It is generally recognized that dysregulation of the immune system plays a critical role in many diseases, including autoimmune diseases and cancer. T cells play a crucial role in maintaining self-tolerance, while loss of immune tolerance and T cell activation can lead to severe inflammation and tissue damage. T cell responses have a key role in the effectiveness of vaccination strategies and immunomodulating therapies. Immunomonitoring methods have the ability to elucidate immunological processes, monitor the development of disease and assess therapeutic effects. In this respect, it is of particular interest to evaluate antigen (Ag)-specific T cells by determining their frequency, type and functionality in cellular assays. Nevertheless, Ag-specific T cells are detected infrequently in most diseases using current techniques. Many efforts have been made to develop more sensitive, reproducible, and reliable methods for Ag-specific T cell detection. It has been found that analysis of cellular proliferation can be a useful tool to determine the presence and frequency of Ag-specific T cell and to provides insight into modulation of the T cell response by a specific antigen or therapy. However, the selection of a cut-off value for a positive response and therefore a more accurate interpretation of the data, continues to be a major concern. Here, we provide guidelines to select a proper cut-off for monitoring of Ag-specific CD4+ T cell responses. In vitro Ag-stimulation has been assessed with two methods; a dye-based proliferation assay and 3H-thymidine-based assay. Two cut-off approaches are compared; mean and variance of control wells, and the stimulation index. By evaluating the proliferative response to the in vitro Ag-stimulation using these two methods, we demonstrate the importance of taking into consideration the variability of the control wells to distinguish a positive from a false positive response.

暂无摘要。

In 2008, the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlands Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen) published the Dutch national guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. New insights into the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with relevance for clinical practice have been adopted in these concise, revised guidelines. The most important changes include the choice of initial antiviral therapy, licensing of tenofovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and the management of antiviral resistance.

暂无摘要。

The new German and American guidelines on hepatitis B show similarities but also some discrepancies. In general, indication for therapy depends more on hepatitis B virus-(HBV-)DNA than alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values. Antivirals are recommended by German guidelines when HBV-DNA exceeds 10,000 copies/ml and ALT is increased more than twice the upper normal limit or when liver biopsy shows significant inflammation and fibrosis. By contrast, American guidelines recommend therapy only when HBV-DNA exceeds 100,000 copies/ml. American guidelines do not recommend lamivudine or telbivudine as initial monotherapy because of risk for resistance, but adefovir or entecavir. By contrast, according to German guidelines monotherapy with lamivudine, telbivudine, adefovir or entecavir may be initiated, if HBV-DNA is < 1 million copies/ml and cirrhosis is absent. Both guidelines recommend to monitor HBV-DNA even in the absence of therapy. Under antiviral therapy HBV-DNA should be measured more often than previously recommended to early identify lack of response and upcoming resistance. When resistance occurs, combination therapy is indicated. Risk for resistance is low as long as viral suppression is effective. In both guidelines liver biopsy should be considered when there are doubts on indication of therapy or selection of antiviral substances. In the presence of severe fibrosis and high HBV-DNA, antiviral substances should have high potency and low risk for resistance.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Cry-consensus peptide is a linearly linked peptide of T-cell epitopes for the management of Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis and is expected to become a new drug for immunotherapy. However, the mechanism of T-cell epitopes in allergic diseases is not well understood, and thus, a simple in vitro procedure for evaluation of its biological activity is desired.
METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 27 JC pollinosis patients and 10 healthy subjects, and cultured in vitro for 4 days in the presence of Cry-consensus peptide and (3)H-thymidine. The relationship between growth stimulation (stimulation index; SI) and antigen-specific IgE levels in serum was also investigated in JC pollinosis patients. Moreover, to confirm the importance of the primary sequence in Cry-consensus peptide, heat-treated Cry-consensus peptide and a mixture of the amino acids of which Cry-consensus peptide is composed, and their (3)H-thymidine uptake was compared with Cry-consensus peptide. Finally, whether Cry-consensus peptide stimulates PBMCs from healthy subjects was investigated.
RESULTS: The mean SI of JC patients showed a good correlation with Cry-consensus peptide concentration in the culture medium; however, the SI was independent of the anti-Cry j 1 IgE level. Heat-denatured Cry-consensus peptide retained a PBMC proliferation stimulatory effect comparable to the original Cry-consensus peptide, while the mixture of amino acids constituting Cry-consensus peptide did not stimulate PBMC proliferation. PBMCs from healthy subjects did not respond to Cry-consensus peptide at all.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the PBMC response of patients suffering from JC pollinosis to Cry-consensus peptide is specific for the sequence of T cell epitopes thereof and may be useful for the evaluation of the efficacy of Cry-consensus peptide in vivo.

In gene mutation tests a decision concerning mutations is made on the basis of hereditary functional changes. In terms of the large amount of data available, the most suitable tests for routine testing in mammalian cells in culture are the tests for acquisition of 6-thioguanine resistance in Chinese hamster cells (V79 and CHO) and for acquisition of alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluorothymidine resistance in the mouse lymphoma line L5178Y TK+/- 3.7.2C. The molecular bases, peculiarities, advantages and disadvantages of these systems will be presented. Which system is to be preferred in any particular case depends among other things on the purpose of the study and the extent to which a technically competent performance of these comparatively exacting tests can be guaranteed.

The following guidelines were adopted by an Ad Hoc Committee convened at the Fourth International Workshop on the Fragile X Syndrome and X-Linked Mental Retardation to establish minimum cytogenetic standards for the preparation and analysis of the fragile X chromosome. The intention of the committee was to develop and provide practical standards for the routine cytogenetic detection of the fragile X. The guidelines describe reasonable criteria for effective tissue culture methods for eliciting the Xq27.3 fragile site in vitro and for the analysis of such chromosome preparations.

Several organizations have proposed guidelines for fra(X) studies on peripheral blood lymphocytes. To evaluate these guidelines, we reviewed 1,033 consecutive specimens referred for fra(X) analysis. Each specimen was cultured with medium 199 and RPMI 1640 with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine or excess thymidine. The karyotype and expression of fra(X) were established from 20 GTL- or QFQ-banded cells and by screening of up to 130 more banded cells. We found anomalies other than fra(X) in 37 (3.6%) of the patients. We found 4% or more fra(X) cells in 38 (3.7%) cases from 36 unrelated families, including 33 (3.9%) of 850 males and 5 (2.7%) of 183 females. Another 4 females had 1 to 3% fra(X) cells. Six specimens were fra(X)-positive in only one stress system, and 32 were positive in 2 systems. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in males, we needed to study up to 36 cells in 31 cases, 50 in one case, and 57 in another. To find the first 2 fra(X) cells in females, we needed to study up to 17 cells in 4 cases and 57 in another. A strong family history of fra(X) occurred in 5 patients, and each one was fra(X)-positive. Some manifestations of the fragile X syndrome occurred in 507 cases, 17 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Abnormalities considered unlikely to be the fragile X syndrome occurred in 103 cases, 3 (3%) of which were fra(X)-positive. Use of chromosome breakage and fra(3)(p14) as quality control indicators of the fra(X) stress systems was found to be unreliable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)