spleen

脾脏
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,广泛的良性和恶性原发性间充质肿瘤和脾脏肿瘤样病变被纳入“基质衍生的肿瘤和肿瘤样病变”这一术语。这些包括树突细胞肿瘤,如滤泡树突细胞肉瘤,EBV阳性炎性滤泡树突状细胞肉瘤,和纤维母细胞网状细胞肿瘤;平滑肌和肌纤维母细胞病变,如炎性假瘤,EBV相关的平滑肌肿瘤和未分化的多形性肉瘤以及多种血管和血管间质肿瘤和肿瘤样病变。虽然有些肿瘤和肿瘤样病变是脾脏特有的,其他也可能发生在不同的脾外内脏。这些肿瘤和肿瘤样病变表现出特征性的组织病理学,免疫细胞化学和生物学行为。虽然横断面成像研究允许检测,这些脾病变的分期和有限的特征,组织病理学确认允许最佳管理和监测策略。
    A wide spectrum of benign and malignant primary mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the spleen has been recently included under the umbrella term \'stroma-derived\' neoplasms and tumor-like lesions. These include dendritic cell neoplasms such as follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, and fibroblastic reticular cell tumor; smooth muscle and myofibroblastic lesions such as inflammatory pseudotumor, EBV-associated smooth muscle tumor and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma as well as a diverse spectrum of vascular and vascular-stromal tumors and tumor-like lesions. While some tumor and tumor-like lesions are unique to the spleen, others may also occur in diverse extra-splenic viscera. These tumors and tumor-like lesions demonstrate characteristic histopathology, immunocytochemistry and biological behavior. While cross-sectional imaging studies allow detection, staging and limited characterization of these splenic lesions, histopathological confirmation permits optimal management and surveillance strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脾病变可能表现出重叠的影像学特征,从囊肿和血管瘤等良性实体到淋巴瘤和血管肉瘤等恶性肿瘤。这项荟萃分析旨在描述区分恶性和良性脾病变的影像学特征。
    方法:遵守PRISMA指南,我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience对鉴别恶性和良性脾病变的影像学特征的研究。我们提取了有关脾病理学和影像学特征的数据,并通过QUADAS-2评估了方法学质量。使用STATA(17.0版,StataCorp,学院站,TX)。
    结果:门脉期低增强,低血管增强模式,扩散限制,后期增强不足,比值比大于10,高度表明恶性肿瘤。提示恶性肿瘤的其他特征包括实体形态,淋巴结病,脾周流体的存在,动脉增强不足,超声波的低回声性,脾肿大,和多个病变的存在。相比之下,囊性形态学,高血管冲洗和高血管持续增强模式,晚期超强期,超声波的消声性,门静脉相位过度,定义明确的边界,钙化有利于良性病理。
    结论:该研究强调了对比增强和弥散加权成像在鉴别良恶性脾病变中的关键作用,强调门静脉期增强不足和扩散受限等特征在诊断恶性肿瘤中的作用。此外,这项研究强调了超声造影的价值,这允许关键对比增强模式的可视化,而没有电离辐射暴露的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: Splenic lesions might exhibit overlapping imaging features, varying from benign entities like cysts and hemangiomas to malignancies such as lymphoma and angiosarcoma. This meta-analysis aims to delineate imaging characteristics that distinguish malignant from benign splenic lesions.
    METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on imaging features differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. We extracted data on splenic pathology and imaging characteristics and assessed the methodological quality via QUADAS-2. Odds ratio meta-analyses were performed using STATA (Version 17.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX).
