymorphisms of UGT enzymes. However, there is evidence of the existence of large monogenetic functional polymorphisms affecting pharmacokinetics and suggesting a potential use of UGT polymorphisms for the individualization of drug therapy.