supraclavicular brachial plexus block

锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在各种组合中适当使用局部麻醉药物的混合物用于神经阻滞方面没有共识。我们打算比较短效利多卡因和长效罗哌卡因的混合物与未稀释的序贯注射,以观察超声引导(USG)锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在上肢手术中的阻滞特征。
    对64名进行上肢手术的成年患者进行了一项双盲随机研究,这些患者分别接受了15mL2%利多卡因与肾上腺素和0.75%罗哌卡因作为1:1的混合物在混合组(M组)中使用USG技术或在顺序组(S组)中连续注射。主要结果是在阻滞注射后10分钟内完成四次神经感觉阻滞的参与者的百分比。次要结果是直到30分钟的感觉和运动阻滞特征,镇痛的总持续时间,感觉和运动阻滞,和并发症。
    人口统计特征和手术时间相似。在10分钟时完全四神经感觉阻滞的参与者百分比在S组(69%)高于M组(41%)(P=0.04)。在30分钟时完全感觉和运动阻滞率相似。块程序时间,镇痛的总持续时间,两组的感觉和运动阻滞相似。无重大并发症。
    利多卡因-罗哌卡因,与混合注射技术相比,感觉和运动阻滞的初始发生率较高,总阻滞持续时间相似。
    UNASSIGNED: There is no consensus on the appropriate use of mixtures of local anaesthetic drugs in various combinations for nerve blocks. We intended to compare short-acting lignocaine and long-acting ropivacaine as a mixture versus undiluted sequential injections on block characteristics of ultrasound-guided (USG) supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: A double-blinded randomised study was conducted on 64 adult patients scheduled for upper limb surgery who received 15 mL each of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.75% ropivacaine as a 1:1 mixture in the mixed group (Group M) or sequential injections in the sequential group (Group S) by using a USG technique. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with complete four nerve sensory blocks at 10 minutes post block injection. Secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block characteristics till 30 minutes, total duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block, and complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic characteristics and time taken for the procedure were similar. The percentage of participants with a complete four-nerve sensory block at 10 minutes was higher in Group S (69%) versus Group M (41%) (P = 0.04). Complete sensory and motor block rates were similar at 30 minutes. The block procedure time, total duration of analgesia, and sensory and motor block were similar in both groups. There were no major complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Sequential lignocaine-ropivacaine, compared to the mixed injection technique, has a higher initial rate of sensory and motor block onset with a similar total block duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景这项研究调查了使用单点注射技术的超声(USG)引导锁骨上阻滞的成功率,将其与多点注射技术进行比较。在保留神经方面,执行该程序所需的时间,感觉和运动阻滞发作所需的时间。材料与方法共204例美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)状态I和II,18-60岁,在体重指数(BMI)≤30kg/m2的情况下,上肢手术给予USG引导的锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞和15mL的0.5%罗哌卡因。将患者随机分为A组(单点注射)和B组(多点注射),使用平面外技术。评估感觉和运动阻滞的发作和达到的最大等级,通过使用针刺,冷,触摸,和运动分别。通过评估肌肉皮肤区域来测试阻滞的功效,尺骨,径向,中位数,腋窝,和肋间臂神经.从插入针头直到药物完全注射计算程序时间。结果两组患者在人口统计学和ASA状态方面具有可比性。A组成功率为60.8%,与B组的98%相比,B组,肋间臂神经最常幸免(7.84%),其次是尺骨(1.96%),和径向(0.98%)。另一方面,A组,最常见的备用神经是尺骨和肋间臂(各占23.5%),其次是径向(12.7%),腋窝(10.8%),肌皮(7.8%),和正中神经(6.9%)。两组感觉和运动阻滞的发作相似。多点组的手术时间更长。结论我们的观察结果表明,在用于USG引导的锁骨上阻滞的多点注射技术中,神经保留要少得多。在大量使用这种技术的患者中,肋间臂神经被阻塞.