    RESULTS: Portal phase hypoenhancement, hypovascular enhancement pattern, diffusion restriction, and late phase hypoenhancement, with odds ratios above 10, highly indicate malignancy. Other features suggestive of malignancy include solid morphology, lymphadenopathy, presence of perisplenic fluid, arterial hypoenhancement, hypoechogenicity on ultrasound, splenomegaly, and presence of multiple lesions. In contrast, cystic morphology, hypervascular-washout and hypervascular-persistent pattern of enhancement, late phase hyperenhancement, anechogenicity on ultrasound, portal phase hyperenhancement, well-defined borders, and calcification are in favour of benign pathology.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the critical role of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions, emphasizing the role of features like portal phase hypoenhancement and restricted diffusion in diagnosing malignancies. Additionally, the study emphasizes the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, which allows for the visualization of key contrast-enhancement patterns without the risk of ionizing radiation exposure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脾脏硬化性血管瘤样结节性转化(SANT)是一种少见的良性血管病变,病因不明。它主要影响中年妇女,并表现为非特异性临床体征,使术前诊断具有挑战性。SANT的明确诊断依赖于脾切除术后的病理检查。本研究旨在通过提供一个病例系列和回顾文献来强调临床表现,从而有助于对SANT的理解。诊断挑战,和治疗结果。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了2013年11月至2023年10月收治的3例SANT确诊患者的临床资料.这些病例包括一名25岁的男性,一个15岁的女性,一个39岁的男性,每个都有一个脾肿块。
    方法:3例患者均行腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)。病理检查证实所有病例均为SANT。
    结果:前2例随访10年未见复发或转移,第三例术后2个月无异常。尽管它很罕见,SANT是一种重要的疾病,因为它有可能误诊,并且很重要,必须将其与恶性病变区分开。该研究强调了LS作为一种安全有效的治疗选择的实用性。
    结论:SANT是一种罕见的脾脏良性肿瘤,和术前诊断是具有挑战性的。LS是SANT安全有效的治疗方法,手术效果满意,随访长期预后良好。该研究有助于对这种罕见疾病的有限研究,并呼吁进行更大的研究来验证这些发现并改善临床管理。
    BACKGROUND: Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen is an uncommon benign vascular lesion with an obscure etiology. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and presents with nonspecific clinical signs, making preoperative diagnosis challenging. The definitive diagnosis of SANT relies on pathological examination following splenectomy. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of SANT by presenting a case series and reviewing the literature to highlight the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of 3 patients with confirmed SANT admitted from November 2013 to October 2023. The cases include a 25-year-old male, a 15-year-old female, and a 39-year-old male, each with a splenic mass.
    METHODS: All of the three cases were treated by laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). Pathological examination confirmed SANT in all cases.
    RESULTS: No recurrence or metastasis was observed during a 10-year follow-up for the first 2 cases, and the third case showed no abnormalities at 2 months postoperatively. Despite its rarity, SANT is a significant condition due to its potential for misdiagnosis and the importance of distinguishing it from malignant lesions. The study underscores the utility of LS as a safe and effective treatment option.
    CONCLUSIONS: SANT is a rare benign tumor of the spleen, and the preoperative diagnosis of whom is challenging. LS is a safe and effective treatment for SANT, with satisfactory surgical outcomes and favorable long-term prognosis on follow-up. The study contributes to the limited body of research on this rare condition and calls for larger studies to validate these findings and improve clinical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    代偿性晚期慢性肝病患者的临床上显着的门脉高压(CSPH)表明代偿失调和死亡的风险增加。虽然像肝静脉-门静脉梯度测量这样的侵入性方法被认为是金标准,非侵入性测试(NIT)已成为诊断和监测CSPH的有价值的工具。这篇综述全面探讨了门静脉高压症的非侵入性诊断方法。在乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化的背景下,重点关注NIT。基于生物化学的NIT可以由单个血清生物标志物(例如,血小板计数)或通过将不同血清生物标志物相互结合或具有人口统计学特征的复合评分(例如,FIB-4).另一方面,肝脏硬度测量和脾脏硬度测量可以使用各种弹性成像技术进行评估,它们可以单独使用,结合,或作为基于生化的NIT之后的第二步。合并肝脏和脾脏硬度测量,单独或联合血小板计数,纳入既定和验证的标准,例如BavenoVI或BavenoVII标准,为预测CSPH和排除高风险静脉曲张提供了有用的工具,可能避免侵入性检查,如上消化道内窥镜检查。此外,它们还被证明能够预测肝脏相关事件(例如,肝失代偿的发生)。当瞬时弹性成像不可用或不可行时,基于生化的NIT(例如,RESIST标准,基于血小板计数和白蛋白水平的组合)是预测未经治疗的病毒病因患者和持续病毒学应答后的高风险静脉曲张的有效替代方法。正在进行的研究应该探索新的生物标志物和新的弹性成像技术,但是目前的证据支持常规血液检查的实用性,LSM,和SSM作为诊断和分期门静脉高压症和预测患者预后的有效替代品。
    Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease indicates an increased risk of decompensation and death. While invasive methods like hepatic venous-portal gradient measurement is considered the gold standard, non-invasive tests (NITs) have emerged as valuable tools for diagnosing and monitoring CSPH. This review comprehensively explores non-invasive diagnostic modalities for portal hypertension, focusing on NITs in the setting of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Biochemical-based NITs can be represented by single serum biomarkers (e.g., platelet count) or by composite scores that combine different serum biomarkers with each other or with demographic characteristics (e.g., FIB-4). On the other hand, liver stiffness measurement and spleen stiffness measurement can be assessed using a variety of elastography techniques, and they can be used alone, in combination with, or as a second step after biochemical-based NITs. The incorporation of liver and spleen stiffness measurements, alone or combined with platelet count, into established and validated criteria, such as Baveno VI or Baveno VII criteria, provides useful tools for the prediction of CSPH and for ruling out high-risk varices, potentially avoiding invasive tests like upper endoscopy. Moreover, they have also been shown to be able to predict liver-related events (e.g., the occurrence of hepatic decompensation). When transient elastography is not available or not feasible, biochemical-based NITs (e.g., RESIST criteria, that are based on the combination of platelet count and albumin levels) are valid alternatives for predicting high-risk varices both in patients with untreated viral aetiology and after sustained virological response. Ongoing research should explore novel biomarkers and novel elastography techniques, but current evidence supports the utility of routine blood tests, LSM, and SSM as effective surrogates in diagnosing and staging portal hypertension and predicting patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脾脏游荡是一种罕见的临床实体,由于悬吊韧带的缺失或异常松弛,脾脏过度移动并从其正常的左下软骨位置迁移到任何其他腹部或骨盆位置(Puranik在GastroenterolRep5:241,2015,Evangelos21,2020),这反过来是由于先天性松弛或外伤导致的,怀孕,或结缔组织疾病(Puranik在胃肠病报告5:241,2015,Jawad在Cureus15,2023)。它可能是无症状的,并且由于其他原因进行成像而意外发现,或者由于椎弓根扭转和梗塞或在其新位置上对相邻内脏的压迫而引起症状。根据脾脏是否活动,需要通过脾切除术或脾切除术进行手术治疗。
    方法:我们介绍了一例39岁的埃塞俄比亚女性患者,患者主诉持续的下腹部疼痛,尤其是右侧伴有1年肿胀,在患者就诊后的前几个月里,疼痛加重。她是初产妇,剖腹产,已知一例HAART感染HIV。体格检查显示右下象限明确,相当移动和轻微的嫩肿胀。血液学检查不显著。腹肾盂U/S成像和CT扫描显示主要是囊性,轻度减弱右侧骨盆肿块,狭窄的细长附着于胰尾,正常位置缺少脾脏。CT还显示,肾脏和胰腺上有多个不同大小的纯囊性病变,与AD多囊肾和胰腺疾病相符。诊断为脾脏游荡可能梗塞,她做了剖腹手术,该发现是位于上骨盆右半部分的完全梗塞的脾脏,椎弓根扭曲,并与相邻的远端回肠和结肠紧密粘连。进行粘连释放和脾切除术。她的术后过程很顺利。
    结论:脾脏游走是一种罕见的临床疾病,需要纳入下腹部和盆腔肿块患者的鉴别诊断清单。正如我们从案件中学到的,需要高度怀疑才能及早发现并通过脾切除术进行干预,从而避免脾切除术及其相关并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Wandering spleen is a rare clinical entity in which the spleen is hypermobile and migrate from its normal left hypochondriac position to any other abdominal or pelvic position as a result of absent or abnormal laxity of the suspensory ligaments (Puranik in Gastroenterol Rep 5:241, 2015, Evangelos in Am J Case Rep. 21, 2020) which in turn is due to either congenital laxity or precipitated by trauma, pregnancy, or connective tissue disorder (Puranik in Gastroenterol Rep 5:241, 2015, Jawad in Cureus 15, 2023). It may be asymptomatic and accidentally discovered for imaging done for other reasons or cause symptoms as a result of torsion of its pedicle and infarction or compression on adjacent viscera on its new position. It needs to be surgically treated upon discovery either by splenopexy or splectomy based on whether the spleen is mobile or not.
