背景:抗癌剂是癌症患者中大多数药物不良反应(ADR)的原因。由于缺乏对印度药物警戒计划的认识和了解,在印度,抗肿瘤药物的ADR报告非常罕见。因此,本研究旨在评估癌症患者使用抗癌药的ADR模式,并提高医疗保健专业人员对ADR监测的认识.
方法:这是一个观察性的,在政府ADR监测中心(AMC)进行的回顾性和非干预性研究。GuruGobindSingh医学院和医院,Faridkot,旁遮普,北印度。分析了2016年1月至2022年12月7年间自愿报告的抗癌药作为可疑药物的ADR形式。分析了各种参数,其中包括患者的人口统计细节,ADR的类型,报告药品不良反应和可疑药物的部门。因果关系评估,根据世界卫生组织乌普萨拉监测中心(WHO-UMC)量表进行严重程度评估和可预防性评估,改良的Hartwig和Siegel量表以及改良的Schumock和Thornton量表,分别。
结果:在41-60岁年龄组(68.29%)和女性(59.75%)中报告了ADR的最大数量。使用紫杉烷类药物(多西他赛和紫杉醇)报告的最大不良反应数(24.39%),靶向药物(吉非替尼,伊马替尼,硼替佐米,贝伐单抗,利妥昔单抗和帕唑帕尼)(24.39%)和铂配合物(顺铂,奥沙利铂和卡铂)(17.07%)。报告的大部分不良反应是发抖和皮肤上的不良反应。大多数ADR是可能的(64.70%),性质温和(85.29%),绝对可以预防(45.58%),也可能可以预防(45.58%)。
结论:需要进行ADR监测以提高癌症患者的抗癌药物治疗效果。通过及时管理这些不良反应,可以提高癌症患者的治疗质量。当今时代需要向医疗保健专业人员通报药物警戒计划,以增加因抗癌药物引起的不良反应的报告。
BACKGROUND: Anticancer agents are responsible for a majority of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in cancer patients. ADR reporting with anticancer drugs is very rare in India due to the lack of awareness and knowledge about the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. Hence, this
study was done to assess the pattern of ADRs with anticancer agents in cancer patients and to increase awareness about ADR monitoring among healthcare professionals.
METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective and non-interventional
study conducted in an ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in Govt. Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, North India. Voluntarily reported ADR forms with anticancer drugs as suspected drugs over a period of seven years from January 2016 to December 2022 were analyzed. Various parameters were analyzed, which include demographic details of the patients, type of ADR, department reporting ADR and suspected drug. Causality assessment, severity assessment and preventability assessment were done according to the World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, modified Hartwig and Siegel scale and modified Schumock and Thornton scale, respectively.
RESULTS: The maximum numbers of ADRs were reported in the age group of 41-60 years (68.29%) and in females (59.75%). The maximum number of ADRs was reported with the use of
taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) (24.39%), targeted drugs (geftinib, imatinib, bortezomib, bevacizumab, rituximab and pazopanib) (24.39%) and platinum co-ordination complexes (cisplatin, oxaliplatin and carboplatin) (17.07%). Majority of the ADRs reported were shivering and ADRs on the skin. Majority of the ADRs were probable (64.70%), mild in nature (85.29%), definitely preventable (45.58%) and probably preventable (45.58%).
CONCLUSIONS: ADR monitoring is needed to increase the outcome of anticancer drug treatment in cancer patients. The quality of treatment in cancer patients can be improved through the timely management of these ADRs. It is a need of the present era to inform healthcare professionals about the Pharmacovigilance Programme to increase the reporting of ADRs due to anticancer drugs.