UNASSIGNED: All Nepalese citizens have the right to high-quality healthcare services free of charge. To achieve this, healthcare services for the rural population in Nepal need to be improved in terms of personnel, medicines, and medical equipment.
UNASSIGNED: To explore challenges and possible improvements healthcare personnel experience when travelling to rural parts of Nepal to provide healthcare.
UNASSIGNED: Data was collected from various health professionals using focus group discussions at Dhulikhel Hospital in Nepal. The data were transcribed and analysed using Systematic text condensation.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-two professional healthcare personnel participated in five group discussions. Four categories emerged from the collected material: Finding ORC services being underutilised, Wanting to fulfil tasks and do a good job, Facing inadequate resources, and Seeing the need for improved organisation and cooperation. There was consensus that rural clinics are important to maintaining health for the rural population of Nepal. However, there was frustration that the rural population was not benefitting from all available healthcare services due to underutilisation.
UNASSIGNED: Rural healthcare clinics are not utilised appropriately, according to healthcare workers at the rural outreach clinics. Potential ways of overcoming the perceived challenges of underutilising available healthcare services include financial and human resources. The rural population´s health awareness needs to be increased, and the work environment for rural healthcare workers needs to be improved. These issues need to be prioritised by the government and policymakers.
Main findings: Outreach clinics in Nepal are perceived as underutilised by health providers.Added knowledge: Increased awareness among rural people on when to seek healthcare, improved work conditions for health providers and collaboration with other health facilities may strengthen the utilisation of offered care.Global health impact for policy and action: Updated policies reflecting these Nepalese suggestions on strengthening rural healthcare may be useful and benefit other rural populations in similar settings.

BACKGROUND: In northern rural Sweden, telemedicine is used to improve access to healthcare and to provide patient-centered care. In emergency care during on-call hours, video-conference systems are used to connect the physicians to the rest of the team - creating \'distributed teams\'. Patient participation is a core competency for healthcare professionals. Knowledge about how distributed teamwork affects patient participation is missing. The aim was to investigate if and how teamwork affecting patient participation, as well as clinicians\' perceptions regarding shared decision-making differ between co-located and distributed emergency teams.
METHODS: In an observational study with a randomized cross-over design, healthcare professionals (n = 51) participated in authentic teams (n = 17) in two scripted simulated emergency scenarios with a standardized patient: one as a co-located team and the other as a distributed team. Team performances were filmed and observed by independent raters using the PIC-ET tool to rate patient participation behavior. The participants individually filled out the Dyadic OPTION questionnaire after the respective scenarios to measure perceptions of shared decision-making. Scores in both instruments were translated to percentage of a maximum score. The observational data between the two settings were compared using linear mixed-effects regression models and the self-reported questionnaire data were compared using one-way ANOVA. Neither the participants nor the observers were blinded to the allocations.
RESULTS: A significant difference in observer rated overall patient participation behavior was found, mean 51.1 (± 11.5) % for the co-located teams vs 44.7 (± 8.6) % for the distributed teams (p = 0.02). In the PIC-ET tool category \'Sharing power\', the scores decreased from 14.4 (± 12.4) % in the co-located teams to 2 (± 4.4) % in the distributed teams (p = 0.001). Co-located teams scored in mean 60.5% (± 14.4) when self-assessing shared decision-making, vs 55.8% (± 15.1) in the distributed teams (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Team behavior enabling patient participation was found decreased in distributed teams, especially regarding sharing power with the patient. This finding was also mirrored in the self-assessments of the healthcare professionals. This study highlights the risk of an increased power asymmetry between patients and distributed emergency teams and can serve as a basis for further research, education, and quality improvement.

UNASSIGNED: Telemedicine has proven to be a boon in the field of medical sciences, as it provides a platform for all health-care personnel to assist patients remotely through digital technology advancements. It brings hope to the lower middle-income regions of the world. Thus, the study was conducted to explore the perceptions regarding telemedicine among healthcare professionals (HCP) in rural Sindh, Pakistan.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 19 in-depth interviews were conducted and this comprised of HCP working in the Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences (PAQSJIMS) and Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women (PUMHSW) being involved in providing online consultations and practicing telemedicine. The interviews were conducted and audio recorded in Sindhi and Urdu and were later transcribed in to English, coded for themes and sub-themes, and were analyzed using content analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The opportunities perceived with the use of telemedicine services were reducing nosocomial infections, facilitating the healthcare in remote areas, handling telemedicine tools, application of telemedicine services on the ground and reducing stress. However, inadequate awareness regarding telemedicine, difficulty in physical examination, the need for training, lack of compliance, and concerns regarding accuracy in diagnosis and treatment were identified as the perceived barriers to the use of telemedicine services.
UNASSIGNED: HCP had perception toward telemedicine as have numerous opportunities favoring implementation as well as various barriers are needed to overcome to promote the usage of telemedicine. Increased awareness, training programs, and technological advancements are key to overcome these challenges.

