sociology

社会学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在运动和运动医学中,损伤被认为不是孤立的事件,而是复杂的结果。这是因为运动员的健康轨迹被理解为是由动态塑造的,个人绩效之间的复杂联系,生物学以及个人表现的更广泛的社会和文化背景和系统。尽管有这样的认可,很少关注人际和情境动态如何通过影响教练的选择和决定而潜在地影响受伤的风险,父母和运动员。为了解决这个差距,这篇叙事回顾将体育社会文化研究的见解与体育损伤研究的发现联系起来。叙事回顾旨在确定和总结人际关系和情境动态如何影响青少年运动损伤的风险。结果揭示了运动员面临的压力,经常导致健康受损。此外,该审查强调了设计复杂的干预措施和策略以促进青年体育中更健康的做法的重要性。具体来说,干预计划应优先提高对伤害风险的认识,培养有效的沟通技巧和培养支持性的培训环境。
    Injuries are recognised in sports and exercise medicine as not isolated incidents but complex outcomes. This is because an athlete\'s health trajectory is understood to be shaped by dynamic, complex linkages between individual performance, biology, and the wider social and cultural contexts and systems in which individuals perform. Despite this recognition, little attention has been paid to how interpersonal and contextual dynamics can potentially affect the risk of injury by influencing the choices and decisions made by coaches, parents and athletes. To address this gap, this narrative review bridges insights from sociocultural studies in sports with the findings of sports injury research. The narrative review aims to identify and summarise how interpersonal and contextual dynamics influence the risk of youth sports injuries. The results reveal the pressures faced by athletes, often leading to compromised health. Moreover, the review underscores the importance of designing complex interventions and strategies to promote healthier practices in youth sports. Specifically, intervention programmes should prioritise raising awareness of injury risks, cultivating effective communication skills and fostering supportive training environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:维持稳定的血液供应对采血机构(BCA)提出了越来越大的挑战。新的和多学科的方法和研究被要求了解潜在的趋势的机制。当前献血的社会学研究是一个潜在的宝贵资源,但它分散在不同的出版物和理论框架上。
    方法:我们对自愿,无偿献血,以确定研究人员和BCA的见解和实际应用。
    结果:确定了四个组织主题:献血,献血者,组织和血液服务系统。与组织无偿献血相关的主要挑战存在于机构和系统层面,并且这些问题可能无法通过仅针对个人捐赠者的干预措施来解决。我们确定了组织通过沟通和与社区合作来建立与捐赠者和公众的信任的机会,以促进献血的包容性。
    结论:结果支持多学科方法和研究,以使BCA前进并找到确保安全的新方法,弹性血液服务系统。
    OBJECTIVE: Maintaining stable blood supplies presents an increasing challenge for blood collection agencies (BCAs). Novel and multidisciplinary approaches and research have been called for to understand the mechanisms underlying the trends. The current body of sociological research on blood donation is a potentially valuable resource, but it is dispersed over different publications and theoretical frameworks.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of sociological research on voluntary, non-remunerated blood donation to identify insights and practical applications for researchers and BCAs.
