UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of highly detailed ventral hernia repair (VHR) operative reports and associations between operative report detail and postoperative outcomes in a medico-legal dataset.
UNASSIGNED: VHR are one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Previous work has shown that VHR operative reports are poorly detailed, however, the relationship between operative report detail and patient outcomes is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Operative reports describing VHR were obtained from a medical-legal database. Medical records were screened and data was extracted including clinical outcomes, such as surgical site infection (SSI), hernia recurrence, and reoperation and the presence of key details in each report. Highly detailed operative reports were defined as having 70% of recommended details. The primary outcome was the prevalence of highly detailed VHR operative reports.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1011 VHR operative reports dictated by 693 surgeons across 517 facilities in 50 states were included. Median duration of follow-up was 4.6 years after initial surgery. Only 35.7% of operative reports were highly detailed. More recent operative reports, cases with resident involvement, and contaminated procedures were more likely to be highly detailed (all P < 0.05). Compared to poorly detailed operative reports, cases with highly detailed reports had fewer SSIs (13.2% vs 7.5%, P = 0.006), hernia recurrence (65.8% vs 55.4%, P = 0.002), and reoperation (78.9% vs 62.6%, P = 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: In this medico-legal dataset, most VHR operative reports are poorly detailed while highly detailed operative reports were associated with lower rates of complications. Future studies should examine a nationally representative dataset to validate our findings.

Introduction: Heterotopic ossification involves the formation of trabecular bone outside of its usual anatomic location. While it is a well-known entity in orthopedic and spinal injury literature, it has also been observed after midline laparotomy and severe burns. Methods/Case Report: We present a case of a 69-year-old man who presented for ventral hernia repair after a prolonged postoperative course following colectomy involving an open abdomen with eventual closure with skin grafting. Results: Two large calcified objects were encountered during the excision of the skin graft from the small intestine and during the component separation. They had grown into the anterior fascia and rectus muscle and interdigitated between loops of the small bowel. After careful resection of the 2 calcified objects, a ventral hernia repair with a component separation was successfully performed. Pathology was consistent with heterotopic ossification. After 18 months, there was no clinical evidence of recurrence. Discussion: Heterotopic ossification is not frequently encountered during ventral hernia repairs, but its presence can complicate repair. Resection is the only option in the context of hernia repair. If recognized preoperatively, waiting up to a year for the bone to mature before excision has been suggested, but there is minimal data to support this. Consultation with a general surgeon is also advised in case the calcified tissue involves the underlying viscera.

BACKGROUND: The consensus about whether the single port approach is advantageous remains controversial. As the ambulatory service becomes the standard of care, techniques are in evolution to augment the patient experience in this setting. This forms the basis for evaluating SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) prosthetic ventral hernia repair in the ambulatory setting. We report a SILS technique of ventral hernia repair using the Stryker Ideal-eyes articulating laparoscope and standard laparoscopic instruments in the day-case setting.
METHODS: We report three cases of ventral hernias (one primary and two incisional). All were completed using single port techniques. They were done in the ambulatory setting and require no admission. Single incision laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias was completed successfully in all cases without conversion to standard laparoscopy. Median (range) operative time was 66min (39-95min). No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. No episodes of prolonged postoperative pain were reported. We examine the literature and subsequently discuss the feasibility of ambulatory single port ventral hernia repair.
CONCLUSIONS: SILS prosthetic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia is easily feasible. In our series, SILS ventral hernia repair appears to be safe and effective. It may decrease parietal trauma augmenting its use in the ambulatory setting. Technology will continue to improve the wide applicability of this technique. Larger randomized trial studies are required to determine the rates of port-site incisional hernia compared with multiport laparoscopy.

A case-control study was performed to compare laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using the Ventralight ST™ lightweight surgical mesh with LVHR using other types of mesh.
Adult patients undergoing intraperitoneal implantation of Ventralight ST™ during LVHR (Ventralight ST™ group; VG) over a 2-year period (2011-2013) were identified from the prospective French Hernia-Club registry. Patients undergoing elective LVHR using other types of intraperitoneal mesh in the first semester of 2013 formed the control group (CG). Patient, hernia and surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes after 8 days, 1 month, and 1 year were compared between the two groups.
The VG comprised 90 LVHRs in 85 patients, and the CG 86 LVHRs in 81 patients. Patient, hernia and surgical characteristics were similar between the two groups, apart from the method of mesh fixation and the number of procedures involving fascial closure. A low rate of minor complications was observed in both groups at 1 month [4.4 % (VG) and 2.3 % (CG)], and the level of postoperative pain was similar in the two groups at Day 8 and 1 month. After 1 year, no complications, recurrences or cases of chronic pain had occurred in either group, and Quality-of-Life outcomes were similar. Patients rated their procedure as excellent or good in 96 % (VG) and 92 % (CG) of cases.
Ventralight ST™ mesh is effective and well tolerated in LVHR, producing very low complication and recurrence rates in the short and medium term. The results are comparable to those achieved with other types of mesh.

We present a case series of 19 patients requiring complex abdominal hernia repairs. Patients presented with challenging clinical histories with 95% having multiple significant comorbidities including overweight or obesity (84%), hypertension (53%), diabetes (42%), cancer (26%), and pulmonary disease (16%). The majority of patients (68%) had prior abdominal infections and 53% had at least one failed prior hernia repair. Upon examination, fascial defects averaged 282 cm(2). Anterior and posterior component separation was performed with placement of a human acellular dermal mesh. Midline abdominal closure under minimal tension was achieved primarily in all cases. Post-operative complications included 2 adverse events (11%) - one pulmonary embolism and one post-operative hemorrhage requiring transfusion; 6 wound-related complications (32%), 1 seroma (5%) and 1 patient with post-operative ileus (5%). Operative intervention was not required in any of the cases and most patients made an uneventful recovery. Increased patient age and longer OR time were independently predictive of early post-operative complications. At a median 2-year follow-up, three patients had a documented hernia recurrence (16%) and one patient was deceased due to unrelated causes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for post-operative events due to comorbidities, prior abdominal infection and failed mesh repairs do well following component separation reinforced with a human bioprosthetic mesh. Anticipated post-operative complications were managed conservatively and at a median 2-year follow-up, a low rate of hernia recurrence was observed with this approach.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of concurrent mesh herniorrhaphy on short-term outcomes of colorectal surgery by using a large, nationwide database.
METHODS: Patients who underwent simultaneous ventral hernia repair (VHR) and colorectal surgery between 2005 and 2010 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients who underwent VHR with mesh repair were case matched with patients who underwent VHR without mesh based on the type of colorectal procedure, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-two patients who underwent VHR with mesh were case matched with 524 patients who underwent VHR without mesh. Mean operating time was significantly longer in patients who underwent VHR with mesh (195.8 ± 98.7 vs 164.3 ± 84.4 minutes, P < .001). Postoperative morbidity (P = .58), mortality (P = .27), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (P = .14), deep SSI (P = .38), organ space SSI (P = .17), wound disruption (P > .99), reoperation (P = .48), and length of hospital stay (P = .71) were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data suggest that VHR with mesh does not increase 30-day mortality, medical or surgical morbidity in colorectal surgery setting.