■本研究旨在通过文献计量学方法和软件来概括和描述眼内炎的研究热点,并分析过去30年来关于这种严重疾病的工作的演变趋势。
■这项研究采用了严格的文献计量学方法。我们通过在WebofScienceCoreCollection下对科学引文索引扩展数据库进行全面搜索,确定了所有与眼内炎相关的文献。然后使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer对数据进行分析和可视化,两个在文献计量学领域得到广泛认可的软件工具。CiteSpace被用来分析国家分布,期刊的双重地图叠加,关键字突发,和共同引用的参考文献。VOSviewer被用来描述作者和共同引用的作者,期刊,共同引用的期刊,和关键词共现网络。这种稳健的方法确保了研究结果的可靠性和有效性。
■共2960种出版物,包括2695篇文章和265条评论,被纳入本文献计量学研究。自1993年以来,与眼内炎相关的出版物并不缺乏,近年来有明显的上升趋势。还分析了与COVID-19大流行的可能相关性。这些研究由来自全球75个国家的11,048名作者完成。以美国为首。在关键词共现网络中,除了眼内炎术语,白内障手术成为频率最高的关键词。不同类别的眼内炎,包括术后,注射后,创伤后,和内源性眼内炎,以及感染性眼内炎的抗菌和抗炎治疗,按类别讨论。从时间线的角度来看,术后和注射后眼内炎分别是2000年前后的主要形式.共引分析表明,1995年进行的眼内炎玻璃体切除术研究(EVS)为以后的研究提供了关键的指导。多种致病菌(例如,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,痤疮丙酸杆菌,病毒链球菌,和蜡状芽孢杆菌)或真菌(例如,念珠菌,曲霉菌,和镰刀菌)有助于不同的治疗原则和临床预后,这是应该认真对待的。此外,玻璃体内和前房内抗生素是治疗和预防感染性眼内炎的主要药物,分别。
■我们的文献计量学分析概述了眼内炎研究领域的动态演变和结构关系。显示的热点和发展方向对未来的调查具有参考价值。
UNASSIGNED: This
study is designed to generalize and depict the research hotspots of endophthalmitis through bibliometric methods and
software and analyze the evolutive tendency of the work on this severe disease over the past 30 years.
UNASSIGNED: This
study employed a rigorous bibliometric approach. We identified all endophthalmitis-related literature by conducting a comprehensive search of the Science Citation Index Expanded database under the Web of Science Core Collection. The data was then analyzed and visualized using CiteSpace and VOSviewer, two widely recognized
software tools in the field of bibliometrics. CiteSpace was used to analyze the country distributions, dual map overlay of journals, keyword bursts, and co-cited references. VOSviewer was employed to describe the authors and co-cited authors, the journals, the co-cited journals, and the keywords co-occurrence network. This robust methodology ensures the reliability and validity of the
study\'s findings.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2960 publications, including 2695 articles and 265 reviews, were included in this bibliometric study. There has been no shortage of endophthalmitis-related publications since 1993, with an apparent upward trend during recent years. Possible correlations with the COVID-19 pandemic are also analyzed. These studies were finished by 11,048 authors from 75 countries worldwide, with the United States in the lead. In the keyword co-occurrence network, except for the endophthalmitis term, cataract surgery becomes the keyword with the highest frequency. Different categories of endophthalmitis, including postoperative, post-injection, post-traumatic, and endogenous endophthalmitis, and antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapies of infectious endophthalmitis, are discussed by categories. From the perspective of the timeline, postoperative and post-injection endophthalmitis were the dominant forms before and after the year 2000, respectively. Co-citation analyses reveal that the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) conducted in 1995 provides pivotal guidance for later research. Diverse pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Propionibacterium acnes, Viridians Streptococci, and Bacillus cereus) or fungi (e.g., Candida, Aspergillus, and Fusarium) contribute to varying treatment principles and clinical prognosis, which should be taken seriously. In addition, intravitreal and intracameral antibiotics are the mainstay for treating and preventing infectious endophthalmitis, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Our bibliometric analysis provides an overview of dynamic evolution and structural relationships in the research field of endophthalmitis. The displayed hotspots and developmental directions have reference values for future investigation.