    METHODS: We present a case of 39 years old female Ethiopian patient who presented to us complaining constant lower abdominal pain especially on the right side associated with swelling of one year which got worse over the preceding few months of her presentation to our facility. She is primiparous with delivery by C/section and a known case of HIV infection on HAART. Physical examination revealed a right lower quadrant well defined, fairly mobile and slightly tender swelling. Hematologic investigations are unremarkable. Imaging with abdominopelvic U/S and CT-scan showed a predominantly cystic, hypo attenuating right sided pelvic mass with narrow elongated attachment to pancreatic tail and absent spleen in its normal position. CT also showed multiple different sized purely cystic lesions all over both kidneys and the pancreas compatible with AD polycystic kidney and pancreatic disease. With a diagnosis of wandering possibly infarcted spleen, she underwent laparotomy, the finding being a fully infarcted spleen located on the right half of the upper pelvis with twisted pedicle and dense adhesions to the adjacent distal ileum and colon. Release of adhesions and splenectomy was done. Her post-operative course was uneventful.
    CONCLUSIONS: Wandering spleen is a rare clinical condition that needs to be included in the list of differential diagnosis in patients presenting with lower abdominal and pelvic masses. As we have learnt from our case, a high index of suspicion is required to detect it early and intervene by doing splenopexy and thereby avoiding splenectomy and its related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    自发性脾破裂是极为罕见的,通常归因于肿瘤病理。其中,原发性脾血管肉瘤是由脾脏内的内皮细胞引起的恶性肿瘤。虽然全球报告了零星病例,对于诊断和治疗的标准化方法仍缺乏全面共识.我们报道一例83岁男性因突然休克而接受紧急增强CT检查,显示明显的腹腔积液。急诊手术显示脾破裂需要脾切除术。组织病理学检查证实了脾血管肉瘤的诊断。尽管手术成功,患者术后两周死于严重并发症。
    Spontaneous splenic rupture is an extremely rare occurrence, often attributed to tumorous pathologies. Among these, primary splenic angiosarcoma stands as a malignancy arising from the endothelial cells within the spleen. While sporadic cases have been reported globally, there remains a lack of comprehensive consensus on standardized approaches for diagnosis and treatment. We report a case of an 83-year-old male who underwent emergency enhanced CT due to sudden shock, revealing significant intra-abdominal fluid accumulation. Emergency surgery revealed splenic rupture necessitating splenectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of splenic angiosarcoma. Despite successful surgery, the patient succumbed to severe complications two weeks postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    感染性心内膜炎(IE)以发热为特征,心脏杂音,和栓子。脾栓塞在左侧IE中常见。对2000年至2023年之间发表的有关脾栓塞(SE)的文献进行了系统回顾。电子数据库中的搜索策略确定了2000年1月1日至2023年10月4日之间发表的2751项研究,其中29项最终被包括在内。结果表明,主要用于检测栓塞的影像学检查是计算机断层扫描(CT),磁共振成像,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/CT,单光子发射计算机断层扫描/CT,超声,和超声造影.最近的研究通常使用18F-FDGPET-CT。SE的比例为1.4%至71.7%。只有7项研究进行了系统的常规CT筛查腹内栓塞,SE的加权平均频率为22%(范围:8-34.8%)。18F-FDGPET-CT在7项研究中进行了系统的研究,脾摄取量的加权平均值为4.5%。关于脾栓塞的频率和处理,已发表的文献缺乏统一性。CT扫描是最常用的方法,直到最近,18F-FDGPET-CT扫描开始占主导地位。关于SE频率的更多数据是必要的,特别是关注它们对IE管理和预后的影响。
