UNASSIGNED: The hand is the highly specialized distal construct of the upper limb with complex and intricate anatomy. Soft tissue defects can compromise this and result in significant functional impairment. Choosing the optimal reconstructive modality is essential for the best functional recovery. The objective of this narrative review was to provide a treatment algorithm for soft tissue defects in the hand.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant literature for the topic was searched from PubMed and Cochrane Database from year 1953 up till end of November 2022. Specified searches for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and reviews were performed.
UNASSIGNED: There are no randomized controlled trials published on this topic. There are six systematic reviews or meta-analyses published. Most of the literature still comprises on expert opinion and case reports with few previously proposed algorithms. Defect features, size, location and depth, patient related factors and available resources are the main determinants of the treatment strategy. In the hand, there are reasonable locoregional coverage options, but microsurgical options should be a routine alternative of the treatment repertoire. In the thumb and fingers, the reconstruction depends remarkably on injury extent.
UNASSIGNED: Patient factors, surgical expertise, etiology, severity and goal of reconstruction will invariably have influence on the ultimate reconstruction performed, and algorithms may significantly help the surgical planning.

Opposition is an essential function of the human thumb to enable fine pinch and grip strength. Loss of opposition can be caused by both congenital and acquired pathology resulting in significant disability. This systematic review aims to compare the different techniques available to restore opposition. A systematic review of opponensplasty techniques was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines using PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science. Studies published in English before April 2021 and that reported on original outcomes of opponensplasty techniques used in the context of neurologic dysfunction were eligible for inclusion. A total of 641 articles were included, of which 42 texts were eligible for inclusion with a total cohort of 873 patients. The most commonly used transfers were palmaris longus (PL), extensor indicis proprius (EIP), and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS). These transfers all demonstrated an improvement in range of motion, pinch strength, and Kapandji scores. Complication rates of 19% and 12% were reported with FDS and EIP transfers, respectively, predominantly related to donor site morbidity. A complication rate of 6% was observed with PL transfers, which was most commonly related to bowstringing. Heterogeneity of outcomes precluded a direct statistical comparison. There is significant heterogeneity in the literature reporting on opponensplasty techniques. There is limited capacity of direct comparison; however, FDS and EIP appear to demonstrate better functional outcomes, at the cost of higher complication rates. Each technique has specific complications and advantages and importance in patient counseling and discussion. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted.

When evaluating the available literature on the diagnosis and management of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears (TFCC), ulnar tears comprise the major focus of TFCC literature. Radial-sided (Class 1D) tears are seldom researched or discussed. The purpose of this study was to review the methods for identifying and treating radial-sided TFCC lesions, by examining the anatomy of the TFCC, the pathology of its radial portion, diagnostic techniques, and both surgical and nonoperative treatments. The avascular nature of the radial TFCC may influence its healing potential. Magnetic resonance arthrogram is the gold standard for non-invasively diagnosing a radial-sided tear. Non-operative management should be exhausted prior to surgical intervention, which commonly involves an inside-out repair involving radial trans-osseous sutures. Still, the literature is limited by patient sample size and therefore requires a greater population of class 1-D tears to confirm optimal diagnostic and treatment methods.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting has become a popular tool in plastic surgery to solve soft tissue defects and achieve skin rejuvenation, but the volume loss after transplantation remains a disturbing problem. In recent years, some new strategies have improved the outcome to some extent, but the fat graft retention is still far from ideal, so there remains a wide development prospect in this field. Macrophages are closely related to the local microenvironment and tissue regeneration, and their role in fat grafting has been increasingly highlighted.
OBJECTIVE: This article was aimed to review the efficacy, possible mechanisms, and potential application of macrophage regulation on fat grafting, as well as concerns and future perspectives of this filed.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the published data was conducted.
RESULTS: Most studies indicated that up-regulating M2 macrophages during fat grafting would improve fat retention via promoting neovascularization. M2 macrophages could secrete several pro-angiogenic factors, accelerate extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and directly function on endothelial cells to encourage vascular expansion. In addition, macrophages could influence the proliferation, apoptosis, and adipogenic differentiation of preadipocytes.
CONCLUSIONS: During autologous fat grafting, appropriately regulating macrophages may become a promising method to increase fat retention. Nevertheless, the M2 macrophage polarizing agents, treatment opportunity, and contraindications require further discussion. We hope our work could promote more in-depth studies in this field, and we are looking forward to a standard procedure for the macrophage therapy in clinical practice.

