urinary retention

尿潴留
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较无导尿管(TWOC)立即试验后建立自发性排尿的成功与男性急性尿retention留的延迟性TWOC。
    在这篇系统综述中,我们纳入了报告在≥18岁男性因急性尿潴留而插管的即时TWOC或延迟TWOC(≤30天)成功率的研究.我们排除了耻骨上导管插入术的研究,术后/围手术期导尿和与创伤相关的尿潴留。我们搜索了以下数据库:MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane系统评价数据库,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,打开灰色和Clinicaltrials.gov.搜索于2022年11月30日结束。语言或发布日期没有限制。使用ROB2.0和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。我们进行了随机效应限制的最大似然模型荟萃分析。使用等级评估证据的确定性。
    我们纳入了61项研究。在两项随机对照试验(RCT)中,都有一些对偏见风险的担忧,包括总共174名参与者,相对成功率为1.22(95%CI0.84-1.76),有利于延迟TWOC。在两项比较队列研究中,两者都有严重的偏见风险,包括642名参与者,相对成功率为1.18(0.94-1.47),有利于延迟TWOC。一项研究由于质量极低而被排除在该荟萃分析之外。四项研究报告了即时TWOC队列的成功率,都有严重的偏见风险,包括409名参与者,总体成功率为47%(29-66)。52项研究报告了TWOC延迟队列的成功率,都有严重的偏见风险,包括12489名参与者,总体成功率为53%(49-56)。证据的确定性被认为是低的RCT和非常低的其余部分。
    有有限数量的适当设计的研究直接解决研究问题。证据都不赞成这两种方法。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84-1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94-1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29-66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49-56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest.
    UNASSIGNED: There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鞘内注射吗啡为一系列手术提供了有效的镇痛作用。然而,对潜在副作用的担忧阻碍了在临床实践中的广泛实施.我们进行了系统的审查,荟萃分析,和荟萃回归的主要目标是确定是否可以定义非肺部并发症的阈值剂量,以及在鞘内注射吗啡用于围手术期或产科镇痛时,剂量与并发症发生率之间是否可以建立关联。
    方法:我们系统地检索了文献,以比较鞘内注射吗啡与对照组在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下接受任何类型手术的患者的随机对照试验。或妇女在劳动。主要结果是术后恶心和呕吐的发生率,瘙痒,术后24小时内尿潴留,根据剂量分析(1-100μg;101-200μg;201-500μg;>500μg),手术类型,和麻醉策略。如果未指定剂量,则排除试验。
    结果:我们的分析包括168项试验,涉及9917名患者。术后恶心和呕吐的发生率,瘙痒,鞘内注射吗啡组尿潴留明显增加,比值比(95%置信区间)为1.52(1.29-1.79),P<0.0001;6.11(5.25-7.10),P<0.0001;和1.73(1.17-2.56),P分别=0.005。Meta回归无法确定剂量与非肺部并发症发生率之间的关联。根据手术结果,没有亚组差异。证据质量低(建议评估分级,发展,和评估[等级]系统)。
    结论:鞘内注射吗啡可显着增加术后恶心和呕吐,瘙痒,手术或分娩后的尿潴留与剂量无关。
    PROSPERO(CRD42023387838)。
    BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia.
    METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1-100 μg; 101-200 μg; 201-500 μg; >500 μg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified.
    RESULTS: Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29-1.79), P<0.0001; 6.11 (5.25-7.10), P<0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17-2.56), P=0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system).
    CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO (CRD42023387838).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴道手术后延长留置导尿管(UC)是一种常见的做法,旨在防止术后尿潴留并提高手术成功率。然而,这种方法也增加了尿路感染(UTI)的机会,延长住院时间(LOS),延迟恢复。平衡这些考虑,我们调查了UC清除时间的影响.我们使用四个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定所有涉及经阴道手术并在术后7天内切除UC的患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。这项系统评价是由两名审评员根据PRISMA指南独立进行的。这项研究调查了拔除导管的时间与尿潴留的发生率的关系,UTI,还有LOS.共有8项RCT研究,纳入了952例患者的荟萃分析.六项研究显示,早期拔管组(24h)和延迟拔管组(>48h,P=0.21),但在4项研究中显示UTI发生率显著降低(P<0.001)。在两项研究中,早期拔除(3h)和24h拔除的尿潴留率无显著差异(P=0.09),UTI率(P=0.57)。总的来说,5项研究显示,早期拔除导管可显着缩短LOS平均1-3天(P≤0.001)。早期去除UC可以大大降低UTI的发生率并缩短LOS。此外,它在提高患者护理质量和降低医疗成本方面具有潜在的益处.
