social inclusion

社会包容
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结核病(TB)仍然是尼泊尔的主要公共卫生问题,在普遍存在的性别和社会不平等的环境中很高。各种社会分层交叉,根据个人的特征和背景,特权或压迫个人,从而增加风险,与TB相关的漏洞和边际化。本研究旨在通过对通过HMIS记录的结核病病例进行交叉分析,评估性别和其他社会分层因素在关键卫生相关国家政策和国家结核病计划(NTP)的健康管理信息系统(HMIS)中的包容性。
    方法:对关键政策和NTP的HMIS进行了案头审查。回顾性交叉分析利用了两个次要数据来源:年度NTP报告(2017-2021年)和两个结核病中心通过HMIS6.5记录的628例结核病病例(2017/18-2018/19)。使用卡方检验和多变量分析来评估社会分层与结核病类型之间的关联。登记类别和治疗结果。
    结果:性别,社会包容和交叉性概念被纳入各种卫生政策和战略,但缺乏有效的实施。NTP已经开始收集年龄,性别,自2014/15年以来通过HMIS的种族和位置数据。然而,只定期报告按年龄和性别分类的数据,留下记录的结核病患者社会分层静态,没有分析和传播。此外,使用TB二级数据进行交叉分析的结果,结果显示,与25岁以下的男性结核病患者相比,25岁以上的男性患者显示出更高的成功结局[调整后优势比(aOR)=4.95,95%置信区间(CI):1.60-19.06,P=0.01]。同样,性别与TB类型显著相关(P<0.05),而年龄(P<0.05)和性别(P<0.05)与患者登记类别(新旧病例)显著相关.
    结论:结果突出了常规HMIS中社会分层者的可用性不足。这种限制阻碍了NTP进行交叉分析的能力,对于揭示结核病其他社会决定因素的作用至关重要。这种局限性突出表明,需要在常规NTP中提供更多分类数据,以更好地为政策和计划提供信息,从而有助于制定更敏感和公平的结核病计划,并有效解决差距。
    BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health problem in Nepal, high in settings marked by prevalent gender and social inequities. Various social stratifiers intersect, either privileging or oppressing individuals based on their characteristics and contexts, thereby increasing risks, vulnerabilities and marganilisation associated with TB. This study aimed to assess the inclusiveness of gender and other social stratifiers in key health related national policies and the Health Management Information System (HMIS) of National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) by conducting an intersectional analysis of TB cases recorded via HMIS.
    METHODS: A desk review of key policies and the NTP\'s HMIS was conducted. Retrospective intersectional analysis utilized two secondary data sources: annual NTP report (2017-2021) and records of 628 TB cases via HMIS 6.5 from two TB centres (2017/18-2018/19). Chi-square test and multi-variate analysis was used to assess the association between social stratifers and types of TB, registration category and treatment outcome.
    RESULTS: Gender, social inclusion and concept of intersectionality are incorporated into various health policies and strategies but lack effective implementation. NTP has initiated the collection of age, sex, ethnicity and location data since 2014/15 through the HMIS. However, only age and sex disaggregated data are routinely reported, leaving recorded social stratifiers of TB patients static without analysis and dissemination. Furthermore, findings from the intersectional analysis using TB secondary data, showed that male more than 25 years exhibited higher odds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60-19.06, P = 0.01)] of successful outcome compared to male TB patients less than 25 years. Similarly, sex was significantly associated with types of TB (P < 0.05) whereas both age (P < 0.05) and sex (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with patient registration category (old/new cases).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight inadequacy in the availability of social stratifiers in the routine HMIS. This limitation hampers the NTP\'s ability to conduct intersectional analyses, crucial for unveiling the roles of other social determinants of TB. Such limitation underscores the need for more disaggregated data in routine NTP to better inform policies and plans contributing to the development of a more responsive and equitable TB programme and effectively addressing disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:学校操场上的户外社交参与对于儿童的社会情感和认知发展至关重要。然而,主流教育环境中的许多残疾儿童没有被社会纳入他们的同龄人群体。我们检查了松散零件游戏(LPP)是否,一种常见且具有成本效益的干预措施,可改变游乐场的游戏环境,以增强儿童主导的免费游戏,可以促进残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的社会参与。
    方法:42名小学生,其中三个患有听力损失或自闭症,评估了两次基线和四次干预会议。我们采用了混合方法设计,结合先进的传感器方法,观察,同行提名,自我报告,定性现场笔记和对操场老师的采访。
    结果:研究结果表明,所有儿童在社会互动和社交游戏干预期间均有所下降,网络中心性没有变化。无残疾儿童的独处游戏和互动伙伴的多样性也有所增加。所有孩子对LPP的享受都很高,然而,与基线水平相比,残疾儿童并未从干预措施中获益,并且变得更加孤立.