    RESULTS: Four organizing themes were identified: donated blood, blood donors, organizations and blood service systems. Key challenges associated with the organization of voluntary blood donation exist at the institutional and systems levels, and they may not be readily resolved by interventions focussed solely on the individual donor level. We identified opportunities for organizations to build trust with donors and the public through communications and working with communities to promote inclusion in blood donation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results support a multidisciplinary approach and research for BCAs to move forward and find novel ways to ensure safe, resilient blood service systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一种非常普遍的公共卫生挑战和侵犯人权的行为。社会学理论涉及社会结构,以了解针对妇女的IPV的流行和动态。本系统综述旨在(1)确定,描述,归类,并综合解释针对女性的IPV预测因素的社会学理论,(2)比较和对比IPV对女性预测因素的社会学理论。在对九个电子数据库进行结构化搜索后,审查小组成员根据纳入和排除标准筛选了标题/摘要和全文,确定与IPV预测因素理论相关的研究。评审团队成员根据为评审开发的数据提取模板提取数据。结果使用叙事综合方法呈现。在审查了108篇文章之后,纳入的文章被分成子理论。子理论提供了不同的,然而重叠,男性对IPV的预测因素和女性对IPV的经历。社会学理论主要涉及社会生态框架的外部和宏观系统层面,然而,一些还解决了对个人行为的结构性影响。这篇系统的综述填补了男性针对女性的IPV预测因素的社会学理论综合的空白,并对这些理论如何重叠和相交进行了批判性分析。虽然社会学理论可能无法完全解释男性对女性实施IPV的动态的所有方面,这一概述表明,社会学理论有几个令人信服的组成部分,对理解如何,where,以及IPV发生的原因。
    Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a highly prevalent public health challenge and human rights violation. Sociological theories address social structures to understand prevalence and dynamics of IPV against women. This systematic review aims (1) to identify, describe, categorize, and synthesize sociological theories that account for predictors of IPV against women, and (2) to compare and contrast sociological theories of predictors of IPV against women. Following a structured search of nine electronic databases, members of the review team screened title/abstract and full texts against inclusion and exclusion criteria, to identify studies that engaged with theory/ies of predictors of IPV. Review team members extracted data according to a data extraction template developed for the review. Results are presented using a narrative synthesis approach. Following review of 108 included articles, included articles were grouped into sub-theories. The sub-theories provide differing, yet overlapping, accounts of predictors of male perpetration of IPV and women\'s experience of IPV. Sociological theories primarily engage with exo- and macro-system levels of the social-ecological framework, yet some also address structural influences on individual behaviors. This systematic review fills a gap in theoretical syntheses of sociological theories of predictors of male-perpetrated IPV against women and also provides critical analysis of how these theories overlap and intersect. While sociological theories may not be able to fully explain all aspects of dynamics of male-perpetrated IPV against women, this overview indicates that there are several compelling components of sociological theory that hold explanatory power for comprehending how, where, and why IPV occurs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    口述历史作为一种理解生活经验的方法,跨越多个学科,包括教育,妇女和性别研究,历史,残疾研究。口述历史可以成为外围人们讲故事的工具,一种非常适合追求社会正义和社会工作的方法。本手稿的目的是报告范围审查,以更好地了解口述历史方法如何在社会工作中使用。
    要回答我们的复习问题,我们使用既定的范围审查框架。根据资格标准,确定了23份手稿-全部发表在2005年至2023年之间的同行评审英语期刊上,并由社会工作认证的作者撰写。
    作者确定了三个主题,反映了口述历史研究在社会工作中的用途:口述历史在社会工作教育中用作教学工具,口述历史用来记录社会服务开拓者的经验和知识,以及关于在社会工作中使用口述历史和其他传记方法的评论。
    这篇评论强调了口述历史,作为一种方法,为社会工作研究和奖学金做出了贡献。
    就口述历史对解决社会问题和对社会工作领域重要的实践问题的有用性提出了建议。
    UNASSIGNED: Oral history as a method of understanding the lived experience spans multiple disciplines including education, women and gender studies, history, and disability studies. Oral histories can be a vehicle for people on the periphery to tell their stories, a method well suited to pursuits related to social justice and social work. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on a scoping review that was conducted to better understand how oral history methods have been used in social work.
    UNASSIGNED: To answer our review question, we use an established scoping review framework. Based on eligibility criteria, 23 manuscripts were identified - all published in peer-reviewed English language journals between 2005 and 2023 and written by social work-credentialed authors.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors identified three themes that reflect the uses of oral history studies in social work: oral history used as a teaching tool in social work education, oral history used to document the experiences and knowledge of social service trailblazers, and commentaries about using oral history and other biographical methods in social work.
    UNASSIGNED: This review highlights how oral history, as a method, has contributed to social work research and scholarship.