    Prolonged retention of urinary catheters (UC) after vaginal surgery is a common practice aimed at preventing postoperative urinary retention and enhancing the success rate of surgery. However, this approach also increases the chance of urinary tract infection (UTI), prolongs hospital stay (LOS), and delays recovery. Balancing these considerations, we investigated the effect of the timing of UC removal. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using four databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who underwent transvaginal surgery and had UC removal within 7 days postsurgery. This systematic review was conducted by two reviewers independently following the PRISMA guideline. This study investigated the timing of catheter removal in relation to the incidence of urinary retention, UTI, and LOS. A total of 8 RCT studies, involving 952 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Six studies revealed no significant difference in the urinary retention rate between early catheter removal group (24 h) and delayed removal group (>48 h, P = 0.21), but exhibited a significantly reduced UTI rate (P < 0.001) in 4 studies. In 2 studies, no significant difference in urinary retention rate between the earlier removal (3 h) and removal at 24 h (P = 0.09), and also UTI rate (P = 0.57). Overall, 5 studies revealed that early catheter removal significantly shortened the LOS by an average of 1-3 days (P ≤ 0.001). Early removal of UC can considerably reduce the rate of UTI and shorten the LOS. Moreover, it has potential benefits in terms of improving the quality of patient care and reducing medical costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:电针是中药治疗尿潴留的非药物疗法之一。这项荟萃分析的目的是评估电针治疗中风后尿潴留的疗效。
    方法:总的来说,在2023年12月31日之前,我们检索了7个电子数据库,并对EA治疗卒中后尿潴留的随机对照试验进行了综述.两位审稿人独立筛选了文献,提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用RevMan5.4和Stata/MP17.0软件进行Meta分析。
    结果:本荟萃分析纳入了11项研究,共856名参与者。EA治疗改善了后空隙残留(PVR)(平均差[MD]:37.85,95%置信区间[CI]:55.09至-20.61p<0.0001)和尿布垫重量(MD:38.87,95%CI:42.68至-335.06)的减少。进一步分析表明,EA提高了有效性比率(风险比[RR]:1.36,95%CI:1.20至1.53,p<0.00001),膀胱功能(MD:0.45,95%CI:0.61至-0.30),与正常治疗和单纯针刺相比,生活质量(MD:1.15,95%:CI:2.10至-0.20)。
    结论:电针可能是卒中后尿潴留的多种预防和治疗的有效方法和合理方式。EA的广泛应用可能与卒中后尿潴留患者膀胱和生活质量的改善以及PVR的下降有关。
    OBJECTIVE: Electroacupuncture (EA) is one of the non-pharmacological therapies in traditional Chinese medicine to treat urinary retention. The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture in the treatment of urinary retention after stroke.
    METHODS: Overall, seven electronic databases were searched until December 31, 2023, and randomized control trials about EA for urinary retention after stroke were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias for included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.4 and Stata/MP 17.0 software.
    RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 856 participants were included in this meta-analysis. EA treatment yielded an improved reduction in the post-void residual (PVR) (mean difference [MD]: 37.85, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 55.09 to -20.61 p < 0.0001) and the weight of diaper pads (MD: 38.87, 95 % CI: 42.68 to -335.06). Further analysis indicated that EA improved the effectiveness ratio (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.20 to 1.53, p < 0.00001), the function of the bladder (MD: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.61 to -0.30), and the quality of life (MD: 1.15, 95 %: CI: 2.10 to -0.20) in comparison to normal treatment and simple acupuncture.