Introduction Bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative rods are a pressing concern for the aging global population, particularly in rural settings. This study investigates the prevalence and entry pathways of Gram-negative rod bloodstream infections in elderly patients at a rural Japanese hospital, aiming to clarify the frequency and associated factors of straightforward entry and bacterial translocation. Method In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed electronic medical records of patients over 18 years of age with symptomatic Gram-negative rod bloodstream infections at Unnan City Hospital, Japan, from September 2021 to August 2023. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess factors of age, sex, body mass index, care dependency, and comorbidities. Results Among the participants who met the inclusion criteria, significant differences were observed in age, sex, inpatient status, and prevalence of conditions like respiratory diseases and cancer between the straightforward entry and bacterial translocation groups. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen identified. Conclusion The study emphasizes the need for tailored medical approaches for elderly patients with bloodstream infections, considering their unique health profiles and risks. It highlights the importance of age, inpatient status, and cancer in determining infection risks, pointing to areas for further research to enhance infection management and healthcare outcomes in older populations.

Introduction Antimicrobial prophylaxis, involving short antibiotic courses preceding surgical procedures, is recommended to minimize postoperative infections. Paediatric cardiac surgeries are classified as clean procedures, though infection challenges persist due to illness severity and extended ICU stays. Antimicrobial prophylaxis varies, ranging from single doses to extended administration until catheters are removed. Typically lasting 24 to 48 hours, it has proven infection-reduction benefits. Despite these practices, uncertainties surround the optimal nature, timing, and duration of administration. This concern is amplified by escalating antimicrobial resistance driven by antibiotic overuse. Vulnerable paediatric populations bear heightened consequences of irrational antimicrobial use, contributing to global resistance trends. Yet, a defined optimal prophylaxis schedule for paediatric cardiac surgery is lacking. Importing adult guidelines may be inadequate due to paediatric research complexities and population diversity. Developing effective prophylaxis protocols is crucial for children undergoing cardiac surgery, given global antibiotic overuse and evolving drug resistance. Establishing an optimal prophylactic strategy remains a challenge, necessitating further research for evidence-based protocols to mitigate infections in this vulnerable patient cohort. Methods This study investigates antibiotic use in paediatric cardiac surgery. A retrospective analysis of 100 patients from a rural Indian hospital (2017-2018) assesses antibiotic patterns, including type, dose, duration, and adherence to prophylaxis protocols. Results In the studied cohort of paediatric cardiac surgery patients, complete compliance (100%) with antibiotic prophylaxis was observed. However, deviations were identified: 30% received antibiotics prematurely, and 30% did not align with institutional protocol criteria. Concerning antibiotic selection, 87% followed hospital policy with the recommended cefoperazone and sulbactam combination plus amikacin, while 9% received piperacillin/tazobactam + amikacin due to sepsis. Irregular use (22%) based on clinical records occurred. Furthermore, 4% received piperacillin/tazobactam + teicoplanin, with one instance of inappropriate higher antibiotic use. Regarding prophylaxis duration, only 27% adhered to the appropriate timeline, with 40% exceeding 48 hours, indicating extended use. Upon discharge, a notable proportion (45 patients) received antibiotic prescriptions. Among them, 73% were prescribed rationally, while 27% exhibited irrational antibiotic use. Conclusion The findings of this study shed a significant light on the issue of antibiotic misuse within the context of paediatric cardiac surgery. It underscores the pressing need for more stringent measures to regulate and address this concerning trend. The study underscores the pivotal importance of adhering rigorously to established protocols and guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis. This adherence not only holds the potential to elevate the overall quality of patient care but also plays a critical role in combating the escalating challenge of antibiotic resistance. Through a concerted effort to optimize antibiotic usage, we can simultaneously enhance patient outcomes and contribute to the ongoing fight against the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains, thus preserving the efficacy of these vital medications for future generations.

BACKGROUND: Mental health services are not sufficient for depression patients in rural areas of China, training in mental health knowledge for primary healthcare providers has been encouraged, but the effect of this encouragement has rarely been reported.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in primary healthcare facilities that sought to include all the primary healthcare providers (registered physicians and nurses) in two cities in Hunan province, China by administering questionnaires that covered depression symptoms, typical depression cases, and the Revised Depression Attitude Questionnaire.
RESULTS: In total, 315 primary healthcare providers agreed to participate in the study and finished the questionnaires, of which 12.1% had training in depression. In addition, 62.9% of the rural primary healthcare providers were able to recognize most general depression symptoms, and 8.3% were able to recognize all general depression symptoms. The primary healthcare providers in the survey held a neutral to slightly negative attitude towards depression as indicated by their professional confidence (mean scores 16.51 ± 4.30), therapeutic optimism/pessimism (mean scores 29.02 ± 5.98), and general perspective (mean scores 18.12 ± 3.12) scores. Fewer rural primary healthcare providers knew (28.3%) or applied (2.9%) psychological intervention in the clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that primary healthcare providers knew about general depression symptoms, but lacked psychological intervention skills and held low confidence in and pessimistic attitudes toward depression care. We therefore speculate that existing psychological training for primary healthcare providers is insufficient in quantity and quality, making the need to explore more effective types of training urgently.