    UNASSIGNED: Recommendations are made as to the usefulness of oral history to address social problems and practice issues important to the field of social work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对健康差距的认识日益提高,导致提出了以公平计酬计划的建议。实施此类建议需要系统的方法来收集和报告健康结果,以确定一段时间内的目标人口统计数据。这为从质量改进项目(QIPs)到平等改进项目(EQIPs)的转变奠定了基础,该项目可以评估对标准的遵守情况和健康公平的进展。我们对EQIP进行了范围审查,以通过健康公平视角为质量改进提供新的框架。40项研究在确定差异后实施了干预措施,而其他149项仅确定了群体差异。大多数评估基于种族的差异,并在机构层面进行,在住院和门诊环境中都有代表。改善股权的EQIP利用多学科的专业知识,医护人员教育,并开发了持续跟踪健康结果的工具。EQIP可以帮助弥合不平等差距,并成为激励的系统平等改善框架的一部分。
    Increasing awareness of health disparities has led to proposals for a pay-for-equity scheme. Implementing such proposals requires systematic methods of collecting and reporting health outcomes for targeted demographics over time. This lays the foundation for a shift from quality improvement projects (QIPs) to equality improvement projects (EQIPs) that could evaluate adherence to standards and progress toward health equity. We performed a scoping review on EQIPs to inform a new framework for quality improvement through a health equity lens. Forty studies implemented an intervention after identifying a disparity compared to 149 others which merely identified group differences. Most evaluated race-based differences and were conducted at the institutional level, with representation in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. EQIPs that improved equity leveraged multidisciplinary expertise, healthcare staff education, and developed tools to track health outcomes continuously. EQIPs can help bridge the inequality gap and form part of an incentivized systematic equality improvement framework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为抑郁症患者的近亲,会给前者带来沉重的代价,但是这些亲戚越来越有责任承担起广泛的照顾者角色。对抑郁症患者亲属的研究目前主要集中在“照顾者负担”上,尽管这样的重点可以解释许多亲属的经历和日常生活,它提供了非常有限的洞察力,一个人的日常生活与抑郁症患者的生活。因此,我们对抑郁症患者的亲属进行了定性研究,并确定了由显性或隐性理论或方法论假设引起的知识差距。我们在CINAHL进行了详尽的文献检索,PubMed,PsycINFO,社会学文摘,还有Eric.总的来说,包括34种出版物,评估他们的质量,并绘制和总结他们的发现。我们确定了四个相互关联和重叠的主题,这些主题主导了出版物的发现:(a)认识到“抑郁症”,(b)情绪反应,(c)关系中断,和(d)分阶段的社会心理过程。绝大多数研究提出了去语境化和解释不足的分析,假设(疾病)经验的同质性,并忽略了社会贡献者对社会关系的重要影响,连通性,和心理健康问题。
    Being a close relative of a person with depression can take a heavy toll on the former, but these relatives are increasingly made responsible for taking on extensive carer roles. Research on relatives of people with depression is currently dominated by a focus on \"carer burden\" and although such a focus can explain many relatives\' experiences and daily lives, it provides very limited insight into the everyday life of a person living with someone with depression. Therefore, we scoped qualitative research on people who are relatives of people living with depression and identified knowledge gaps caused by explicit or implicit theoretical or methodological assumptions. We conducted an exhaustive literature search in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and Eric. In total, 34 publications were included, their quality evaluated and their findings mapped and summarized. We identified four interrelated and overlapping themes that dominated the findings of the publications: (a) recognition of \"depression\", (b) emotional responses, (c) interruptions of relationships, and (d) a staged psychosocial process. The vast majority of studies presented de-contextualized and underinterpreted analyses assuming a homogeneity of (illness) experiences and disregarded the important influence of social contributors to social relationships, connectedness, and mental health problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇文章提供了对重点民族志的第一次批判性审查,在健康学科中越来越流行的研究方法。专注的人种学家,我们争论,举例说明方法论边界工作的实践,与人类学和社会学的传统人种学方法相反,定义了他们的方法。为了检查这个边界工作,我们收集了过去十年发表的两篇健康研究文章样本,并比较了民族志学家和医学人类学家的描述,正当的,并练习人种学。我们发现,最常断言将重点人种学与常规人种学区分开的核心特征是:更有限的研究时间范围和范围;有限的亚群样本;更集中的研究问题;纳入内部研究人员;以及更多针对应用结果的方向。我们展示,然而,这些是想象中的二进制文件,无法映射到两个样本中实际的实践差异,并且掩盖了它们之间的许多相似之处。相比之下,我们确定了两种人种学方法之间的四个替代差异.这些中心是对“研究时间”的理解;人种学的意义;研究人员与“数据”的关系;以及假定的最佳社会干预方法。因此,我们将重点民族志定义为民族志的一种通用方法,该方法关注健康科学中关于有效证明和经验描述的特定认识论期望,研究的边界,研究关系的性质,以及改善生物医学的责任。最终,我们的研究强调了方法论上的边界工作很重要,因为假定的差异和未表达的误解会阻止学科之间进行富有成效的对话和富有成效的合作,以解决紧迫的健康问题。
