Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) versus the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) imaging classifications for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Materials and Methods Patients in the institutional review board-approved Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) registry referred for multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at the authors\' institution (January 1, 2006-April 1, 2021) were included in this retrospective study when ILD was diagnosed at MDD. MDD diagnoses included HP, connective tissue disease-ILD, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Retrospective review of thin-section CT images was performed in consensus by two cardiothoracic radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnostic patterns were determined for thin-section CT images using both classifications. Discordance rates were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were assessed using MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Results A total of 297 patients were included in the study: 200 (67%) with HP, 49 (16%) with connective tissue disease-ILD, and 48 (16%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at MDD. The discordance rate between the two classifications was 21%. Assuming low HP prevalence (10%), ATS/JRS/ALAT classification outperformed ACCP classification, with greater accuracy (92.3% vs 87.6%) and greater positive predictive value (60.7% vs 42.9%). Assuming high prevalence (50%), accuracy and negative predictive value were superior using ACCP classification (81.7% vs 79.7% and 77.7% vs 72.6%, respectively), and positive predictive value was superior using ATS/JRS/ALAT classification (93.3% vs 87.1%). Conclusion Accuracy of the ATS/JRS/ALAT and ACCP HP classifications was greater in settings with low and high HP prevalence, respectively. Diagnostic performance of both classifications was discordant in a minority of cases. Keywords: CT, Thorax, Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Interstitial Lung Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are crucial in cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay (Seegene, SouthKorea) for its clinical accuracy and reproducibility according to the international criteria, using the RealTime High Risk HPV m2000 assay (Abbott, USA) as standard comparator. The Allplex HPV HR assay exhibits significant non-inferior sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+) with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03, P = 0.006), insignificant non-inferior sensitivity to detect CIN3+ with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.88-1.13, P = 0.098), and non-inferior specificity to exclude CIN2+ with a ratio of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00, P < 0.001) compared to the standard comparator. In addition, the assay shows an excellent reproducibility within the same laboratory [96.5% (95% CI: 94.6-97.9) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] and between laboratories [96.7% (95% CI: 94.8-98.0) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] for overall high-risk HPV positivity as well as for each individual HPV type. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. We conclude that both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.IMPORTANCEThe clinical validation of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in accordance with well-established international guidelines is crucial to ensure that only validated assays are used in the context of screening (Meijer et al., Int J Cancer, 2009). The guidelines, developed by an international consortium, require that a novel HPV assay has non-inferior accuracy against a standard comparator test for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+). Additionally, a new HPV assay should meet specific criteria for both intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility to ensure the assay consistently exhibits technical precision and robust performance. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. In conclusion, both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the different versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for defining resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection, and to assess inter-reader agreement.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 283 patients (mean age, 65.1 years ± 9.4 [SD]; 155 men) who underwent upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2017 and 2019. Two radiologists independently determined the resectability on preoperative CT according to the 2017, 2019, and 2020 NCCN guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: R0 resection was accomplished in 239 patients (84.5%). The sensitivity and specificity averaged across two readers were, respectively, 76.6% and 29.5% for the 2020 guidelines, 74.1% and 32.9% for the 2019 guidelines, and 72.6% and 34.1% for the 2017 guidelines. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, both 2019 and 2017 guidelines showed significantly lower sensitivity for R0 resection (p ≤ .009). Specificity was significantly higher with the 2017 guidelines (p = .043) than with the 2020 guidelines. Inter-reader agreements for determining the resectability of PDCA were strong (k ≥ 0.83) with all guidelines, being highest with the 2020 guidelines (k = 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 NCCN guidelines showed significantly higher sensitivity for prediction of R0 resection than the 2017 and 2019 guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The International AIH Pathology Group (IAIH-PG) put forward the new histological criteria of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in 2022, which have not undergone adequate verification. In this study, we verified the applicability of the new histological criteria in the population of Chinese patients with chronic liver disease, comparing it with the simplified criteria.
METHODS: The gold standard for diagnosis in all patients was based on histological findings, combined with clinical manifestations and laboratory tests and determined after a follow-up period of at least 3 years. A total of 640 patients with various chronic liver diseases from multiple centres underwent scoring using the new histological criteria and the simplified criteria, comparing their diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: In this study, the new histological criteria showed a sensitivity of 73.6% and 100% for likely and possible AIH, with specificities of 100% and 69.0% respectively. The coincidence rates of possible AIH for the new histological criteria, simplified histological criteria and simplified score were 81.7%, 72.8% and 69.7% respectively. For likely AIH, the rates were 89.2%, 75.9% and 65.6% respectively. Based on the new histological criteria, all patients with AIH were correctly diagnosed. Specifically, 73.6% were diagnosed with likely AIH and 26.4% were possible AIH. Additionally, the simplified histological criteria achieved a diagnosis rate of 98.6% for AIH, while the simplified score could only diagnose 53.8% of AIH.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the simplified score and simplified histological criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of the new histological criteria for AIH were significantly improved. The results indicate that the new histological criteria exhibit high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AIH in China.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease are key to preventing progression, and echocardiography has an important diagnostic role. Standard echocardiography might not be feasible in high-prevalence regions due to its high cost, complexity, and time requirement. Handheld echocardiography might be an easy-to-use, low-cost alternative, but its performance in screening for and diagnosing acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease needs further investigation.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, LILACS, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science up to Feb 9, 2024, for studies on the screening and diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease using handheld echocardiography (index test) or standard echocardiography or auscultation (reference tests) in high-prevalence areas. We included all studies with useable data in which the diagnostic performance of the index test was assessed against a reference test. Data on test accuracy in diagnosing rheumatic heart disease, acute rheumatic fever, or carditis with acute rheumatic fever (primary outcomes) were extracted from published articles or calculated, with authors contacted as necessary. Quality of evidence was appraised using GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria. We summarised diagnostic accuracy statistics (including sensitivity and specificity) and estimated 95% CIs using a bivariate random-effects model (or univariate random-effects models for analyses including three or fewer studies). Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Heterogeneity was assessed by visual inspection of plots. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022344081).