    Infective endocarditis (IE) is characterised by fever, heart murmurs, and emboli. Splenic emboli are frequent in left-sided IE. A systematic review of the literature published on splenic embolism (SE) between 2000 and 2023 was conducted. Search strategies in electronic databases identified 2751 studies published between 1 January 2000 and 4 October 2023, of which 29 were finally included. The results showed that the imaging tests predominantly used to detect embolisms were computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, single-photon emission computed tomography/CT, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. More recent studies typically used 18F-FDG PET-CT. The proportion of SE ranged from 1.4% to 71.7%. Only seven studies performed systematic conventional CT screening for intra-abdominal emboli, and the weighted mean frequency of SE was 22% (range: 8-34.8%). 18F-FDG PET-CT was performed systematically in seven studies, and splenic uptake was found in a weighted mean of 4.5%. There was a lack of uniformity in the published literature regarding the frequency and management of splenic embolisation. CT scans were the most frequently used method, until recently, when 18F-FDG PET-CT scans began to predominate. More data are necessary regarding the frequency of SE, especially focusing on their impact on IE management and prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:系统评价二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)脾硬度测量(SSM)预测肝硬化患者出血静脉曲张(HRV)高风险的准确性。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Medline,科克伦,和GoogleScholar数据库在2023年5月31日之前搜索了所有使用2D-SWE估计SSM和内窥镜检查检测HRV的人体研究。使用广义线性混合模型进行Meta分析。使用漏斗图不对称测试评估发布偏差。使用“mada”软件包估算了汇总接收器工作特征曲线下的面积(AUSROC)。
    结果:共纳入13项研究和1970例患者。其中,27.8%有HRV。SSM在检测HRV时的合并敏感性和轮询特异性分别为90%(95CI:87-92%)和68%(95CI:58-77%),分别,AUSROC为0.86(95CI:0.82-0.90)。SSM检测HRV的中位值为34.2kPa。在研究中,包括专门的HBV肝硬化患者,SSM在预测HRV方面的调查敏感性和特异性分别为88%(95CI:82-92%)和73%(95CI:68-78%),分别。AUSROC为0.84(95CI:0.81-0.87)。每位患者的重复测量次数(<5次或≥5次)不影响该方法的能力。使用Aixprerer评估SSM在排除HRV方面比其他2D-SWE设备具有更高的灵敏度。
    结论:我们的荟萃分析支持通过2D-SWE进行SSM对于排除肝硬化中的HRV具有良好的诊断性能。
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) by 2D- Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) in predicting high risk for bleeding varices (HRV) in cirrhotic patients.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 31/05/2023 for all human studies using 2D-SWE to estimate SSM and endoscopy to detect HRV. Meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model. Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot asymmetry test. The Area Under the Summarized Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUSROC) was estimated using the \"mada\" package.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 1970 patients were included. Of them, 27.8 % had HRV. The pooled sensitivity and polled specificity of SSM in detecting HRV were 90 % (95 %CI:87-92 %) and 68 % (95 %CI:58-77 %), respectively, with an AUSROC at 0.86 (95 %CI:0.82-0.90). The median cutoff value of SSM in detecting HRV was 34.2 kPa. In studies including exclusively HBV cirrhotic patients, SSM\'s polled sensitivity and specificity in predicting HRV was 88 % (95 %CI:82-92 %) and 73 % (95 %CI:68-78 %), respectively. The AUSROC was 0.84 (95 %CI:0.81-0.87). The number of repeated measurements per patient (<5 or ≥ 5) did not affect the method\'s capability. Using Aixplorer to evaluate SSM had a higher sensitivity in ruling out HRV than other 2D-SWE devices.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis supports that SSM by 2D-SWE has a good diagnostic performance for ruling out HRV in cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于脾切除术(SP)和脾保存在胃癌外科治疗中的相对优势,一直存在争论。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在阐明与这两种手术相关的生存结局和术后并发症的潜在差异。
