OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the current knowledge and guidelines on managing COVID-19 in children and proposed a practical approach to drug treatment.
METHODS: We analysed international guidelines from four prominent scientific bodies on treating COVID-19 in children. These were the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the American National Institutes of Health, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce COVID-19.
RESULTS: Most paediatric patients with COVID-19 only require symptomatic treatment. There was limited evidence on treatment recommendations for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of disease progression. However, several drugs are available for children and we have summarised the guidelines, in order to provide a concise, practical format for clinicians. All the guidelines agree that nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir or remdesivir can be used as prophylaxis for severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients. Remdesivir can also be used for severe COVID-19 cases. Glucocorticosteroids are recommended, particularly in patients requiring oxygen therapy. Tocilizumab or baricitinib should be reserved for patients with progressive disease and/or signs of systemic inflammation.
CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines provide useful advice and a degree of consensus on specific drug treatment for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of progression.

UNASSIGNED: Extrahepatic biliary atresia (BA) is seen in infants, with an incidence of 1 in 15,000 live births. The presentation is progressive jaundice, dark-colored urine, and clay-colored stools. Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the commonly performed surgical procedure in these patients. Postoperatively, phenobarbitone, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), steroids, and other drugs are given to improve bile drainage and prevent inflammation and fibrosis. However, a definitive protocol regarding the need for different drugs, dosage, and duration varies across individual surgeons and centers. No universally accepted protocol exists for postoperative management after KPE.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to know the prevailing postoperative management of BA by subject experts and use the Delphi process to know if the experts want to change their practice based on the results from the survey.
UNASSIGNED: A questionnaire was made after discussing with two experts in the field of BA. The questionnaire was mailed to 25 subject experts. The first survey data were analyzed and shared with all responders. In the second survey, change in the management based on the results from the first survey was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: The Delphi questionnaire was answered by 17 experts. Postoperatively, prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed for 6-12 weeks by around 40% and >12 weeks by 30% of respondents. Phenobarbitone is prescribed for <3 months by nearly 50%. UDCA is prescribed for <3 months, ≤6 months, and 6 months-1 year by 47.1%, 23.5%, and 23.5% responders, respectively. Nearly 50% prescribe steroids (mostly prednisolone), and among them, two-thirds prescribe it for 6-12 weeks. Approximately 60% give antiviral drugs to children who are cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M positive. In our survey, 50% of experts perform 5-10 KPE per year, and 25% each perform 10-15 and >15 KPE per year. The second survey noted that a significant percentage of responders want to change their practice according to consensus.
UNASSIGNED: From our Delphi survey, an overview of the postoperative management of BA could be made. However, multicentric studies are required for uniform protocol on the postoperative management of BA.

Glucocorticoids are widely prescribed as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. This results in at least 1% of the population using chronic glucocorticoid therapy, being at risk for glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency. This risk is dependent on the dose, duration and potency of the glucocorticoid, route of administration, and individual susceptibility. Once glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency develops or is suspected, it necessitates careful education and management of affected patients. Tapering glucocorticoids can be challenging when symptoms of glucocorticoid withdrawal develop, which overlap with those of adrenal insufficiency. In general, tapering of glucocorticoids can be more rapidly within a supraphysiological range, followed by a slower taper when on physiological glucocorticoid dosing. The degree and persistence of HPA axis suppression after cessation of glucocorticoid therapy are dependent on overall exposure and recovery of adrenal function varies greatly amongst individuals. This first European Society of Endocrinology/Endocrine Society joint clinical practice guideline provides guidance on this clinically relevant condition to aid clinicians involved in the care of patients on chronic glucocorticoid therapy.

Glucocorticoids are widely prescribed as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. This results in at least 1% of the population using chronic glucocorticoid therapy, being at risk for glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency. This risk is dependent on the dose, duration and potency of the glucocorticoid, route of administration, and individual susceptibility. Once glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency develops or is suspected, it necessitates careful education and management of affected patients. Tapering glucocorticoids can be challenging when symptoms of glucocorticoid withdrawal develop, which overlap with those of adrenal insufficiency. In general, tapering of glucocorticoids can be more rapidly within a supraphysiological range, followed by a slower taper when on physiological glucocorticoid dosing. The degree and persistence of HPA axis suppression after cessation of glucocorticoid therapy are dependent on overall exposure and recovery of adrenal function varies greatly amongst individuals. This first European Society of Endocrinology/Endocrine Society joint clinical practice guideline provides guidance on this clinically relevant condition to aid clinicians involved in the care of patients on chronic glucocorticoid therapy.

Diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), especially in isolated cases, is challenging, particularly due to the limitations of endomyocardial biopsy, leading to potential undiagnosed cases in pacemaker-implanted patients. This study aims to provide real world findings to support new guideline for CS using 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) which give a definite diagnosis of isolated CS (iCS) without histological findings. We examined consecutive patients with cardiac pacemakers for atrioventricular block (AV-b) attending our outpatient pacemaker clinic. The patients underwent periodical follow-up echocardiography and were divided into two groups according to echocardiographic findings: those with suspected CS and those without suspected CS. Patients suspected of having nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent FDG-PET/CT for CS diagnosis. We investigated the utility of the new guideline for CS using FDG-PET/CT. Among the 272 patients enrolled, 97 patients were implanted with cardiac pacemakers for AV-b. Twenty-two patients were suspected of having CS during a median observation period of 5.4 years after pacemaker implantation. Of these, one did not consent, and nine of 21 cases (43%) were diagnosed with definite CS according to the new guidelines. Five of these nine patients were diagnosed with iCS using FDG-PET/CT. The number of patients diagnosed with definite CS using the new guidelines tended to be approximately 2.3 times that of the conventional criteria (p = 0.074). Three of the nine patients underwent steroid treatment. The composite outcome, comprising all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and a substantial reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction, were significantly lower in patients receiving steroid treatment compared to those without steroid treatment (p = 0.048). The utilization of FDG-PET/CT in accordance with the new guidelines facilitates the diagnosis of CS, including iCS, resulting in approximately 2.3 times as many diagnoses of CS compared to the conventional criteria. This guideline has the potential to support the early identification of iCS and may contribute to enhancing patient clinical outcomes.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences.

OBJECTIVE: Review the literature to update the MASCC guidelines from 2015 for controlling nausea and vomiting with systemic cancer treatment of moderate emetic potential.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was completed using Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. The literature search was done from June 2015 to January 2023 of the management of antiemetic prophylaxis for anticancer therapy of moderate emetic potential.
RESULTS: Of 342 papers identified, 19 were relevant to update recommendations about managing antiemetic prophylaxis for systemic cancer treatment regimens of moderate emetic potential. Important practice changing updates include the use of emetic prophylaxis based on a triple combination of neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonist, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and steroids for patients undergoing carboplatin (AUC ≥ 5) and women < 50 years of age receiving oxaliplatin-based treatment. A double combination of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and steroids remains the recommended prophylaxis for other MEC. Based on the data in the literature, it is recommended that the administration of steroids should be limited to day 1 in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens, due to the demonstration of non-inferiority between the different regimens. More data is needed on the emetogenicity of new agents at moderate emetogenic risk. Of particular interest would be antiemetic studies with the agents sacituzumab-govitecan and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. Experience to date with these agents indicate an emetogenic potential comparable to carboplatin > AUC 5. Future studies should systematically include patient-related risk assessment in order to define the risk of emesis with MEC beyond the emetogenicity of the chemotherapy and improve the guidelines for new drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: This antiemetic MASCC-ESMO guideline update includes new recommendations considering individual risk factors and the optimization of supportive anti-emetic treatments.

This position paper provides an overview of the assessment and management of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). There is a focus on the use of ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory and corticosteroid-dependent GvHD.

These guidelines are a consensus of French glaucoma and retina experts on the management of ocular hypertension (OHT) observed in a third of the cases after corticosteroid implant intravitreal injections. They update the first guidelines published in 2017. Two implants are marketed in France: the dexamethasone implant (DEXi) and the fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAci). It is essential to assess the pressure status before injecting a patient with a corticosteroid implant. A molecule-specific monitoring of the intraocular pressure is needed throughout the follow-up and at the time of reinjections. Real-life studies have allowed optimizing the management algorithm by significantly increasing the safety of these implants. Corticosteroid testing with DEXi should be performed before switching to FAci to optimize pressure tolerance of FAci. Beyond topical hypotensive treatments, selective laser trabeculoplasty may be considered in the therapeutic arsenal for the management of steroid-induced OHT and subsequent injections.

The Japanese clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis (MG) were revised in 2022. The major revision points in these guidelines are as follows. 1) A description of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) was included for the first time. 2) Revised diagnostic criteria of both MG and LEMS are proposed. 3) A high-dose oral steroid regimen with escalation and de-escalation schedule is not recommended. 4) Refractory MG is defined. 5) The use of molecular-targeted drugs is included. 6) MG is divided into six clinical subtypes. 7) Treatment algorithms for both MG and LEMS are presented.