RESULTS: Out of 4868 records we identified 11 studies, and two additional reports, comprising 15 578 unique participants. Pooled data showed that handheld echocardiography had high sensitivity (0·87 [95% CI 0·76-0·93]), specificity (0·98 [0·71-1·00]), and overall high accuracy (AUC 0·94 [0·84-1·00]) for diagnosing rheumatic heart disease when compared with standard echocardiography (two studies; moderate certainty of evidence), with better performance for diagnosing definite compared with borderline rheumatic heart disease. High sensitivity (0·79 [0·73-0·84]), specificity (0·85 [0·80-0·89]), and overall accuracy (AUC 0·90 [0·85-0·94]) for screening rheumatic heart disease was observed when pooling data of handheld echocardiography versus standard echocardiography (seven studies; high certainty of evidence). Most studies had a low risk of bias overall. Some heterogeneity was observed for sensitivity and specificity across studies, possibly driven by differences in the prevalence and severity of rheumatic heart disease, and level of training or expertise of non-expert operators.
CONCLUSIONS: Handheld echocardiography has a high accuracy and diagnostic performance when compared with standard echocardiography for diagnosing and screening of rheumatic heart disease in high-prevalence areas.
BACKGROUND: World Health Organization.
UNASSIGNED: For the Chinese, French, Italian, Persian, Portuguese, Spanish and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

OBJECTIVE: This research evaluates the effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) before and after cycloplegia to detect amblyogenic refractive errors in children.
METHODS: Children ages 3 to 10 years old were screened by the SVS before and after cycloplegia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, paired t-test, Bland-Altman plot and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve were evaluated by comparing the results of the SVS (v3.0.05) measurements with the results of the cycloplegic Topcon autorefractometer according to the 2021 guidelines of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
RESULTS: Both eyes of 211 patients aged 3 to 10 years old were included. Regarding the amblyopia risk factors, the noncycloplegic SVS had 65.7 % sensitivity, 94.9 % specificity, 81.2 % positive predictive value and 89.3 % negative predictive value. The SVS\'s sensitivity increased from 65.7 % to 81.9 % with cycloplegia compared to noncycloplegic SVS results. The sensitivity detection of hyperopia was improved from 4.2 % to 100 % after cycloplegia. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve for noncycloplegic SVS and cycloplegic SVS were 0.506 (95 % CI, 0.395 to 0.646, p = 0737) and 0.905 (95 % CI, 0.915 to 0.971, p < 0.001) for hyperopia, respectively. Using the +1.64 D revised cutoff criteria for hyperopia increased sensitivity from 4.2 % to 78 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Noncycloplegic SVS measurements showed relatively high specificity in detecting amblyopia risk factors. The fact that noncycloplegic measurements have a very low sensitivity for hyperopia is an important weakness of the SVS, especially because hyperopia is the most frequently encountered refractive error in very young children. It should be noted that amblyogenic hyperopia may be overlooked by an SVS without cycloplegia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present consensus paper was to provide recommendations for clinical practice considering the use of visual examination, dental radiography and adjunct methods for primary caries detection.
METHODS: The executive councils of the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) nominated ten experts each to join the expert panel. The steering committee formed three work groups that were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity assessment and (3) forming individualised caries diagnoses. The experts responsible for \"caries detection and diagnostic methods\" searched and evaluated the relevant literature, drafted this manuscript and made provisional consensus recommendations. These recommendations were discussed and refined during the structured process in the whole work group. Finally, the agreement for each recommendation was determined using an anonymous Delphi survey.
RESULTS: Recommendations (N = 8) were approved and agreed upon by the whole expert panel: visual examination (N = 3), dental radiography (N = 3) and additional diagnostic methods (N = 2). While the quality of evidence was found to be heterogeneous, all recommendations were agreed upon by the expert panel.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual examination is recommended as the first-choice method for the detection and assessment of caries lesions on accessible surfaces. Intraoral radiography, preferably bitewing, is recommended as an additional method. Adjunct, non-ionising radiation methods might also be useful in certain clinical situations.
CONCLUSIONS: The expert panel merged evidence from the scientific literature with practical considerations and provided recommendations for their use in daily dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and conduct an initial validation of the Damage Index for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD DI).