    This article offers the first critical review of focused ethnography, an increasingly popular research method across health disciplines. Focused ethnographers, we argue, exemplify the practice of methodological boundary work, defining their method in contrast to the \'traditional\' ethnographic approach of anthropology and sociology. To examine this boundary work, we collected two samples of health research articles published over the last decade and compared how focused ethnographers and medical anthropologists described, justified, and practised ethnography. We found that the core characteristics most often asserted to differentiate focused ethnography from conventional ethnography were: a more limited study timeframe and scope; a limited subpopulation sample; more concentrated research questions; the inclusion of insider researchers; and more orientation towards applied results. We show, however, that these are imagined binaries that fail to map onto actual differences of practice in the two samples and which obscure many similarities between them. By contrast, we identified four alternative differences between the two methods of ethnography. These centre on understandings of \'research time\'; the very meaning of ethnography; the relationship of researchers to \'data\'; and the presumed best method of social intervention. We therefore define focused ethnography as a versatile method of ethnography that attends to specific epistemological expectations within the health sciences regarding valid proof and empirical description, the boundaries of research, the nature of research relationships, and the duty to improve biomedicine. Ultimately, our study highlights that methodological boundary-work matters, because assumed differences and unexpressed misunderstandings can prevent productive dialogue and fruitful collaboration between disciplines to address pressing health problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Purpose: The capacity to recover motor function with pathology or age-related decline is termed physical resilience. It is unknown what outcome domains are captured with existing measurement instruments. Thus, this scoping review aimed to identify measurement instruments for physical resilience, identify research gaps, and make recommendations for future research. Methods: Articles were included from the search when their subject matter included the term resilience in relation to the physical health of older adults. Data on physical resilience measurement instruments were extracted using the outcome domains: body function or structure, activity and participation, and societal impact. Results: The majority of the 33 included articles involved older adults with fractures, cardiac conditions, and cancer. Many measurement instruments quantified body function or structure, and some instruments captured activity and participation, and societal impact of physical resilience. Measurement instruments were pooled into 4 categories: psychological, physiological, motor function, and psychosocial scales. No studies combined all areas of measurement. Conclusions: A potential gap of a measurement instrument capturing social aspects of physical resilience was identified. Comprehensive measurement could identify which outcome domains could be targeted to foster resilience. This knowledge might be useful across many health disciplines and contribute to therapeutic decision-making and rehabilitation strategies.