    CONCLUSIONS: EA may be an effective way and reasonable modality to incorporate into the multiple prevention and therapy for urinary retention after stroke. The wide application of EA could be associated with the improvement of bladder and life quality and decline in the PVR for patients after stroke with urinary retention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:产后尿潴留是妇女产后最常见的并发症之一。目的是系统评估阴道分娩后产后尿潴留的危险因素。
    方法:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,我们从PubMed检索了相关研究,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience核心合集,中国全民知识互联网,王方数据库,和中国生物医学数据库进行观察性研究,调查从开始到2022年11月11日产后尿潴留的危险因素。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的工具用于评估偏倚风险。我们使用RevMan5.3进行了荟萃分析。
    结果:总计,筛选了3074篇文章,并将27项研究的数据用于荟萃分析。确定了16个危险因素,即,劳动力增加(OR=1.72,95%CI=1.17-2.51),基本奇偶校验(OR=2.36,95%CI=1.64-3.38),手动底压(OR=2.84,95%CI=1.00-8.11),会阴血肿(OR=7.28,95%CI=1.62-32.72),外阴水肿(OR=7.99,95%CI=5.50-11.63),总产程(MD=90.10,95%CI=49.11-131.08),第一产程的持续时间(MD=33.97,95%CI=10.28-57.65),第二产程的持续时间(MD=14.92,95%CI=11.79-18.05),第二产程的持续时间>60分钟(OR=3.18,95%CI=1.32-7.67),会阴侧切(OR=3.65,95%CI=1.70-7.83),严重会阴撕裂(OR=3.21,95%CI=1.84-5.61),硬膜外镇痛(OR=3.23,95%CI=1.50-6.96),产钳分娩(OR=4.95,95%CI=2.88-8.51),真空输送(OR=2.44,95%CI=1.30-4.58),新生儿出生体重>4,000g(OR=3.61,95%CI=1.96-6.65),新生儿出生体重>3,500g(OR=1.89,95%CI=1.12-3.19)。
    结论:我们的结果表明,原语奇偶校验,手动眼底压力,会阴血肿,外阴水肿,劳动的总持续时间,第一个分娩阶段的持续时间,第二阶段的持续时间,第二产程的持续时间>60分钟,会阴侧切,严重的会阴撕裂,硬膜外镇痛,镊子递送,真空输送,新生儿出生体重>4,000g和>3,500g是阴道分娩妇女产后尿潴留的危险因素。需要澄清导致产后尿潴留的第一和第二阶段的具体范围。
    OBJECTIVE: Postpartum urinary retention is one of the most common complications in women during the immediate postpartum period. The objective was to systematically assess risk factors for postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery.
    METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, China National Knowledge Internet, Wangfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database for observational studies investigating the risk factors for postpartum urinary retention from inception to 11 November 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute\'s tool were used to assess the risk of bias. We conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3.
    RESULTS: In total, 3,074 articles were screened and data from 27 studies were used in the meta-analysis. Sixteen risk factors were identified, namely, labor augmentation (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.17-2.51), primiparity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.64-3.38), manual fundal pressure (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.00-8.11), perineal hematoma (OR = 7.28, 95% CI = 1.62-32.72), vulvar edema (OR = 7.99, 95% CI = 5.50-11.63), the total duration of labor (MD = 90.10, 95% CI = 49.11-131.08), the duration of the first stage of labor (MD = 33.97, 95% CI = 10.28-57.65), the duration of the second stage of labor (MD = 14.92, 95% CI = 11.79-18.05), the duration of the second stage of labor > 60 min (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.32-7.67), mediolateral episiotomy (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.70-7.83), severe perineal tear (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.84-5.61), epidural analgesia (OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.50-6.96), forceps delivery (OR = 4.95, 95% CI = 2.88-8.51), vacuum delivery (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.30-4.58), neonatal birth weight > 4,000 g (OR = 3.61, 95% CI = 1.96-6.65), and neonatal birth weight > 3,500 g (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.12-3.19).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that labor augmentation, primiparity, manual fundal pressure, perineal hematoma, vulvar edema, the total duration of labor, the duration of the first stage of labor, the duration of the second stage of labor, the duration of the second stage of labor > 60 min, mediolateral episiotomy, severe perineal tear, epidural analgesia, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, and neonatal birth weight > 4,000 g and > 3,500 g were risk factors for postpartum urinary retention in women with vaginal delivery. The specific ranges of the first and the second stages of labor causing postpartum urinary retention need to be clarified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宫颈癌是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。根治性子宫切除术是早期宫颈癌患者的首选。研究表明,针灸可能是预防和治疗根治性子宫切除术后尿潴留的更有效方法。