    在多个数据库中进行了详尽的文献检索,即PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience。我们通过RevMan5.4软件使用随机效应模型对与SP和脾脏保存相关的风险比(HR)和风险比(RR)进行荟萃分析。亚组分析基于纳入研究的各种属性。我们采用漏斗图来评估发表偏倚,并进行了敏感性分析,以衡量综合结果的稳定性。漏斗图和灵敏度分析均使用Stata12进行。
    我们的研究纳入了23项观察性研究和三项随机对照试验,共涉及6,255名患者。与脾保存相比,SP没有产生更好的生存结果,该结论与随机对照试验的综合结果一致.SP和脾保存之间的生存预后无统计学差异,无论患者是否患有近端胃癌或近端胃癌侵入胃的更大曲率。SP显示所有术后并发症的发生率较高,尤其是胰瘘和腹腔脓肿。然而,在吻合口漏方面,它与脾保存没有显着差异,切口感染,肠梗阻,腹腔出血,和肺部感染。SP和脾保存之间的术后死亡率没有显着差异。漏斗图表明没有明显的出版偏见,敏感性分析证实了综合结果的稳定性。
    尽管在某些个体并发症和术后死亡率方面没有显著差异,我们的数据更广泛的模式表明,SP与术后并发症的总体频率更高相关,与脾保存相比,没有提供额外的生存益处。因此,不提倡SP的常规实施。
    当医生为胃(胃)癌进行手术时,他们有时会切除脾脏,称为脾切除术(SP)的程序。然而,关于切除脾脏是否比保存脾脏更好,存在争议。我们的研究旨在比较这两种方法的患者生存率和手术后并发症的风险。要做到这一点,我们研究了26项研究的数据,涉及6,255例患者.我们的分析很彻底,使用先进的统计方法来确保准确性。我们发现:切除脾脏的患者的寿命并不比保留脾脏的患者更长。无论癌症是在胃的上部还是已经扩散到附近的胃的大曲线,两组的生存率相似.接受SP的患者面临更多的术后并发症,尤其是胰瘘和腹内脓肿.然而,一些并发症,如手术关节渗漏,伤口感染,肠梗阻,内出血,和肺部感染,两组间差异无统计学意义。无论患者是否切除脾脏,术后死亡的机会都相似。我们的发现表明,在胃癌手术期间常规切除脾脏并不能提高生存率,并且与更多的术后并发症有关。因此,除非绝对必要,否则最好避免切除脾脏。
    UNASSIGNED: There is an ongoing debate regarding the comparative merits of splenectomy (SP) and splenic preservation in the surgical management of gastric cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to shed light on potential differences in survival outcomes and postoperative complications associated with these two procedures.
    UNASSIGNED: An exhaustive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We utilized a random-effects model via RevMan 5.4 software to conduct a meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) associated with SP and spleen preservation. Subgroup analyses were based on various attributes of the included studies. We employed funnel plots to assess publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to gauge the stability of the combined results. Both funnel plots and sensitivity analysis were performed using Stata 12.
    UNASSIGNED: Our research incorporated 23 observational studies and three randomized controlled trials, involving a total of 6,255 patients. SP did not yield superior survival outcomes in comparison to splenic preservation, a conclusion that aligns with the combined results of the randomized controlled trials. No statistically significant difference in survival prognosis was observed between SP and splenic preservation, irrespective of whether the patients had proximal gastric cancer or proximal gastric cancer invading the stomach\'s greater curvature. SP exhibited a higher incidence of all postoperative complications, notably pancreatic fistula and intraabdominal abscesses. However, it did not significantly differ from splenic preservation in terms of anastomotic leakage, incision infection, intestinal obstruction, intra-abdominal bleeding, and pulmonary infection. No significant difference in postoperative mortality between SP and splenic preservation was found. Funnel plots suggested no notable publication bias, and sensitivity analysis affirmed the stability of the combined outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the lack of significant differences in certain individual complications and postoperative mortality, the broader pattern of our data suggests that SP is associated with a greater overall frequency of postoperative complications, without providing additional survival benefits compared to splenic preservation. Thus, the routine implementation of SP is not advocated.
