vaccinated

已接种疫苗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:异源COVID-19疫苗有效性(VE)的持久性主要在高收入国家进行了研究,而低收入和中等收入国家对异源疫苗政策的评估仍然有限。
    目的:我们旨在评估异源COVID-19疫苗方案的VE在减轻严重结局方面的持续时间,特别是重度COVID-19和COVID-19住院后的死亡仍然超过50%。
    方法:我们通过将年龄≥18岁的泰国公民的记录与重要公民联系起来,形成了一个动态队列,COVID-19疫苗,和2021年5月至2022年7月的COVID-19病例登记数据库。加密的公民身份号码用于合并数据库之间的数据。本研究的重点是8种常见的异源疫苗序列:CoronaVac/ChAdOx1,ChAdOx1/BNT162b2,CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1,CoronaVac/ChAdOx1/BNT162b2mRNA,BBIBP-CorV/BBCorOxNT1,AdCh162b2/AdCh1/考虑非免疫个体进行比较。根据疫苗接种状态对队列进行分层,年龄,性别,省位置,一个月的疫苗接种,和结果。数据分析采用逻辑回归来确定VE,考虑潜在的混杂因素和随着时间的推移的持久性,在7个月的随访期内观察到的数据。
    结果:这项研究包括52,580,841个人,大约17,907,215和17,190,975接受2剂和3剂普通异源疫苗(不相互排斥),分别。2剂量异源疫苗接种对严重COVID-19和COVID-19住院2个月后死亡提供了约50%的VE;然而,随着时间的推移,保护显著下降。3剂量异源疫苗接种对两种结果持续超过50%VE至少8个月,由具有持久性时间相互作用模型的逻辑回归确定。由CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1组成的疫苗序列对两种结果均显示>80%的VE,没有VE减弱的证据。最后一次给药后7个月,CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1对重度COVID-19和住院后死亡的最终每月测量VE为82%(95%CI80.3%-84%)和86.3%(95%CI83.6%-84%),分别。
    结论:在泰国,在7个月的观察期内,2剂量方案不能维持50%的VE对严重和致命的COVID-19超过2个月,但所有的三剂量方案都有。CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1方案对严重和致命的COVID-19显示出最佳的保护作用。在所有3剂异源COVID-19疫苗方案中,估计至少8个月的50%VE的持久性支持采用异源初免-加强疫苗接种策略,主要使用一系列灭活病毒疫苗,并用病毒载体或mRNA疫苗加强,防止低收入和中等收入国家发生类似的流行病。
    BACKGROUND: The durability of heterologous COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) has been primarily studied in high-income countries, while evaluation of heterologous vaccine policies in low- and middle-income countries remains limited.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the duration during which the VE of heterologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens in mitigating serious outcomes, specifically severe COVID-19 and death following hospitalization with COVID-19, remains over 50%.
    METHODS: We formed a dynamic cohort by linking records of Thai citizens aged ≥18 years from citizen vital, COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 cases registry databases between May 2021 and July 2022. Encrypted citizen identification numbers were used to merge the data between the databases. This study focuses on 8 common heterologous vaccine sequences: CoronaVac/ChAdOx1, ChAdOx1/BNT162b2, CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1, CoronaVac/ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1, CoronaVac/ChAdOx1/BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV/BBIBP-CorV/BNT162b2, ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1/BNT162b2, and ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1/mRNA-1273. Nonimmunized individuals were considered for comparisons. The cohort was stratified according to the vaccination status, age, sex, province location, month of vaccination, and outcome. Data analysis employed logistic regression to determine the VE, accounting for potential confounders and durability over time, with data observed over a follow-up period of 7 months.
