The inductive effect of hyalinisation and its influence on the biologic behaviour of ameloblastoma variants represent a scarcely researched domain of oral pathology. The complexity of the induction effects within the odontogenic apparatus, with the involvement of both ectodermal and mesodermal tissues, is responsible for diverse histopathological characteristics, hyalinisation being the major feature. The present study aims to deduce for the first time the correlation between the severity of hyalinisation (SOH) and recurrence in three unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) variants, namely, intra-luminal (UA-IL), luminal (UA-L) and mural (UA-M). Retrospectively diagnosed archival cases of UA-IL (n = 08), UA-L (n = 22) and UA-M (n = 30) were assessed for SOH and its correlation with recurrence. A subgroup comparison (between UA-IL/UA-L and UA-M) was also performed. The clinical parameters of the patients were also analysed from files for clinicopathological correlation with recurrence. Results: sub-epithelial hyalinisation (SEH) significantly correlated with the recurrence of UA-L and UA-M (p = 0.001). When the histologic types (UA-L and UA-IL vs. UA-M) were grouped and the correlation of SOH with recurrence was checked, it was observed that both groups (p = 0.001) showed strong statistical correlation. UA-M lesions with multilocular radiolucency (p = 0.001) also showed significant correlation with recurrence. SOH can be a reliable histological predictor of recurrence and of aggressive biologic behaviour in UA. The present study shows a significant association of hyalinisation with the biologic behaviour of UA. Further studies with immunohistochemical investigations could validate the presence of hyalinisation and identify the origin of the hyalinised product in UAs.

Unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) is an uncommon variant of ameloblastoma and behaves totally different from the solid multicystic variant of ameloblastoma (SMA); furthermore the histological subgroups of UA also show varied behavior regarding proliferation. The present multi-centric study was designed to present the clinicopathological features of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) and to compare the two popular histological classifications systems. 80 satisfactory cases of UA were retrieved and evaluated for clinicopathological parameters from four teaching dental schools of North India. The cases were classified using modified Reichart and Philipsen system and Marx and Stern system followed by comparison of inter-observer variability. The results were analyzed using SPSS software. The mean age of occurrence was 30.79 ± 16.49 years. Males outnumbered females (M:F::1.67:1). The majority of cases occurred in the third decade irrespective of the gender. Most cases were found in body-angle-ramus region of the mandible. The modified Reichart and Philipsen classification yielded better interobserver agreement (kappa value 0.845). The modified Reichart and Philipsen classification yields better inter-rater agreement and is easy to reproduce amongst oral pathologists. Being simpler it may easily be understood by the operating surgeon for better treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The study intends to evaluate the clinical outcome of treating young patients of unicystic ameloblastoma, by various conservative treatment modalities such as marsupialization, enucleation with bone curettage and aid in establishing sound treatment guidelines.
METHODS: A case series of fifteen patients is presented of unicystic ameloblastoma, who presented to our Department over the past 6 years (2010-2015) and conservative method of treatment elected in all the patients. Also, a methodical literature review of studies discussing treatment of unicystic ameloblastoma in young age group (<20 years) patients over the last 15 years from 2001 to 2015 is added.
RESULTS: Faster osseous regeneration after conservative treatment was noted, owing to the young age and growth potential. Over a mean follow-up of 4 years, uneventful secondary healing, no clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence and no apparent deformity were noted in any of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Unicystic ameloblastoma is a benign, locally invasive odontogenic neoplasm of young age which can develop during the stage of tooth formation and hence its early inception and vast proliferation is not uncommon in this age group, due to which it can grow into a huge lesion causing significant morbidity. Conservative surgical management may be a viable option to reduce morbidity and increase the probability of uneventful secondary healing and bone regeneration in the younger population.

OBJECTIVE: Ameloblastoma is a locally aggressive benign tumor, commonly occurring in the mandible. While giant ameloblastoma of multicystic or plexiform variant have been reported, the authors report a rare case of giant unicystic ameloblastoma of luminal variant, which was treated by compartmental resection and planned for delayed reconstruction.
METHODS: A 46 year old male patient reported to the oral surgery out-patient department with a swelling of the left side mandible region of 2 years duration. He had undergone ayurvedic treatment for the same with no improvement. The size of the lesion on presenting was approximately 9 × 12 cm.
METHODS: Compartmental resection with plan for secondary reconstruction, after adequate follow up period.
CONCLUSIONS: While conservative management is being explored as a treatment option for unicystic ameloblastoma, resection is still the standard of care regardless of the histopathological subtype for giant lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to elicit the amount of safety margin necessary around the ameloblastic lesion in view of preventing further recurrence.
METHODS: The study consisted of 25 cases of mandibular ameloblastoma. Diagnosis was based on clinical and radiological analysis and confirmed by histopathological report. An incisional biopsy was done preoperatively to confirm the diagnosis. Segmental resection was planned for all the cases. After the resection, postoperative panoramic radiograph of the specimen was taken followed by histopathological examination of its margin to detect tumor cell infiltration.
CONCLUSIONS: In all our cases, the ameloblastoma was infiltrating in nature. A follow-up period of 10 years showed neither recurrence nor implant failure. In our study, we conclude our safe margin for infiltrating variant of ameloblastoma based on histopathological report of the resected specimen.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cases of ameloblastoma retrospectively for various parameters.
METHODS: Ninety-one previously reported cases of ameloblastoma from Government Dental College and Hospitals, Nagpur, were included in this study. Data were collected considering parameters such as age, sex, symptoms, radiographic, histopathology, treatment modalities, and recurrence. Our findings were also compared with world literature.
RESULTS: The average age was 32.5 years. Mostly men complained of an asymptomatic swelling and duration of less than one year. Posterior segment and vertical ramus of mandible was the frequently involved site. Radiographically, multilocular appearance was noted more than 60% of the cases. Plexiform and unicystic ameloblastoma occurred frequently. Surgery was the treatment of choice in this review. Recurrence was noted in more than 10% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: There are variations in our review in comparison to reported literature.