skill

技能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从进化的角度来看,艺术提出了许多难题。人类投入大量精力来产生包括艺术品在内的明显无用的展示。这些差异很大,从普通到复杂。从信号理论的角度来看,这些对高度复杂的艺术设计的投资可以反映有关个人及其社会地位的信息。使用来自印度南部的大量kolam艺术(192名女性的N=3139kolam),我们检验了许多关于社会分层和个体差异影响艺术设计复杂性的假设。与约束优化的进化信号理论一致,我们发现科兰艺术倾向于占据艺术复杂性的“甜蜜点”,用香农信息熵来衡量,从小到大图纸保持相对恒定。这种稳定性是通过一个可观察的,显然是无意识的两种标准信息理论度量之间的权衡:丰富性和均匀性。虽然这些图纸出现在一个高度分层,基于种姓的社会,我们没有找到强有力的证据表明艺术复杂性受到印度社会种姓界限的影响。相反,权衡可能是由于个人层面的审美偏好和技能差异,奉献和时间,以及人类认知和记忆的基本约束。
    From an evolutionary perspective, art presents many puzzles. Humans invest substantial effort in generating apparently useless displays that include artworks. These vary greatly from ordinary to intricate. From the perspective of signalling theory, these investments in highly complex artistic designs can reflect information about individuals and their social standing. Using a large corpus of kolam art from South India (N = 3139 kolam from 192 women), we test a number of hypotheses about the ways in which social stratification and individual differences affect the complexity of artistic designs. Consistent with evolutionary signalling theories of constrained optimisation, we find that kolam art tends to occupy a \'sweet spot\' at which artistic complexity, as measured by Shannon information entropy, remains relatively constant from small to large drawings. This stability is maintained through an observable, apparently unconscious trade-off between two standard information-theoretic measures: richness and evenness. Although these drawings arise in a highly stratified, caste-based society, we do not find strong evidence that artistic complexity is influenced by the caste boundaries of Indian society. Rather, the trade-off is likely due to individual-level aesthetic preferences and differences in skill, dedication and time, as well as the fundamental constraints of human cognition and memory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管近年来职业健康与安全(OHS)有所改善,但由于职业安全实践不良而造成的经济负担仍然很高。进行风险评估是改善OHS的一种方法。工作场所可能没有足够的风险评估专业知识。这项研究的目的是确定所需的OHS风险评估技能,目前在工作场所的支持和提高风险评估技能的方法。这项研究是通过对OHS专家的Delphi调查(n=13)和案例公司的访谈(n=41)进行的。OHS专家一致认为,最重要的技能是让员工识别工作中的危险并将风险降至最低;让主管以良好的榜样影响他人;以及让OHS专家了解和管理安全实践的整体性,并理解和管理其含义。概念,和风险评估标准。当前的主要支持方法是在工作中学习,培训和书面说明。然而,许多受访者认为他们没有接受风险评估培训,支持取决于他们的活动。最后,OHS专家确定提高风险评估技能的最可行方法是培训,指导并给出明确的指示。同样,受访者提出了各种培训方法。基于这些结果,可以制定提高风险评估技能的具体发展计划。
    Financial burden due to poor occupational safety practices remains high although occupational health and safety (OHS) have improved in recent years. Conducting risk assessment is one way to improve OHS. Workplaces may not have sufficient expertise in risk assessment. The aim of this study was to identify the needed OHS risk assessment skills, current support in the workplaces and the ways to improve risk assessment skills. This study was conducted with the Delphi survey for OHS experts (n = 13) and with interviews (n = 41) in the case companies. OHS experts agreed that the most significant skills were for employees to identify hazards and minimize risks in one\'s work; for supervisors to influence others with a good example; and for OHS experts to understand and manage the wholeness of safety practices and understand and manage the meaning, concepts, and criteria of risk assessment. The current main support methods were learning at work, training and written instructions. However, many of the interviewees felt that they had not received risk assessment training and that the support depended on their activity. Finally, the OHS experts determined that the most feasible ways to improve risk assessment skills were training, coaching and giving clear instructions. Likewise, the interviewees suggested various training methods. Based on these results, concrete development plans to improve risk assessment skills can be made.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of operative technique on staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
    BACKGROUND: Staple-line leaks after LSG are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Variations in operative technique exist; however, their effect on leaks is poorly understood.
    METHODS: We analyzed data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC) to perform a case-control study comparing patients who had a clinically significant leak after undergoing a primary LSG to those who did not. A total of 45 patients with leaks were identified between January 2007 and December 2013. The leak group was matched 1:2 to a control group based on procedure type, age, body mass index, sex, and year the procedure was performed. Technique-specific factors were assessed by reviewing operative notes from all primary bariatric procedures in our study population. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify techniques associated with leaks. To increase the power of our analysis, we used a significance level of .10.
    RESULTS: Leak rates with LSG have decreased over the past 5 years (1.18% to .36%) as annual case volume has increased (846 cases/yr to 4435 cases/yr). Surgeons who performed 43 or more cases per year had a leak rate<1%. Leaks were more common among cases requiring a blood transfusion (26.2% versus 1.08%, P = .0031) and when cases were converted to open surgery (7.14% versus 0%, P = .0741). However, there was no significant difference in operative time between cases involving a leak and their matched controls (95.4 min versus 87.1 min, P = .1197). Oversewing of the staple line was the only technique associated with less leaks after controlling for confounding factors (OR .397 CI .174, .909, P = .0665). Notably, surgeons who oversewed routinely were also found to have higher case volume (307 versus 140, P = .0216) and less overall complication rates (4.81% versus 7.95%, P = .0027). Furthermore, oversewing technique varied widely as only 22.6% of cases involved oversewing of the entire staple line.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite considerable variation in operative technique, leak rates with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy have decreased over time as operative volume has increased. Oversewing of the staple line was associated with fewer leaks, but specific suturing technique was not uniform and oversewing was performed routinely by more experienced surgeons with higher case volumes and less complication rates overall. Before standardizing surgical technique one must take into account variations in surgeon skill and experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号