    系统评价针刺防治根治性子宫切除术后尿潴留的临床疗效。
    我们搜索了Cochrane库,WebofScience,PubMed,Embase,中国生物医学文献数据库,万方数据库,Wipu数据库,中国国家知识基础设施数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov以从成立时间至2023年12月为研究对象,收集针灸防治根治性子宫切除术后尿潴留临床疗效的随机对照研究。筛选符合标准的文献进行数据提取。根据《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》进行质量评价。采用RevMan5.3和stata14.0软件进行Meta分析。
    22项随机对照试验,纳入1,563名患者,治疗组854例,对照组709例,完全包括在内。Meta分析结果显示:针刺组总有效率高于对照组,具有统计学显著性差异[相对风险(RR)]=1.43,95%置信区间(CI1.22,1.68),p<0.0001;针刺组尿路感染发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义[RR]=0.23,95%CI(0.07,0.78),p<0.05;针刺组留置导尿管时间较对照组减少,具有统计学显著的平均差异=-3.45,95%CI(-4.30,-2.59),p<0.00001;针刺组尿潴留发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义[RR=0.37,95%CI(0.27,0.50),p<0.00001];针刺组残余尿量较对照组减少,具有统计学显著的平均差异=-50.73,95%CI(-63.61,-7.85),p<0.00001。
    在常规治疗的基础上进行针刺治疗,可以更好地预防和改善宫颈癌根治术后尿潴留,对他们来说可能是更好的选择。
    由PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023452387。
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Radical hysterectomy is the first choice for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Studies have suggested that acupuncture may be a more effective therapy for the prevention and treatment of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in the prevention and treatment of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the Cochrane library, Web of science, PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang database, Wipu database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database and ClinicalTrials.gov with the time from inception until December 2023, to collect randomized controlled studies on the clinical efficacy of acupuncture for prevention and treatment of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. Literature meeting criteria was screened for data extraction. Quality evaluation was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. And meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 and stata14.0 software.
    UNASSIGNED: 22 Randomized controlled trials with 1,563 patients, 854 in treatment group and 709 in control group, were included totally. Meta-analysis results showed that: the total effective rate in acupuncture group was higher than that in control group, with a statistically significant difference [relative risk (RR)] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI 1.22, 1.68), p < 0.0001; the rate of urinary tract infection in acupuncture group was lower than that in control group, with a statistically significant difference [RR] = 0.23, 95% CI (0.07, 0.78), p < 0.05; the time of indwelling urinary catheter was reduced in acupuncture group compared with control group, with a statistically significant mean difference = -3.45, 95% CI (-4.30, -2.59), p < 0.00001; the incidence of urinary retention was lower in acupuncture group than in control group, and the difference was statistically significant [RR = 0.37, 95% CI (0.27, 0.50), p < 0.00001]; the residual urine volume was reduced in acupuncture group compared with control group, with a statistically significant mean difference = -50.73, 95% CI (-63.61, -7.85), p < 0.00001.
    UNASSIGNED: Acupuncture treatment based on conventional therapy can better prevent and improve urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, could be a better option for them.
    UNASSIGNED: Registered by PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42023452387.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:导尿是产后尿潴留(PUR)的常用治疗方法;其在PUR诊断前的应用尚不清楚。目的是概述有关产时或产后导尿预防PUR的有效性和安全性的现有文献。
    方法:本范围审查遵循一个方法论框架。PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Embase,WebofScience,中国国家知识基础设施,万方,中国科技期刊数据库,从每个数据库开始到2023年5月21日,检索了中国生物医学文献数据库。
    结果:搜索显示16项研究检查了三种不同的导管插入方法,包括12项产时研究。十项研究得出结论,产时或产后导管插入术可预防PUR,其中两个仅用于公开或秘密PUR。13项实验研究中有4项,没有发现显着差异:一个用于产时导管插入术与常规护理,另一种用于产时或产后间歇性与留置导尿。然而,一项研究发现,与留置导尿相比,无效针对性护理后的产后一次性导尿降低了PUR的发生率.3项病例对照研究中的一项得出结论,产前导管插入≥2次是PUR的危险因素。
    结论:根据本范围审查的结果,在诊断PUR之前进行导管检查似乎在预防PUR中起作用并且是安全的.初步证据表明,三种导管插入方法在预防PUR方面的有效性正在积累,但是需要更全面的研究来确定这些发现。
    OBJECTIVE: Catheterization is a common treatment for postpartum urinary retention (PUR); however, its application before diagnosis of PUR remains unclear. The aim was to give an overview of the existing literature on the effectiveness and safety of intrapartum or postpartum catheterization in the prevention of PUR.
