暂无摘要。

Biological sex is a primary determinant of athletic performance because of fundamental sex differences in anatomy and physiology dictated by sex chromosomes and sex hormones. Adult men are typically stronger, more powerful, and faster than women of similar age and training status. Thus, for athletic events and sports relying on endurance, muscle strength, speed, and power, males typically outperform females by 10%-30% depending on the requirements of the event. These sex differences in performance emerge with the onset of puberty and coincide with the increase in endogenous sex steroid hormones, in particular testosterone in males, which increases 30-fold by adulthood, but remains low in females. The primary goal of this consensus statement is to provide the latest scientific knowledge and mechanisms for the sex differences in athletic performance. This review highlights the differences in anatomy and physiology between males and females that are primary determinants of the sex differences in athletic performance and in response to exercise training, and the role of sex steroid hormones (particularly testosterone and estradiol). We also identify historical and nonphysiological factors that influence the sex differences in performance. Finally, we identify gaps in the knowledge of sex differences in athletic performance and the underlying mechanisms, providing substantial opportunities for high-impact studies. A major step toward closing the knowledge gap is to include more and equitable numbers of women to that of men in mechanistic studies that determine any of the sex differences in response to an acute bout of exercise, exercise training, and athletic performance.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is the most frequent treatment offered to gender-incongruent individuals, which reduces dysphoria. The goal of therapy among gender-incongruent individuals seeking gender affirmation as male is to change their secondary sex characteristics to affect masculine physical appearances. GAHT greatly improves mental health and quality of life among gender incongruent individuals. India-specific guideline for appropriate care for gender-incongruent individuals is almost absent. This document is intended to assist endocrinologists and other healthcare professionals interested in gender incongruity for individuals seeking gender affirmation as male. A safe and effective GAHT regimen aims to effect masculinising physical features without adverse effects. In this document, we offer suggestions based on an in-depth review of national and international guidelines, recently available evidence and collegial meetings with expert Indian clinicians working in this field. Clinicians represented in our expert panel have developed expertise due to the volume of gender incongruent individuals they manage. This consensus statement provides protocols for the hormone prescribing physicians relating to diagnosis, baseline evaluation and counselling, prescription planning for masculinising hormone therapy, choice of therapy, targets for monitoring masculinising hormone therapy, clinical and biochemical monitoring, recommending sex affirmation surgery and peri-operative hormone therapy. The recommendations made in this document are not rigid guidelines, and the hormone-prescribing physicians are encouraged to modify the suggested protocol to address emerging issues.

The American Urological Association and Endocrine Society published guidelines for the management of testosterone deficiency in 2018. Testosterone prescription patterns have varied widely recently, owing to increased public interest and emerging data on the safety of testosterone therapy. The effect of guideline publication on testosterone prescribing is unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess testosterone prescription trends using Medicare prescriber data. Specialties with over 100 testosterone prescribers from 2016-2019 were analyzed. Nine specialties were included (in order of descending prescription frequency): family practice, internal medicine, urology, endocrinology, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, general practice, infectious disease, and emergency medicine. The number of prescribers grew by a mean of 8.8% annually. There was a significant increase in average claims per provider from 2016 to 2019 (26.4 to 28.7, p < 0.0001), with the steepest increase occurring between 2017 and 2018 when the guidelines were released (27.2 to 28.1, p = 0.015). The largest increase in claims per provider was among urologists. Advanced practice providers comprised 7.5% of Medicare testosterone claims in 2016 and 11.6% in 2019. While no causation can be established, these results suggest that professional society guidelines are associated with increasing numbers of testosterone claims per provider, especially among urologists. The changing demographics of prescribers justifies targeted education and further research.

OBJECTIVE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most prevalent male sexual dysfunctions. ED has been in the past mistakenly considered a purely psycho-sexological symptom by patients and doctors. However, an ever-growing body of evidence supporting the role of several organic factors in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ED has been recognized.
METHODS: The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) commissioned an expert task force involving several other National Societies to provide an updated guideline on the diagnosis and management of ED. Derived recommendations were based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
RESULTS: Several evidence-based statements were released providing the necessary up-to-date guidance in the context of ED with organic and psychosexual comorbidities. Many of them were related to incorrect lifestyle habits suggesting how to associate pharmacotherapies and counseling, in a couple-centered approach. Having the oral therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as the gold standard along with several other medical and surgical therapies, new therapeutic or controversial options were also discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: These are the first guidelines based on a multidisciplinary approach that involves the most important Societies related to the field of sexual medicine. This fruitful discussion allowed for a general agreement on several recommendations and suggestions to be reached, which can support all stakeholders in improving couple sexual satisfaction and overall general health.