    结论:在主流环境下的LPP期间,残疾儿童和非残疾儿童在校园中的社会参与并没有改善。研究结果强调,在设计游乐场干预措施时,需要考虑残疾儿童的社会需求,并重新思考LPP哲学和实践,使其适应包容性设置和目标。
    Outdoor social participation in the school playground is crucial for children\'s socio-emotional and cognitive development. Yet, many children with disabilities in mainstream educational settings are not socially included within their peer group. We examined whether loose-parts-play (LPP), a common and cost-effective intervention that changes the playground play environment to enhance child-led free play, can promote social participation for children with and without disabilities.
    Forty-two primary school children, out of whom three had hearing loss or autism, were assessed for two baseline and four intervention sessions. We applied a mixed-method design, combining advanced sensors methodology, observations, peer nominations, self-reports, qualitative field notes and an interview with the playground teachers.
    Findings indicated for all children a decrease during the intervention in social interactions and social play and no change in network centrality. Children without disabilities displayed also an increase in solitude play and in the diversity of interacting partners. Enjoyment of LPP was high for all children, yet children with disabilities did not benefit socially from the intervention and became even more isolated compared with baseline level.
    Social participation in the schoolyard of children with and without disabilities did not improve during LPP in a mainstream setting. Findings emphasize the need to consider the social needs of children with disabilities when designing playground interventions and to re-think about LPP philosophy and practices to adapt them to inclusive settings and goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,在芬兰,大约五分之一的人口居住在1960年代和1970年代建造的社区中。建筑环境老化,与此同时,最古老的居民群体的比例也在增长。邻里环境和社会凝聚力对弱势群体来说变得很重要,比如老年人,他们花了很多时间在家里和周围。城市的致密化和旧街区的更新需要考虑当地的人口结构,他们对物质和社会环境的需求。本文介绍了一个正在进行的案例研究。目的是认识到社区中包容性社会活动的有意义的空间,关注老年人。定性和混合方法用于研究老年人的生活经历及其与邻居的关系。社区案例研究正在经历一个重要的城市发展过程。一个新的服务中心,拥有商业和公共服务以及新的地铁站,吸引老年人搬到这个地区。由于大多数活动都集中在新的服务中心,弱势群体获得当地服务变得更加困难。与以前相比,社区内非正式社交的空间越来越少,各个年龄段的人都生活在一个人的家庭中。为了建立社会可持续发展的社区,所有居民群体的融合很重要。成功的城市转型惠及新居民,但也包括目前的居民。考虑到通用设计原则的致密化和翻新可以支持生命力,社会凝聚力,和邻居的吸引力。
    Currently, in Finland approximately one fifth of the population live in the neighborhoods built in the 1960s and 1970s. The built environment is aging, and at the same time the share of the oldest resident cohorts is growing. The neighborhood built environment and social cohesion become important for vulnerable groups, such as older people, who spend a lot of their time at home and in the surroundings. Urban densification and renewal of the old neighborhoods need to take into consideration the local population structure, their needs for the physical and social environment. This paper presents an ongoing case study. The objective was to recognize the meaningful spaces for inclusive social activities in the neighborhood, focusing on aging residents. Qualitative and mixed methods were used to study older people\'s lived experiences and their relation to the neighborhood. The case study neighborhood is undergoing an important urban development process. A new service hub, with commercial and public services as well as a new metro station, is attracting seniors to move to the area. As most activities are concentrated in the new service hub, access to local services become more difficult for vulnerable groups. The spaces for informal social encounters within the neighborhood are getting fewer and more people of all ages are living in one-person households than previously. To build socially sustainable communities, the integration of all resident groups is important. Successful urban transformation benefits new residents, but also include current residents. The densification and renovation taking into account Universal Design principles can support the vitality, social cohesion, and attractiveness of a neighborhood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    决策是个人或团体在几种选择中确定和选择最佳选择所采用的本质上的社会过程。决策选择受偏好的影响,值,以及参与决策过程的个人或群体的信念。进行这项研究是为了分析残疾人(PWD)在参与决策的背景下的社会包容性。研究区域包括在巴基斯坦政府注册的8028名残疾人,通过多阶段分层随机抽样技术从中选择了488个PWD样本。这些残疾人包括身体残疾,盲,残废,和聋人;然而,这些数据是从能够接受采访的人那里收集的。卡方和肯德尔的Tau-b检验用于确定强度,level,和变量之间的关联方向。在多元水平上,研究发现,在控制性别时,社会包容和参与决策之间存在虚假关系,家庭月收入,残疾人士的残疾程度。结果表明,参与决策更积极地改善了男性和中度残疾残疾人的社会包容性。然而,参与决策是一个普遍的特征,解释了残疾人的社会包容性,无论他们每月的家庭收入如何。logistic回归模型解释说,当PWD结婚时,PWD的社会融合更有可能发生,家庭月收入较高(16500PKR及以上),属于一个共同的家庭,积极参与决策。该研究建议确保残疾人士参与家庭决策,社区,学校,和其他相关机构最终增强了他们的社会包容性。