    Background This study investigated the success rate of ultrasonography (USG)-guided supraclavicular block using a single-point injection technique comparing it with multiple-point injection technique, in terms of nerve sparing, time taken to perform the procedure, time taken to onset of sensory and motor block. Materials and methods A total of 204 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Status I and II, aged 18-60 years, with body mass index (BMI) ≤30 kg/m2, posted for upper limb surgeries were given USG-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 15 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine. The patients were randomly divided into group A (single-point injection) and group B (multiple-point injection), using an out-of-plane technique. Sensory and motor block was assessed for onset and maximum grade achieved, by using pinprick, cold, touch, and movement respectively. The efficacy of the block was tested by assessment in the territories of musculocutaneous, ulnar, radial, median, axillary, and intercostobrachial nerves. Procedural time was calculated from the insertion of the needle till the complete injection of the drug. Results Patients in both groups were comparable in terms of demography and ASA status. The success rate for group A was 60.8%, compared to 98% in group B. In group B, the intercostobrachial nerve was most commonly spared (7.84%), followed by ulnar (1.96%), and radial (0.98%). On the other hand, in group A, the most frequently spared nerves were ulnar and intercostobrachial (23.5% each), followed by radial (12.7%), axillary (10.8%), musculocutaneous (7.8%), and median nerves (6.9%). The onset of sensory and motor block was similar in both groups. The procedure time was longer in the multiple-point group. Conclusion Our observations suggest that nerve sparing is much lesser in the multiple-point injection technique used for USG-guided supraclavicular block. In a good number of patients using this technique, the intercostobrachial nerve gets blocked.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:区域麻醉为麻醉师提供了,外科医生,以及患者相对于全身麻醉的优势,例如通过手术有意识,避免多种药物,更好的血流动力学稳定性,出色的术后镇痛,手术后每次口服消耗更快。与腋路相比,锁骨水平的臂丛神经阻滞可以麻醉所有四个上肢远端神经区域,而无需单独阻滞肌皮神经。
    目的:本研究的目的是比较锁骨上和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞在起效时间上的效果,性能,阻止成功。
    方法:将60例接受肘下上肢手术的患者随机分为两组:(i)锁骨上(S组)和(ii)锁骨下(I组)。所有患者均接受30ml0f0.5%布比卡因作为局部麻醉药。块性能时间,感觉和运动阻滞发作所需的时间,块的总持续时间,并观察血流动力学参数。阻滞执行时间和感觉阻滞的开始是主要结果,而阻滞持续时间和血液动力学参数是次要结果。将使用两个双尾独立样本t检验来比较变量。
    结果:我们观察到锁骨下阻滞的阻滞表现时间(平均14.833分钟)长于锁骨上阻滞(平均10.37分钟)。这是统计学上显著的,p<0.001。就感觉阻滞的发作而言,与锁骨上组(17.333分钟)相比,锁骨下组(13.667分钟)起效更快.这也是统计学上显著的,p<0.001。两组感觉和运动阻滞的平均总持续时间相似(p值分别为0.341和0.791),没有统计学差异。在我们的研究中没有血流动力学不稳定或并发症。
    结论:与起效更快的锁骨上技术相比,超声引导锁骨下阻滞是一种相对更安全的技术。通过反复暴露于该技术可以减少施用锁骨下阻滞所需的时间。
    BACKGROUND: Regional anaesthesia offers the anaesthesiologist, the surgeon, as well as the patient advantages over general anaesthesia such as being conscious through the surgery, avoiding multiple drugs, better haemodynamic stability, excellent postoperative analgesia, and faster per oral consumption post surgery. Compared with the axillary approach, the brachial plexus block at the level of the clavicle can anaesthetize all four distal upper extremity nerve territories without the requirement for a separate block of the musculocutaneous nerve.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of both supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in terms of time taken for onset, performance, and block success.
    METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing below-elbow upper limb surgeries were randomized into two groups: (i) supraclavicular (Group S) and (ii) infraclavicular (Group I). All patients received 30ml 0f 0.5% bupivacaine as the local anesthetic of choice. The block performance time, time taken for onset of sensory and motor blockade, total duration of block, and hemodynamic parameters were observed. The block performance times and the onset of the sensory blockade were the primary outcomes while the duration of the block and hemodynamic parameters were secondary outcomes. Two two-tailed independent sample t-tests will be used to compare the variables.