Access to quality sexual assault (SA) care in rural communities is limited by challenges surrounding building and sustaining a skilled SA nurse examiner workforce. Telehealth can facilitate access to expert care while cultivating a local sexual assault response. The Sexual Assault Forensic Examination Telehealth (SAFE-T) Center aims to decrease disparities in SA care by providing expert, live, interactive mentoring, quality assurance, and evidence-based training via telehealth. This study examines multidisciplinary perceptions of pre-implementation barriers and SAFE-T program impact using qualitative methods. Implications for the implementation of telehealth programs to support access to quality SA care are considered.

UNASSIGNED: Mental healthcare systems are primarily designed to urban populations. However, the specific characteristics of rural areas require specific strategies, resource allocation, and indicators which fit their local conditions. This planning process requires comparison with other rural areas. This demonstration study aimed to describe and compare specialized rural adult mental health services in Australia, Norway, and Spain; and to demonstrate the readiness of the healthcare ecosystem approach and the DESDE-LTC mapping tool (Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories of Long Term Care) for comparing rural care between countries and across areas.
UNASSIGNED: The study described and classified the services using the DESDE-LTC. The analyses included context analysis, care availability, placement capacity, balance of care, and diversity of care. Additionally, readiness (Technology Readiness Levels - TRL) and impact analyses (Adoption Impact Ladder - AIL) were also assessed by two independent raters.
UNASSIGNED: The findings demonstrated the usability of the healthcare ecosystem approach and the DESDE-LTC to map and identify differences and similarities in the pattern of care of highly divergent rural areas. Day care had a greater weight in the European pattern of care, while it was replaced by social outpatient care in Australian areas. In contrast, care coordination was more common in Australia, pointing to a more fragmented system that requires navigation services. The share between hospital and community residential care showed no differences between the two regions, but there were differences between catchment areas. The healthcare ecosystem approach showed a TRL 8 (the tool has been demonstrated in a real-world environment and it is ready for release and general use) and an AIL of 5 (the target public agencies provided resources for its completion). Two experts evaluated the readiness of the use of DESDE-LTC in their respective regional studies. All of them were classified using the TRL.
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, this study strongly supports gathering data on the provision of care in rural areas using standardized methods to inform rural service planning. It provides information on context and service availability, capacity and balance of care that may improve, directly or through subsequent analyses, the management and planning of services in rural areas.

Introduction Many obstetrical patients from rural areas in the United States lack hospitals that provide labor and delivery care. Our objective was to examine the effects of such patients on caseloads of cesarean deliveries at Iowa hospitals with level III maternal care, as defined by the Iowa Department of Public Health (e.g., with obstetric anesthesiologists). Methods This retrospective longitudinal study included every discharge with cesarean delivery in the state of Iowa from October 2015 through June 2021. There were N=60,534 such deliveries from 76 hospitals, of which three were level III, and the rest were level I or II. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation and controlling for geography, maternal risk factors, and insurance, were used to evaluate the binary outcome of whether patients received care at the university level III hospital in Eastern Iowa, or not. Similar models were also developed for care at the two private level III hospitals in Central Iowa, or not. Differences in the mean probabilities of receiving care at the level III hospitals were then estimated using logistic regression, with results reported in units of changes in cases per week at the hospitals. Results Statewide, the university level III hospital performed 7.4% of the cesarean deliveries, and the two private level III hospitals performed 23.4%. Patients from counties in which no cesarean deliveries were performed during the quarter of the year when they underwent a cesarean delivery disproportionately received care at level III hospitals versus levels I and II hospitals. Lower 99% confidence limits for incremental risk ratios were 1.46 and 4.20, respectively. Cesarean deliveries among patients residing in counties where no hospital had a labor and delivery ward were distributed unequally between the counties of the hospitals with level III maternal care. There were approximately 1.09 (standard error 0.10) extra cesarean deliveries per week at the university hospital versus 5.81 (standard error 0.11) at the private hospitals. The 1.09 vs 5.81 difference was caused, in part, by the effects of insurance and other hospitals with similar services. Conclusions Patients residing in counties without labor and delivery care disproportionately go to level III hospitals. These results can help anesthesiologists, obstetricians, and analysts at hospitals with large tertiary (level III) programs interpret their annual increases in total obstetric anesthesia activity.

We used explorative interviews to gauge (inter)personal, physiological, and emotional challenges of seven rural cancer patients who traveled long distances to cancer treatment centers. After a thematic analysis, we foregrounded experiences of temporality by using a phenomenologically inspired approach. The analysis resulted in three themes: (a) An epiphany of \"what really matters in life\"-time gains new meaning, (b) Feeling out of sync with others and own body-striving for coherence and simultaneity, and (c) Being torn between benefits of home and treatments site-time and distance as a tangible aspect of traveling and being away. Under these themes, 13 meaning units were generated, which reflected changes in temporality. During treatment, life primarily revolved around repeating circles of travel arrangements, staying on top of treatment schedule, and synchronizing a home life with a life away from home. Nurses should provide comprehensive care to enhance stability in cancer patients\' temporal experiences.