OBJECTIVE: Persons with vestibular schwannoma suffer from dizziness, imbalance, and decreased function leading to reduced quality of life. Other forms of peripheral vestibular hypofunction show improvements in these signs and symptoms with vestibular rehabilitation; however, the efficacy of this intervention for those with vestibular schwannoma is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to determine the effect of vestibular physical therapy on subjective and objective measures of vestibular symptoms and function in people with vestibular schwannoma.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Included studies were experimental or observational in design and featured patients with vestibular schwannoma who had undergone vestibular physical therapy. Screening and quality assessment was completed independently by 2 researchers. Risk of bias was assessed with a tool appropriate for study design (eg, Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to synthesize findings.
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included. Overall, the effect of vestibular physical therapy for patients with vestibular schwannoma was uncertain. Outcomes of dizziness, static and dynamic balance, and vestibular function all showed very low certainty on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment. Multimodal physical therapist interventions consistent with clinical practice guidelines (eg, gaze stability, habituation, balance training, gait training) demonstrated potential for improvement in dizziness, balance, and vestibular function, respectively. Results were mostly insignificant when a single modality was used.
CONCLUSIONS: There may be benefit in multimodal vestibular physical therapy for people with vestibular schwannoma to improve symptoms and function. More high-quality studies specific to vestibular schwannoma prehabilitation and rehabilitation are needed to increase the certainty in the evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapists are encouraged to use multimodal vestibular rehabilitation for vestibular schwannoma in clinical practice in line with clinical guidelines for peripheral vestibular hypofunction.

Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a chronic and disabling disorder characterized by persistent dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance. It often arises without an identifiable cause and is exacerbated by upright posture, active or passive movement, and exposure to moving or complex visual stimuli. This complex pathophysiology and the psychological dimensions of its symptomatology pose a significant challenge to clinicians. PPPD presents diagnostic challenges and a lack of standardized treatment options, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary approaches encompassing pharmacotherapy, vestibular rehabilitation, and psychological interventions for effective management. Bridging the gaps in understanding PPPD requires collaborative efforts across disciplines, emphasizing integrated research approaches and patient support networks to enhance care and improve outcomes. This review explores the challenges, controversies, and clinical complexities of PPPD, highlighting the importance of a patient-centered approach.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises on individuals with vestibular dysfunction symptoms.
METHODS: Systematic search was conducted using PubMed, EBSCO SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to March 2023. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies.
RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. In total, 610 participants, 41.31 % of whom were men were included in this review. The PEDro scale scores ranged from 6 to 8 with a median of 6.5/10. Our findings revealed improvements in patients\' vestibular dysfunction symptoms after Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises and other conventional interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial findings showed that Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises are not superior to other concurrent vestibular rehabilitation interventions in improving vestibular dysfunction symptoms. Additional trials with long-term follow-ups are strongly recommended to understand the impacts of Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises on vestibular dysfunction symptoms.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the impact of early vestibular rehabilitation training combined with corticosteroids initiated within 2 weeks, compared with corticosteroid treatment, after the peripheral acute vestibular syndrome (pAVS) onset.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. From inception to January 24, 2024. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews approved this study (CRD42023422308).
UNASSIGNED: Five studies involving 235 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The subjective outcome measure Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was pooled for a meta-analysis and was statistically significantly in favor of early vestibular rehabilitation training (early VRT) plus corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone: at one-month follow-up (p = 0.00) and 12 months follow-up (p = 0.01). DHI was a critical outcome for measuring the differences in effect of early VRT. The objective outcome measures of caloric lateralization, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography were gathered for a narrative synthesis.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis showed that early VRT in combination with corticosteroids was more effective for treating pAVS than corticosteroid treatment alone. No adverse effects were reported for early VRT.