A paucity of literature exists specifically examining self-inflicted (SI) gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the hand and wrist, which impart greater energy and have a higher risk of adverse events than non-self-inflicted (NSI) GSWs.
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who presented to our plastic surgery service after sustaining acute GSWs involving the hand and wrist between 2016 and 2018.
We identified 60 patients who sustained GSWs involving the hand and wrist; 17 (28%) were SI, and 43 (72%) were NSI. Within the SI group, 100% of patients were Caucasian, with an average age of 54 years. Within the NSI cohort, 77% of patients were Black, 19% were Caucasian, and 4% identified as other. While not statistically significant, we noted a substantial increase in patients requiring operative intervention in the SI cohort (65% SI vs 37% NSI, P = .08). There was a statistically significant increase in patients requiring more than 1 operation in SI patients (24% SI vs 5% NSI, P = .04). Patients who sustained SI injuries were also more likely to present with acute carpal tunnel syndrome requiring urgent surgical release and to develop wound infections (12% vs 0%, P = .08).
Self-inflicted GSWs involving the hand and wrist are associated with greater morbidity than their low-energy NSI counterparts. Individuals presenting with SI GSWs are more likely to be older, to require multiple operations, to develop infections, and to present with acute carpal tunnel syndrome requiring urgent surgical decompression.

Postoperative care after dorsal wrist ganglion (DWG) excision is highly varied. The effect of immobilization of the wrist on patient outcomes has not yet been examined.
A systematic review of the literature was performed to determine whether wrist immobilization after DWG surgical excision is beneficial. A survey of hand surgeons in Canada was performed to sample existing practice variations in current immobilization protocols after DWG excision.
A systematic review yielded 11 studies that rigidly immobilized the wrist (n = 5 open excision, n = 5 arthroscopic excision, n = 1 open or arthroscopic excision), 10 studies that used dressings to partially limit wrist motion (n = 5 open, n = 5 arthroscopic), 1 study (open) that did either of the above, and 2 studies (arthroscopic) that did not restrict wrist motion postoperatively. This ranged from 48 hours to 2 weeks in open DWG excision and 5 days to 3 weeks in arthroscopic DWG excision. The survey of Canadian hand surgeons had a similarly divided result of those who chose to immobilize the wrist fully (41%), partially (14%), or not at all (55%). Most surgeons surveyed who immobilized the wrist postoperatively did so for 1 to 2 weeks.
The systematic review and survey of Canadian hand surgeons reveal that hand surgeons are divided regarding the need to immobilize the wrist after DWG excision. In terms of functional outcome, there is no compelling data to suggest 1 strategy is superior. The time frame for immobilization when undertaken was short at 2 weeks or less.The systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO database (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016050877).

Just as in the craft of carpentry, a stable foundation and framework are absolutely essential to the final function of a building, but no more important than the drywall, trim, and paint that make the building functional, durable, and livable. Reconstruction of the lower extremity is similar; the orthopaedic surgeon must obtain stable fixation of the damaged or diseased bone once a thorough debridement of nonviable bone is performed, while the plastic or orthopaedic soft tissue surgeon must provide vascularized, stable coverage. These two components are complementary and both contribute to the success or failure of functional limb restoration. The stability of bone repair will predict the ultimate functional status, while the vascularized envelope will enhance the biology of bone and soft tissue healing. When both components are properly attended to, the result is often a functional limb with an acceptable appearance. While a single surgeon need not perform both of these tasks (although some may choose to do so), the orthopaedic and plastic surgeon involved in this care must have a clear understanding of each other\'s role and their importance for a good outcome. This is what we call the orthoplastic approach to reconstructive surgery of the extremities, that is, the application of principles and practice of both specialties applied simultaneously to optimize the outcomes in limb reconstruction. In this review article, we discuss the history of orthoplastic surgery, the key elements of orthoplastic surgery, and thoughts on factors that lead to good outcomes through select cases.

Significance: Wounds sustained in a combat trauma often result in a composite tissue loss. Combat injuries, due to high energy transfer to tissues, lead to trauma at multiple anatomical sites. An early wound cover is associated with lower rate of infections and a faster wound healing. The concept of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the management of combat-related wounds has evolved from the civilian trauma and the wounds from nontraumatic etiologies. Recent Advances: Encouraged by the results of NPWT in noncombat-related wounds, the military surgeons during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom used this novel method in a large percentage of combat wounds, with gratifying results. The mechanism of NPWT in wound healing is multifactorial and often complex reconstructive procedure can be avoided in a combat trauma setting. Critical Issues: Wounds sustained in military trauma are heavily contaminated with dirt, patient clothing, and frequently associated with extensive soft tissue loss and osseous destruction. Delay in evacuation during an ongoing conflict carries the risk of systemic infection. Early debridement is indicated followed by delayed closure of wounds. NPWT helps to provide temporary wound cover during the interim period of debridement and wound closure. Future Directions: Future area of research in combat wounds is related to abdominal trauma with loss of abdominal wall. The concept of negative pressure incisional management system in patients with a high risk of wound breakdown following surgery is under review, and may be of relevance in combat wounds.