    RESULTS: This study includes 52,580,841 individuals, with approximately 17,907,215 and 17,190,975 receiving 2- and 3-dose common heterologous vaccines (not mutually exclusive), respectively. The 2-dose heterologous vaccinations offered approximately 50% VE against severe COVID-19 and death following hospitalization with COVID-19 for 2 months; however, the protection significantly declined over time. The 3-dose heterologous vaccinations sustained over 50% VE against both outcomes for at least 8 months, as determined by logistic regression with durability time-interaction modeling. The vaccine sequence consisting of CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 demonstrated >80% VE against both outcomes, with no evidence of VE waning. The final monthly measured VE of CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 against severe COVID-19 and death following hospitalization at 7 months after the last dose was 82% (95% CI 80.3%-84%) and 86.3% (95% CI 83.6%-84%), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: In Thailand, within a 7-month observation period, the 2-dose regimens could not maintain a 50% VE against severe and fatal COVID-19 for over 2 months, but all of the 3-dose regimens did. The CoronaVac/CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 regimen showed the best protective effect against severe and fatal COVID-19. The estimated durability of 50% VE for at least 8 months across all 3-dose heterologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens supports the adoption of heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategies, with a primary series of inactivated virus vaccine and boosting with either a viral vector or an mRNA vaccine, to prevent similar pandemics in low- and middle-income countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院工作人员最容易感染COVID-19,目前通过接种疫苗预防。医院职员亦拒绝接种疫苗,尽管根本原因尚未确定。该研究旨在比较服用冠状病毒疫苗和未接种疫苗的卫生工作者的身体疾病症状的严重程度。
    方法:这项队列研究旨在评估在摩苏尔医院接种和未接种冠状病毒的卫生工作者的感染严重程度。伊拉克。数据来自摩苏尔总医院,尼尼微,伊拉克。该问卷的三个组成部分中的第一个概述了人口统计学特征。第二部分:第一组未接种疫苗的医护人员包括那些没有接受过COVID-19免疫接种或只接种了一剂疫苗的人;第二组包括那些接受了第一剂电晕疫苗的人,第三组包括那些接受了两剂电晕疫苗的人。获得电晕疫苗的HCWs被包括在三剂量的最终组中。
    结果:研究结果表明,与电晕疫苗接种相比,接种疫苗的患者出现较不严重的感染症状和较少的剂量停留.在接受疫苗接种的20至30岁人群中,医护人员的比例很高,这说明了接种疫苗和未接种疫苗群体之间的性别差距。
    结论:这项研究得出的结论是,电晕疫苗的结果在各组HCWs中并不一致。接种疫苗的可接受性在护士中几乎是一致的,但在医生和其他医疗保健专业人员中就不那么重要了。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital staff members are most susceptible to the COVID-19 illness, which is currently prevented through vaccination. Hospital staff members also refuse vaccinations, albeit the underlying causes have not been identified. The study aimed to compare the severity of the symptoms of the disease on the body for health workers who took the coronavirus vaccine and those who did not take the vaccine.
    METHODS: This cohort study aimed to estimate the of infection severity of vaccinated and unvaccinated health workers with Corona Virus in Mosul Hospital, Iraq. Data were obtained from the General Mosul Hospital, Nineveh, Iraq. The first of the three components of this questionnaire outlined the demographic characteristics. Second part: First group of unvaccinated Health care workers included those who had not received the COVID-19 immunization or had only gotten one dose of the vaccine; the second group included those who had received their first dose of Corona vaccine and the third group included those who had received two doses of Corona Vaccine. HCWs who got corona vaccine were included in the three-dose final group.
    RESULTS: The study\'s findings indicate that as compared to the corona vaccination, the vaccinated experienced less severe infection symptoms and fewer dosage stays. The high share of healthcare workers among the 20- to 30-year-olds who received vaccinations accounts for the gender gap between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the results of the corona vaccine are not consistent among the various groups of HCWs. The acceptability of vaccinations is practically unanimous among nurses, but less so among doctors and other healthcare professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们比较了接种疫苗的住院COVID-19患者与未接种疫苗的住院COVID-19患者的临床特征和结果。在信德省传染病医院和研究中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,卡拉奇,巴基斯坦。2021年4月至2022年3月共纳入1407例COVID-19阳性住院患者,其中男性812例(57.71%)。在1407年中,有378名(26.87%)患者接种了疫苗,而有1029名(73.13%)患者未接种疫苗。在接种疫苗的患者中,160(42.32%)部分接种,而218(57.68%)完全接种(疫苗突破感染)。与接种疫苗的患者相比,未接种疫苗的COVID-19患者的存活人数更少(62.5%vs.70%,RR0.89,95%CI:0.82-0.96,p值=0.004)。尽管有更多60岁以上的接种疫苗的患者(60.05%vs.47.13%),他们的死亡风险降低了43%(OR=0.578;CI=0.4201~0.7980,p=0.0009).关于生存分析,与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗的患者具有更好的30天生存率(p=0.028)。此外,比较第3-5波,第4波未接种疫苗的患者,这是由三角洲变异体驱动的,生存率最差(51.8%,p≤0.001),而第3波(由α变体驱动)的疫苗接种患者的生存率最好(71.6%)。