    RESULTS: We observed that the block performance time for the infraclavicular block (mean 14.833 minutes) was longer than the supraclavicular block (mean 10.37 minutes). This was statistically significant with p <0.001. In terms of onset of sensory blockade, the infraclavicular group (13.667 minutes) had a quicker onset compared to the supraclavicular group (17.333 minutes). This was also statistically significant with p <0.001. The mean total duration of sensory and motor blockade was similar in both groups (p-value of 0.341 and 0.791 respectively) and there was no statistical difference. There was no hemodynamic instability or complications in our study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block is a relatively safer technique when compared to the supraclavicular technique with faster onset. The time taken for administering the infraclavicular block can be reduced by repeated exposure to the technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成功的臂丛神经阻滞产生交感神经阻滞,导致阻塞段的皮肤温度升高。本研究旨在评估红外热成像预测节段性锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败的准确性。
    这项前瞻性观察性研究包括接受锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下上肢手术的成年患者。感觉是在尺骨的皮区分布进行评估,中位数,和桡神经.块失败定义为在块完成后30分钟没有完全感觉损失。通过尺骨皮肤供应的红外热成像评估皮肤温度,中位数,基线时的桡神经,块完成后5、10、15和20分钟。计算每个时间点的基线测量的温度变化。结果是使用受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)分析下的面积,每个部位的温度变化预测相应神经阻滞失败的能力。
    80名患者可用于最终分析。5分钟时温度变化能力的AUC(95%置信区间[CI])预测尺骨失败,中位数,radial神经阻滞为0.79(0.68-0.87),0.77(0.67-0.86),和0.79(0.69-0.88)。AUC(95%CI)逐渐增加,并在15分钟时达到最大值(尺神经0.98[0.92-1.00],正中神经0.97[0.90-0.99],radial神经0.96[0.89-0.99]),阴性预测值为100%。
    不同皮肤段的红外热成像为预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败提供了准确的工具。在每个节段处增加的皮肤温度可以100%准确度地排除相应神经中的阻滞失败。
    UNASSIGNED: Successful brachial plexus blockade produces sympathetic blockade, resulting in increased skin temperature in the blocked segments. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography in predicting failed segmental supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing upper-limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sensation was evaluated at the dermatomal distribution of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. Block failure was defined as absence of complete sensory loss 30 min after block completion. Skin temperature was evaluated by infrared thermography at the dermatomal supply of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at baseline, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after block completion. The temperature change from the baseline measurement was calculated for each time point. Outcomes were the ability of temperature change at each site to predict failed block of the corresponding nerve using area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients were available for the final analysis. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of temperature change at 5 min to predict failed ulnar, median, and radial nerve block was 0.79 (0.68-0.87), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.79 (0.69-0.88). The AUC (95% CI) increased progressively and reached its maximum values at 15 min (ulnar nerve 0.98 [0.92-1.00], median nerve 0.97 [0.90-0.99], radial nerve 0.96 [0.89-0.99]) with negative predictive value of 100%.