This cross-sectional study examines whether direct-to-consumer platforms provide guideline-concordant care regarding testosterone therapy.

These clinical practice recommendations by the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) and the Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine (AChSHM) for the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) provide evidence-based clinical guidelines on the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) in Australia.
A comprehensive clinical history and a tailored physical examination are essential (Level of evidence [LoE] 3; GRADE B). Laboratory testing should include fasting glucose, lipid profile and total testosterone level (LoE 3; GRADE A). Specialised diagnostic tests are recommended in selected cases and the patient should be counselled accordingly (LoE 4; GRADE B). Lifestyle changes and optimisation of existing medical conditions should accompany all ED treatment regimens (LoE 1; GRADE A). Oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) is an effective first line medical therapy (LoE 1; GRADE A). Intracavernosal injections and vacuum erection devices are recommended as second line therapy (LoE 1; GRADE B). A penile prosthesis implant can be considered in men who are medically refractory or unable to tolerate the side effects of medical therapy (LoE 4; GRADE B). Pro-erectile regenerative therapy remains largely experimental (LoE 3; GRADE B).
Modification of lifestyle behaviour, management of reversible risk factors and optimisation of existing medical conditions remain pivotal, and existing standard ED therapies are often effective and safe following cardiovascular risk stratification. Caution should be exercised on the use of regenerative technology in ED due to unknown long term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To provide the evidence-based recommendations on the role of testosterone (T) on age-related symptoms and signs remains.
METHODS: The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) commissioned an expert task force to provide an updated guideline on adult-onset male hypogonadism. Derived recommendations were based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
RESULTS: Clinical diagnosis of adult-onset hypogonadism should be based on a combination of clinical and biochemical parameters. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) should be offered to all symptomatic subjects with hypogonadism after the exclusion of possible contraindications. T gels and the long-acting injectable T are currently available preparations showing the best efficacy/safety profile. TRT can improve all aspects of sexual function, although its effect is limited in more complicated patients. Body composition (reducing fat mass and increasing lean mass) is improved after TRT, either in subjects with or without metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes. Conversely, the role of TRT in improving glycometabolic control is more conflicting. TRT can result in increasing bone mineral density, particularly at lumbar site, but no information on fracture risk is available. Limited data support the use of TRT for improving other outcomes, including mood frailty and mobility.
CONCLUSIONS: TRT can improve sexual function and body composition particularly in less complicated adult and in aging subjects with hypogonadism. When hypogonadism is adequately diagnosed, T appropriately prescribed and subjects correctly followed up, no short-term increased risk of adverse events is observed. Longer and larger studies are advisable to better clarify TRT long-term efficacy/safety profile.

An Endo-European Reference Network guideline initiative was launched including 16 clinicians experienced in endocrinology, pediatric and adult and 2 patient representatives. The guideline was endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, the European Society for Endocrinology and the European Academy of Andrology. The aim was to create practice guidelines for clinical assessment and puberty induction in individuals with congenital pituitary or gonadal hormone deficiency. A systematic literature search was conducted, and the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. If the evidence was insufficient or lacking, then the conclusions were based on expert opinion. The guideline includes recommendations for puberty induction with oestrogen or testosterone. Publications on the induction of puberty with follicle-stimulation hormone and human chorionic gonadotrophin in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism are reviewed. Specific issues in individuals with Klinefelter syndrome or androgen insensitivity syndrome are considered. The expert panel recommends that pubertal induction or sex hormone replacement to sustain puberty should be cared for by a multidisciplinary team. Children with a known condition should be followed from the age of 8 years for girls and 9 years for boys. Puberty induction should be individualised but considered at 11 years in girls and 12 years in boys. Psychological aspects of puberty and fertility issues are especially important to address in individuals with sex development disorders or congenital pituitary deficiencies. The transition of these young adults highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, to discuss both medical issues and social and psychological issues that arise in the context of these chronic conditions.

Biopotent androgens such as testosterone circulate in low levels in women. However, androgen precursors, such as dehyroepiandrosterone, are among the most abundant hormones produced in both men and women. While testosterone exerts obvious phenotypic effects in men and is essential for male sexual function, considerable debate and controversy abounds over the role of androgens in women and whether androgens exert an analogous role in women as they do in men. This piece reviews androgen economy in women and the clinical case for and against androgen treatment for women for specific indications.