    Objectif : la résilience physique désigne la capacité de recouvrer sa fonction motrice malgré le déclin lié à une pathologie ou à l’âge. On ne sait pas quels domaines de résultats cliniques les instruments de mesure actuels saisissent. Ainsi, la présente étude de portée visait à déterminer les instruments pour mesurer la résilience physique, repérer les lacunes de la recherche et faire des recommandations en vue des futures recherches. Méthodologie : les articles de la recherche étaient conservés lorsque leur sujet incluait le terme resilience à l’égard de la santé physique des personnes âgées. Les chercheurs ont extrait les données sur les instruments de mesure de la résilience physique au moyen des domaines de résultats suivants : fonction ou structure corporelle, l’activité et la participation et les répercussions sociétales. Résultats : la majorité des 33 articles inclus portaient sur des personnes âgées ayant des fractures, des affections cardiaques et un cancer. De nombreux instruments de mesure quantifiaient la fonction ou la structure corporelle et certains saisissaient l’activité, la participation et les répercussions sociétales de la résilience physique. Les chercheurs ont regroupé les instruments de mesure en quatre catégories : échelles psychologique, physiologique, de la fonction motrice et psychosociale. Aucune étude ne combinait tous les domaines de mesure. Conclusions : les chercheurs ont repéré une lacune potentielle d’un instrument qui saisit les aspects sociaux de la résilience physique. Une mesure exhaustive pourrait déterminer les domaines de résultat à cibler pour favoriser la résilience. Ces connaissances pourraient être utiles dans de nombreuses disciplines et contribuer aux décisions thérapeutiques et aux stratégies de réadaptation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:社会计量或全网络分析,一种用于分析社会行为者之间关系模式的方法,强调社会结构在塑造行为中的作用。这种方法已应用于非法药物研究的许多方面,包括公共卫生领域,流行病学,和犯罪学。以前关于社交网络和药物的评论缺乏对使用社会计量网络分析进行跨学科非法药物研究的关注。当前的范围审查旨在概述非法药物研究中使用的社会计量网络分析方法,并评估如何将此类方法用于未来的研究。
    方法:对六个数据库的系统搜索(WebofScience,ProQuest社会学合集,政治学完整,PubMed,刑事司法摘要,和PsycINFO)返回了72项符合纳入标准的相关研究。要包括在内,研究不得不提到非法药物,并使用整个社会网络分析作为他们的方法之一。使用数据图表形式和研究主要主题的描述对研究进行了定量和定性总结。
    结果:在过去十年中,非法药物研究中的社会计量网络分析越来越受欢迎,主要使用描述性的网络指标,如度中心性(72.2%)和密度(44.4%)。研究被发现属于三个研究领域。第一,毒品犯罪调查了贩毒网络中的网络复原力和协作模式。第二个领域,公共卫生,专注于吸毒者的社交网络和社会支持。最后,第三个领域侧重于政策的协作网络,执法,和服务提供商。
    结论:使用整个网络SNA的未来非法药物研究应包括更多不同的数据源和样本,结合混合和定性方法,并应用社会网络分析研究药物政策。
    Sociometric or whole network analysis, a method used to analyze relational patterns among social actors, emphasizes the role of social structure in shaping behaviour. Such method has been applied to many aspects of illicit drug research, including in the areas of public health, epidemiology, and criminology. Previous reviews about social networks and drugs have lacked a focus on the use of sociometric network analysis for illicit drugs research across disciplines. The current scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the sociometric network analysis methods used in illicit drugs research and to assess how such methods could be used for future research.
    A systematic search of six databases (Web of Science, ProQuest Sociology Collection, Political Science Complete, PubMed, Criminal Justice Abstracts, and PsycINFO) returned 72 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to mention illicit drugs and use whole social network analysis as one of their methods. Studies were summarized quantitatively and qualitatively using a data-charting form and a description of the studies\' main topics.
    Sociometric network analysis in illicit drugs research has grown in popularity in the last decade, using mostly descriptive network metrics, such as degree centrality (72.2%) and density (44.4%). Studies were found to belong to three study domains. The first, drug crimes investigated network resilience and collaboration patterns in drug trafficking networks. The second domain, public health, focused on the social networks and social support of people who use drugs. Finally, the third domain focused on the collaboration networks of policy, law enforcement, and service providers.