    METHODS: This scoping review followed a methodological framework. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database were searched from the inception of each database to 21 May 2023.
    RESULTS: The search revealed 16 studies examining three different catheterization methodologies, including 12 intrapartum studies. Ten studies concluded that intrapartum or postpartum catheterization prevented PUR, two of which were only for overt or covert PUR. In 4 out of 13 experimental studies, no significant difference was found: one for intrapartum catheterization versus routine nursing, the other for intrapartum or postpartum intermittent versus indwelling catheterization. However, one found that postpartum disposable catheterization after ineffective targeted care reduced the incidence of PUR compared with indwelling catheterization. One out of the 3 case-control studies concluded that prenatal catheterization ≥2 times was a risk factor for PUR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings in this scoping review, catheterization prior to the diagnosis of PUR appears to play a role in preventing PUR and is safe. Preliminary evidence is accumulating on the effectiveness of three types of catheterization methods in preventing PUR, but more comprehensive studies are needed to establish these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电针(EA)被认为是尿潴留(UR)的有效治疗方法。
    方法:截至2023年4月7日,在8个数据库中广泛搜索了EA用于UR的随机对照试验(RCT),包括Pubmed,科克伦,Embase,WebofScience,中国生物医学文献数据库,中国期刊全文数据库,万方数据,和VIP全文电子期刊数据库。偏差工具的Cochrane风险和建议的分级,评估,发展,和评估(GRADE)用于评估所有纳入的随机对照试验的质量。采用Stata15.0软件进行Meta分析。
    结果:共纳入23项试验,荟萃分析结果表明,与对照组相比,EA可有效治疗各种类型的UR(风险比[RR]=1.22,95CI%:1.14,1.31)并促进膀胱功能恢复,残余尿量显着减少(加权平均差[WMD]=-49.60,95CI%:-64.10,-35.11),最大膀胱容量增加(WMD=47.00,95CI%:12.76,81.24),首次排尿时间缩短(标准化平均差[SMD]=-1.42,95CI%:-2.08,-0.76),不良反应较少(RR=0.21,95CI%:0.07,0.65)。
    结论:EA在治疗UR方面具有显着的优势,但疗效和安全性仍需通过大样本和高质量的随机对照试验进一步验证.
    BACKGROUND: Electroacupuncture (EA) is considered as an effective treatment for urinary retention (UR).
    METHODS: Up to April 7, 2023, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EA for UR were extensively searched in 8 databases, including Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data, and VIP Full-text e-Journals Database. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) were utilized to evaluate the quality of all included RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 software.
    RESULTS: A total of 23 trials were included, and the meta-analysis results suggested that compared with the control group, EA can effectively treat various types of UR (risk ratio [RR] = 1.22, 95CI%: 1.14, 1.31) and promote bladder function recovery, with a significant reduce in residual urine volume (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -49.60, 95CI%: -64.10, -35.11), an increase in maximum bladder capacity (WMD = 47.00, 95CI%: 12.76, 81.24), a shorten in the first urination time (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.42, 95CI%: -2.08, -0.76), and less adverse reactions (RR = 0.21, 95CI%: 0.07, 0.65).