METHODS: A draft of index items for assessing organ damages in patients with IgG4-RD was generated by experts from the Chinese IgG4-RD Consortium (CIC). The preliminary DI was refined using the Delphi method, and a final version was generated by consensus. 40 IgG4-RD cases representing four types of clinical scenarios were then selected, each with two time points of assessment for at least 3 years of follow-up. 48 rheumatologists from 35 hospitals nationwide were invited to evaluate organ damage using the CIC IgG4-RD DI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Kendall-W coefficient of concordance (KW) were used to assess the inter-rater reliability. The criterion validity of IgG4-RD DI was tested by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of raters.
RESULTS: IgG4-RD DI is a cumulative index consisting of 14 domains of organ systems, including a total of 39 items. The IgG4-RD DI was capable of distinguishing stable and increased damage across the active disease subgroup and stable disease subgroup. In terms of scores at baseline and later observations by all raters, overall consistency in scores at baseline and later observations by all raters was satisfactory. ICC at the two time points was 0.69 and 0.70, and the KW was 0.74 and 0.73, respectively. In subgroup analysis, ICC and KW in all subgroups were over 0.55 and 0.61, respectively. The analysis of criterion validity showed a good performance with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.82) and an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: The IgG4-RD DI is a useful approach to analyse disease outcomes, and it has good operability and credibility. It is anticipated that the DI will become a useful tool for therapeutic trials and studies of prognosis in patients with IgG4-RD.

OBJECTIVE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, which increases the risk of premature coronary artery disease. Early detection and treatment are vital, especially in children. To improve FH diagnosis in children, the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) released new guidelines in July 2022. This study assessed and compared the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnostic criteria from the JAS pediatric FH guidelines of 2017 and 2022.
METHODS: From September 2020 to March 2023, 69 children with elevated plasma LDL-C levels (≥ 140 mg/dL) were included in a pediatric FH screening project in Kagawa. The children were evaluated using genetic testing alongside the clinical diagnostic criteria from the JAS pediatric FH guidelines of 2017 and 2022.
RESULTS: Using the JAS pediatric FH 2017 criteria, eight children were diagnosed as FH-positive and 61 children as FH-negative. The JAS pediatric FH 2022 criteria identified 15 children with definite FH, 31 with probable FH, and 23 with possible FH. Genetic testing detected FH pathogenic variants in 24 children. The sensitivity and specificity for the JAS pediatric FH 2017 criteria were 0.292 and 0.978, respectively. For the JAS pediatric FH 2022 criteria, the sensitivity was 0.542 for definite FH with a specificity of 0.956, and 0.917 for probable FH with a specificity of 0.467.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical diagnostic criteria of the JAS pediatric FH 2022 guidelines demonstrated improved diagnostic efficiency compared with those of 2017, as evidenced by the increased sensitivity while preserving specificity.

BACKGROUND: Current diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI) by standard urine culture (SUC) has significant limitations in sensitivity, especially for fastidious organisms, and the ability to identify organisms in polymicrobial infections. The significant rate of both SUC \"negative\" or \"mixed flora/contamination\" results in UTI cases and the high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria indicate the need for an accurate diagnostic test to help identify true UTI cases. This study aimed to determine if infection-associated urinary biomarkers can differentiate definitive UTI cases from non-UTI controls.
METHODS: Midstream clean-catch voided urine samples were collected from asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic subjects ≥ 60 years old diagnosed with a UTI in a urology specialty setting. Microbial identification and density were assessed using a multiplex PCR/pooled antibiotic susceptibility test (M-PCR/P-AST) and SUC. Three biomarkers [neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and Interleukins 8 and 1β (IL-8, and IL-1β)] were also measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Definitive UTI cases were defined as symptomatic subjects with a UTI diagnosis and positive microorganism detection by SUC and M-PCR, while definitive non-UTI cases were defined as asymptomatic volunteers.
RESULTS: We observed a strong positive correlation (R2 > 0.90; p < 0.0001) between microbial density and the biomarkers NGAL, IL-8, and IL-1β for symptomatic subjects. Biomarker consensus criteria of two or more positive biomarkers had sensitivity 84.0%, specificity 91.2%, positive predictive value 93.7%, negative predictive value 78.8%, accuracy 86.9%, positive likelihood ratio of 9.58, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 in differentiating definitive UTI from non-UTI cases, regardless of non-zero microbial density. NGAL, IL-8, and IL-1β showed a significant elevation in symptomatic cases with positive microbe identification compared to asymptomatic cases with or without microbe identification. Biomarker consensus exhibited high accuracy in distinguishing UTI from non-UTI cases.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that positive infection-associated urinary biomarkers NGAL, IL-8, and IL-1β, in symptomatic subjects with positive SUC and/or M-PCR results was associated with definitive UTI cases. A consensus criterion with ≥ 2 of the biomarkers meeting the positivity thresholds showed a good balance of sensitivity (84.0%), specificity (91.2%), and accuracy (86.9%). Therefore, this biomarker consensus is an excellent supportive diagnostic tool for resolving the presence of active UTI, particularly if SUC and M-PCR results disagree.