    We compared the clinical characteristics and outcome of vaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients with unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital and Research Center, Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 1407 hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients were included from April 2021 to March 2022, of which 812 (57.71%) were males. Of the 1407, 378 (26.87%) patients were vaccinated while 1029 (73.13%) were unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated patients, 160 (42.32%) were partially vaccinated while 218 (57.68%) were fully vaccinated (vaccine breakthrough infection). Fewer unvaccinated COVID-19 patients survived compared to vaccinated patients (62.5% vs. 70%, RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p-value = 0.004). Despite there being more vaccinated patients above 60 years of age (60.05% vs. 47.13%), their risk of mortality was lower by 43% (OR = 0.578; CI = 0.4201 to 0.7980, p = 0.0009). On survival analysis, vaccinated patients had better 30-day survival compared to unvaccinated patients (p = 0.028). Moreover, comparing waves 3-5, unvaccinated patients of wave 4, which was driven by the delta variant, had the worst survival (51.8%, p ≤ 0.001) while vaccinated patients of wave 3 (driven by the alpha variant) had the best survival (71.6%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    麻疹是索马里的地方病;每年都有反复爆发的报告。由于免疫接种率低,五岁以下儿童受影响最大,维生素A缺乏,和营养不良。这项研究旨在评估人口统计学,临床,以及在研究医院接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的麻疹住院儿童之间的并发症差异。
    2022年10月10日至11月10日实施了一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究,方法是根据结构良好的入院临床特征清单审查病例记录文件。人口特征,麻疹免疫史,和麻疹并发症状况。通过呈现分类的频率和百分比以及连续变量的平均得分来使用描述性统计。使用χ2和P=0.05的Fisher精确检验来确定接种和未接种病例之间的比例差异。
    共有93名住院麻疹儿童参加了这项研究。一半以上是男孩,月龄的平均年龄为20.9(SD±7.28),超过三分之二的母亲/照顾者没有接受过正规教育。几乎9.7%的住院麻疹儿童接种了一剂含麻疹疫苗,而没有两个剂量。接种疫苗的病例比未接种疫苗的病例少,并发症少。发烧,咳嗽,皮疹,和Koplik斑点是与麻疹免疫状态相关的临床特征。
    大约十分之一的住院儿童接种了一剂麻疹疫苗。接种疫苗的病例比未接种疫苗的病例少,并发症少。这篇论文高度强调提供加强剂量,改善疫苗物流和储存,并遵循免疫计划。此外,非常需要开展进一步的多中心高样本量研究,以确定疫苗不足是由宿主相关还是疫苗相关因素引起.
    Measles is endemic in Somalia; recurrent outbreaks are reported annually. Under-five children are the most affected due to low immunization coverage, vitamin A deficiency, and malnutrition. The study aims to evaluate the demographical, clinical, and complication variations between vaccinated and unvaccinated hospitalized children with measles in the study hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study was implemented between 10 October and 10 November 2022 by reviewing case record files following a well-structured checklist of admitted clinical features, demographic characteristics, history of measles immunization, and measles complication status. Descriptive statistics were used by presenting frequency and percentage for categorical and the mean score for continuous variables. χ2 and Fisher\'s exact test at P =0.05 were used to identify the proportions differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated cases.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 93 hospitalized measles children participated in the study. Over half were boys, the mean age in months was 20.9 (SD±7.28), and over two-thirds of the mothers/caregivers did not have formal education. Almost 9.7% of hospitalized measles children had one dose of the measles-containing vaccine, while none had two doses. The vaccinated cases had fewer ill with fewer complications than the unvaccinated cases. Fever, cough, rash, and Koplik\'s spots were clinical features associated with measles immunization status.