    CONCLUSIONS: EA has significant advantages in treating UR, but the efficacy and safety are still needed to be further verified through large-sample and high-quality RCTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经会阴前列腺活检(TPB)是诊断前列腺癌的常用技术,因为人们越来越关注与经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检(TRUSB)相关的感染性并发症。TPB与接近零的感染性并发症发生率相关,然而,急性尿潴留(AUR)仍然是导致发病率的主要并发症。以前在TRUSB中,有微弱的证据表明α-受体阻滞剂会降低AUR率,它们的用法已被外推到TPB的临床实践中。这篇综述旨在探讨是否有使用α-受体阻滞剂预防TPB后AUR的证据基础。
    方法:使用与\"经会阴\"和\"保留\"相关的关键字,使用系统方法搜索OvidMedline和Embase。然后通过应用纳入和排除标准筛选文章,以寻找比较围手术期α受体阻滞剂接受者与不使用α受体阻滞剂以及随后对TPB中AUR的影响的研究。
    结果:在初步搜索中确定了361条记录,最终纳入了5项研究。没有发现随机对照试验(RCTs)。一项观察性研究显示,单剂量坦索罗辛的AUR率从12.5%降低至5.3%。先前对前列腺活检相关并发症的系统评价得出结论,在TPB围手术期给予α受体阻滞剂可能有潜在益处。三项观察性研究表明,使用α-受体阻滞剂会产生有害影响;然而,它们的明显局限性很好地解释了这一点。
    结论:根据这篇综述和TRUSB数据的推断,围手术期α受体阻滞剂在预防TPB后的AUR方面可能提供一些微弱的益处.然而,鉴于文献中存在显著差距,并且在TPB中缺乏标准α受体阻滞剂方案,因此RCT的研究范围和需要进一步发展证据基础.
    BACKGROUND: Transperineal Prostate Biopsy (TPB) is a commonly used technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer due to growing concerns related to infectious complications associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). TPB is associated with an infective complication rate of near zero, however, acute urinary retention (AUR) remains the leading complication causing morbidity. Previously in TRUSB, there was weak evidence that alpha-blockers reduce AUR rates, and their usage has been extrapolated to clinical practice with TPB. This review aims to explore if there is an evidence base for using alpha-blockers to prevent AUR following TPB.
    METHODS: A systematic approach was used to search Ovid Medline and Embase using keywords related to \"Transperineal\" and \"Retention\". Articles were then screened by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to find studies that compared alpha-blocker recipients to no alpha-blocker use in the perioperative period and the subsequent effect on AUR in TPB.
    RESULTS: 361 records were identified in the initial search to produce 5 studies included in the final review. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. One observational study showed a reduction in AUR rate from 12.5% to 5.3% with a single dose of tamsulosin. A previous systematic review of complications associated with prostate biopsy concluded there may be a potential benefit to alpha-blockers given in the TPB perioperative period. Three observational studies demonstrated a harmful effect related to alpha-blocker use; however, this was well explained by their clear limitations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review and the extrapolation from TRUSB data, perioperative alpha-blockers may offer some weak benefits in preventing AUR following TPB. However, there is significant scope and need for an RCT to further develop the evidence base further given the significant gap in the literature and lack of a standard alpha blocker protocol in TPB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术后尿潴留(POUR)被定义为在手术后膀胱充满的情况下无法排尿。并发症包括谵妄,疼痛,住院时间延长,和长期改变的膀胱收缩力。合并症,手术类型和麻醉影响POUR的发展。发病率在5%到70%之间变化。病史和临床检查,膀胱导管插入和超声检查是诊断POUR的三种方法.POUR的预防目前涉及识别具有术前危险因素的患者,然后在可能的情况下对其进行修改。膀胱导管插入术是POUR的标准治疗方法,然而,需要进一步的研究来确定需要膀胱导管的患者,膀胱容积阈值和导管插入时间。
    Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is defined as the inability to void in the presence of a full bladder after surgery. Complications include delirium, pain, prolonged hospitalization, and long-term altered bladder contractility. Comorbidities, type of surgery and anesthesia influence the development of POUR. The incidence varies between 5% and 70%. History and clinical examination, the need for bladder catheterization and ultrasonographic evaluation are three methods used to diagnose POUR. The prevention of POUR currently involves identifying patients with pre-operative risk factors and then modifying them where possible. Bladder catheterization is the standard treatment of POUR, however, further studies are necessary to establish patients who need a bladder catheter, bladder volume thresholds and duration of catheterization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号