    Decision making is an essentially social process adopted by individuals or groups to identify and choose the best choice among several alternatives. Decision-making choices are influenced by the preferences, values, and beliefs of the individuals or groups involved in the decision-making process. This study was conducted to analyze the social inclusion of Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) in the context of their participation in decision making. The study area consisted of 8028 PWDs registered with the government of Pakistan, from which a sample of 488 PWDs was selected through a multistage stratified random sampling technique. These PWDs included physically disabled, blind, crippled, and deaf persons; however, the data were collected from those who were able to be interviewed. Chi-square and Kendall\'s Tau-b tests were used to determine the strength, level, and direction of association among variables. At the multivariate level, the study found a spurious relation between social inclusion and participation in decision making when controlling for gender, monthly family income, and level of disability of the PWDs. The results highlighted that participation in decision making improved the social inclusion of male and moderately disabled PWDs more positively. However, participation in decision making was a universal feature explaining the social inclusion of PWDs irrespective of their monthly family income. The logistic regression model explained that the social inclusion of PWDs was more likely to occur when PWDs were married, had high monthly family income (PKR 16,500 and above), belonged to a joint family, and actively participated in decision making. The study recommends that ensuring the participation of PWDs in decision making in family, community, school, and other relevant institutions ultimately enhances their social inclusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Whilst cities can be sites of creativity, innovation, and change, they can also reproduce the conditions for the exclusion of vulnerable groups. Older people report experiencing specific barriers to accessing the city and are often excluded from the resources for ageing well. The smart city agenda has attempted to bring about technological change whilst also delivering improved quality of life for urban citizens. Smart technologies are a key element of the smart city and are viewed as having the potential to support the independence, autonomy, and well-being of older people. Yet, there has been little research exploring the role of the smart city in supporting the social inclusion of older people, nor any attempt to link this with key policy drivers on ageing e.g., age-friendly cities and communities. In response, the aim of this paper is to explore the experiences of older people living in a smart city in China and discuss how the smart city and age-friendly agenda can be brought together to support positive social outcomes for older people. The paper presents qualitative findings from a multi-methods approach, including semi-structured interviews, walking interviews and focus groups. A total of 64 older people participated in the research across three diverse neighbourhoods in the case study smart city of Chongqing, China. The findings identified opportunities in the development and deployment of smart city, including the potential for improved health and well-being and social connectedness. Yet in delivering on these benefits, a number of challenges were identified which may widen social inequalities, including inequities in access, issues of safety and security, and exclusion from the co-production of smart city policy and practise. The paper discusses the implications of the findings for future smart city policy and practise, specifically in delivering interventions that support older adults\' social inclusion and the delivery of age-friendly cities and communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The situation of labour inclusion of people with disabilities in Spain is still too negative, in spite of the different efforts carried out by public and private sector. Previous research points to social discrimination as one of the main causes of the situation. Ilunion Hotels is one of the most important hotel companies in Spain focused on labour inclusion of people with disabilities. The objective of this paper is to explore the social inclusion case of Ilunion Hotels of the Costa del Sol, the actions that they have developed to improve the labour integration of this collective, based on a behavioral economics theoretical model (with a high relevance of the influence of social stigma, stress theories and coping to stress responses). We look into the specific situation of two of the three hotels developed as Special Employment Centres (sheltered employment contexts defined by Spanish legislation) and the possible impact of their Support Units for Professional Activity. Case study methodology is considered the most appropriate, according to the research objective, supported by semi-structured interviews with the hotel managers. The results show that, although Special Employment Centres are effective in improving labour integration in the short term and could contribute to change the long-term social perspectives about workers with disabilities, they could be also reinforcing the social stigma existing in the ordinary market.