    UNASSIGNED: Infrared thermography of different skin segments provides an accurate tool for predicting failed supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Increased skin temperature at each segment can exclude block failure in the corresponding nerve with 100% accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    导言目前,周围神经阻滞显示出巨大的潜力,有效的患者满意度。如果上肢手术,超声引导下的锁骨上臂丛入路可快速而密集地麻醉。此外,局部麻醉药佐剂的临床应用可以改善神经阻滞的持续时间和插入。因此,本研究的目的是比较右美托咪定和地塞米松在上肢手术患者锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中的阻滞特征。材料和方法本研究是对100名年龄在20-60岁的患者进行的,这些患者符合美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)-I和ASA-II分类,计划进行上肢手术。这些患者平均分为两组,即D组(接受20mL0.5%布比卡因+50mcg(0.5mL)右美托咪定+1.5mL生理盐水)和X组(接受20mL0.5%布比卡因+8mg地塞米松),确保两组给药总体积为22mL。感觉和运动阻滞的发作时间和持续时间,以及术中镇痛的质量,被评估。结果在0.5%布比卡因中加入右美托咪定(50mcg)和地塞米松(8mg)可确保感觉和运动阻滞的起效更快,持续时间更长。此外,右美托咪定导致更长时间的术后镇痛,在最初的24小时内,平均视觉模拟量表得分较低,24小时内阿片类药物的消费量低于地塞米松。结论右美托咪定辅助应用于上肢手术患者锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的效果优于地塞米松。
    Introduction Currently, peripheral nerve block has shown immense potential with effective patient satisfaction. In the event of upper limb surgeries, the supraclavicular brachial plexus approach under ultrasound guidance renders quick and dense anesthesia. In addition, the clinical utility of adjuvants with local anesthetics elicits a good quality of nerve block with improved duration and inset. So the aim of the present study was to compare the block characteristics of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone during supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. Materials and methods The present study was conducted on 100 patients aged 20-60 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-I and ASA-II classification who were scheduled for upper limb surgeries. These patients were divided equally into two groups, namely group D (who received 20mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 50 mcg (0.5mL) of dexmedetomidine +1.5mL normal saline) and group X (who received 20mL of 0.5% bupivacaine +8mg of dexamethasone), ensuring a total volume of 22mL administered to both groups. The time of onset and duration of the sensory and motor blocks, as well as the quality of intraoperative analgesia, were assessed. Results The addition of dexmedetomidine (50mcg) and dexamethasone (8mg) to 0.5% bupivacaine ensured a faster onset and prolonged duration of the sensory and motor blocks. Additionally, dexmedetomidine resulted in more prolonged postoperative analgesia, a lower mean visual analog scale score in the first 24 hours, and lesser opioid consumption in 24 hours than dexamethasone. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is superior to dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定1-6岁儿童超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(SC-BPB)的0.2%罗哌卡因的中位有效量(EV50)。
    招募在重庆医科大学儿童医院进行单侧上肢手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1至6岁的儿童。所有患者均在全麻联合臂丛神经阻滞下进行手术。麻醉诱导后超声引导SC-BPB,定位后给予0.2%罗哌卡因。在研究中,我们使用Dixon的上下方法,初始剂量为0.50ml/kg。考虑到上一块的效果,成功或失败的块可以产生0.05ml/kg的体积减少或增加,相应地。实验在有7个拐点时停止。使用等渗回归和自举算法,计算EV50,95%有效体积(EV95)和95%置信区间(CI)。患者的一般信息,术后疼痛评分,并记录不良事件.
    27名患者参与了这项研究。0.2%罗哌卡因的EV50为0.150ml/kg(95%CI,0.131-0.169ml/kg),EV95(次要指标)为0.195ml/kg(95%CI,0.188-0.197ml/kg)。研究期间未发生不良事件。
    对于1-6岁接受单侧上肢手术的儿童的超声引导SC-BPB,0.2%罗哌卡因的EV50为0.150ml/kg(95%CI,0.131~0.169ml/kg).
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the median effective volume (EV50) of 0.2% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SC-BPB) in children aged 1-6 years.
    UNASSIGNED: Children aged from 1 to 6 years with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II who were scheduled for unilateral upper extremity surgery at the Children\'s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were recruited. All patients underwent surgery under general anaesthesia combined with brachial plexus block. SC-BPB was guided by ultrasound after anaesthesia induction, and 0.2% ropivacaine was given after localization. In the study, we used Dixon\'s up-and-down approach with an initial dose of 0.50 ml/kg. Considering the effect of the previous block, a successful or failed block could produce a 0.05 ml/kg decrement or increment in volume, correspondingly. The experiment was stopped when there were 7 inflection points. Using isotonic regression and bootstrapping algorithms, the EV50, the 95% effective volume (EV95) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The patients\' general information, postoperative pain scores, and adverse events were also recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven patients were involved in this study. The EV50 of 0.2% ropivacaine was 0.150 ml/kg (95% CI, 0.131-0.169 ml/kg) and the EV95 (secondary metric) was 0.195 ml/kg (95% CI, 0.188-0.197 ml/kg). No adverse events occurred during the research study.