    When doctors perform surgery for gastric (stomach) cancer, they sometimes remove the spleen, a procedure known as splenectomy (SP). However, there’s a debate on whether removing the spleen is better than preserving it. Our study aimed to compare these two methods in terms of patient survival and the risk of complications after surgery. To do this, we looked at data from 26 studies involving 6,255 patients. Our analysis was thorough, using advanced statistical methods to ensure accuracy. Here’s what we found: patients who had their spleen removed did not live longer than those who kept their spleen. Whether the cancer was just in the upper part of the stomach or had spread to the nearby large curve of the stomach, the survival rates were similar for both groups. Patients who underwent SP faced more postoperative complications, especially issues like pancreatic fistula and intra-abdominal abscesses. However, for some complications like leakage from the surgical joint, infection of the wound, bowel obstruction, internal bleeding, and lung infections, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The chances of dying post-surgery were similar whether patients had their spleen removed or not. Our findings suggest that routinely removing the spleen during gastric cancer surgery does not improve survival rates and is linked to more postoperative complications. Therefore, it may be better to avoid removing the spleen unless absolutely necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:脾B细胞淋巴瘤/具有突出核仁的白血病(SBLPN),即毛细胞白血病变体(HCL-v)是一种罕见的B细胞慢性淋巴增殖性疾病。主要的诊断挑战是区分SBLPN与经典毛细胞白血病(HCL-c),因为前者对治疗的反应较差,预后较差。
    目的:目的探讨3例SBLPN的临床血液学和免疫表型。
    方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究。
    方法:从2011年到2021年,对所有诊断为HCL的病例进行了流式细胞术,收集3例CD25阴性或暗淡且血液学表现与SBLPN匹配的病例。
    方法:使用描述性统计。
    结果:所有病例均为男性。年龄从43岁到64岁不等。血红蛋白浓度中位数,白细胞总数,血小板计数为8.6g/dL,6.9×109/L,53×109/L,分别。非典型细胞为中等至大。所有三个都显示出突出的核仁。在所有病例中,骨髓活检均显示间质浸润。毛细胞CD20、CD11c、CD103CD25在一例中呈暗阳性。膜联蛋白A1在所有三个病例中均为阴性。在一个病例中进行了BRAFV600E突变分析,结果为突变阴性。
    结论:SBLPN是一种罕见的实体,通常在流式细胞术CD25阴性。然而,在昏暗的CD25阳性病例中,BRAFV600E突变分析有助于辨别SBLPN诊断并将其与HCL-c区分开。
    BACKGROUND: Splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) aka hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-v) is a rare B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder. The main diagnostic challenge is to differentiate SBLPN from Classical hairy cell leukemia (HCL-c), as the former faces inferior responses to therapies and a poor prognosis.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim is to discuss the clinic-hematological and immunophenotyping findings of three cases of SBLPN.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study.
    METHODS: From the year 2011 to 2021, flow cytometry of all the cases with HCL diagnosis was reviewed, and three cases with negative or dim CD25 and hematological presentation matching with SBLPN were picked up.
    METHODS: Descriptive statistics is used.
    RESULTS: All the cases were male. The age ranges from 43 to 64 years. Median hemoglobin concentration, total leucocyte count, and platelet count were 8.6 g/dL, 6.9 × 109/L, and 53 × 109/L, respectively. The atypical cells were medium to large. All three showed prominent nucleoli. Bone marrow biopsies showed an interstitial pattern of infiltration in all the cases. The hairy cells were positive for CD20, CD11c, and CD103. CD25 was dim positive in one case. Annexin A1 was negative in all three cases. BRAF V600E mutation analysis was done in one case and turned out negative for the mutation.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBLPN is a rare entity, usually on-flow cytometry CD25 negative. However, in dim CD25-positive cases, BRAFV600E mutational analysis helps in discerning SBLPN diagnosis and differentiating it from HCL-c.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号