    Future illicit drugs research using whole network SNA should include more diverse data sources and samples, incorporate mixed and qualitative methods, and apply social network analysis to study drug policy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理学和神经科学对理解同情的进步做出了重大贡献。相比之下,很少有人关注同情心的流行病学。人类的同情心经验在时间上是异质的,地点,和人。因此,同情心有流行病学,尽管人们对同情的空间或时间聚类的因素知之甚少,或者如何利用这些因素来促进和实现一个更富有同情心的世界。我们回顾了科学文献,以描述对他人同情的“风险因素”。如果研究使用定量方法,把同情当作一种结果,并使用了同情措施,其中包括同情和减轻痛苦的行动。82项研究符合纳入标准;对89项潜在危险因素进行了418次与同情心的相关性测试。发现个体人口统计学因素与同情心有显著关联(例如,性别,宗教信仰);个人特征(例如,情商,透视,安全附件);个人经验(例如,以前的逆境);行为(例如,教会出席);同情遭遇期间的环境因素(例如,对痛苦严重性的看法,同情者和接受者的关系接近度,同情者的情绪状态);和组织特征。很少有研究探讨接受能力,而不是给予,同情。同情的定义和措施在不同学科之间差异很大;87%的研究使用自我报告措施,39%使用横截面设计。10项随机临床试验记录了同情训练的有效性。从流行病学的角度来看,大多数研究将同情心视为一种个体宿主因素,而不是被时间或环境传播或影响。从痛苦到同情反应的因果途径似乎是非线性和复杂的。在某些环境或特定人群中,各种因素(充当效果修饰剂)似乎对同情的产生是允许的或必不可少的。未来关于同情心的流行病学研究应考虑背景和环境因素,并应阐明组织和人类系统内与同情心相关的动态。此类研究应通过一系列流行病学工具和方法来进行,以及其他科学学科和精神和宗教传统的见解。
    Psychology and neuroscience have contributed significantly to advances in understanding compassion. In contrast, little attention has been given to the epidemiology of compassion. The human experience of compassion is heterogeneous with respect to time, place, and person. Therefore, compassion has an epidemiology, although little is known about the factors that account for spatial or temporal clustering of compassion or how these factors might be harnessed to promote and realize a more compassionate world. We reviewed the scientific literature to describe what is known about \"risk factors\" for compassion towards others. Studies were included if they used quantitative methods, treated compassion as an outcome, and used measures of compassion that included elements of empathy and action to alleviate suffering. Eighty-two studies met the inclusion criteria; 89 potential risk factors were tested 418 times for association with compassion. Significant associations with compassion were found for individual demographic factors (e.g., gender, religious faith); personal characteristics (e.g., emotional intelligence, perspective-taking, secure attachment); personal experience (e.g., previous adversity); behaviors (e.g., church attendance); circumstantial factors during the compassion encounter (e.g., perceptions of suffering severity, relational proximity of the compassion-giver and -receiver, emotional state of the compassion-giver); and organizational features. Few studies explored the capacity to receive, rather than give, compassion. Definitions and measures of compassion varied widely across disciplines; 87% of studies used self-report measures and 39% used a cross-sectional design. Ten randomized clinical trials documented the effectiveness of compassion training. From an epidemiologic perspective, most studies treated compassion as an individual host factor rather than as transmissible or influenced by time or the environment. The causal pathways leading from suffering to a compassionate response appear to be non-linear and complex. A variety of factors (acting as effect modifiers) appear to be permissive of-or essential for-the arising of compassion in certain settings or specific populations. Future epidemiologic research on compassion should take into account contextual and environmental factors and should elucidate compassion-related dynamics within organizations and human systems. Such research should be informed by a range of epidemiologic tools and methods, as well as insights from other scientific disciplines and spiritual and religious traditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号