    UNASSIGNED: For ultrasound-guided SC-BPB in children aged 1-6 years undergoing unilateral upper extremity surgery, the EV50 of 0.2% ropivacaine was 0.150 ml/kg (95% CI, 0.131-0.169 ml/kg).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Costoclavicular brachial plexus block has been described recently as a new technique in adults and pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the supraclavicular and costoclavicular approaches, which are claimed to be effective and practical in pediatric patients.
    Sixty children were randomized to receive supraclavicular (SC group) or costoclavicular (CC group) brachial plexus blocks prior to surgical incision. Block performance times were recorded as the primary outcome. Procedural features (ideal brachial plexus cord visualization/needle pathway planning time, needle tip/shaft visualization difficulty, number of needle maneuvers, requirement of extra needle maneuvers due to insufficient local anesthetic distribution) and postoperative pain-related data (sensorimotor block intensities, Wong-Baker and FLACC pain scores and analgesic requirements) were also evaluated. To observe the tendency toward respiratory complications, ultrasonographic diaphragm movement amplitude (with M-mode) and diaphragm thickness (with B-mode) were measured postoperatively.
    A total of 56 patients were included. Block performance times [70(7-97) vs. 115(75-180) s] were significantly lower in the CC group (p < 0.01). The block success rates did not differ (p > 0.05). The incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was 44% in the SC group (p < 0.001), and inspiratory diaphragm thickness was significantly lower (p < 0.01). None of CC group patients experienced hemidiaphragm paralysis. All other parameters were comparable (p > 0.05).
    Although costoclavicular block did not show superiority in pain management, the block performance was perceived as more practical than supraclavicular block. We believe that costoclavicular brachial plexus block stands as a good option in upper extremity surgeries with the advantages of shorter block performance time and reduced ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis risk in pediatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:右美托咪定用作局部麻醉剂的佐剂,以在周围神经阻滞中提供延长的镇痛。本研究旨在确定右美托咪定的最佳剂量,当与罗哌卡因联合使用时,将在延长无痛期和减少围手术期镇痛/阿片类药物使用方面产生高质量的阻滞,这反过来又提高了患者的满意度。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的目的是评估两种不同剂量(25μg和50μg)右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因用于锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛持续时间。
    UNASSIGNED:这项前瞻性随机对照研究包括50例接受锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞上肢手术的患者,随机分为两组。D25组接受29mL0.5%罗哌卡因+25μg右美托咪定稀释在1mL生理盐水中(共30mL);D50组接受29mL0.5%罗哌卡因+50μg右美托咪定稀释在1mL生理盐水中(共30mL)。感觉运动阻滞的开始和持续时间,镇痛持续时间,观察抢救镇痛的时间间隔和血流动力学稳定性。
    UNASSIGNED:在D25组中,运动和感觉阻滞的平均发作明显更高(P=0.001)。D50组视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和抢救镇痛消耗量均显著降低(P=0.013、0.001)。D50组的镇痛时间明显延长(P=0.001)。
    UNASSIGNED:右美托咪定50μg是罗哌卡因的有效辅助剂量,其血流动力学变化不明显,镇痛持续时间更好,疼痛评分更低。
    UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine is used as an adjuvant to local anesthetic agents to provide prolonged analgesia in peripheral nerve blocks. This study aimed at determining the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine, which when combined with ropivacaine will produce a superior quality block in terms of extended pain-free period and reduced perioperative analgesic/opioid use, which in turn improves patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study is to assess the duration of analgesia with two different doses (25 μg and 50 μg) of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective randomized controlled study included 50 patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block randomly divided into two groups. Group D25 received 29 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine +25 μg dexmedetomidine diluted in 1 mL of normal saline (total 30 mL); Group D50 received 29 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine +50 μg dexmedetomidine diluted in 1 mL of normal saline (total 30 mL). Onset and duration of sensorimotor block, duration of analgesia, and time interval for the rescue analgesia and hemodynamic stability were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean onset of motor and sensory block was significantly higher in the D25 group (P = 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale pain scores and rescue analgesia consumption were significantly lower in the D50 group (P = 0.013, 0.001). The duration of analgesia was significantly higher in the D50 group (P = 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine 50 μg is an effective adjuvant dose to ropivacaine with insignificant hemodynamic changes with better duration of analgesia and lesser pain scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    盐酸布比卡因0.5%(5mg/mL)通常用于臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛。我们建议超声引导下0.25%(2.5mg/mL)布比卡因可用于有效的术后镇痛,以减少有效剂量。共有126例患者接受了0.25%布比卡因的超声引导臂丛神经阻滞。平均镇痛时间为21.95(σ=3.93)小时,无并发症。与锁骨上阻滞(21.09,σ=3.69)相比,接受锁骨下阻滞(22.56σ=4.02)的患者镇痛显着增加(p=0.04)。这些结果表明,超声引导下0.25%布比卡因在臂丛神经阻滞中的应用需要进一步研究。
    Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (5 mg/mL) is commonly utilized for analgesia in brachial plexus blocks. We suggest that ultrasound-guided 0.25% (2.5 mg/mL) bupivacaine can be utilized for effective postoperative analgesia to reduce the effective dose. A total of 126 patients underwent ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine. The mean duration of analgesia was 21.95 (σ = 3.93) hours with no complications. Patients that received an infraclavicular block (22.56 σ = 4.02) had a significant increase in analgesia compared to supraclavicular blocks (21.09, σ = 3.69) (p = 0.04). These results suggest that further research is warranted for ultrasound-guided 0.25% bupivacaine in brachial plexus nerve blocks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:脉搏灌注指数(PI)反映了血液灌注。据报道,PI可用于评估神经阻滞的效果,但是目前,它主要集中在清醒的成年人身上。在小儿全身麻醉中,据报道,PI可以评估骶骨阻滞的效果。尽管如此,缺乏对臂丛神经阻滞影响的相关研究。我们的目的是评估PI对七氟醚或丙泊酚全身麻醉下小儿锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞成功的预测作用。
    方法:这是一个单中心,平行,双臂随机优势试验。本研究将招募104名1个月至12岁接受上肢手术的儿童。根据麻醉诱导和维持用药,它们将被分为七氟醚和丙泊酚组。在所有儿童的锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(SCB)的阻塞侧和非阻塞侧将记录食指和小指的PI值。主要结果是评估PI对七氟醚或丙泊酚全身麻醉下小儿锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞成功的影响。次要结果包括平均动脉血压(MAP),心率(HR),基线PI与SCB后10分钟(PI比)之间的相关性。
    结论:本试验将为儿童七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉中SCB后PI的变化提供证据。SCB可能导致七氟醚或异丙酚麻醉下PI值的变化。手术结束后孩子们醒来,在排除麻醉药的影响时,阻滞侧和非阻滞侧PI值的变化可能有助于判断神经阻滞的效果。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04216823。于2020年7月15日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Pulse perfusion index (PI) reflects blood perfusion. It has been reported that PI can be used to evaluate the effect of nerve block, but currently, it is mainly focused on awake adults. In pediatric general anesthesia, it has been reported that PI can evaluate the effect of the sacral block. Still, there is a lack of relevant research on the impact of brachial plexus blocks. Our objective is to assess the prediction effects of PI on the success of supraclavicular brachial plexus block in pediatric patients under sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia.
    METHODS: This is a mono-center, parallel, 2-arm randomized superiority trial. One hundred four children aged 1 month to 12 years who undergo upper limb surgery will be enrolled in this study. According to anesthesia induction and maintenance medication, they will be divided into sevoflurane and propofol groups. The PI values of the index and little finger will be recorded on the blocked and non-blocked sides of supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB) in all children. The primary outcome is to assess the effects of PI on the success of supraclavicular brachial plexus block in pediatric patients under sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia. The secondary outcome includes mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and correlation between baseline PI and 10 min after SCB (PI ratio).
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide evidence on the changes in PI after SCB in sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia in children. SCB may lead to changes in PI values under sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia. After the children wake up at the end of the surgery, the changes in PI values on the block side and non-block side may be helpful to judge the effect of nerve block when excluding the influence of anesthetics.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04216823 . Registered on 15 July 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号