BACKGROUND: The consequence of complete or partial uncompensated vestibular dysfunction in children is usually balance disorders, with the risk of falls and increased fatigue, particularly during tasks requiring postural control. The aim of these recommendations is to establish guidelines for vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in children with vestibular impairment.
METHODS: The guidelines were developed based on a systematic review of the international literature, validated by a multidisciplinary group of French-speaking otorhinolaryngologists, scientists, and physiotherapists. They are classified as grade A, B, C, or expert opinion according to a decreasing level of scientific evidence.
RESULTS: A PubMed search of studies published between January 1990 and December 2021 was carried out using the keywords \"vestibular,\" \"rehabilitation,\" and \"children\". After filtering and reviewing the articles, a total of 10 publications were included to establish the recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that a vestibular assessment be carried out before VR, including a study of vestibulo-ocular reflex, otolithic function, and postural control. In cases of vestibular dysfunction, physiotherapy treatment is recommended from an early age to train different aspects of postural control, including anticipatory and reactive postural adjustments. VR adapted to the pediatric population is recommended for children whose vestibular dysfunction leads to functional disorders or symptoms of vertigo for those who have suffered head trauma. It is recommended that children with bilateral vestibular impairment be treated using gaze stabilization exercises for adaptation and substitution. Optokinetic stimulation and virtual reality are not recommended for children and young adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effects optokinetic stimulation in people with vestibular disorders, with a specific focus on people with visually induced dizziness.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using three electronic databases, CINAHL, PubMed and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), from 2000 up to February 2024.
METHODS: Randomised controlled trials were included, which compared: (a) adults above 18 years old with vestibular disorders, (b) the study evaluated interventions using optokinetic stimulation, (c) the intervention was compared with usual care; placebo or to no intervention, (d) the study included at least one outcome measure evaluating vestibular symptoms and (e) published in English. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and PROSPERO\'s registration number ID: CRD42021273382).
RESULTS: Eleven randomised control trials, reported in 12 records, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of the studies were considered to have \'good\' methodological quality according to the PEDro scale. All studies showed significant improvement in vestibular symptoms in both the intervention and control groups. A meta-analysis performed on six of the records found a preference towards the addition of OKS to conventional vestibular rehabilitation helped to further reduce dizziness symptoms for patients, but the results were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: No optimal duration or frequency for OKS has been determined. The addition of OKS to conventional vestibular rehabilitation may be beneficial in further improving vestibular symptoms in patients with dizziness. OKS could help to improve enjoyment and adherence to vestibular rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of optokinetic stimulation (OKS) for improving symptoms and function in patients with vestibular and balance disorders.
METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL Complete, and PEDro databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with vestibular and balance disorders and compared the effects of OKS versus other interventions or no intervention on subjective or objective functional outcomes. Data were analysed by the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were selected including 468 patients, 177 of whom received OKS. There were no significant differences in scores on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) (SMD = 0.02; 95% CI - 0.18 to 0.23; p = 0.83) or the visual analogue scale (VAS) for vertigo (SMD = 0.16; 95% CI - 1.25 to 1.58; p = 0.82). However, there were statistically significant differences in the timed up and go (TUG) test, with a large effect (SMD = - 1.13; 95% CI -2 to - 0.28; p = 0.009), and in the sensory organization test (SOT), with a medium effect (SMD = - 0.7; 95% CI - 1.21 to - 0.19; p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed significant effects of OKS on VAS (p = 0.017), TUG (p = 0.009) and SOT (p = 0.001) only in patients with balance disorders without vestibular disease (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: OKS may improve dizziness intensity measured with VAS or dynamic balance measured whit TUG and SOT in patients with balance disorders not due to vestibular disease. The quality of the evidence was low or very low due to the small number of included studies.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023445024.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to examine the effects of the Semont maneuver on posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).
METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, SCOPUS, REHABDATA, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched comprehensively from inception to January 2024. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was employed to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.
RESULTS: In total, 18 randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2237 participants with BPPV (mean age = 58.10 years) were included in this review. Among them, 37.5% were males, and 58% presented with right-sided BPPV. The included studies ranked from 5 to 9 out of 10 (Median = 7), suggesting good to excellent quality on the PEDro scale. The available literature revealed that the Semont maneuver is effective in improving posterior canal BPPV symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The Semont maneuver is considered a standard option for treating posterior canal BPPV, with a high success rate of around 80%. It is suggested as the primary option for managing posterior canal BPPV in individuals who complain of cervical or lumbar problems, severe cardiac or respiratory conditions. Further studies are strongly needed to understand the long-term effects of the Semont maneuver and to identify the recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to examine the effects of Brandt-Daroff exercises (BDEs) on individuals with posterior canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) and to provide recommendations for future research on this topic.
METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, PEDro, SCOPUS, REHABDATA, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 2023. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
RESULTS: In total, ten randomized controlled trials met our eligibility criteria. A total of 880 individuals with BPPV (63.6% females) were included in this review. The included studies were ranked \"good quality\" on the PEDro scale. The available literature showed that BDEs do not significantly reduce symptoms or promote recovery in people with posterior canal BPPV compared to other interventions, such as Epley and Semont maneuvers.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the effects of BDEs on patients with BPPV is limited. Further high-quality studies with long-term follow-ups are strongly required to investigate the long-term effects of BDEs in posterior canal BPPV, define the optimal application of BDEs, and identify the factors associated with treatment response and recovery.

There is limited evidence to support the use of vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) on improving balance and gait in patients after stroke. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of VRT in addition to usual rehabilitation compared with usual rehabilitation on improving balance and gait for patients after stroke.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines. Ten electronic databases were searched up to 1 June 2023 without restrictions in language and publication status. The PEDro scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development, and Evaluation were used to evaluate the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence. The meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3.
Fifteen randomised controlled trials with 769 participants were included. PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias with a mean score of 5.9 (0.7). VRT was effective in improving balance for patients after stroke (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI (0.40, 0.78), p < 0.00001), particularly for patients after stroke that occurred within 6 months (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI (0.33, 0.79), p < 0.00001) with moderate certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis showed that VRT provided as gaze stability exercises combined with swivel chair training (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI (0.48, 1.22), p < 0.00001) and head movements (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI (0.43, 1.07), p < 0.00001) could significantly improve balance. Four-week VRT had better effect on balance improvement (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI (0.40, 0.89), p < 0.00001) than the less than 4-week VRT. The pooled mean difference of values of Timed Up-and-Go test showed that VRT could significantly improve gait function for patients after stroke (MD =  -4.32, 95% CI (-6.65, -1.99), p = 0.0003), particularly for patients after stroke that occurred within 6 months (MD =  -3.92, 95% CI (-6.83, -1.00), p = 0.008) with moderate certainty of evidence.
There is moderate certainty of evidence supporting the positive effect of VRT in improving balance and gait of patients after stroke.
PROSPERO CRD42023434304.