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This article will survey the dramatic change English football had undergone since the end of the last century. The authors will closely explore the implementation of the Taylor Report recommendations, to convince that which power and management techniques were used to decrease violence in public areas that were previously considered dangerous and crime-oriented. It will be argued that disciplinarian techniques were practiced, much like those described in Foucault\'s Discipline and Punish, while this very power has proven to be positive and revitalizing. It will be therefore concluded that power is at its most effective when operated via techniques of discipline and social inclusion. These arguments correspond with the positive criminology theory whose popularity within the discipline is gradually increasing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The use of city centre spaces by people with learning disability is not much debated in the literature. Here we include the thoughts and opinions of groups of people with learning disability as we undertook some guided walks through Sheffield city centre. We found that few of the participants had independent access to the city centre. Many cited concerns over personal safety and the most, on few occasions when they did visit, did so with family and/or paid staff for pre-planned purposes, usually linked to shopping. The need for appropriate support figured prominently. There is also a need to re-assess what we mean by social inclusion for this cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究社会弱势少数族裔使用者参与精神保健管理的动机。
    方法:采用了定性案例研究方法,以调查里约热内卢CAPSPedroPellegrino的东北少数民族用户参与精神卫生保健治理的情况。巴西。对少数北方人(n=12)和机构利益相关者(n=26)的半结构化访谈得到了对用户集会和用户运动会议的参与者观察的补充。
    结果:东北少数民族表达了参与精神卫生保健治理的个人和集体动机。个人动机包括增加社交互动的愿望,获得有意义的社会角色,克服精神疾病带来的耻辱。集体动机包括旨在提高精神保健的反应能力,并为有精神问题的人实现社会正义。一起来看,这些动机表明,用户强烈希望促进他们的社会包容和包容也经历边缘化的其他人。结果还表明,长期参与者的参与主要由集体目标驱动,而早期参与者主要集中在处理个人问题上。这与相互激励理论相悖,这假设在解释用户参与时,集体动机高于个人动机。
    结论:历史上被排除在决策过程之外的群体可能会将社会包容视为其参与的核心目标。旨在提高用户参与医疗保健治理的举措必须解决推动用户参与的动机范围,而不是只关注与医疗保健管理和提供有关的问题。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance by socially disadvantaged ethnic minority users.
    METHODS: A qualitative case study approach was employed to investigate the involvement of minority north-eastern users in mental health-care governance at CAPS Pedro Pellegrino in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Semi-structured interviews with minority Northeasterners (n = 12) and institutional stakeholders (n = 26) were complemented by participant observation of user assembly and user movement meetings.
    RESULTS: Minority Northeasterners express both individual and collective motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance. Individual motivations include the desire to increase social interaction, acquire meaningful social roles and overcome the stigma attached to mental illness. Collective motivations include the intent to improve the responsiveness of mental health care and achieve social justice for people with mental problems. Taken together, these motivations demonstrate a strong aspiration by users to promote their social inclusion and the inclusion of others who also experience marginalization. Results also reveal that the involvement of long-term participants is driven mostly by collective goals while early-stage participants focus predominantly in dealing with individual concerns. This is at odds with the mutual incentives theory, which postulates that collective motivations prevail over individual motivations in explaining user involvement.
    CONCLUSIONS: Groups historically excluded from decision-making processes may identify social inclusion as the core goal of their involvement. Initiatives aiming to increase user participation in health-care governance must address the range of motivations driving the involvement of users, instead of focusing solely on issues related to health-care management and provision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The present study examined the correspondence between perceived and actual social discrimination of overweight people. In total, 77 first-year students provided self-ratings about their height, weight, and perceived social inclusion. To capture actual social inclusion, each participant nominated those fellow students (a) she/he likes and dislikes and (b) about whom she/he is likely to hear social news. Students with lower Body Mass Index (BMI) felt socially included, irrespective of their actual social inclusion. In contrast, students with higher BMI felt socially included depending on the degree of their actual social inclusion. Specifically, their felt social inclusion accurately reflected whether they were actually liked/disliked, but only when they were part of social news. When not part of social news, they also showed insensitivity to their actual social inclusion status. Thus, students with a lower BMI tended to be insensitive, while students with a higher BMI showed a differential sensitivity to actual social discrimination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号