    UNASSIGNED: Around one in ten hospitalized children had one dose of the measles vaccine. Vaccinated cases had fewer illnesses with few complications than unvaccinated cases. The paper highly emphasizes providing booster doses, improving vaccine logistics and storage, and following immunization schedules. In addition, conducting further multicentral high sample-size studies is highly required to identify whether vaccine inadequacy was due to host-related or vaccine-related factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:完全接种疫苗的人的突破性感染对全球正在进行的针对SARS-CoV-2的疫苗运动构成了重大挑战。
    未经评估:调查突破性感染的发生以及Covid症状与医护人员(HCWs)疫苗接种状况的关系。
    未经批准:在政府医学院完成,在接受过一剂或两剂Covid疫苗的Covid阳性HCWs中,Patiala,从2021年4月1日至2021年6月15日,使用预先测试的半结构化验证形式和电话采访。
    未经批准:在3388个HCWs中,115例接种疫苗的HCW(第一剂或第二剂)变为Covid阳性。在接种疫苗的Covid阳性HCWs中,54接受了第一剂量,61接受了两种剂量。突破性感染(第二剂量后≥14天)发生在4.6%(1021个中的47个)HCWs中。如比值比为0.27所示,疫苗具有显着的保护性;因此,与未接种疫苗的HCW相比,接种疫苗的HCW感染Covid的可能性低73%。无论是服用一剂疫苗还是两种疫苗,病例的症状特征之间没有统计学上的显着差异,除了头痛。与接种疫苗的HCW相比,在未接种疫苗的组中仅报告了显著更高的疲劳和头痛。
    UNASSIGNED:需要研究跟踪接种Covid阳性HCWs样本的免疫反应和病毒基因组序列,以便对合并的SARS-CoV-2新毒株保持持续警惕。
    UNASSIGNED: Breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated persons pose a major challenge to the ongoing vaccine campaign against SARS-CoV-2 globally.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the occurrence of breakthrough infections and the association of Covid symptoms with the vaccination status of health care workers (HCWs).
    UNASSIGNED: Done in Government Medical College, Patiala among Covid-positive HCWs who have received one or both doses of Covid vaccine, using pretested semi-structured validated Proforma and telephonic interview from April 1, 2021 to June 15, 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 3388 HCWs, 115 vaccinated HCWs (1st or 2nd dose) became Covid positive. Among vaccinated Covid positive HCWs, 54 received the first dose and 61 both doses. Breakthrough infections (≥14 days post 2nd dose) occurred in 4.6% (47 of 1021) HCWs. The vaccine is significantly protective as shown by an odds ratio of 0.27; thus, vaccinated HCWs are 73% less likely to get Covid infection as compared to non-vaccinated HCWs. There was no statistically significant difference between symptom profiles of cases whether they took one or both doses of vaccine, except headache. Only tiredness and headache were reported significantly higher in the unvaccinated group in comparison to vaccinated HCWs.
    UNASSIGNED: Research is needed on tracking the immune response and viral genomic sequence of samples of vaccinated Covid-positive HCWs to have constant vigilance on remerging new strains of the SARS-CoV-2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:单克隆抗体(mAb)在早期给药时可预防COVID-19的进展。我们比较了在Delta波期间接种和未接种的患者的mAb治疗结果,并评估了在mAb稀缺的情况下实施更严格的合格标准的可行性。
    方法:我们在急诊科或门诊输液中心(2021年7月1日至8月20日)对casirivimab/imdevimab轻中度COVID-19感染患者进行了回顾性观察研究。主要结果是在接种疫苗与疫苗之间的治疗后30天内全因入院。布朗克斯三角洲激增期间未接种疫苗的患者,NY.
    结果:共有250名患者接受了casirivimab/imdevimab(162名未接种疫苗与88接种疫苗)。未接种疫苗的患者的平均年龄为39岁,接种疫苗的患者为52年(p<0.0001)。未接种疫苗的患者符合EUA标准的中位数为1,接种疫苗的患者为2(p<0.0001)。总的来说,6%(15/250)的患者在治疗后30天内入院。在30天内有11名未接种疫苗的患者(7%)入院,而4名(5%)接种疫苗的患者(p=0.48)。
    结论:接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者30天全因入院没有统计学差异。当联邦分配的疗法有限时,项目必须优先考虑住院和死亡风险最高的患者,无论疫苗接种状态如何.
    BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) prevent COVID-19 progression when administered early. We compared mAb treatment outcomes among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients during Delta wave and assessed the feasibility of implementing stricter eligibility criteria in the event of mAb scarcity.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of casirivimab/imdevimab recipients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection in an emergency department or outpatient infusion center (July 1-August 20, 2021). Primary outcome was all-cause hospital admission within 30 days post-treatment between vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients during Delta surge in the Bronx, NY.
    RESULTS: A total of 250 patients received casirivimab/imdevimab (162 unvaccinated vs. 88 vaccinated). The median age was 39 years for unvaccinated patients, and 52 years for vaccinated patients (p < 0.0001). The median number of EUA criteria met was 1 for unvaccinated and 2 for vaccinated patients (p < 0.0001). Overall, 6% (15/250) of patients were admitted within 30 days post-treatment. Eleven unvaccinated patients (7%) were admitted within 30-days compared to 4 (5%) vaccinated patients (p = 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: All-cause 30-day admission was not statistically different between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. When federal allocation of therapies is limited, programs must prioritize patients at highest risk of hospitalization and death regardless of vaccination status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号